Get rid of excess Labels on Pandas DataFrames - python

so I got a DataFrame by doing:
dfgrp=df.groupby(['CCS_Category_ICD9','Gender'])['f0_'].sum()
ndf=pd.DataFrame(dfgrp)
ndf
f0_
CCS_Category_ICD9 Gender
1 F 889
M 796
U 2
2 F 32637
M 33345
U 34
Where f0_ is the sum of the counts by Gender
All I really want is a simple one level dataframe similar to this which I got via
ndf=ndf.unstack(level=1)
ndf
f0_
Gender F M U
CCS_Category_ICD9
1 889.0 796.0 2.0
2 32637.0 33345.0 34.0
3 2546.0 1812.0 NaN
4 347284.0 213782.0 34.0
But what I want is:
CCS_Category_ICD9 F M U
1 889.0 796.0 2.0
2 32637.0 33345.0 34.0
3 2546.0 1812.0 NaN
4 347284.0 213782.0 34.0
I cannot figure out how to flatten or get rid of the levels associated with f0_ and Gender All I need is the "M","F","U" column headings so I have a simple one level dataframe. I have tried reset_index and set_index along with several other variations, with no luck...
At the end I want to have a simple crosstab with row and column totals (which my example does not show..
well I did (as suggested in one answer):
ndf = ndf.f0_.unstack()
ndf
Which gave me:
Gender F M U
CCS_Category_ICD9
1 889.0 796.0 2.0
2 32637.0 33345.0 34.0
3 2546.0 1812.0 NaN
4 347284.0 213782.0 34.0
Followed by:
nndf=ndf.reset_index(['CCS_Category_ICD9','F','M','U'])
nndf
Gender CCS_Category_ICD9 F M U
0 1 889.0 796.0 2.0
1 2 32637.0 33345.0 34.0
2 3 2546.0 1812.0 NaN
3 4 347284.0 213782.0 34.0
4 5 3493.0 7964.0 1.0
5 6 12295.0 9998.0 4.0
Which just about does it But I cannot change the index name from Gender to something like Idx no matter what I do I get an extra row added with the New name ie a row titled Idx just under Gender.. Also is there a more straight forward solution?

You can
df.loc[:, 'f0_']
for the DataFrame resulting from .unstack(), ie, select the first level of your MultiIndex columns which only leaves the gender level , or alternatively
df.columns = df.columns.droplevel()
see MultiIndex.droplevel docs

Because ndf is a pd.DataFrame it has a column index. When you performed unstack() it appends the last level from the row index to the column index. Since columns already had f0_, you got a second level. To flatten the way you'd like, call unstack() on the column instead.
ndf = ndf.f0_.unstack()
The text Gender is the name of the column index. If you want to get rid of it, you have to overwrite the name attribute for that object.
ndf.columns.name = None
Use this right after the ndf.f0_.unstack()

Generally, use df.pivot when you want use a column as the row index and another column as the column index. Use df.pivot_table when you need to aggregate values due to rows with duplicate (row,column) pairs.
In this case, instead of df.groupby(...)[...].sum().unstack() you could use
df.pivot_table:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
N = 100
df = pd.DataFrame({'CCS': np.random.choice([1,2], size=N),
'Gender':np.random.choice(['F','M','U'], size=N),
'f0':np.random.randint(10, size=N)})
result = df.pivot_table(index='CCS', columns='Gender', values='f0', aggfunc='sum')
result.columns.name = None
result = result.reset_index()
yields
CCS F M U
0 1 89 104 90
1 2 66 65 65
Notice that after calling pivot_table(), the DataFrame result has named
index and column Indexes:
In [176]: result = df.pivot_table(index='CCS', columns='Gender', values='f0', aggfunc='sum'); result
Out[176]:
Gender F M U
CCS
1 89 104 90
2 66 65 65
The index is named CSS:
In [177]: result.index
Out[177]: Int64Index([1, 2], dtype='int64', name='CCS')
and the columns index is named Gender:
In [178]: result.columns
Out[178]: Index(['F', 'M', 'U'], dtype='object', name='Gender') # <-- notice the name='Gender'
To remove the name from an Index, assign None to the name attribute:
In [179]: result.columns.name = None
In [180]: result
Out[180]:
F M U
CCS
1 95 68 67
2 82 63 68
Though it's not needed here, to remove names from the levels of a MultiIndex,
assign a list of Nones to the names (plural) attribute:
result.columns.names = [None]*numlevels

Related

How to combine two datasets vertically in pandas?

