Related
Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in the documentation.
>>> r'\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
>>> r'\\'
'\\\\'
>>> r'\\\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\\\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious.
The whole misconception about python's raw strings is that most of people think that backslash (within a raw string) is just a regular character as all others. It is NOT. The key to understand is this python's tutorial sequence:
When an 'r' or 'R' prefix is present, a character following a
backslash is included in the string without change, and all
backslashes are left in the string
So any character following a backslash is part of raw string. Once parser enters a raw string (non Unicode one) and encounters a backslash it knows there are 2 characters (a backslash and a char following it).
This way:
r'abc\d' comprises a, b, c, \, d
r'abc\'d' comprises a, b, c, \, ', d
r'abc\'' comprises a, b, c, \, '
and:
r'abc\' comprises a, b, c, \, ' but there is no terminating quote now.
Last case shows that according to documentation now a parser cannot find closing quote as the last quote you see above is part of the string i.e. backslash cannot be last here as it will 'devour' string closing char.
The reason is explained in the part of that section which I highlighted in bold:
String quotes can be escaped with a
backslash, but the backslash remains
in the string; for example, r"\"" is a
valid string literal consisting of two
characters: a backslash and a double
quote; r"\" is not a valid string
literal (even a raw string cannot end
in an odd number of backslashes).
Specifically, a raw string cannot end
in a single backslash (since the
backslash would escape the following
quote character). Note also that a
single backslash followed by a newline
is interpreted as those two characters
as part of the string, not as a line
continuation.
So raw strings are not 100% raw, there is still some rudimentary backslash-processing.
That's the way it is! I see it as one of those small defects in python!
I don't think there's a good reason for it, but it's definitely not parsing; it's really easy to parse raw strings with \ as a last character.
The catch is, if you allow \ to be the last character in a raw string then you won't be able to put " inside a raw string. It seems python went with allowing " instead of allowing \ as the last character.
However, this shouldn't cause any trouble.
If you're worried about not being able to easily write windows folder pathes such as c:\mypath\ then worry not, for, you can represent them as r"C:\mypath", and, if you need to append a subdirectory name, don't do it with string concatenation, for it's not the right way to do it anyway! use os.path.join
>>> import os
>>> os.path.join(r"C:\mypath", "subfolder")
'C:\\mypath\\subfolder'
In order for you to end a raw string with a slash I suggest you can use this trick:
>>> print r"c:\test"'\\'
test\
It uses the implicit concatenation of string literals in Python and concatenates one string delimited with double quotes with another that is delimited by single quotes. Ugly, but works.
Another trick is to use chr(92) as it evaluates to "\".
I recently had to clean a string of backslashes and the following did the trick:
CleanString = DirtyString.replace(chr(92),'')
I realize that this does not take care of the "why" but the thread attracts many people looking for a solution to an immediate problem.
Since \" is allowed inside the raw string. Then it can't be used to identify the end of the string literal.
Why not stop parsing the string literal when you encounter the first "?
If that was the case, then \" wouldn't be allowed inside the string literal. But it is.
The reason for why r'\' is syntactical incorrect is that although the string expression is raw the used quotes (single or double) always have to be escape since they would mark the end of the quote otherwise. So if you want to express a single quote inside single quoted string, there is no other way than using \'. Same applies for double quotes.
But you could use:
'\\'
Another user who has since deleted their answer (not sure if they'd like to be credited) suggested that the Python language designers may be able to simplify the parser design by using the same parsing rules and expanding escaped characters to raw form as an afterthought (if the literal was marked as raw).
I thought it was an interesting idea and am including it as community wiki for posterity.
Naive raw strings
The naive idea of a raw string is
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
and it will mean itself.
Unfortunately, this does not work, because if the whatever
happens to contain a quote, the raw string would end at that point.
It is simply impossible that I can put "whatever I want"
between fixed delimiters, because some of it could look like
the terminating delimiter -- no matter what that delimiter is.
Real-world raw strings (variant 1)
One possible approach to this problem would be to say
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
This restriction sounds harsh, until one recognizes that
Python's large offering of quotes can accommodate most situations
with this rule. The following are all valid Python quotes:
'
"
'''
"""
With this many possibilities for the delimiter, almost anything
can be made to work.
About the only exception would be if the string
literal is supposed to contain a complete list of all allowed
Python quotes.
