I have a file called models.py in which i state:
Base = declarative_base()
class Vehicle(Base):
__tablename__ = 'vehicle'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
code = Column(String(15), nullable=False)
description = Column(String(100), default='')
vehicletype_id = ForeignKey('VehicleType.id')
Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
Which creates the database tables in my PostgreSQL database.
In my app.py should i now use:
from models.py import Vehicle
<do something with the Vehicle object>
or should i use something like:
meta = MetaData()
meta.reflect(bind=engine)
vehicle = meta.tables['vehicle']
when i want to access the schema of the table and the data in the database in that table.
I want to be able to create an API call (flask-jsonrpc) that gives the schema of a table , and another API call that returns the data from that table in the PostgreSQL database.
Since you're already using declarative ORM approach (by declaring your Vehicle class), there is no point to reflect it. Reflection is normally used when you're dealing with existing database and advanced features (such as defining custom relationships) are not important to you.
Related
I am trying to learn how to use the SQlalchemy core properly and currently, I have this query.
up = Airport.__table__.update().where(Airport.__table__.c.iata_code == iata_code).values(city=city)
I am using it to update values in a table that has this structure:
class Airport(Base):
__tablename__ = 'airports'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
iata_code = Column(String(64), index=True, nullable=False)
city = Column(String(256), nullable=False)
The problem is that after the execution of the update procedure I need the ids of the updated rows.
Is it possible to update the values and obtain the ids in only one query? I would like to avoid to have to perform 2 queries for this operation.
The DBMS I am using is mysql.
Disclaimer: This is for SQLAlchemy ORM, not Core
Get the object, and update it. SQLAlchemy will update the instance's ID in the same DB round trip.
airport = Airport.filter_by(Airport.__table__.c.iata_code == iata_code).first()
airport.city = city
db.session.commit()
print(airport.id)
I have a test database with two entities: post and category and I'm using declarative base to perform the manipulation of the data in my base, as follows:
engine = create_engine("sqlite:///test.db")
Base = declarative_base()
Base.metadata.bind = engine
class Post(Base):
__tablename__ = "post"
post_id = Column('id', primary_key=True)
title = Column('title')
...other attributes...
class Category(Base):
__tablename__ = "category"
category_id = Column('id', primary_key=True)
description = Column('name')
...other attributes...
Assuming I wanted to create a relationship between post and category (which does not exist in my database), how do I create it? Any idea?
Edit1:
I'll try to be clearer: the database already exists where a bind is done, as well as the post and category tables. What I want is to create a relationship between them through the code and write this in the database
create_all method support specify tables to create:
Base.metadata.create_all(tables=[Post.__table__,])
result:
$ sqlite3 test.db
sqlite> .tables
post
I have two separate SQLAlchemy interfaces to a Postgres database. The first interface, in the context of a Flask App, contains this model:
app = create_app() # sets the SQLAlchemy Database URI, etc.
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
class User(db.Model):
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
created_at = db.Column(db.DateTime, default=datetime.datetime.utcnow)
updated_at = db.Column(db.DateTime, onupdate=datetime.datetime.utcnow)
name = db.Column(db.String, nullable=False)
The second interface is not through Flask -- rather, it's a script that listens for a particular event, in which case it is meant to perform some computations and update a row in the database. To accomplish this, I have SQLAlchemy reflect the existent database:
from sqlalchemy import create_engine, MetaData, Table
from sqlalchemy.orm import mapper, sessionmaker
from sqlalchemy.ext.automap import automap_base
from os import environ
dbPath = "postgresql://" + ...
engine = create_engine(dbPath)
Base = automap_base()
Base.prepare(engine, reflect=True)
metadata = MetaData(engine)
class User(object):
pass
users = Table('user', metadata, autoload=True, autoload_with=engine)
mapper(User, users)
Session = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = Session()
The issue I'm now running into is this: when I'm using the first interface to create a new entry or update one, things work as expected, and the created_at and updated_at fields are updated appropriately.
However, when I'm using the second interface -- importing the code and using session.query(User) to get an entry and to update it, the updated_at field doesn't change. Moreover, when I'm using this interface to create a new User, while it creates the new row as expected, it populates neither the created_at nor updated_at fields.
My questions:
Why is this happening? Why does the reflection seemingly break the default/onupdate methods?
How can I fix this?
default and onupdate are handled entirely client side in Python and so cannot be reflected from the DB. See "Limitations of Reflection". In case of default you could use server_default:
class User(db.Model):
...
created_at = db.Column(db.DateTime,
server_default=text("now() at time zone 'UTC'"))
and for onupdate you'd have to write a DB trigger and use server_onupdate=FetchedValue().
