I am trying to traverse through a dictionary and capitalize all of the keys if they are strings. I am getting a RunTime error for this:
for k, v in ref_dict.items():
if isinstance(k, str):
ref_dict[k.upper()] = v
else:
ref_dict[k] = v
How do I avoid something like this? Or, better, how do I improve the code in order to solve this more elegantly?
How big is your dict? If it is not huge, then you could do:
new_dict = {}
for k, v in ref_dict.items():
if isinstance(k, str):
new_dict[k.upper()] = v
else:
new_dict[k] = v
ref_dict = new_dict
In the other case, you may need to review your creation of ref_dict and modify the key there.
Also, one could modify your original code as follows change ref_dict. But it's worth mentioning that it would add new elements to ref_dict. For example
ref_dict = {'abc' : 1}
### change of code
keys = [k for key in ref_dict]
for k in keys:
if isinstance(k, str):
ref_dict[k.upper()] = ref_dict[k]
# else part is not neccessary
# else:
# ref_dict[k] = v
# now ref_dict = {'abc':1, 'ABC':1}
I solved it by doing this:
final_dict = dict((str(k).upper(), v) for k, v in ref_dict.items())
return final_dict
The str application is not ideal, but it will do for now.
I want to apply a function to all values in dict and store that in a separate dict. I am just trying to see how I can play with python and want to see how I can rewrite something like this
for i in d:
d2[i] = f(d[i])
to something like
d2[i] = f(d[i]) for i in d
The first way of writing it is of course fine, but I am trying to figure how python syntax can be changed
If you're using Python 2.7 or 3.x:
d2 = {k: f(v) for k, v in d1.items()}
Which is equivalent to:
d2 = {}
for k, v in d1.items():
d2[k] = f(v)
Otherwise:
d2 = dict((k, f(v)) for k, v in d1.items())
You could use map:
d2 = dict(d, map(f, d.values()))
If you don't mind using an extension. You can also use valmap in the toolz library which is functionally equivalent to using the map solution:
from toolz.dicttoolz import valmap
d2 = valmap(f, d)
If not for the clean presentation of the method, you also have the option of supplying a default return class as well, for people that need something other than a dict.
d2 = dict((k, f(v)) for k,v in d.items())
Dictionaries can be nested in Python and in this case the solution d2 = {k: f(v) for k, v in d1.items()} will not work.
For nested dictionaries one needs some function to transverse the whole data structure. For instance if values are allowed to be themselves dictionaries, one can define a function like:
def myfun(d):
for k, v in d.iteritems():
if isinstance(v, dict):
d[k] = myfun(v)
else:
d[k] = f(v)
return d
And then
d2 = myfun(d)
Following works for a dictionary, but not OrderedDict. For od it seems to form an infinite loop. Can you tell me why?
If the function input is dict it has to return dict, if input is OrderedDict it has to return od.
def key_lower(d):
"""returns d for d or od for od with keys changed to lower case
"""
for k in d.iterkeys():
v = d.pop(k)
if (type(k) == str) and (not k.islower()):
k = k.lower()
d[k] = v
return d
It forms an infinite loop because of the way ordered dictionaries add new members (to the end)
Since you are using iterkeys, it is using a generator. When you assign d[k] = v you are adding the new key/value to the end of the dictionary. Because you are using a generator, that will continue to generate keys as you continue adding them.
You could fix this in a few ways. One would be to create a new ordered dict from the previous.
def key_lower(d):
newDict = OrderedDict()
for k, v in d.iteritems():
if (isinstance(k, (str, basestring))):
k = k.lower()
newDict[k] = v
return newDict
The other way would be to not use a generator and use keys instead of iterkeys
As sberry mentioned, the infinite loop is essentially as you are modifying and reading the dict at the same time.
Probably the simplest solution is to use OrderedDict.keys() instead of OrderedDict.iterkeys():
for k in d.keys():
v = d.pop(k)
if (type(k) == str) and (not k.islower()):
k = k.lower()
d[k] = v
as the keys are captured directly at the start, they won't get updated as items are changed in the dict.