Real-world raw strings (variant 2, as in Python)
Python, however, takes a different route using
an extended version of the above rule.
It effectively states
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
If I insist on including a quote, even that is allowed,
but I have to put a backslash before it.
So the Python approach is, in a sense, even more liberal
than variant 1 above -- but it has the side effect of
"mis"interpreting the closing quote as part of the string
if the last intended character of the string is a backslash.
Variant 2 is not helpful:
If I want the quote in my string,
but not the backslash, the allowed version of my string literal
will not be what I need.
However, given the three different other kinds of quotes I have
at my disposal, I will probably just pick one of those and my
problem will be solved -- so this is not problematic case.
The problematic case is this one:
If I want my string to end with a backslash, I am at a loss.
I need to resort to concatenating a non-raw string literal
containing the backslash.
Conclusion
After writing this, I go with several of the other posters
that variant 1 would have been easier to understand and to accept
and therefore more pythonic. That's life!
Comming from C it pretty clear to me that a single \ works as escape character allowing you to put special characters such as newlines, tabs and quotes into strings.
That does indeed disallow \ as last character since it will escape the " and make the parser choke. But as pointed out earlier \ is legal.
some tips :
1) if you need to manipulate backslash for path then standard python module os.path is your friend. for example :
os.path.normpath('c:/folder1/')
2) if you want to build strings with backslash in it BUT without backslash at the END of your string then raw string is your friend (use 'r' prefix before your literal string). for example :
r'\one \two \three'
3) if you need to prefix a string in a variable X with a backslash then you can do this :
X='dummy'
bs=r'\ ' # don't forget the space after backslash or you will get EOL error
X2=bs[0]+X # X2 now contains \dummy
4) if you need to create a string with a backslash at the end then combine tip 2 and 3 :
voice_name='upper'
lilypond_display=r'\DisplayLilyMusic \ ' # don't forget the space at the end
lilypond_statement=lilypond_display[:-1]+voice_name
now lilypond_statement contains "\DisplayLilyMusic \upper"
long live python ! :)
n3on
Despite its role, even a raw string cannot end in a single
backslash, because the backslash escapes the following quote
character—you still must escape the surrounding quote character to
embed it in the string. That is, r"...\" is not a valid string
literal—a raw string cannot end in an odd number of backslashes.
If you need to end a raw string with a single backslash, you can use
two and slice off the second.
I encountered this problem and found a partial solution which is good for some cases. Despite python not being able to end a string with a single backslash, it can be serialized and saved in a text file with a single backslash at the end. Therefore if what you need is saving a text with a single backslash on you computer, it is possible:
x = 'a string\\'
x
'a string\\'
# Now save it in a text file and it will appear with a single backslash:
with open("my_file.txt", 'w') as h:
h.write(x)
BTW it is not working with json if you dump it using python's json library.
Finally, I work with Spyder, and I noticed that if I open the variable in spider's text editor by double clicking on its name in the variable explorer, it is presented with a single backslash and can be copied to the clipboard that way (it's not very helpful for most needs but maybe for some..).
Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in the documentation.
>>> r'\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
>>> r'\\'
'\\\\'
>>> r'\\\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\\\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious.
The whole misconception about python's raw strings is that most of people think that backslash (within a raw string) is just a regular character as all others. It is NOT. The key to understand is this python's tutorial sequence:
When an 'r' or 'R' prefix is present, a character following a
backslash is included in the string without change, and all
backslashes are left in the string
So any character following a backslash is part of raw string. Once parser enters a raw string (non Unicode one) and encounters a backslash it knows there are 2 characters (a backslash and a char following it).
This way:
r'abc\d' comprises a, b, c, \, d
r'abc\'d' comprises a, b, c, \, ', d
r'abc\'' comprises a, b, c, \, '
and:
r'abc\' comprises a, b, c, \, ' but there is no terminating quote now.
Last case shows that according to documentation now a parser cannot find closing quote as the last quote you see above is part of the string i.e. backslash cannot be last here as it will 'devour' string closing char.
The reason is explained in the part of that section which I highlighted in bold:
String quotes can be escaped with a
backslash, but the backslash remains
in the string; for example, r"\"" is a
valid string literal consisting of two
characters: a backslash and a double
quote; r"\" is not a valid string
literal (even a raw string cannot end
in an odd number of backslashes).