On the other hand you could avoid all that and just separate your models from your application code to a module, used by both your Flask application and your script. This would of course be a bit more involved as you'd have to use vanilla SQLAlchemy declarative instead of the customized db.Model base of Flask-SQLAlchemy. Or, you could use custom commands with Flask to implement your scripts, which would allow using the Flask-SQLAlchemy extensions.
I am using Flask-SQLAlchemy to define my models, and then using Flask-Migrate to auto-generate migration scripts for deployment onto a PostgreSQL database. I have defined a number of SQL Views on the database that I use in my application like below.
However, Flask-Migrate now generates a migration file for the view as it thinks it's a table. How do I correctly get Flask-Migrate / Alembic to ignore the view during autogenerate?
SQL View name: vw_SampleView with two columns: id and rowcount.
class ViewSampleView(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'vw_report_high_level_count'
info = dict(is_view=True)
id = db.Column(db.String(), primary_key=True)
rowcount = db.Column(db.Integer(), nullable=False)
Which means I can now do queries like so:
ViewSampleView.query.all()
I tried following instructions on http://alembic.zzzcomputing.com/en/latest/cookbook.html and added the info = dict(is_view=True) portion to my model and the following bits to my env.py file, but don't know where to go from here.
def include_object(object, name, type_, reflected, compare_to):
"""
Exclude views from Alembic's consideration.
"""
return not object.info.get('is_view', False)
...
context.configure(url=url,include_object = include_object)
I think (though haven't tested) that you can mark your Table as a view with the __table_args__ attribute:
class ViewSampleView(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'vw_report_high_level_count'
__table_args__ = {'info': dict(is_view=True)}
id = db.Column(db.String(), primary_key=True)
rowcount = db.Column(db.Integer(), nullable=False)
I am trying to store a list of models within the field of another model. Here is a trivial example below, where I have an existing model, Actor, and I want to create a new model, Movie, with the field Movie.list_of_actors:
import uuid
from sqlalchemy import Boolean, Column, Integer, String, DateTime
from sqlalchemy.schema import ForeignKey
rom sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship
Base = declarative_base()
class Actor(Base):
__tablename__ = 'actors'
id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4)
name = Column(String)
nickname = Column(String)
academy_awards = Column(Integer)
# This is my new model:
class Movie(Base):
__tablename__ = 'movies'
id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4)
title = Column(String)
# How do I make this a list of foreign keys???
list_of_actors = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), ForeignKey('actors.id'))
I understand that this can be done with a many-to-many relationship, but is there a more simple solution? Note that I don't need to look up which Movie's an Actor is in - I just want to create a new Movie model and access the list of my Actor's. And ideally, I would prefer not to add any new fields to my Actor model.
I've gone through the tutorials using the relationships API, which outlines the various one-to-many/many-to-many combinations using back_propagates and backref here: http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/basic_relationships.html But I can't seem to implement my list of foreign keys without creating a full-blown many-to-many implementation.
But if a many-to-many implementation is the only way to proceed, is there a way to implement it without having to create an "association table"? The "association table" is described here: http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/basic_relationships.html#many-to-many ? Either way, an example would be very helpful!
Also, if it matters, I am using Postgres 9.5. I see from this post there might be support for arrays in Postgres, so any thoughts on that could be helpful.
Update
It looks like the only reasonable approach here is to create an association table, as shown in the selected answer below. I tried using ARRAY from SQLAlchemy's Postgres Dialect but it doesn't seem to support Foreign Keys. In my example above, I used the following column:
list_of_actors = Column('actors', postgresql.ARRAY(ForeignKey('actors.id')))
but it gives me an error. It seems like support for Postgres ARRAY with Foreign Keys is in progress, but still isn't quite there. Here is the most up to date source of information that I found: http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/postgresql-9-3-development-array-element-foreign-keys/
If you want many actors to be associated to a movie, and many movies be associated to an actor, you want a many-to-many. This means you need an association table. Otherwise, you could chuck away normalisation and use a NoSQL database.
An association table solution might resemble:
class Actor(Base):
__tablename__ = 'actors'
id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4)
name = Column(String)
nickname = Column(String)
academy_awards = Column(Integer)
class Movie(Base):
__tablename__ = 'movies'
id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4)
title = Column(String)
actors = relationship('ActorMovie', uselist=True, backref='movies')
class ActorMovie(Base):
__tablename__ = 'actor_movies'
actor_id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), ForeignKey('actors.id'))
movie_id = Column(UUID(as_uuid=True), ForeignKey('movies.id'))
If you don't want ActorMovie to be an object inheriting from Base, you could use sqlachlemy.schema.Table.