We Keep Coding

Python interpreter sequence with a function [duplicate]

Suppose I have a Python function foo which takes a default argument, where that default is set to some global variable. If I now change that global variable before calling the function, the default argument is still set to the original value of that global variable.
For example:
x = 1
def foo(a=x):
print a
x = 2
foo()
This prints 1, instead of 2.
How should I be writing my code, so that I can change this global variable, and have it update this default argument?

A default variable is only evaluated and set once. So Python makes a copy of the reference and from then on, it always passes that reference as default value. No re-evaluation is done.
You can however solve this by using another object as default object, and then use an if statement to substitute it accordingly. Something like:
the_default = object()
x = 1
def foo(a = the_default):
if a is the_default:
a = x
print a
x = 2
foo()
Note that we use is to perform reference equality. So we check if it is indeed the default_object. You should not use the the_default object somewhere else in your code.
In many Python code, they use None as a default (and thus reduce the number of objects the construct). For instance:
def foo(a = None):
if a is None:
a = x
print a
Note however that if you do that, your program cannot make a distinction between a user calling foo() and foo(None) whereas using something as the_object makes it harder for a user to obtain a reference to that object. This can be useful if None would be a valid candidate as well: if you want foo(None) to print 'None' and not x.

Python: Is it possible to delay execution of default argument values until the class object has been instantiated? [duplicate]

Sometimes it seems natural to have a default parameter which is an empty list. Yet Python produces unexpected behavior in these situations.
If for example, I have a function:
def my_func(working_list=[]):
working_list.append("a")
print(working_list)
The first time it is called, the default will work, but calls after that will update the existing list (with one "a" each call) and print the updated version.
So, what is the Pythonic way to get the behavior I desire (a fresh list on each call)?

def my_func(working_list=None):
if working_list is None:
working_list = []
# alternative:
# working_list = [] if working_list is None else working_list
working_list.append("a")
print(working_list)
The docs say you should use None as the default and explicitly test for it in the body of the function.

Other answers have already already provided the direct solutions as asked for, however, since this is a very common pitfall for new Python programmers, it's worth adding the explanation of why Python behaves this way, which is nicely summarized in The Hitchhikers Guide to Python under Mutable Default Arguments:
Python's default arguments are evaluated once when the function is defined, not each time the function is called (like it is in say, Ruby). This means that if you use a mutable default argument and mutate it, you will and have mutated that object for all future calls to the function as well.

Not that it matters in this case, but you can use object identity to test for None:
if working_list is None: working_list = []
You could also take advantage of how the boolean operator or is defined in python:
working_list = working_list or []
Though this will behave unexpectedly if the caller gives you an empty list (which counts as false) as working_list and expects your function to modify the list he gave it.

If the intent of the function is to modify the parameter passed as working_list, see HenryR's answer (=None, check for None inside).
But if you didn't intend to mutate the argument, just use it as starting point for a list, you can simply copy it:
def myFunc(starting_list = []):
starting_list = list(starting_list)
starting_list.append("a")
print starting_list
(or in this simple case just print starting_list + ["a"] but I guess that was just a toy example)
In general, mutating your arguments is bad style in Python. The only functions that are fully expected to mutate an object are methods of the object. It's even rarer to mutate an optional argument — is a side effect that happens only in some calls really the best interface?
If you do it from the C habit of "output arguments", that's completely unnecessary - you can always return multiple values as a tuple.
If you do this to efficiently build a long list of results without building intermediate lists, consider writing it as a generator and using result_list.extend(myFunc()) when you are calling it. This way your calling conventions remains very clean.
One pattern where mutating an optional arg is frequently done is a hidden "memo" arg in recursive functions:
def depth_first_walk_graph(graph, node, _visited=None):
if _visited is None:
_visited = set() # create memo once in top-level call
if node in _visited:
return
_visited.add(node)
for neighbour in graph[node]:
depth_first_walk_graph(graph, neighbour, _visited)