Specifically, a raw string cannot end
in a single backslash (since the
backslash would escape the following
quote character). Note also that a
single backslash followed by a newline
is interpreted as those two characters
as part of the string, not as a line
continuation.
So raw strings are not 100% raw, there is still some rudimentary backslash-processing.
That's the way it is! I see it as one of those small defects in python!
I don't think there's a good reason for it, but it's definitely not parsing; it's really easy to parse raw strings with \ as a last character.
The catch is, if you allow \ to be the last character in a raw string then you won't be able to put " inside a raw string. It seems python went with allowing " instead of allowing \ as the last character.
However, this shouldn't cause any trouble.
If you're worried about not being able to easily write windows folder pathes such as c:\mypath\ then worry not, for, you can represent them as r"C:\mypath", and, if you need to append a subdirectory name, don't do it with string concatenation, for it's not the right way to do it anyway! use os.path.join
>>> import os
>>> os.path.join(r"C:\mypath", "subfolder")
'C:\\mypath\\subfolder'
In order for you to end a raw string with a slash I suggest you can use this trick:
>>> print r"c:\test"'\\'
test\
It uses the implicit concatenation of string literals in Python and concatenates one string delimited with double quotes with another that is delimited by single quotes. Ugly, but works.
Another trick is to use chr(92) as it evaluates to "\".
I recently had to clean a string of backslashes and the following did the trick:
CleanString = DirtyString.replace(chr(92),'')
I realize that this does not take care of the "why" but the thread attracts many people looking for a solution to an immediate problem.
Since \" is allowed inside the raw string. Then it can't be used to identify the end of the string literal.
Why not stop parsing the string literal when you encounter the first "?
If that was the case, then \" wouldn't be allowed inside the string literal. But it is.
The reason for why r'\' is syntactical incorrect is that although the string expression is raw the used quotes (single or double) always have to be escape since they would mark the end of the quote otherwise. So if you want to express a single quote inside single quoted string, there is no other way than using \'. Same applies for double quotes.
But you could use:
'\\'
Another user who has since deleted their answer (not sure if they'd like to be credited) suggested that the Python language designers may be able to simplify the parser design by using the same parsing rules and expanding escaped characters to raw form as an afterthought (if the literal was marked as raw).
I thought it was an interesting idea and am including it as community wiki for posterity.
Naive raw strings
The naive idea of a raw string is
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
and it will mean itself.
Unfortunately, this does not work, because if the whatever
happens to contain a quote, the raw string would end at that point.
It is simply impossible that I can put "whatever I want"
between fixed delimiters, because some of it could look like
the terminating delimiter -- no matter what that delimiter is.
Real-world raw strings (variant 1)
One possible approach to this problem would be to say
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
This restriction sounds harsh, until one recognizes that
Python's large offering of quotes can accommodate most situations
with this rule. The following are all valid Python quotes:
'
"
'''
"""
With this many possibilities for the delimiter, almost anything
can be made to work.
About the only exception would be if the string
literal is supposed to contain a complete list of all allowed
Python quotes.
Real-world raw strings (variant 2, as in Python)
Python, however, takes a different route using
an extended version of the above rule.
It effectively states
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
If I insist on including a quote, even that is allowed,
but I have to put a backslash before it.
So the Python approach is, in a sense, even more liberal
than variant 1 above -- but it has the side effect of
"mis"interpreting the closing quote as part of the string
if the last intended character of the string is a backslash.
Variant 2 is not helpful:
If I want the quote in my string,
but not the backslash, the allowed version of my string literal
will not be what I need.
However, given the three different other kinds of quotes I have
at my disposal, I will probably just pick one of those and my
problem will be solved -- so this is not problematic case.
The problematic case is this one:
If I want my string to end with a backslash, I am at a loss.
I need to resort to concatenating a non-raw string literal
containing the backslash.
Conclusion
After writing this, I go with several of the other posters
that variant 1 would have been easier to understand and to accept
and therefore more pythonic. That's life!
Comming from C it pretty clear to me that a single \ works as escape character allowing you to put special characters such as newlines, tabs and quotes into strings.