If a and b are 2 dictionaries:
a = {'UK':'http://www.uk.com', 'COM':['http://www.uk.com','http://www.michaeljackson.com']}
bb = {'Australia': 'http://www.australia.com', 'COM':['http://www.Australia.com', 'http://www.rafaelnadal.com','http://www.rogerfederer.com']}
I want to merge them to get
{'Australia': ['http://www.australia.com'], 'COM': ['http://www.uk.com', 'http://www.michaeljackson.com', 'http://www.Australia.com', 'http://www.rafaelnadal.com', 'http://www.rogerfederer.com'], 'UK': ['http://www.uk.com']}
I want to union them i.e.
How to do it in Python without overwwriting and replacing any value?
Use a defaultdict:
from collections import defaultdict
d = defaultdict(list)
for dd in (a,bb):
for k,v in dd.items():
#Added this check to make extending work for cases where
#the value is a string.
v = (v,) if isinstance(v,basestring) else v #basestring is just str in py3k.
d[k].extend(v)
(but this is pretty much what I told you in my earlier answer)
This now works if your input dictionaries look like
{'Australia':['http://www.australia.com']}
or like:
{'Australia':'http://www.australia.com'}
However, I would advise against the latter form. In general, I think it's a good idea to keep all the keys/values of a dictionary looking the same (at least if you want to treat all the items the same as in this question). That means that if one value is a list, it's a good idea for all of them to be a list.
If you really insist on keeping things this way:
d = {}
for dd in (a,b):
for k,v in dd.items():
if(not isinstance(v,list)):
v = [v]
try:
d[k].extend(v)
except KeyError: #no key, no problem, just add it to the dict.
d[k] = v
I have a dict and would like to remove all the keys for which there are empty value strings.
metadata = {u'Composite:PreviewImage': u'(Binary data 101973 bytes)',
u'EXIF:CFAPattern2': u''}
What is the best way to do this?
Python 2.X
dict((k, v) for k, v in metadata.iteritems() if v)
Python 2.7 - 3.X
{k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if v}
Note that all of your keys have values. It's just that some of those values are the empty string. There's no such thing as a key in a dict without a value; if it didn't have a value, it wouldn't be in the dict.
It can get even shorter than BrenBarn's solution (and more readable I think)
{k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if v}
Tested with Python 2.7.3.
If you really need to modify the original dictionary:
empty_keys = [k for k,v in metadata.iteritems() if not v]
for k in empty_keys:
del metadata[k]
Note that we have to make a list of the empty keys because we can't modify a dictionary while iterating through it (as you may have noticed). This is less expensive (memory-wise) than creating a brand-new dictionary, though, unless there are a lot of entries with empty values.
If you want a full-featured, yet succinct approach to handling real-world data structures which are often nested, and can even contain cycles, I recommend looking at the remap utility from the boltons utility package.
After pip install boltons or copying iterutils.py into your project, just do:
from boltons.iterutils import remap
drop_falsey = lambda path, key, value: bool(value)
clean = remap(metadata, visit=drop_falsey)
This page has many more examples, including ones working with much larger objects from Github's API.
It's pure-Python, so it works everywhere, and is fully tested in Python 2.7 and 3.3+. Best of all, I wrote it for exactly cases like this, so if you find a case it doesn't handle, you can bug me to fix it right here.
Based on Ryan's solution, if you also have lists and nested dictionaries:
For Python 2:
def remove_empty_from_dict(d):
if type(d) is dict:
return dict((k, remove_empty_from_dict(v)) for k, v in d.iteritems() if v and remove_empty_from_dict(v))
elif type(d) is list:
return [remove_empty_from_dict(v) for v in d if v and remove_empty_from_dict(v)]
else:
return d
For Python 3:
def remove_empty_from_dict(d):
if type(d) is dict:
return dict((k, remove_empty_from_dict(v)) for k, v in d.items() if v and remove_empty_from_dict(v))
elif type(d) is list:
return [remove_empty_from_dict(v) for v in d if v and remove_empty_from_dict(v)]
else:
return d
BrenBarn's solution is ideal (and pythonic, I might add). Here is another (fp) solution, however:
from operator import itemgetter
dict(filter(itemgetter(1), metadata.items()))
If you have a nested dictionary, and you want this to work even for empty sub-elements, you can use a recursive variant of BrenBarn's suggestion:
def scrub_dict(d):
if type(d) is dict:
return dict((k, scrub_dict(v)) for k, v in d.iteritems() if v and scrub_dict(v))
else:
return d
For python 3
dict((k, v) for k, v in metadata.items() if v)
Quick Answer (TL;DR)
Example01
### example01 -------------------
mydict = { "alpha":0,
"bravo":"0",
"charlie":"three",
"delta":[],
"echo":False,
"foxy":"False",
"golf":"",
"hotel":" ",
}
newdict = dict([(vkey, vdata) for vkey, vdata in mydict.iteritems() if(vdata) ])
print newdict
### result01 -------------------
result01 ='''
{'foxy': 'False', 'charlie': 'three', 'bravo': '0'}
'''
Detailed Answer
Problem
Context: Python 2.x
Scenario: Developer wishes modify a dictionary to exclude blank values
aka remove empty values from a dictionary
aka delete keys with blank values
aka filter dictionary for non-blank values over each key-value pair
Solution
example01 use python list-comprehension syntax with simple conditional to remove "empty" values
Pitfalls
example01 only operates on a copy of the original dictionary (does not modify in place)
example01 may produce unexpected results depending on what developer means by "empty"
Does developer mean to keep values that are falsy?