I have a loop which generates dataframes with 2 columns in each. Now, when I try to append the dataframes vertically (stacking those vertically), the code adds the new dataframes horizontally when I use pd.concat within a loop. However, the results do not merge the columns (with same lenght properly). Instead, it adds 2 new columns for every loop iteration, creating a bunch on Nans. How to solve?
df_master=pd.DataFrame()
columns=list(df_master)
data=[]
for i in range(1,3):
--do something and return a df2 with 2 columns
data.append(df2)
df_master = pd.concat(data, axis=1)
df_master.head()
How do I compress the new 2 column for every iteration within one dataframe?
If you don't need to keep the column labels of original dataframes, you can try renaming the column labels of each dataframe to the same (e.g. 0 and 1) before concat, for example:
df_master = pd.concat([dfi.rename({old: new for new, old in enumerate(dfi.columns)}, axis=1) for dfi in data], ignore_index=True)
Demo
df1
57 59
0 1 2
1 3 4
df2
138 140
0 11 12
1 13 14
data = [df1, df2]
df_master = pd.concat([dfi.rename({old: new for new, old in enumerate(dfi.columns)}, axis=1) for dfi in data], ignore_index=True)
df_master
0 1
0 1 2
1 3 4
2 11 12
3 13 14
I suppose the problem is your columns have different names in each iteration, so you could easily solve it by calling df2.rename() and renaming it to the same names
It works for me if I change axis to 0 inside the concat command.
df_master = pd.concat(data, axis=0)
Pandas would fill empty cells with NaNs in each scenario and like the example you see below.
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'col1':[11,12,13], 'col2': [21,22,23], 'col3':[31,32,33]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'col1':[111,112,113, 114], 'col2': [121,122,123,124]})
merge / join / concatenate data frames [df1, df2] vertically - add rows
pd.concat([df1,df2], ignore_index=True)
# output
col1 col2 col3
0 11 21 31.0
1 12 22 32.0
2 13 23 33.0
3 111 121 NaN
4 112 122 NaN
5 113 123 NaN
6 114 124 NaN
merge / join / concatenate data frames horizontally (aligning by index)
pd.concat([df1,df2], axis=1)
# output
col1 col2 col3 col1 col2
0 11.0 21.0 31.0 111 121
1 12.0 22.0 32.0 112 122
2 13.0 23.0 33.0 113 123
3 NaN NaN NaN 114 124

Merge a dataframe to another dataframe without existing data

Need to merge a DataFrame with another DataFrame without affecting existing data
df1:
Name
Subject
mark
a
Ta
52
b
En
c
Ma
d
Ss
60
df2:
Name
mark
b
57
c
58
Expected Output:
Name
Subject
mark
a
Ta
52
b
En
57
c
Ma
58
d
Ss
60
Use combine_first after setting Name as index:
df1.set_index('Name').combine_first(df2.set_index('Name')).reset_index()
output:
Name Subject mark
0 a Ta 52.0
1 b En 57.0
2 c Ma 58.0
3 d Ss 60.0
Try using merge and combine_first:
>>> df = df1.merge(df2, on='Name', how='outer')
>>> df['mark'] = df.pop('mark_x').combine_first(df.pop('mark_y'))
>>> df
Name Subject mark
0 a Ta 52.0
1 b En 57.0
2 c Ma 58.0
3 d Ss 60.0
>>>
One of the ways in which you can achieve this is by using the below steps:
Inner join the 2 tables using the pandas.merge()command.
Create a new column which basically checks if the marks column from df1 is not None, then take that value, else, take df2 column value.