That does indeed disallow \ as last character since it will escape the " and make the parser choke. But as pointed out earlier \ is legal.
some tips :
1) if you need to manipulate backslash for path then standard python module os.path is your friend. for example :
os.path.normpath('c:/folder1/')
2) if you want to build strings with backslash in it BUT without backslash at the END of your string then raw string is your friend (use 'r' prefix before your literal string). for example :
r'\one \two \three'
3) if you need to prefix a string in a variable X with a backslash then you can do this :
X='dummy'
bs=r'\ ' # don't forget the space after backslash or you will get EOL error
X2=bs[0]+X # X2 now contains \dummy
4) if you need to create a string with a backslash at the end then combine tip 2 and 3 :
voice_name='upper'
lilypond_display=r'\DisplayLilyMusic \ ' # don't forget the space at the end
lilypond_statement=lilypond_display[:-1]+voice_name
now lilypond_statement contains "\DisplayLilyMusic \upper"
long live python ! :)
n3on
Despite its role, even a raw string cannot end in a single
backslash, because the backslash escapes the following quote
character—you still must escape the surrounding quote character to
embed it in the string. That is, r"...\" is not a valid string
literal—a raw string cannot end in an odd number of backslashes.
If you need to end a raw string with a single backslash, you can use
two and slice off the second.
I encountered this problem and found a partial solution which is good for some cases. Despite python not being able to end a string with a single backslash, it can be serialized and saved in a text file with a single backslash at the end. Therefore if what you need is saving a text with a single backslash on you computer, it is possible:
x = 'a string\\'
x
'a string\\'
# Now save it in a text file and it will appear with a single backslash:
with open("my_file.txt", 'w') as h:
h.write(x)
BTW it is not working with json if you dump it using python's json library.
Finally, I work with Spyder, and I noticed that if I open the variable in spider's text editor by double clicking on its name in the variable explorer, it is presented with a single backslash and can be copied to the clipboard that way (it's not very helpful for most needs but maybe for some..).
Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in the documentation.
>>> r'\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
>>> r'\\'
'\\\\'
>>> r'\\\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\\\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious.
The whole misconception about python's raw strings is that most of people think that backslash (within a raw string) is just a regular character as all others. It is NOT. The key to understand is this python's tutorial sequence:
When an 'r' or 'R' prefix is present, a character following a
backslash is included in the string without change, and all
backslashes are left in the string
So any character following a backslash is part of raw string. Once parser enters a raw string (non Unicode one) and encounters a backslash it knows there are 2 characters (a backslash and a char following it).
This way:
r'abc\d' comprises a, b, c, \, d
r'abc\'d' comprises a, b, c, \, ', d
r'abc\'' comprises a, b, c, \, '
and:
r'abc\' comprises a, b, c, \, ' but there is no terminating quote now.
Last case shows that according to documentation now a parser cannot find closing quote as the last quote you see above is part of the string i.e. backslash cannot be last here as it will 'devour' string closing char.
The reason is explained in the part of that section which I highlighted in bold:
String quotes can be escaped with a
backslash, but the backslash remains
in the string; for example, r"\"" is a
valid string literal consisting of two
characters: a backslash and a double
quote; r"\" is not a valid string
literal (even a raw string cannot end
in an odd number of backslashes).
Specifically, a raw string cannot end
in a single backslash (since the
backslash would escape the following
quote character). Note also that a
single backslash followed by a newline
is interpreted as those two characters
as part of the string, not as a line
continuation.
So raw strings are not 100% raw, there is still some rudimentary backslash-processing.
That's the way it is! I see it as one of those small defects in python!
I don't think there's a good reason for it, but it's definitely not parsing; it's really easy to parse raw strings with \ as a last character.
The catch is, if you allow \ to be the last character in a raw string then you won't be able to put " inside a raw string. It seems python went with allowing " instead of allowing \ as the last character.
However, this shouldn't cause any trouble.
If you're worried about not being able to easily write windows folder pathes such as c:\mypath\ then worry not, for, you can represent them as r"C:\mypath", and, if you need to append a subdirectory name, don't do it with string concatenation, for it's not the right way to do it anyway! use os.path.join
>>> import os
>>> os.path.join(r"C:\mypath", "subfolder")
'C:\\mypath\\subfolder'
In order for you to end a raw string with a slash I suggest you can use this trick:
>>> print r"c:\test"'\\'
test\
It uses the implicit concatenation of string literals in Python and concatenates one string delimited with double quotes with another that is delimited by single quotes. Ugly, but works.
