I've got two lists containing a series of tuples (x,y), representing different points on a Cartesian plane:
a = [(0, 0), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 4)]
b = [(3, 4), (4, 1), (5, 3)]
I'd like to find the two points (one for each list, not within the same list) at the smaller distance, in this specific case:
[((2, 4), (3, 4))]
whose distance is equal to 1. I was using list comprehension, as:
[(Pa, Pb) for Pa in a for Pb in b \
if math.sqrt(math.pow(Pa[0]-Pb[0],2) + math.pow(Pa[1]-Pb[1],2)) <= 2.0]
but this uses a threshold value. Is there a way to append an argmin() somewhere or something like that and get only the pair [((xa, ya), (xb, yb))] smallest distance? Thanks.
import numpy
e = [(Pa, Pb) for Pa in a for Pb in b]
e[numpy.argmin([math.sqrt(math.pow(Pa[0]-Pb[0],2) + math.pow(Pa[1]-Pb[1],2)) for (Pa, Pb) in e])]
Will use argmin as you suggested and return ((2, 4), (3, 4))
Just use list comprehension and min as follows:
dist = [(Pa, Pb, math.sqrt(math.pow(Pa[0]-Pb[0],2) + math.pow(Pa[1]-Pb[1],2)))
for Pa in a for Pb in b]
print min(dist, key=lambda x:x[2])[0:2]
Solution similar to DevShark's one with a few optimization tricks:
import math
import itertools
import numpy as np
def distance(p1, p2):
return math.hypot(p2[0] - p1[0], p2[1] - p1[1])
a = [(0, 0), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 4)]
b = [(3, 4), (4, 1), (5, 3)]
points = [tup for tup in itertools.product(a, b)]
print(points[np.argmin([distance(Pa, Pb) for (Pa, Pb) in points])])
You could also use the scipy.spatial library with the following :
import scipy.spatial as spspat
import numpy as np
distanceMatrix = spspat.distance_matrix(a,b)
args = np.argwhere(distanceMatrix==distanceMatrix.min())
print(args)
This will return you the following : array([[3, 0]]) , being the position of the points in each list.
This should also work in any dimension.
Related
I have to make this small recursion exercise where, given a matrix and a number I have to return the position of the number in the matrix. For example:
matrix = [[2,0,1],[3,5,3],[5,1,4,9],[0,5]]
numberToFind = 5
The expected result would be this one:
[(1,1),(2,0),(3,1)]
Could anyone pint me on how to start or what I have to do to create the code?
Here is one approach using a recursive generator:
matrix = [[2,0,1],[3,5,3],[5,1,4,9],[0,5]]
numberToFind = 5
def find(m, n, prev=tuple()):
for i,x in enumerate(m):
if isinstance(x, list):
yield from find(x, n, prev=prev+(i,))
elif x==n:
yield prev+(i,)
list(find(matrix, numberToFind))
output: [(1, 1), (2, 0), (3, 1)]
other example:
matrix = [[2,0,1],[3,5,3],[5,1,4,5],[0,5],[[[2,5,[1,5]]]]]
list(find(matrix, numberToFind))
# [(1, 1), (2, 0), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 0, 0, 1), (4, 0, 0, 2, 1)]
you can use just a single for loop as below. Way more efficient than a recursion
matrix = [[2,0,1],[3,5,3],[5,1,4,9],[0,5]]
my_list = []
for x in range(0,len(matrix)):
try:
a = matrix[x].index(5)
my_list.append((x,a))
except ValueError:
pass
My list of tuples look like this:
[(0, 0), (3, 0), (3, 3), (0, 3), (0, 0), (0, 6), (3, 6), (3, 9), (0, 9), (0, 6), (6, 0), (9, 0), (9, 3), (6, 3), (6, 0), (0, 3), (3, 3), (3, 6), (0, 6), (0, 3)]
It has the format of (X, Y) where I want to get the max and min of all Xs and Ys in this list.
It should be min(X)=0, max(X)=9, min(Y)=0, max(Y)=9
However, when I do this:
min(listoftuples)[0], max(listoftuples)[0]
min(listoftuples)[1], max(listoftuples)[1]
...for the Y values, the maximum value shown is 3 which is incorrect.
Why is that?
for the Y values, the maximum value shown is 3
because max(listoftuples) returns the tuple (9, 3), so max(listoftuples)[0] is 9 and max(listoftuples)[1] is 3.
By default, iterables are sorted/compared based on the values of the first index, then the value of the second index, and so on.