If the values in the dictionary are not gauranteed to be strings, developer may have unexpected data loss.
result01 shows that only three key-value pairs were preserved from the original set
Alternate example
example02 helps deal with potential pitfalls
The approach is to use a more precise definition of "empty" by changing the conditional.
Here we only want to filter out values that evaluate to blank strings.
Here we also use .strip() to filter out values that consist of only whitespace.
Example02
### example02 -------------------
mydict = { "alpha":0,
"bravo":"0",
"charlie":"three",
"delta":[],
"echo":False,
"foxy":"False",
"golf":"",
"hotel":" ",
}
newdict = dict([(vkey, vdata) for vkey, vdata in mydict.iteritems() if(str(vdata).strip()) ])
print newdict
### result02 -------------------
result02 ='''
{'alpha': 0,
'bravo': '0',
'charlie': 'three',
'delta': [],
'echo': False,
'foxy': 'False'
}
'''
See also
list-comprehension
falsy
checking for empty string
modifying original dictionary in place
dictionary comprehensions
pitfalls of checking for empty string
Building on the answers from patriciasz and nneonneo, and accounting for the possibility that you might want to delete keys that have only certain falsy things (e.g. '') but not others (e.g. 0), or perhaps you even want to include some truthy things (e.g. 'SPAM'), then you could make a highly specific hitlist:
unwanted = ['', u'', None, False, [], 'SPAM']
Unfortunately, this doesn't quite work, because for example 0 in unwanted evaluates to True. We need to discriminate between 0 and other falsy things, so we have to use is:
any([0 is i for i in unwanted])
...evaluates to False.
Now use it to del the unwanted things:
unwanted_keys = [k for k, v in metadata.items() if any([v is i for i in unwanted])]
for k in unwanted_keys: del metadata[k]
If you want a new dictionary, instead of modifying metadata in place:
newdict = {k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if not any([v is i for i in unwanted])}
I read all replies in this thread and some referred also to this thread:
Remove empty dicts in nested dictionary with recursive function
I originally used solution here and it worked great:
Attempt 1: Too Hot (not performant or future-proof):
def scrub_dict(d):
if type(d) is dict:
return dict((k, scrub_dict(v)) for k, v in d.iteritems() if v and scrub_dict(v))
else:
return d
But some performance and compatibility concerns were raised in Python 2.7 world:
use isinstance instead of type
unroll the list comp into for loop for efficiency
use python3 safe items instead of iteritems
Attempt 2: Too Cold (Lacks Memoization):
def scrub_dict(d):
new_dict = {}
for k, v in d.items():
if isinstance(v,dict):
v = scrub_dict(v)
if not v in (u'', None, {}):
new_dict[k] = v
return new_dict
DOH! This is not recursive and not at all memoizant.