I might be off-topic, but remember that if you just want to pass a variable number of arguments, the pythonic way is to pass a tuple *args or a dictionary **kargs. These are optional and are better than the syntax myFunc([1, 2, 3]).
If you want to pass a tuple:
def myFunc(arg1, *args):
print args
w = []
w += args
print w
>>>myFunc(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
(2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
[2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
If you want to pass a dictionary:
def myFunc(arg1, **kargs):
print kargs
>>>myFunc(1, option1=2, option2=3)
{'option2' : 2, 'option1' : 3}

Quote from https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#function-definitions
Default parameter values are evaluated from left to right when the function definition is executed. This means that the expression is evaluated once, when the function is defined, and that the same “pre-computed” value is used for each call. This is especially important to understand when a default parameter is a mutable object, such as a list or a dictionary: if the function modifies the object (e.g. by appending an item to a list), the default value is in effect modified. This is generally not what was intended. A way around this is to use None as the default, and explicitly test for it in the body of the function, e.g.:
def whats_on_the_telly(penguin=None):
if penguin is None:
penguin = []
penguin.append("property of the zoo")
return penguin

Perhaps the simplest thing of all is to just create a copy of the list or tuple within the script. This avoids the need for checking. For example,
def my_funct(params, lst = []):
liste = lst.copy()
. .

There have already been good and correct answers provided. I just wanted to give another syntax to write what you want to do which I find more beautiful when you for instance want to create a class with default empty lists:
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, _id, val, parents=None, children=None):
self.id = _id
self.val = val
self.parents = parents if parents is not None else []
self.children = children if children is not None else []
This snippet makes use of the if else operator syntax. I like it especially because it's a neat little one-liner without colons, etc. involved and it nearly reads like a normal English sentence. :)
In your case you could write
def myFunc(working_list=None):
working_list = [] if working_list is None else working_list
working_list.append("a")
print working_list

I took the UCSC extension class Python for programmer
Which is true of: def Fn(data = []):
a) is a good idea so that your data lists start empty with every call.
b) is a good idea so that all calls to the function that do not provide any arguments on the call will get the empty list as data.
c) is a reasonable idea as long as your data is a list of strings.
d) is a bad idea because the default [] will accumulate data and the default [] will change with subsequent calls.
Answer:
d) is a bad idea because the default [] will accumulate data and the default [] will change with subsequent calls.

Assign results of function call in one line in python

How can I assign the results of a function call to multiple variables when the results are stored by name (not index-able), in python.
For example (tested in Python 3),
import random
# foo, as defined somewhere else where we can't or don't want to change it
def foo():
t = random.randint(1,100)
# put in a dummy class instead of just "return t,t+1"
# because otherwise we could subscript or just A,B = foo()
class Cat(object):
x = t
y = t + 1
return Cat()
# METHOD 1
# clearly wrong; A should be 1 more than B; they point to fields of different objects
A,B = foo().x, foo().y
print(A,B)
# METHOD 2
# correct, but requires two lines and an implicit variable
t = foo()
A,B = t.x, t.y
del t # don't really want t lying around
print(A,B)
# METHOD 3
# correct and one line, but an obfuscated mess
A,B = [ (t.x,t.y) for t in (foo(),) ][0]
print(A,B)
print(t) # this will raise an exception, but unless you know your python cold it might not be obvious before running
# METHOD 4
# Conforms to the suggestions in the links below without modifying the initial function foo or class Cat.
# But while all subsequent calls are pretty, but we have to use an otherwise meaningless shell function
def get_foo():
t = foo()
return t.x, t.y
A,B = get_foo()
What we don't want to do
If the results were indexable ( Cat extended tuple/list, we had used a namedtuple, etc.), we could simply write A,B = foo() as indicated in the comment above the Cat class. That's what's recommended here , for example.
Let's assume we have a good reason not to allow that. Maybe we like the clarity of assigning from the variable names (if they're more meaningful than x and y) or maybe the object is not primarily a container. Maybe the fields are properties, so access actually involves a method call. We don't have to assume any of those to answer this question though; the Cat class can be taken at face value.
This question already deals with how to design functions/classes the best way possible; if the function's expected return value are already well defined and does not involve tuple-like access, what is the best way to accept multiple values when returning?