Pandas, group dataframe and normalize values in each group

I have a csv file with different groups identified by an ID, something like:
ID,X
aaa,3
aaa,5
aaa,4
bbb,50
bbb,54
bbb,52
I need to:
calculate the mean of x in each group;
divide each value of x by the mean of x for that specific group.
So, in my example above, the mean in the 'aaa' group is 4, while in 'bbb' it's 52.
I need to obtain a new dataframe with a third column, where in each row I have the original value of x divided by the group average:
ID,X,x/group_mean
aaa,3,3/4
aaa,5,5/4
aaa,4,4/4
bbb,50,50/52
bbb,54,54/52
bbb,52,52/52
I can group the dataframe and calcualte each group's mean by:
df_data = pd.read_csv('test.csv', index_col=0)
df_grouped = df_data.groupby('ID')
for group_name, group_content in df_grouped:
mean_x_group = group_content['x'].mean()
print(f'mean = {mean_x_group}')
but how do I add the third column?
Use Groupby.transform:
In [1874]: df['mean'] = df.groupby('ID').transform('mean')
In [1879]: df['newcol'] = df.X.div(df['mean'])
In [1880]: df
Out[1880]:
ID X mean newcol
0 aaa 3 4 0.750000
1 aaa 5 4 1.250000
2 aaa 4 4 1.000000
3 bbb 50 52 0.961538
4 bbb 54 52 1.038462
5 bbb 52 52 1.000000
The idea being in a neat one-liner:
df['new_column'] = df.apply(lambda row: row.X/df.loc[df.ID==row.ID, 'X'].mean(), axis=1)
One liner code to do that
# divide X with mean of X group by ID
df['group_mean'] = df.X / df.groupby('ID').transform('mean').X

How to findout difference between two dataframes irrespective of index? [duplicate]