Attempt 3: Just Right (so far):
def scrub_dict(d):
new_dict = {}
for k, v in d.items():
if isinstance(v,dict):
v = scrub_dict(v)
if not v in (u'', None, {}):
new_dict[k] = v
return new_dict
To preserve 0 and False values but get rid of empty values you could use:
{k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if v or v == 0 or v is False}
For a nested dict with mixed types of values you could use:
def remove_empty_from_dict(d):
if isinstance(d, dict):
return dict((k, remove_empty_from_dict(v)) for k, v in d.items() \
if v or v == 0 or v is False and remove_empty_from_dict(v) is not None)
elif isinstance(d, list):
return [remove_empty_from_dict(v) for v in d
if v or v == 0 or v is False and remove_empty_from_dict(v) is not None]
else:
if d or d == 0 or d is False:
return d
"As I also currently write a desktop application for my work with Python, I found in data-entry application when there is lots of entry and which some are not mandatory thus user can left it blank, for validation purpose, it is easy to grab all entries and then discard empty key or value of a dictionary. So my code above a show how we can easy take them out, using dictionary comprehension and keep dictionary value element which is not blank. I use Python 3.8.3
data = {'':'', '20':'', '50':'', '100':'1.1', '200':'1.2'}
dic = {key:value for key,value in data.items() if value != ''}
print(dic)
{'100': '1.1', '200': '1.2'}
Dicts mixed with Arrays
The answer at Attempt 3: Just Right (so far) from BlissRage's answer does not properly handle arrays elements. I'm including a patch in case anyone needs it. The method is handles list with the statement block of if isinstance(v, list):, which scrubs the list using the original scrub_dict(d) implementation.
#staticmethod
def scrub_dict(d):
new_dict = {}
for k, v in d.items():
if isinstance(v, dict):
v = scrub_dict(v)
if isinstance(v, list):
v = scrub_list(v)
if not v in (u'', None, {}, []):
new_dict[k] = v
return new_dict
#staticmethod
def scrub_list(d):
scrubbed_list = []
for i in d:
if isinstance(i, dict):
i = scrub_dict(i)
scrubbed_list.append(i)
return scrubbed_list
An alternative way you can do this, is using dictionary comprehension. This should be compatible with 2.7+
result = {
key: value for key, value in
{"foo": "bar", "lorem": None}.items()
if value
}
Here is an option if you are using pandas:
import pandas as pd
d = dict.fromkeys(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'])
d['b'] = 'not null'
d['c'] = '' # empty string
print(d)
# convert `dict` to `Series` and replace any blank strings with `None`;
# use the `.dropna()` method and
# then convert back to a `dict`
d_ = pd.Series(d).replace('', None).dropna().to_dict()
print(d_)
Some of Methods mentioned above ignores if there are any integers and float with values 0 & 0.0
If someone wants to avoid the above can use below code(removes empty strings and None values from nested dictionary and nested list):
def remove_empty_from_dict(d):
if type(d) is dict:
_temp = {}
for k,v in d.items():
if v == None or v == "":
pass
elif type(v) is int or type(v) is float:
_temp[k] = remove_empty_from_dict(v)
elif (v or remove_empty_from_dict(v)):
_temp[k] = remove_empty_from_dict(v)
return _temp
elif type(d) is list:
return [remove_empty_from_dict(v) for v in d if( (str(v).strip() or str(remove_empty_from_dict(v)).strip()) and (v != None or remove_empty_from_dict(v) != None))]
else:
return d
metadata ={'src':'1921','dest':'1337','email':'','movile':''}
ot = {k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if v != ''}
print(f"Final {ot}")
You also have an option with filter method:
filtered_metadata = dict( filter(lambda val: val[1] != u'', metadata.items()) )
Some benchmarking:
1. List comprehension recreate dict
In [7]: %%timeit dic = {str(i):i for i in xrange(10)}; dic['10'] = None; dic['5'] = None
...: dic = {k: v for k, v in dic.items() if v is not None}
1000000 loops, best of 7: 375 ns per loop
2. List comprehension recreate dict using dict()
In [8]: %%timeit dic = {str(i):i for i in xrange(10)}; dic['10'] = None; dic['5'] = None
...: dic = dict((k, v) for k, v in dic.items() if v is not None)
1000000 loops, best of 7: 681 ns per loop
3. Loop and delete key if v is None
In [10]: %%timeit dic = {str(i):i for i in xrange(10)}; dic['10'] = None; dic['5'] = None
...: for k, v in dic.items():
...: if v is None:
...: del dic[k]
...:
10000000 loops, best of 7: 160 ns per loop
so loop and delete is the fastest at 160ns, list comprehension is half as slow at ~375ns and with a call to dict() is half as slow again ~680ns.
Wrapping 3 into a function brings it back down again to about 275ns. Also for me PyPy was about twice as fast as neet python.