Another trick is to use chr(92) as it evaluates to "\".
I recently had to clean a string of backslashes and the following did the trick:
CleanString = DirtyString.replace(chr(92),'')
I realize that this does not take care of the "why" but the thread attracts many people looking for a solution to an immediate problem.
Since \" is allowed inside the raw string. Then it can't be used to identify the end of the string literal.
Why not stop parsing the string literal when you encounter the first "?
If that was the case, then \" wouldn't be allowed inside the string literal. But it is.
The reason for why r'\' is syntactical incorrect is that although the string expression is raw the used quotes (single or double) always have to be escape since they would mark the end of the quote otherwise. So if you want to express a single quote inside single quoted string, there is no other way than using \'. Same applies for double quotes.
But you could use:
'\\'
Another user who has since deleted their answer (not sure if they'd like to be credited) suggested that the Python language designers may be able to simplify the parser design by using the same parsing rules and expanding escaped characters to raw form as an afterthought (if the literal was marked as raw).
I thought it was an interesting idea and am including it as community wiki for posterity.
Naive raw strings
The naive idea of a raw string is
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
and it will mean itself.
Unfortunately, this does not work, because if the whatever
happens to contain a quote, the raw string would end at that point.
It is simply impossible that I can put "whatever I want"
between fixed delimiters, because some of it could look like
the terminating delimiter -- no matter what that delimiter is.
Real-world raw strings (variant 1)
One possible approach to this problem would be to say
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
This restriction sounds harsh, until one recognizes that
Python's large offering of quotes can accommodate most situations
with this rule. The following are all valid Python quotes:
'
"
'''
"""
With this many possibilities for the delimiter, almost anything
can be made to work.
About the only exception would be if the string
literal is supposed to contain a complete list of all allowed
Python quotes.
Real-world raw strings (variant 2, as in Python)
Python, however, takes a different route using
an extended version of the above rule.
It effectively states
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
If I insist on including a quote, even that is allowed,
but I have to put a backslash before it.
So the Python approach is, in a sense, even more liberal
than variant 1 above -- but it has the side effect of
"mis"interpreting the closing quote as part of the string
if the last intended character of the string is a backslash.
Variant 2 is not helpful:
If I want the quote in my string,
but not the backslash, the allowed version of my string literal
will not be what I need.
However, given the three different other kinds of quotes I have
at my disposal, I will probably just pick one of those and my
problem will be solved -- so this is not problematic case.
The problematic case is this one:
If I want my string to end with a backslash, I am at a loss.
I need to resort to concatenating a non-raw string literal
containing the backslash.
Conclusion
After writing this, I go with several of the other posters
that variant 1 would have been easier to understand and to accept
and therefore more pythonic. That's life!
Comming from C it pretty clear to me that a single \ works as escape character allowing you to put special characters such as newlines, tabs and quotes into strings.
That does indeed disallow \ as last character since it will escape the " and make the parser choke. But as pointed out earlier \ is legal.
some tips :
1) if you need to manipulate backslash for path then standard python module os.path is your friend. for example :
os.path.normpath('c:/folder1/')
2) if you want to build strings with backslash in it BUT without backslash at the END of your string then raw string is your friend (use 'r' prefix before your literal string). for example :
r'\one \two \three'
3) if you need to prefix a string in a variable X with a backslash then you can do this :
X='dummy'
bs=r'\ ' # don't forget the space after backslash or you will get EOL error
X2=bs[0]+X # X2 now contains \dummy
4) if you need to create a string with a backslash at the end then combine tip 2 and 3 :
voice_name='upper'
lilypond_display=r'\DisplayLilyMusic \ ' # don't forget the space at the end
lilypond_statement=lilypond_display[:-1]+voice_name
now lilypond_statement contains "\DisplayLilyMusic \upper"
long live python ! :)
n3on
Despite its role, even a raw string cannot end in a single
backslash, because the backslash escapes the following quote
character—you still must escape the surrounding quote character to
embed it in the string. That is, r"...\" is not a valid string
literal—a raw string cannot end in an odd number of backslashes.
If you need to end a raw string with a single backslash, you can use
two and slice off the second.