I would strongly recommend either using multiple statements, or just keeping the result object without unpacking its attributes. That said, you can use operator.attrgetter for this:
from operator import attrgetter
a, b, c = attrgetter('a', 'b', 'c')(foo())

Get array name in function it is passed to [duplicate]

I already read How to get a function name as a string?.
How can I do the same for a variable? As opposed to functions, Python variables do not have the __name__ attribute.
In other words, if I have a variable such as:
foo = dict()
foo['bar'] = 2
I am looking for a function/attribute, e.g. retrieve_name() in order to create a DataFrame in Pandas from this list, where the column names are given by the names of the actual dictionaries:
# List of dictionaries for my DataFrame
list_of_dicts = [n_jobs, users, queues, priorities]
columns = [retrieve_name(d) for d in list_of_dicts]

With Python 3.8 one can simply use f-string debugging feature:
>>> foo = dict()
>>> f'{foo=}'.split('=')[0]
'foo'
One drawback of this method is that in order to get 'foo' printed you have to add f'{foo=}' yourself. In other words, you already have to know the name of the variable. In other words, the above code snippet is exactly the same as just
>>> 'foo'

Even if variable values don't point back to the name, you have access to the list of every assigned variable and its value, so I'm astounded that only one person suggested looping through there to look for your var name.
Someone mentioned on that answer that you might have to walk the stack and check everyone's locals and globals to find foo, but if foo is assigned in the scope where you're calling this retrieve_name function, you can use inspect's current frame to get you all of those local variables.
My explanation might be a little bit too wordy (maybe I should've used a "foo" less words), but here's how it would look in code (Note that if there is more than one variable assigned to the same value, you will get both of those variable names):
import inspect
x, y, z = 1, 2, 3
def retrieve_name(var):
callers_local_vars = inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_locals.items()
return [var_name for var_name, var_val in callers_local_vars if var_val is var]
print(retrieve_name(y))
If you're calling this function from another function, something like:
def foo(bar):
return retrieve_name(bar)
foo(baz)
And you want the baz instead of bar, you'll just need to go back a scope further. This can be done by adding an extra .f_back in the caller_local_vars initialization.
See an example here: ideone

The only objects in Python that have canonical names are modules, functions, and classes, and of course there is no guarantee that this canonical name has any meaning in any namespace after the function or class has been defined or the module imported. These names can also be modified after the objects are created so they may not always be particularly trustworthy.
What you want to do is not possible without recursively walking the tree of named objects; a name is a one-way reference to an object. A common or garden-variety Python object contains no references to its names. Imagine if every integer, every dict, every list, every Boolean needed to maintain a list of strings that represented names that referred to it! It would be an implementation nightmare, with little benefit to the programmer.