I have two data frames df1 and df2, where df2 is a subset of df1. How do I get a new data frame (df3) which is the difference between the two data frames?
In other word, a data frame that has all the rows/columns in df1 that are not in df2?
By using drop_duplicates
pd.concat([df1,df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
Update :
The above method only works for those data frames that don't already have duplicates themselves. For example:
df1=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2,3,3],'B':[2,3,4,4]})
df2=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1],'B':[2]})
It will output like below , which is wrong
Wrong Output :
pd.concat([df1, df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
Out[655]:
A B
1 2 3
Correct Output
Out[656]:
A B
1 2 3
2 3 4
3 3 4
How to achieve that?
Method 1: Using isin with tuple
df1[~df1.apply(tuple,1).isin(df2.apply(tuple,1))]
Out[657]:
A B
1 2 3
2 3 4
3 3 4
Method 2: merge with indicator
df1.merge(df2,indicator = True, how='left').loc[lambda x : x['_merge']!='both']
Out[421]:
A B _merge
1 2 3 left_only
2 3 4 left_only
3 3 4 left_only
For rows, try this, where Name is the joint index column (can be a list for multiple common columns, or specify left_on and right_on):
m = df1.merge(df2, on='Name', how='outer', suffixes=['', '_'], indicator=True)
The indicator=True setting is useful as it adds a column called _merge, with all changes between df1 and df2, categorized into 3 possible kinds: "left_only", "right_only" or "both".
For columns, try this:
set(df1.columns).symmetric_difference(df2.columns)
Accepted answer Method 1 will not work for data frames with NaNs inside, as pd.np.nan != pd.np.nan. I am not sure if this is the best way, but it can be avoided by
df1[~df1.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1).isin(df2.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1))]
It's slower, because it needs to cast data to string, but thanks to this casting pd.np.nan == pd.np.nan.
Let's go trough the code. First we cast values to string, and apply tuple function to each row.
df1.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1)
df2.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1)
Thanks to that, we get pd.Series object with list of tuples. Each tuple contains whole row from df1/df2.
Then we apply isin method on df1 to check if each tuple "is in" df2.
The result is pd.Series with bool values. True if tuple from df1 is in df2. In the end, we negate results with ~ sign, and applying filter on df1. Long story short, we get only those rows from df1 that are not in df2.
To make it more readable, we may write it as:
df1_str_tuples = df1.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1)
df2_str_tuples = df2.astype(str).apply(tuple, 1)
df1_values_in_df2_filter = df1_str_tuples.isin(df2_str_tuples)
df1_values_not_in_df2 = df1[~df1_values_in_df2_filter]
import pandas as pd
# given
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'Name':['John','Mike','Smith','Wale','Marry','Tom','Menda','Bolt','Yuswa',],
'Age':[23,45,12,34,27,44,28,39,40]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'Name':['John','Smith','Wale','Tom','Menda','Yuswa',],
'Age':[23,12,34,44,28,40]})
# find elements in df1 that are not in df2
df_1notin2 = df1[~(df1['Name'].isin(df2['Name']) & df1['Age'].isin(df2['Age']))].reset_index(drop=True)
# output:
print('df1\n', df1)
print('df2\n', df2)
print('df_1notin2\n', df_1notin2)
# df1
# Age Name
# 0 23 John
# 1 45 Mike
# 2 12 Smith
# 3 34 Wale
# 4 27 Marry
# 5 44 Tom
# 6 28 Menda
# 7 39 Bolt
# 8 40 Yuswa
# df2
# Age Name
# 0 23 John
# 1 12 Smith
# 2 34 Wale
# 3 44 Tom
# 4 28 Menda
# 5 40 Yuswa
# df_1notin2
# Age Name
# 0 45 Mike
# 1 27 Marry
# 2 39 Bolt
Perhaps a simpler one-liner, with identical or different column names. Worked even when df2['Name2'] contained duplicate values.
newDf = df1.set_index('Name1')
.drop(df2['Name2'], errors='ignore')
.reset_index(drop=False)
edit2, I figured out a new solution without the need of setting index
newdf=pd.concat([df1,df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
Okay i found the answer of highest vote already contain what I have figured out. Yes, we can only use this code on condition that there are no duplicates in each two dfs.
I have a tricky method. First we set ’Name’ as the index of two dataframe given by the question. Since we have same ’Name’ in two dfs, we can just drop the ’smaller’ df’s index from the ‘bigger’ df.
Here is the code.
df1.set_index('Name',inplace=True)
df2.set_index('Name',inplace=True)
newdf=df1.drop(df2.index)
Pandas now offers a new API to do data frame diff: pandas.DataFrame.compare