I encountered this problem and found a partial solution which is good for some cases. Despite python not being able to end a string with a single backslash, it can be serialized and saved in a text file with a single backslash at the end. Therefore if what you need is saving a text with a single backslash on you computer, it is possible:
x = 'a string\\'
x
'a string\\'
# Now save it in a text file and it will appear with a single backslash:
with open("my_file.txt", 'w') as h:
h.write(x)
BTW it is not working with json if you dump it using python's json library.
Finally, I work with Spyder, and I noticed that if I open the variable in spider's text editor by double clicking on its name in the variable explorer, it is presented with a single backslash and can be copied to the clipboard that way (it's not very helpful for most needs but maybe for some..).
I am trying to match (using regex in python):
http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg
in the following string:
http://www.mymaterialssite.com','http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg','Model Photo'
My code has something like this:
temp="http://www.mymaterialssite.com','http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg','Model Photo'"
dummy=str(re.compile(r'.com'',,''(.*?)'',,''Model Photo').search(str(temp)).group(1))
I do not think the "dummy" is correct & I am unsure how I "escape" the single and double quotes in the regex re.compile command.
I tried googling for the problem, but I couldnt find anything relevant.
Would appreciate any guidance on this.
Thanks.
The easiest way to deal with strings in Python that contain escape characters and quotes is to triple double-quote the string (""") and prefix it with r. For example:
my_str = r"""This string would "really "suck"" to write if I didn't
know how to tell Python to parse it as "raw" text with the 'r' character and
triple " quotes. Especially since I want \n to show up as a backlash followed
by n. I don't want \0 to be the null byte either!"""
The r means "take escape characters as literal". The triple double-quotes (""") prevent single-quotes, double-quotes, and double double-quotes from prematurely ending the string.
EDIT: I expanded the example to include things like \0 and \n. In a normal string (not a raw string) a \ (the escape character) signifies that the next character has special meaning. For example \n means "the newline character". If you literally wanted the character \ followed by n in your string you would have to write \\n, or just use a raw string instead, as I show in the example above.
You can also read about string literals in the Python documentation here:
For beginners: http://docs.python.org/tutorial/introduction.html#strings
Complex explanation: http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-literals
Try triple quotes:
import re
tmp=""".*http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg.*"""
str="""http://www.mymaterialssite.com\'\,\'http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg','Model Photo'"""
x=re.match(tmp,str)
if x!=None:
print x.group()
Also you were missing the .* in the beginning of the pattern and at the end. I added that too.
if you use double quotes (which have the same meaning as the single ones, in Python), you don't have to escape at all.. (in this case). you can even use string literal without the starting r (you don't have any backslash there)
re.compile(".com','(.*?)','Model Photo")
Commas don't need to be escaped, and single quotes don't need to be escaped if you use double quotes to create the string:
>>> dummy=re.compile(r".com','(.*?)','Model Photo").search(temp).group(1)
>>> print dummy
http://images.mymaterials.com/images/steel-images/small/steel/steel800/steel800-2.jpg
Note that I also removed some unnecessary str() calls, and for future reference if you do ever need to escape single or double quotes (say your string contains both), use a backslash like this:
'.com\',\'(.*?)\',\'Model Photo'
As mykhal pointed out in comments, this doesn't work very nicely with regex because you can no longer use the raw string (r'...') literal. A better solution would be to use triple quoted strings as other answers suggested.
Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in the documentation.
>>> r'\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
>>> r'\\'
'\\\\'
>>> r'\\\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\\\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious.
The whole misconception about python's raw strings is that most of people think that backslash (within a raw string) is just a regular character as all others. It is NOT. The key to understand is this python's tutorial sequence:
When an 'r' or 'R' prefix is present, a character following a
backslash is included in the string without change, and all
backslashes are left in the string
So any character following a backslash is part of raw string. Once parser enters a raw string (non Unicode one) and encounters a backslash it knows there are 2 characters (a backslash and a char following it).
This way:
r'abc\d' comprises a, b, c, \, d
r'abc\'d' comprises a, b, c, \, ', d
r'abc\'' comprises a, b, c, \, '
and:
r'abc\' comprises a, b, c, \, ' but there is no terminating quote now.
Last case shows that according to documentation now a parser cannot find closing quote as the last quote you see above is part of the string i.e. backslash cannot be last here as it will 'devour' string closing char.
The reason is explained in the part of that section which I highlighted in bold:
String quotes can be escaped with a
backslash, but the backslash remains
in the string; for example, r"\"" is a
valid string literal consisting of two
characters: a backslash and a double
quote; r"\" is not a valid string
literal (even a raw string cannot end
in an odd number of backslashes).