TL;DR
Use the Wrapper helper from python-varname:
from varname.helpers import Wrapper
foo = Wrapper(dict())
# foo.name == 'foo'
# foo.value == {}
foo.value['bar'] = 2
For list comprehension part, you can do:
n_jobs = Wrapper(<original_value>)
users = Wrapper(<original_value>)
queues = Wrapper(<original_value>)
priorities = Wrapper(<original_value>)
list_of_dicts = [n_jobs, users, queues, priorities]
columns = [d.name for d in list_of_dicts]
# ['n_jobs', 'users', 'queues', 'priorities']
# REMEMBER that you have to access the <original_value> by d.value
I am the author of the python-varname package. Please let me know if you have any questions or you can submit issues on Github.
The long answer
Is it even possible?
Yes and No.
We are retrieving the variable names at runtime, so we need a function to be called to enable us to access the previous frames to retrieve the variable names. That's why we need a Wrapper there. In that function, at runtime, we are parsing the source code/AST nodes in the previous frames to get the exact variable name.
However, the source code/AST nodes in the previous frames are not always available, or they could be modified by other environments (e.g: pytest's assert statement). One simple example is that the codes run via exec(). Even though we are still able to retrieve some information from the bytecode, it needs too much effort and it is also error-prone.
How to do it?
First of all, we need to identify which frame the variable is given. It's not always simply the direct previous frame. For example, we may have another wrapper for the function:
from varname import varname
def func():
return varname()
def wrapped():
return func()
x = wrapped()
In the above example, we have to skip the frame inside wrapped to get to the right frame x = wrapped() so that we are able to locate x. The arguments frame and ignore of varname allow us to skip some of these intermediate frames. See more details in the README file and the API docs of the package.
Then we need to parse the AST node to locate where the variable is assigned value (function call) to. It's not always just a simple assignment. Sometimes there could be complex AST nodes, for example, x = [wrapped()]. We need to identify the correct assignment by traversing the AST tree.
How reliable is it?
Once we identify the assignment node, it is reliable.
varname is all depending on executing package to look for the node. The node executing detects is ensured to be the correct one (see also this).
It partially works with environments where other AST magics apply, including pytest, ipython, macropy, birdseye, reticulate with R, etc. Neither executing nor varname is 100% working with those environments.
Do we need a package to do it?
Well, yes and no, again.
If your scenario is simple, the code provided by #juan Isaza or #scohe001 probably is enough for you to work with the case where a variable is defined at the direct previous frame and the AST node is a simple assignment. You just need to go one frame back and retrieve the information there.
However, if the scenario becomes complicated, or we need to adopt different application scenarios, you probably need a package like python-varname, to handle them. These scenarios may include to:
present more friendly messages when the source code is not available or AST nodes are not accessible
skip intermediate frames (allows the function to be wrapped or called in other intermediate frames)
automatically ignores calls from built-in functions or libraries. For example: x = str(func())
retrieve multiple variable names on the left-hand side of the assignment
etc.
How about the f-string?
Like the answer provided by #Aivar Paalberg. It's definitely fast and reliable. However, it's not at runtime, meaning that you have to know it's foo before you print the name out. But with varname, you don't have to know that variable is coming:
from varname import varname
def func():
return varname()
# In external uses
x = func() # 'x'
y = func() # 'y'
Finally
python-varname is not only able to detect the variable name from an assignment, but also:
Retrieve variable names directly, using nameof
Detect next immediate attribute name, using will
Fetch argument names/sources passed to a function using argname
Read more from its documentation.
However, the final word I want to say is that, try to avoid using it whenever you can.
Because you can't make sure that the client code will run in an environment where the source node is available or AST node is accessible. And of course, it costs resources to parse the source code, identify the environment, retrieve the AST nodes and evaluate them when needed.

On python3, this function will get the outer most name in the stack:
import inspect
def retrieve_name(var):
"""
Gets the name of var. Does it from the out most frame inner-wards.
:param var: variable to get name from.
:return: string
"""
for fi in reversed(inspect.stack()):
names = [var_name for var_name, var_val in fi.frame.f_locals.items() if var_val is var]
if len(names) > 0:
return names[0]
It is useful anywhere on the code. Traverses the reversed stack looking for the first match.

I don't believe this is possible. Consider the following example:
>>> a = []
>>> b = a
>>> id(a)
140031712435664
>>> id(b)
140031712435664
The a and b point to the same object, but the object can't know what variables point to it.

def name(**variables):
return [x for x in variables]
It's used like this:
name(variable=variable)

>> my_var = 5
>> my_var_name = [ k for k,v in locals().items() if v == my_var][0]
>> my_var_name
'my_var'
In case you get an error if myvar points to another variable, try this (suggested by #mherzog)-
>> my_var = 5
>> my_var_name = [ k for k,v in locals().items() if v is my_var][0]
>> my_var_name
'my_var'
locals() - Return a dictionary containing the current scope's local variables.
by iterating through this dictionary we can check the key which has a value equal to the defined variable, just extracting the key will give us the text of variable in string format.
from (after a bit changes)
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/How-to-get-a-variable-name-as-a-string-in-Python