df.compare(df2)
col1 col3
self other self other
0 a c NaN NaN
2 NaN NaN 3.0 4.0
In addition to accepted answer, I would like to propose one more wider solution that can find a 2D set difference of two dataframes with any index/columns (they might not coincide for both datarames). Also method allows to setup tolerance for float elements for dataframe comparison (it uses np.isclose)
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def get_dataframe_setdiff2d(df_new: pd.DataFrame,
df_old: pd.DataFrame,
rtol=1e-03, atol=1e-05) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Returns set difference of two pandas DataFrames"""
union_index = np.union1d(df_new.index, df_old.index)
union_columns = np.union1d(df_new.columns, df_old.columns)
new = df_new.reindex(index=union_index, columns=union_columns)
old = df_old.reindex(index=union_index, columns=union_columns)
mask_diff = ~np.isclose(new, old, rtol, atol)
df_bool = pd.DataFrame(mask_diff, union_index, union_columns)
df_diff = pd.concat([new[df_bool].stack(),
old[df_bool].stack()], axis=1)
df_diff.columns = ["New", "Old"]
return df_diff
Example:
In [1]
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'A':[2,1,2],'C':[2,1,2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,1],'B':[1,1]})
print("df1:\n", df1, "\n")
print("df2:\n", df2, "\n")
diff = get_dataframe_setdiff2d(df1, df2)
print("diff:\n", diff, "\n")
Out [1]
df1:
A C
0 2 2
1 1 1
2 2 2
df2:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 1
diff:
New Old
0 A 2.0 1.0
B NaN 1.0
C 2.0 NaN
1 B NaN 1.0
C 1.0 NaN
2 A 2.0 NaN
C 2.0 NaN
As mentioned here
that
df1[~df1.apply(tuple,1).isin(df2.apply(tuple,1))]
is correct solution but it will produce wrong output if
df1=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1],'B':[2]})
df2=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2,3,3],'B':[2,3,4,4]})
In that case above solution will give
Empty DataFrame, instead you should use concat method after removing duplicates from each datframe.
Use concate with drop_duplicates
df1=df1.drop_duplicates(keep="first")
df2=df2.drop_duplicates(keep="first")
pd.concat([df1,df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
I had issues with handling duplicates when there were duplicates on one side and at least one on the other side, so I used Counter.collections to do a better diff, ensuring both sides have the same count. This doesn't return duplicates, but it won't return any if both sides have the same count.
from collections import Counter
def diff(df1, df2, on=None):
"""
:param on: same as pandas.df.merge(on) (a list of columns)
"""
on = on if on else df1.columns
df1on = df1[on]
df2on = df2[on]
c1 = Counter(df1on.apply(tuple, 'columns'))
c2 = Counter(df2on.apply(tuple, 'columns'))
c1c2 = c1-c2
c2c1 = c2-c1
df1ondf2on = pd.DataFrame(list(c1c2.elements()), columns=on)
df2ondf1on = pd.DataFrame(list(c2c1.elements()), columns=on)
df1df2 = df1.merge(df1ondf2on).drop_duplicates(subset=on)
df2df1 = df2.merge(df2ondf1on).drop_duplicates(subset=on)
return pd.concat([df1df2, df2df1])
> df1 = pd.DataFrame({'a': [1, 1, 3, 4, 4]})
> df2 = pd.DataFrame({'a': [1, 2, 3, 4, 4]})
> diff(df1, df2)
a
0 1
0 2
There is a new method in pandas DataFrame.compare that compare 2 different dataframes and return which values changed in each column for the data records.
Example
First Dataframe
Id Customer Status Date
1 ABC Good Mar 2023
2 BAC Good Feb 2024
3 CBA Bad Apr 2022
Second Dataframe
Id Customer Status Date
1 ABC Bad Mar 2023
2 BAC Good Feb 2024
5 CBA Good Apr 2024
Comparing Dataframes
print("Dataframe difference -- \n")
print(df1.compare(df2))
print("Dataframe difference keeping equal values -- \n")
print(df1.compare(df2, keep_equal=True))
print("Dataframe difference keeping same shape -- \n")
print(df1.compare(df2, keep_shape=True))
print("Dataframe difference keeping same shape and equal values -- \n")
print(df1.compare(df2, keep_shape=True, keep_equal=True))
Result
Dataframe difference --
Id Status Date
self other self other self other
0 NaN NaN Good Bad NaN NaN
2 3.0 5.0 Bad Good Apr 2022 Apr 2024
Dataframe difference keeping equal values --
Id Status Date
self other self other self other
0 1 1 Good Bad Mar 2023 Mar 2023
2 3 5 Bad Good Apr 2022 Apr 2024
Dataframe difference keeping same shape --
Id Customer Status Date
self other self other self other self other
0 NaN NaN NaN NaN Good Bad NaN NaN
1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
2 3.0 5.0 NaN NaN Bad Good Apr 2022 Apr 2024
Dataframe difference keeping same shape and equal values --
Id Customer Status Date
self other self other self other self other
