I'm writing code for a Linked List in Python and here's part of the code:
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
def search(self, n, value):
if n is None:
return False
elif n.data == value:
return True
else:
return search(n.next, value)
def append(self, new_value):
if self.head is None:
self.head = LinkedListNode(new_value)
else:
node = self.head
while node.next != None:
node = node.next
node.next = LinkedListNode(new_value)
def remove(self, position):
if position > 0:
node = self.head
l = 0
while node != position - 1:
l += 1
node = node.next
node.next = node.next.next
elif position == 0:
self.head = self.head.next
I'm just wondering how to implement the search() method? I think I have the right idea, but it's not working. Thank you!
When you call the method inside the same class, you need to qualify it with self.
def search(self, n, value):
if n is None:
return False
elif n.data == value:
return True
else:
return self.search(n.next, value) # <--
BTW, current search implementation requires user to pass n (LinkedList.head maybe). So I would make a wrapper to search from head, so user doesn't need to specify linked_list_instance.head every time:
def search_from_head(self, value):
return self.search(self.head, value)
Related
why can't print reversed this double linked list by python?
always print 6 or None
please can anyone help me fast to pass this task
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
class Node:
def __init__(self, data=None, next=None, prev=None):
self.data = data
self.next = next
self.previous = prev
sample methods==>
def set_data(self, newData):
self.data = newData
def get_data(self):
return self.data
def set_next(self, newNext):
self.next = newNext
def get_next(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
return self.next is not None
def set_previous(self, newprev):
self.previous = newprev
def get_previous(self):
return self.previous
def hasPrevious(self):
return self.previous is not None
class double===>
class DoubleLinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
self.tail = None
def addAtStart(self, item):
newNode = Node(item)
if self.head is None:
self.head = self.tail = newNode
else:
newNode.set_next(self.head)
newNode.set_previous(None)
self.head.set_previous(newNode)
self.head = newNode
def size(self):
current = self.head
count = 0
while current is not None:
count += 1
current = current.get_next()
return count
here is the wrong method ==>
try to fix it without more changes
def printReverse(self):
current = self.head
while current:
temp = current.next
current.next = current.previous
current.previous = temp
current = current.previous
temp = self.head
self.head = self.tail
self.tail = temp
print("Nodes of doubly linked list reversed: ")
while current is not None:
print(current.data),
current = current.get_next()
call methods==>
new = DoubleLinkedList()
new.addAtStart(1)
new.addAtStart(2)
new.addAtStart(3)
new.printReverse()
Your printReverse seems to do something else than what its name suggests. I would think that this function would just iterate the list nodes in reversed order and print the values, but it actually reverses the list, and doesn't print the result because of a bug.
The error in your code is that the final loop has a condition that is guaranteed to be false. current is always None when it reaches that loop, so nothing gets printed there. This is easily fixed by initialising current just before the loop with:
current = self.head
That fixes your issue, but it is not nice to have a function that both reverses the list, and prints it. It is better practice to separate these two tasks. The method that reverses the list could be named reverse. Then add another method that allows iteration of the values in the list. This is done by defining __iter__. The caller can then easily print the list with that iterator.
Here is how that looks:
def reverse(self):
current = self.head
while current:
current.previous, current.next = current.next, current.previous
current = current.previous
self.head, self.tail = self.tail, self.head
def __iter__(self):
node = self.head
while node:
yield node.data
node = node.next
def __repr__(self):
return "->".join(map(repr, self))
The main program can then be:
lst = DoubleLinkedList()
lst.addAtStart(1)
lst.addAtStart(2)
lst.addAtStart(3)
print(lst)
lst.reverse()
print(lst)
I'm trying to learn python so I decided to implement a Singly Linked List but I stumbled upon a weird problem.
As you could see from the screenshot above, the output when I'm trying to search for the index of a node has a leading and trailing single quote.
class Node:
next_node = None
def __init__(self, data):
self.data = data
def __repr__(self):
return "<Node data: %s>" % self.data
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
self.tail = None
def is_empty(self):
return self.head == None
def size(self):
current = self.head
count = 0
while current:
count += 1
current = current.next_node
return count
def append(self, data):
new_node = Node(data)
if self.is_empty():
self.head = new_node
else:
self.tail.next_node = new_node
self.tail = new_node
def search_node(self, key):
current = self.head
position = 0
while current:
if current.data == key:
# This returns with a leading and trailing single quote
return "<Node index: %s>" % position
else:
current = current.next_node
position += 1
return None
def search_index(self, index):
if index == 0:
return self.head
elif index == self.size() - 1:
return self.tail
else:
current = self.head
position = 0
while position < index:
current = current.next_node
position += 1
return current
def __repr__(self):
nodes = []
current = self.head
if self.is_empty():
return "<Empty>"
if self.size() == 1:
return "<Head: Tail: %s>" % current.data
while current:
if current is self.head:
nodes.append("<Head: %s>" % current.data)
elif current.next_node is None:
nodes.append("<Tail: %s>" % current.data)
else:
nodes.append("<%s>" % current.data)
current = current.next_node
return "-> ".join(nodes)
What's causing this behavior? I saw some articles about the repr function causing it but I'm not really sure.