I wrote the package sorcery to do this kind of magic robustly. You can write:
from sorcery import dict_of
columns = dict_of(n_jobs, users, queues, priorities)
and pass that to the dataframe constructor. It's equivalent to:
columns = dict(n_jobs=n_jobs, users=users, queues=queues, priorities=priorities)

Here's one approach. I wouldn't recommend this for anything important, because it'll be quite brittle. But it can be done.
Create a function that uses the inspect module to find the source code that called it. Then you can parse the source code to identify the variable names that you want to retrieve. For example, here's a function called autodict that takes a list of variables and returns a dictionary mapping variable names to their values. E.g.:
x = 'foo'
y = 'bar'
d = autodict(x, y)
print d
Would give:
{'x': 'foo', 'y': 'bar'}
Inspecting the source code itself is better than searching through the locals() or globals() because the latter approach doesn't tell you which of the variables are the ones you want.
At any rate, here's the code:
def autodict(*args):
get_rid_of = ['autodict(', ',', ')', '\n']
calling_code = inspect.getouterframes(inspect.currentframe())[1][4][0]
calling_code = calling_code[calling_code.index('autodict'):]
for garbage in get_rid_of:
calling_code = calling_code.replace(garbage, '')
var_names, var_values = calling_code.split(), args
dyn_dict = {var_name: var_value for var_name, var_value in
zip(var_names, var_values)}
return dyn_dict
The action happens in the line with inspect.getouterframes, which returns the string within the code that called autodict.
The obvious downside to this sort of magic is that it makes assumptions about how the source code is structured. And of course, it won't work at all if it's run inside the interpreter.

This function will print variable name with its value:
import inspect
def print_this(var):
callers_local_vars = inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_locals.items()
print(str([k for k, v in callers_local_vars if v is var][0])+': '+str(var))
***Input & Function call:***
my_var = 10
print_this(my_var)
***Output**:*
my_var: 10

>>> locals()['foo']
{}
>>> globals()['foo']
{}
If you wanted to write your own function, it could be done such that you could check for a variable defined in locals then check globals. If nothing is found you could compare on id() to see if the variable points to the same location in memory.
If your variable is in a class, you could use className.dict.keys() or vars(self) to see if your variable has been defined.

I have a method, and while not the most efficient...it works! (and it doesn't involve any fancy modules).
Basically it compares your Variable's ID to globals() Variables' IDs, then returns the match's name.
def getVariableName(variable, globalVariables=globals().copy()):
""" Get Variable Name as String by comparing its ID to globals() Variables' IDs
args:
variable(var): Variable to find name for (Obviously this variable has to exist)
kwargs:
globalVariables(dict): Copy of the globals() dict (Adding to Kwargs allows this function to work properly when imported from another .py)
"""
for globalVariable in globalVariables:
if id(variable) == id(globalVariables[globalVariable]): # If our Variable's ID matches this Global Variable's ID...
return globalVariable # Return its name from the Globals() dict

In Python, the def and class keywords will bind a specific name to the object they define (function or class). Similarly, modules are given a name by virtue of being called something specific in the filesystem. In all three cases, there's an obvious way to assign a "canonical" name to the object in question.
However, for other kinds of objects, such a canonical name may simply not exist. For example, consider the elements of a list. The elements in the list are not individually named, and it is entirely possible that the only way to refer to them in a program is by using list indices on the containing list. If such a list of objects was passed into your function, you could not possibly assign meaningful identifiers to the values.
Python doesn't save the name on the left hand side of an assignment into the assigned object because:
It would require figuring out which name was "canonical" among multiple conflicting objects,
It would make no sense for objects which are never assigned to an explicit variable name,
It would be extremely inefficient,
Literally no other language in existence does that.
So, for example, functions defined using lambda will always have the "name" <lambda>, rather than a specific function name.
The best approach would be simply to ask the caller to pass in an (optional) list of names. If typing the '...','...' is too cumbersome, you could accept e.g. a single string containing a comma-separated list of names (like namedtuple does).