Specifically, a raw string cannot end
in a single backslash (since the
backslash would escape the following
quote character). Note also that a
single backslash followed by a newline
is interpreted as those two characters
as part of the string, not as a line
continuation.
So raw strings are not 100% raw, there is still some rudimentary backslash-processing.
That's the way it is! I see it as one of those small defects in python!
I don't think there's a good reason for it, but it's definitely not parsing; it's really easy to parse raw strings with \ as a last character.
The catch is, if you allow \ to be the last character in a raw string then you won't be able to put " inside a raw string. It seems python went with allowing " instead of allowing \ as the last character.
However, this shouldn't cause any trouble.
If you're worried about not being able to easily write windows folder pathes such as c:\mypath\ then worry not, for, you can represent them as r"C:\mypath", and, if you need to append a subdirectory name, don't do it with string concatenation, for it's not the right way to do it anyway! use os.path.join
>>> import os
>>> os.path.join(r"C:\mypath", "subfolder")
'C:\\mypath\\subfolder'
In order for you to end a raw string with a slash I suggest you can use this trick:
>>> print r"c:\test"'\\'
test\
It uses the implicit concatenation of string literals in Python and concatenates one string delimited with double quotes with another that is delimited by single quotes. Ugly, but works.
Another trick is to use chr(92) as it evaluates to "\".
I recently had to clean a string of backslashes and the following did the trick:
CleanString = DirtyString.replace(chr(92),'')
I realize that this does not take care of the "why" but the thread attracts many people looking for a solution to an immediate problem.
Since \" is allowed inside the raw string. Then it can't be used to identify the end of the string literal.
Why not stop parsing the string literal when you encounter the first "?
If that was the case, then \" wouldn't be allowed inside the string literal. But it is.
The reason for why r'\' is syntactical incorrect is that although the string expression is raw the used quotes (single or double) always have to be escape since they would mark the end of the quote otherwise. So if you want to express a single quote inside single quoted string, there is no other way than using \'. Same applies for double quotes.
But you could use:
'\\'
Another user who has since deleted their answer (not sure if they'd like to be credited) suggested that the Python language designers may be able to simplify the parser design by using the same parsing rules and expanding escaped characters to raw form as an afterthought (if the literal was marked as raw).
I thought it was an interesting idea and am including it as community wiki for posterity.
Naive raw strings
The naive idea of a raw string is
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
and it will mean itself.
Unfortunately, this does not work, because if the whatever
happens to contain a quote, the raw string would end at that point.
It is simply impossible that I can put "whatever I want"
between fixed delimiters, because some of it could look like
the terminating delimiter -- no matter what that delimiter is.
Real-world raw strings (variant 1)
One possible approach to this problem would be to say
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
This restriction sounds harsh, until one recognizes that
Python's large offering of quotes can accommodate most situations
with this rule. The following are all valid Python quotes:
'
"
'''
"""
With this many possibilities for the delimiter, almost anything
can be made to work.
About the only exception would be if the string
literal is supposed to contain a complete list of all allowed
Python quotes.
Real-world raw strings (variant 2, as in Python)
Python, however, takes a different route using
an extended version of the above rule.
It effectively states
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
If I insist on including a quote, even that is allowed,
but I have to put a backslash before it.
So the Python approach is, in a sense, even more liberal
than variant 1 above -- but it has the side effect of
"mis"interpreting the closing quote as part of the string
if the last intended character of the string is a backslash.
Variant 2 is not helpful:
If I want the quote in my string,
but not the backslash, the allowed version of my string literal
will not be what I need.
However, given the three different other kinds of quotes I have
at my disposal, I will probably just pick one of those and my
problem will be solved -- so this is not problematic case.
The problematic case is this one:
If I want my string to end with a backslash, I am at a loss.
I need to resort to concatenating a non-raw string literal
containing the backslash.
Conclusion
After writing this, I go with several of the other posters
that variant 1 would have been easier to understand and to accept
and therefore more pythonic. That's life!
Comming from C it pretty clear to me that a single \ works as escape character allowing you to put special characters such as newlines, tabs and quotes into strings.