If you want to find the tuple with the maximum value in the second index, you need to use key function:
from operator import itemgetter
li = [(0, 0), (3, 0), ... ]
print(max(li, key=itemgetter(1)))
# or max(li, key=lambda t: t[1])
outputs
(3, 9)
Here is a simple way to do it using list comprehensions:
min([arr[i][0] for i in range(len(arr))])
max([arr[i][0] for i in range(len(arr))])
min([arr[i][1] for i in range(len(arr))])
max([arr[i][1] for i in range(len(arr))])
In this code, I have used a list comprehension to create a list of all X and all Y values and then found the min/max for each list. This produces your desired answer.
The first two lines are for the X values and the last two lines are for the Y values.
Tuples are ordered by their first value, then in case of a tie, by their second value (and so on). That means max(listoftuples) is (9, 3). See How does tuple comparison work in Python?
So to find the highest y-value, you have to look specifically at the second elements of the tuples. One way you could do that is by splitting the list into x-values and y-values, like this:
xs, ys = zip(*listoftuples)
Or if you find that confusing, you could use this instead, which is roughly equivalent:
xs, ys = ([t[i] for t in listoftuples] for i in range(2))
Then get each of their mins and maxes, like this:
x_min_max, y_min_max = [(min(L), max(L)) for L in (xs, ys)]
print(x_min_max, y_min_max) # -> (0, 9) (0, 9)
Another way is to use NumPy to treat listoftuples as a matrix.
import numpy as np
a = np.array(listoftuples)
x_min_max, y_min_max = [(min(column), max(column)) for column in a.T]
print(x_min_max, y_min_max) # -> (0, 9) (0, 9)
(There's probably a more idiomatic way to do this, but I'm not super familiar with NumPy.)
This is part of the code I'm working on: (Using Python)
import random
pairs = [
(0, 1),
(1, 2),
(2, 3),
(3, 0), # I want to treat 0,1,2,3 as some 'coordinate' (or positional infomation)
]
alphas = [(random.choice([1, -1]) * random.uniform(5, 15), pairs[n]) for n in range(4)]
alphas.sort(reverse=True, key=lambda n: abs(n[0]))
A sample output looks like this:
[(13.747649802587832, (2, 3)),
(13.668274782626717, (1, 2)),
(-9.105374057105703, (0, 1)),
(-8.267840318934667, (3, 0))]
Now I'm wondering is there a way I can give each element in 0,1,2,3 a random binary number, so if [0,1,2,3] = [0,1,1,0], (By that I mean if the 'coordinates' on the left list have the corresponding random binary information on the right list. In this case, coordinate 0 has the random binary number '0' and etc.) then the desired output using the information above looks like:
[(13.747649802587832, (1, 0)),
(13.668274782626717, (1, 1)),
(-9.105374057105703, (0, 1)),
(-8.267840318934667, (0, 0))]
Thanks!!
One way using dict:
d = dict(zip([0,1,2,3], [0,1,1,0]))
[(i, tuple(d[j] for j in c)) for i, c in alphas]
Output:
[(13.747649802587832, (1, 0)),
(13.668274782626717, (1, 1)),
(-9.105374057105703, (0, 1)),
(-8.267840318934667, (0, 0))]
You can create a function to convert your number to the random binary assigned. Using a dictionary within this function would make sense. Something like this should work where output1 is that first sample output you provide and binary_code would be [0, 1, 1, 0] in your example:
def convert2bin(original, binary_code):
binary_dict = {n: x for n, x in enumerate(binary_code)}
return tuple([binary_code[x] for x in original])
binary_code = np.random.randint(2, size=4)
[convert2bin(x[1], binary_code) for x in output1]
Suppose I have a matrix like this:
m = [0, 1, 1, 0,
1, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1]
And I need to get the coordinates of the same neighbouring values (but not diagonally):
So the result would be a list of lists of coordinates in the "matrix" list, starting with [0,0], like this:
r = [[[0,0]],
[[0,1], [0,2], [1,0], [1,1]],
[[0,3], [1,2], [1,3], [2,0], [2,1], [2,2]]
[[2,3]]]
There must be a way to do that, but I'm really stuck.
tl;dr: We take an array of zeros and ones and use scipy.ndimage.label to convert it to an array of zeros and [1,2,3,...]. We then use np.where to find the coordinates of each element with value > 0. Elements that have the same value end up in the same list.
scipy.ndimage.label interprets non-zero elements of a matrix as features and labels them. Each unique feature in the input gets assigned a unique label. Features are e.g. groups of adjacent elements (or pixels) with the same value.
import numpy as np
from scipy.ndimage import label
# make dummy data
arr = np.array([[0,1,1,0], [1,1,0,0], [0,0,0,1]])
#initialise list of features
r = []
Since OP wanted all features, that is groups of zero and non-zero pixels, we use label twice: First on the original array, and second on 1 - original array. (For an array of zeros and ones, 1 - array just flips the values).