I think it's so difficult to do this in Python because of the simple fact that you never will not know the name of the variable you're using. So, in his example, you could do:
Instead of:
list_of_dicts = [n_jobs, users, queues, priorities]
dict_of_dicts = {"n_jobs" : n_jobs, "users" : users, "queues" : queues, "priorities" : priorities}

Many of the answers return just one variable name. But that won't work well if more than one variable have the same value. Here's a variation of Amr Sharaki's answer which returns multiple results if more variables have the same value.
def getVariableNames(variable):
results = []
globalVariables=globals().copy()
for globalVariable in globalVariables:
if id(variable) == id(globalVariables[globalVariable]):
results.append(globalVariable)
return results
a = 1
b = 1
getVariableNames(a)
# ['a', 'b']

just another way to do this based on the content of input variable:
(it returns the name of the first variable that matches to the input variable, otherwise None. One can modify it to get all variable names which are having the same content as input variable)
def retrieve_name(x, Vars=vars()):
for k in Vars:
if isinstance(x, type(Vars[k])):
if x is Vars[k]:
return k
return None

If the goal is to help you keep track of your variables, you can write a simple function that labels the variable and returns its value and type. For example, suppose i_f=3.01 and you round it to an integer called i_n to use in a code, and then need a string i_s that will go into a report.
def whatis(string, x):
print(string+' value=',repr(x),type(x))
return string+' value='+repr(x)+repr(type(x))
i_f=3.01
i_n=int(i_f)
i_s=str(i_n)
i_l=[i_f, i_n, i_s]
i_u=(i_f, i_n, i_s)
## make report that identifies all types
report='\n'+20*'#'+'\nThis is the report:\n'
report+= whatis('i_f ',i_f)+'\n'
report+=whatis('i_n ',i_n)+'\n'
report+=whatis('i_s ',i_s)+'\n'
report+=whatis('i_l ',i_l)+'\n'
report+=whatis('i_u ',i_u)+'\n'
print(report)
This prints to the window at each call for debugging purposes and also yields a string for the written report. The only downside is that you have to type the variable twice each time you call the function.
I am a Python newbie and found this very useful way to log my efforts as I program and try to cope with all the objects in Python. One flaw is that whatis() fails if it calls a function described outside the procedure where it is used. For example, int(i_f) was a valid function call only because the int function is known to Python. You could call whatis() using int(i_f**2), but if for some strange reason you choose to define a function called int_squared it must be declared inside the procedure where whatis() is used.

Maybe this could be useful:
def Retriever(bar):
return (list(globals().keys()))[list(map(lambda x: id(x), list(globals().values()))).index(id(bar))]
The function goes through the list of IDs of values from the global scope (the namespace could be edited), finds the index of the wanted/required var or function based on its ID, and then returns the name from the list of global names based on the acquired index.

Whenever I have to do it, mostly while communicating json schema and constants with the frontend I define a class as follows
class Param:
def __init__(self, name, value):
self.name = name
self.value = value
Then define the variable with name and value.
frame_folder_count = Param({'name':'frame_folder_count', 'value':10})
Now you can access the name and value using the object.
>>> frame_folder_count.name
'frame_folder_count'

>>> def varname(v, scope=None):
d = globals() if not scope else vars(scope); return [k for k in d if d[k] == v]
...
>>> d1 = {'a': 'ape'}; d2 = {'b': 'bear'}; d3 = {'c': 'cat'}
>>> ld = [d1, d2, d3]
>>> [varname(d) for d in ld]
[['d1'], ['d2'], ['d3']]
>>> d5 = d3
>>> [varname(d) for d in ld]
[['d1'], ['d2'], ['d3', 'd5']]
>>> def varname(v, scope=None):
d = globals() if not scope else vars(scope); return [k for k in d if d[k] is v]
...
>>> [varname(d) for d in ld]
[['d1'], ['d2'], ['d3', 'd5']]
As you see and is noted here, there can be multiple variables with the same value or even address, so using a wrapper to keep the names with the data is best.