That does indeed disallow \ as last character since it will escape the " and make the parser choke. But as pointed out earlier \ is legal.
some tips :
1) if you need to manipulate backslash for path then standard python module os.path is your friend. for example :
os.path.normpath('c:/folder1/')
2) if you want to build strings with backslash in it BUT without backslash at the END of your string then raw string is your friend (use 'r' prefix before your literal string). for example :
r'\one \two \three'
3) if you need to prefix a string in a variable X with a backslash then you can do this :
X='dummy'
bs=r'\ ' # don't forget the space after backslash or you will get EOL error
X2=bs[0]+X # X2 now contains \dummy
4) if you need to create a string with a backslash at the end then combine tip 2 and 3 :
voice_name='upper'
lilypond_display=r'\DisplayLilyMusic \ ' # don't forget the space at the end
lilypond_statement=lilypond_display[:-1]+voice_name
now lilypond_statement contains "\DisplayLilyMusic \upper"
long live python ! :)
n3on
Despite its role, even a raw string cannot end in a single
backslash, because the backslash escapes the following quote
character—you still must escape the surrounding quote character to
embed it in the string. That is, r"...\" is not a valid string
literal—a raw string cannot end in an odd number of backslashes.
If you need to end a raw string with a single backslash, you can use
two and slice off the second.
Given the confusion around the arbitrary-seeming restriction against an odd number of backslashes at the end of a Python raw-string, it's fair to say that this is a design mistake or legacy issue originating in a desire to have a simpler parser.
While workarounds (such as r'C:\some\path' '\\' yielding 'C:\\some\\path\\' (in Python notation) or C:\some\path\ (verbatim)) are simple, it's counterintuitive to be needing them. For comparison, let's have a look at C++ and Perl.
In C++, we can straightforwardly use raw string literal syntax
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << R"(Hello World!)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\\)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\\\)" << std::endl;
}
to get the following output:
Hello World!
Hello World!\
Hello World!\\
Hello World!\\\
If we want to use the closing delimiter (above: )) within the string literal, we can even extend the syntax in an ad-hoc way to R"delimiterString(quotedMaterial)delimiterString". For example, R"asdf(some random delimiters: ( } [ ] { ) < > just for fun)asdf" produces the string some random delimiters: ( } [ ] { ) < > just for fun in the output. (Ain't that a good use of "asdf"!)
In Perl, this code
my $str = q{This is a test.\\};
print ($str);
print ("This is another test.\n");
will output the following: This is a test.\This is another test.
Replacing the first line by
my $str = q{This is a test.\};
would lead to an error message: Can't find string terminator "}" anywhere before EOF at main.pl line 1.
However, Perl treating a pre-delimiter \ as an escape character doesn't prevent the user from having an odd number of backslashes at the end of the resulting string; eg to place 3 backslashes \\\ into the end of $str, simply end the code with 6 backslashes: my $str = q{This is a test.\\\\\\};. Importantly, while we need to double the backslashes in the input, there is no Python-like inconsistent-seeming syntactic restriction.
Another way of looking at things is that these 3 languages use different ways to address the parsing issue of interaction between escape characters and closing delimiters:
Python: disallows an odd number of backslashes just before the closing delimiter; a simple workaround is r'stringWithoutFinalBackslash' '\\'
C++: allows essentially¹ everything between the delimiters
Perl: allows essentially² everything between the delimiters, but backslashes need to be consistently doubled
¹ The custom delimiterString itself cannot be more than 16 characters long, but that's hardly a limitation.
² If you need the delimiter itself, just escape it with \.
However, to be fair in a comparison to Python, we need to acknowledge that (1) C++ didn't have such string literals until C++11 and is famously hard to parse and (2) Perl is even harder to parse.
I encountered this problem and found a partial solution which is good for some cases. Despite python not being able to end a string with a single backslash, it can be serialized and saved in a text file with a single backslash at the end. Therefore if what you need is saving a text with a single backslash on you computer, it is possible:
x = 'a string\\'
x
'a string\\'
# Now save it in a text file and it will appear with a single backslash:
with open("my_file.txt", 'w') as h:
h.write(x)
BTW it is not working with json if you dump it using python's json library.
Finally, I work with Spyder, and I noticed that if I open the variable in spider's text editor by double clicking on its name in the variable explorer, it is presented with a single backslash and can be copied to the clipboard that way (it's not very helpful for most needs but maybe for some..).