I made some notes in your code that will hopefully help with identifying why your outputs are not consistent.
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None < - node or None
self.tail = None < - node or None
def search_node(self, key): # <- function return will be str or None
current = self.head
position = 0
while current:
if current.data == key:
return "<Node index: %s>" % position # <-- Returning a string
else:
current = current.next_node
position += 1
return None # <--- Returning None
def search_index(self, index): # <- function returns node or None
if index == 0:
return self.head # <- returing node or None
elif index == self.size() - 1:
return self.tail # <- returning node or None
else:
current = self.head
position = 0
while position < index:
current = current.next_node
position += 1
return current # <- returning node or None
The __repr__(str) of a string will always have the quotes surrounding it.
I'm trying to learn how to create linked lists. This is my first time doing this and the reason of code failure may be something basic I'm missing.
That being said, I am unable to figure out even after using vs code's debugger. It simply stops at the end of the append method when it is called the second time.
I am using recursion to traverse to the tail. Could that be a the problem?
class Node:
def __init__(self, data, next_node=None):
self.data = data
self.next = next_node
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
def __repr__(self):
if not self.head:
return 'Linked list is empty'
linked_list = self.head.data
if self.head.next == None:
return linked_list
current = self.head
while current.next != None:
linked_list += '\n|\nV' + current.data
return linked_list
def append(self, value):
if not self.head:
self.head = Node(data=value)
return
tail = self.tail()
tail.next = Node(data=value)
def tail(self):
tail = self._traverse_to_tail(self.head)
while tail.next != None:
tail = self._traverse_to_tail(tail)
return tail
def _traverse_to_tail(self, current_node, recursion_count=0):
print(current_node.data)
if recursion_count > 997:
return current_node
if current_node.next == None:
return current_node
current_node = current_node.next
recursion_count += 1
return self._traverse_to_tail(current_node, recursion_count)
if __name__ == '__main__':
ll = LinkedList()
ll.append('foo')
ll.append('baz')
print(ll)
The problem is you have an infinite loop in the __repr__() function, because you never increment current.
def __repr__(self):
if not self.head:
return 'Linked list is empty'
linked_list = self.head.data
if self.head.next == None:
return linked_list
current = self.head
while current.next != None:
current = current.next
linked_list += '\n|\nV' + current.data
return linked_list
class Node:
def __init__(self, data):
self.data = data
self.ref = None
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
def show(self):
if self.head is None:
print("This linked lists is empty")
else:
currentnode = self.head
while currentnode is not None:
print(currentnode.data, end=" --> ")
currentnode = currentnode.ref
def addelement(self, value):
newnode = Node(value)
newnode.ref = self.head
self.head = newnode
def lenofll(self , i = 0):
while self.head is not None:
i = i +1
self.head = self.head.ref
return i
def middle(self):
i = 0
lent = self.lenofll()
if self.head is None: # self.head changed to None after calling lenofll method.
print("linked list is empty")
I wanted to get the length of linked lists in the middle method. But as I called self.lenofll(), it changed the self.head to None.
What can I do to fix this?
Indeed, doing self.head = self.head.ref modifies the head. You should not make any modifications to self.head in a method whose job is just to search in the list -- without modifying anything to it.
As you can see, that method keeps looping until self.head is not None is not true, i.e. when self.head is None. No wonder that self.head is None after running this method!
Use a local variable for this iteration instead:
def lenofll(self, i = 0):
node = self.head # use local variable
while node is not None:
i += 1
node = node.ref
return i
I've created a list using only the Node class
class Node:
def __init__(self, init_data):
self.data = init_data
self.next = None
def get_data(self):
return self.data
def get_next(self):
return self.next
def set_data(self, new_data):
self.data = new_data
def set_next(self, new_next):
self.next = new_next
def __str__(self):
return str(self.data)
I've intialized the list and the last Node is None.
I'm trying to delete this node but don't know how to?
One good way to do this is to keep track of the previous node and the current node, and then when you reach the end of the list, set the next of the previous to None.
prev = None
cur = head
while cur.next is not None:
prev = cur
cur = cur.next
if prev: #in case the head is the tail
prev.next = None
You'll probably want a List class to manage your nodes.
class List:
def __init__(self):
self._nodes = None
def push(self, node):
node.set_next(self._nodes)
self._nodes = node
return self
def pop(self):
if self._nodes is None:
return None
temp = self._nodes
self._nodes = temp.get_next()
return temp
def __len__(self):
l = 0
n = self._nodes
while n is not None:
n = n.get_next()
l += 1
return l
def remove(self, node):
n = self._nodes
p = None
while n is not None:
if n is node:
p.set_next(n.get_next())
n.set_next(None)
return True
p = n
n = n.get_next()
return False
def del_from_end(self):
if self.head is None:
return "No node to delete"
else:
current = self.head
while current.next.next is not None:
current = current.next
current.next = None
Add this method in your linked list class which would look like
class LinkedList():
def __init__(self, head=None):
if head == "" or head is None:
self.head = None
else:
self.head = Node(head)