Following method will not return the name of variable but using this method you can create data frame easily if variable is available in global scope.
class CustomDict(dict):
def __add__(self, other):
return CustomDict({**self, **other})
class GlobalBase(type):
def __getattr__(cls, key):
return CustomDict({key: globals()[key]})
def __getitem__(cls, keys):
return CustomDict({key: globals()[key] for key in keys})
class G(metaclass=GlobalBase):
pass
x, y, z = 0, 1, 2
print('method 1:', G['x', 'y', 'z']) # Outcome: method 1: {'x': 0, 'y': 1, 'z': 2}
print('method 2:', G.x + G.y + G.z) # Outcome: method 2: {'x': 0, 'y': 1, 'z': 2}
A = [0, 1]
B = [1, 2]
pd.DataFrame(G.A + G.B) # It will return a data frame with A and B columns

Some of the previous cases would fail if there are two variables with the same value. So it is convenient to alert it:
Defining function:
# Variable to string of variable name
def var_name(variable,i=0):
results = []
for name in globals():
if eval(name) == variable:
results.append(name)
if len(results) > 1:
print('Warning:' )
print(' var_name() has found',len(results), 'possible outcomes.')
print(' Please choose the suitable parameter "i". Where "i" is the index')
print(' that matches your choice from the list below.')
print(' ',results) ; print('')
return results[i]
Use:
var_1 = 10
var_name(var_1) # Output will be "var_1"
If you have 2 variables with the same value like var_1 = 8 and var_2 = 8, then a warning will appear.
var_1 = 8
var_2 = 8
var_name(var_2) # Output will be "var_1" too but Warning will appear

You can get your variable as kwargs and return it as string:
var=2
def getVarName(**kwargs):
return list(kwargs.keys())[0]
print (getVarName(var = var))
Note: variable name must be equal to itself.

I try to get name from inspect locals, but it cann't process var likes a[1], b.val.
After it, I got a new idea --- get var name from the code, and I try it succ!
code like below:
#direct get from called function code
def retrieve_name_ex(var):
stacks = inspect.stack()
try:
func = stacks[0].function
code = stacks[1].code_context[0]
s = code.index(func)
s = code.index("(", s + len(func)) + 1
e = code.index(")", s)
return code[s:e].strip()
except:
return ""

You can try the following to retrieve the name of a function you defined (does not work for built-in functions though):
import re
def retrieve_name(func):
return re.match("<function\s+(\w+)\s+at.*", str(func)).group(1)
def foo(x):
return x**2
print(retrieve_name(foo))
# foo

When finding the name of a variable from its value,
you may have several variables equal to the same value,
for example var1 = 'hello' and var2 = 'hello'.
My solution:
def find_var_name(val):
dict_list = []
global_dict = dict(globals())
for k, v in global_dict.items():
dict_list.append([k, v])
return [item[0] for item in dict_list if item[1] == val]
var1 = 'hello'
var2 = 'hello'
find_var_name('hello')
Outputs
['var1', 'var2']

Compressed version of iDilip's answer:
import inspect
def varname(x):
return [k for k,v in inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_locals.items() if v is x][0]
hi = 123
print(varname(hi))

It's totally possible to get the name of an instance variable, so long as it is the property of a class.
I got this from Effective Python by Brett Slatkin. Hope it helps someone:
The class must implement the get, set, and set_name dunder methods, which are part of the "Descriptor Protocol"
This worked when I ran it:
class FieldThatKnowsItsName():
def __init__(self):
self.name = None
self._value= None
self.owner = None
def __set_name__(self, owner, name):
self.name = name
self.owner = owner
self.owner.fields[self.name] = self
def __get__(self, instance, instance_type):
return self
def __set__(self, instance, value):
self = value
class SuperTable:
fields = {}
field_1=FieldThatKnowsItsName()
field_2=FieldThatKnowsItsName()
table = SuperTable()
print(table.field_1.name)
print(table.field_2.name)
You can then add methods and or extend your datatype as you like.
As a bonus, the set_name(self, owner, name) dunder also passes the parent instance, so the Field class instance can register itself with the parent.
I got this from Effective Python by Brett Slatkin. It took a while to figure out how to implement.