Now, label returns a tuple, containing the labelled array (which we are interested in) and the number of features that it found in that array (which we could use, but when I coded this, I chose to ignore it. So, we are interested in the first element of the tuple returned by label, which we access with [0]:
a = label(arr)[0]
b = label(1-arr)[0]
Now we check which unique pixel values label has assigned. So we want the set of a and b, repectively. In order for set() to work, we need to linearise both arrays, which we do with .ravel(). We have to subtract {0} in both cases, because for both a and b we are interested in only the non-zero values.
So, having found the unique labels, we loop through these values, and use np.where to find where on the array a given value is located. np.where returns a tuple of arrays. The first element of this tuple are all the row-coordinates for which the condition was met, and the second element are the column-coordinates.
So, we can use zip(* to unpack the two containers of length n to n containers of length 2. This means that we go from list of all row-coords + list of all column-coords to list of all row-column-coordinate pairs for which the condition is met. Finally in python 3, zip is a generator, which we can evaluate by calling list() on it. The resulting list is then appended to our list of coordinates, r.
for x in set(a.ravel())-{0}:
r.append(list(zip(*np.where(a==x))))
for x in set(b.ravel())-{0}:
r.append(list(zip(*np.where(b==x))))
print(r)
[[(0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 0), (1, 1)],
[(2, 3)],
[(0, 0)],
[(0, 3), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2)]]
That said, we can speed up this code slightly by making use of the fact that label returns the number of features it assigned. This allows us to avoid the set command, which can take time on large arrays:
a, num_a = label(arr)
for x in range(1, num_a+1): # range from 1 to the highest label
r.append(list(zip(*np.where(a==x))))
A solution with only standard libraries:
from pprint import pprint
m = [0, 1, 1, 0,
1, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1]
def is_neighbour(x1, y1, x2, y2):
return (x1 in (x2-1, x2+1) and y1 == y2) or \
(x1 == x2 and y1 in (y2+1, y2-1))
def is_value_touching_group(val, groups, x, y):
for d in groups:
if d['color'] == val and any(is_neighbour(x, y, *cell) for cell in d['cells']):
return d
def check(m, w, h):
groups = []
for i in range(h):
for j in range(w):
val = m[i*w + j]
touching_group = is_value_touching_group(val, groups, i, j)
if touching_group:
touching_group['cells'].append( (i, j) )
else:
groups.append({'color':val, 'cells':[(i, j)]})
final_groups = []
while groups:
current_group = groups.pop()
for c in current_group['cells']:
touching_group = is_value_touching_group(current_group['color'], groups, *c)
if touching_group:
touching_group['cells'].extend(current_group['cells'])
break
else:
final_groups.append(current_group['cells'])
return final_groups
pprint( check(m, 4, 3) )
Prints:
[[(2, 3)],
[(0, 3), (1, 3), (1, 2), (2, 2), (2, 0), (2, 1)],
[(0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 1), (1, 0)],
[(0, 0)]]
Returns as a list of groups under value key.
import numpy as np
import math
def get_keys(old_dict):
new_dict = {}
for key, value in old_dict.items():
if value not in new_dict.keys():
new_dict[value] = []
new_dict[value].append(key)
else:
new_dict[value].append(key)
return new_dict
def is_neighbor(a,b):
if a==b:
return True
else:
distance = abs(a[0]-b[0]), abs(a[1]-b[1])
return distance == (0,1) or distance == (1,0)
def collate(arr):
arr2 = arr.copy()
ret = []
for a in arr:
for i, b in enumerate(arr2):
if set(a).intersection(set(b)):
a = list(set(a+b))
ret.append(a)
for clist in ret:
clist.sort()
return [list(y) for y in set([tuple(x) for x in ret])]
def get_groups(d):
for k,v in d.items():
ret = []
for point in v:
matches = [a for a in v if is_neighbor(point, a)]
ret.append(matches)
d[k] = collate(ret)
return d
a = np.array([[0,1,1,0],
[1,1,0,0],
[0,0,1,1]])
d = dict(np.ndenumerate(a))
d = get_keys(d)
d = get_groups(d)
print(d)
Result:
{
0: [[(0, 3), (1, 2), (1, 3)], [(0, 0)], [(2, 0), (2, 1)]],
1: [[(2, 2), (2, 3)], [(0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 0), (1, 1)]]
}
If a list like this :L = [(1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 0)]
where i want to random choice an element of L, it returns an Error saying the element of L must be 1-dimensional. So, how should i use random.choice when the elements are not 1-dimensional?
import numpy as np
L = [(1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 0)]
re = np.random.choice(L)
when i try code above, it reports wrong
A simple solution to this is to take a random index of the list, instead of the element itself:
import numpy as np
L = [(1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 0)]
random_index = np.random.choice(len(L))
re = L[random_index]
numpy is a matrix library so it confused L with a 2D array. Use builtin random module instead:
import random
L = [(1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 0)]
re = random.choice(L)