0 1 1 ABC ABC Good Bad Mar 2023 Mar 2023
1 2 2 BAC BAC Good Good Feb 2024 Feb 2024
2 3 5 CBA CBA Bad Good Apr 2022 Apr 2024
A slight variation of the nice #liangli's solution that does not require to change the index of existing dataframes:
newdf = df1.drop(df1.join(df2.set_index('Name').index))
Finding difference by index. Assuming df1 is a subset of df2 and the indexes are carried forward when subsetting
df1.loc[set(df1.index).symmetric_difference(set(df2.index))].dropna()
# Example
df1 = pd.DataFrame({"gender":np.random.choice(['m','f'],size=5), "subject":np.random.choice(["bio","phy","chem"],size=5)}, index = [1,2,3,4,5])
df2 = df1.loc[[1,3,5]]
df1
gender subject
1 f bio
2 m chem
3 f phy
4 m bio
5 f bio
df2
gender subject
1 f bio
3 f phy
5 f bio
df3 = df1.loc[set(df1.index).symmetric_difference(set(df2.index))].dropna()
df3
gender subject
2 m chem
4 m bio
Defining our dataframes:
df1 = pd.DataFrame({
'Name':
['John','Mike','Smith','Wale','Marry','Tom','Menda','Bolt','Yuswa'],
'Age':
[23,45,12,34,27,44,28,39,40]
})
df2 = df1[df1.Name.isin(['John','Smith','Wale','Tom','Menda','Yuswa'])
df1
Name Age
0 John 23
1 Mike 45
2 Smith 12
3 Wale 34
4 Marry 27
5 Tom 44
6 Menda 28
7 Bolt 39
8 Yuswa 40
df2
Name Age
0 John 23
2 Smith 12
3 Wale 34
5 Tom 44
6 Menda 28
8 Yuswa 40
The difference between the two would be:
df1[~df1.isin(df2)].dropna()
Name Age
1 Mike 45.0
4 Marry 27.0
7 Bolt 39.0
Where:
df1.isin(df2) returns the rows in df1 that are also in df2.
~ (Element-wise logical NOT) in front of the expression negates the results, so we get the elements in df1 that are NOT in df2–the difference between the two.
.dropna() drops the rows with NaN presenting the desired output
Note This only works if len(df1) >= len(df2). If df2 is longer than df1 you can reverse the expression: df2[~df2.isin(df1)].dropna()
I found the deepdiff library is a wonderful tool that also extends well to dataframes if different detail is required or ordering matters. You can experiment with diffing to_dict('records'), to_numpy(), and other exports:
import pandas as pd
from deepdiff import DeepDiff
df1 = pd.DataFrame({
'Name':
['John','Mike','Smith','Wale','Marry','Tom','Menda','Bolt','Yuswa'],
'Age':
[23,45,12,34,27,44,28,39,40]
})
df2 = df1[df1.Name.isin(['John','Smith','Wale','Tom','Menda','Yuswa'])]
DeepDiff(df1.to_dict(), df2.to_dict())
# {'dictionary_item_removed': [root['Name'][1], root['Name'][4], root['Name'][7], root['Age'][1], root['Age'][4], root['Age'][7]]}
Symmetric Difference
If you are interested in the rows that are only in one of the dataframes but not both, you are looking for the set difference:
pd.concat([df1,df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
⚠️ Only works, if both dataframes do not contain any duplicates.
Set Difference / Relational Algebra Difference
If you are interested in the relational algebra difference / set difference, i.e. df1-df2 or df1\df2:
pd.concat([df1,df2,df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False)
⚠️ Only works, if both dataframes do not contain any duplicates.
Another possible solution is to use numpy broadcasting:
df1[np.all(~np.all(df1.values == df2.values[:, None], axis=2), axis=0)]
Output:
Name Age
1 Mike 45
4 Marry 27
7 Bolt 39
Using the lambda function you can filter the rows with _merge value “left_only” to get all the rows in df1 which are missing from df2
df3 = df1.merge(df2, how = 'outer' ,indicator=True).loc[lambda x :x['_merge']=='left_only']
df
Try this one:
df_new = df1.merge(df2, how='outer', indicator=True).query('_merge == "left_only"').drop('_merge', 1)
It will result a new dataframe with the differences: the values that exist in df1 but not in df2.

does groupby concatenate the columns?

i have a "1000 rows * 4 columns" DataFrame:
a b c d
1 aa 93 4
2 bb 32 3
...
1000 nn 78 2
**[1283 rows x 4 columns]**
and I use groupby to group them based on 3 of the columns:
df.groupby(['a','b','c']).sum()
print(df)
a b c d
1 aa 93 12
2 bb 32 53
...
1000 nn 78 38
**[1283 rows x 1 columns]**
however the result give me a "1000 rows * 1 columns" Dataframe. SO my question is if Groupby concatenate columns as one Column? if yes how can I prevent that. I want to plot my data after grouping it but i can't since it only see one column instead of all 4.
edit: when i call the columns i only get the last column, it means it can't read 'a','b','c' as columns, why is that and how can i markl them as column again.
df.columns
Index([u'd'], dtype='object')
you can do it this way:
df.groupby(['a','b','c'], as_index=False).sum()
or:
df.groupby(['a','b','c']).sum().reset_index()

Categories