How can I do the same for a variable? As opposed to functions, Python variables do not have the __name__ attribute.
The problem comes up because you are confused about terminology, semantics or both.
"variables" don't belong in the same category as "functions". A "variable" is not a thing that takes up space in memory while the code is running. It is just a name that exists in your source code - so that when you're writing the code, you can explain which thing you're talking about. Python uses names in the source code to refer to (i.e., give a name to) values. (In many languages, a variable is more like a name for a specific location in memory where the value will be stored. But Python's names actually name the thing in question.)
In Python, a function is a value. (In some languages, this is not the case; although there are bytes of memory used to represent the actual executable code, it isn't a discrete chunk of memory that your program logic gets to interact with directly.) In Python, every value is an object, meaning that you can assign names to it freely, pass it as an argument, return it from a function, etc. (In many languages, this is not the case.) Objects in Python have attributes, which are the things you access using the . syntax. Functions in Python have a __name__ attribute, which is assigned when the function is created. Specifically, when a def statement is executed (in most languages, creation of a function works quite differently), the name that appears after def is used as a value for the __name__ attribute, and also, independently, as a variable name that will get the function object assigned to it.
But most objects don't have an attribute like that.
In other words, if I have a variable such as:
That's the thing: you don't "have" the variable in the sense that you're thinking of. You have the object that is named by that variable. Anything else depends on the information incidentally being stored in some other object - such as the locals() of the enclosing function. But it would be better to store the information yourself. Instead of relying on a variable name to carry information for you, explicitly build the mapping between the string name you want to use for the object, and the object itself.

Python function, overwrite original variable

I have this function:
def icaocode(code):
c.execute("SELECT ICAO, LAT, LON FROM airports WHERE ICAO = ?", (code,))
result = c.fetchone()
if result is None:
print("No airport found with ICAO code", code)
sys.exit()
else:
print("Found", code)
[...]
Lets say I call this function with
icaocode(x)
How do I get the function to overwrite x with the results?

In function def:
def icaocode(code):
...
return code # new value
When calling:
x = icaocode(x)
Btw if the argument is mutable (like a list), you can overwrite it without returning the new value. If it's immutable (like a string, integer), you can't.
E.g.
def f(some_list):
some_list.append("something")
In this case
my_list = []
f(my_list)
my_list will be ["something"]

You can't overwrite the value of the parameter. That is, you can't change it to refer to another object. You can, however, change the object. There is an old thread on pass-by-value and pass-by-reference semantics in Python that you may find illuminating: https://stackoverflow.com/a/986145/399047
For example, you can append elements to a list that is passed in as a parameter. The following code:
def func(a_list):
a_list.append("some value")
l = [1,2,3]
print l
func(l)
print l
would give:
[1,2,3]
[1,2,3,"some value"]
In contrast, a string, cannot be modified. The following code:
def func2(a_str):
a_str += "suffix"
s = "test"
print s
func2(s)
print s
would give:
"test"
"test"
My recommendation, unless you have a good reason, is to avoid mutating your input parameters, and return the modified object instead. Side-effects can make for messy code.
If, at the end of all this you really want to modify your input parameter, one technique would be to wrap the code parameter inside another object. e.g.
def icaocode(code_list):
input_code = code_list[0]
[...]
# do something to input_code, assign result to
# output_code
[...]
code_list[0] = output_code
Then you would call with:
code_list = [code]
icaocode(code_list)
That said, this code is ugly to me, smells something awful, and I don't recommend it.

You can, but it is a horrible way to conduct business. Return the value instead, remember that you can return more than one value if you like. Here is however one way to return a value through a parameter. But don't use it.
>>> def a(b):
... b[0] = 'hi'
....
>>> c = ['nono']
>>> a(c)
>>> print(c)
['hi']