I'm having a hard time to make some of my figures in my paper aligned appropriately.
Here is the problem. I have two figures that I want to use the same x-axis. I plot two figures separately and include them as two subfigures in Latex. The problem with this: the yticklabels of the second graph take more room, which makes it look smaller than the first graph.
I specified the figsize as the same using the following code
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6,4))
But obviously when other things like titles, labels, tick labels take more space, the "main plot" appears smaller, making two subfigures misaligned. Is there any way to specify the size of the "main plot" ignoring other labels, titles, etc.?
P.S.: I didn't use matplotlib's subplots function because I noticed a bug in pandas or matplotlib: whenever I use an inset axis, the xlabel and xticklabels will not show. So I have to get around this by plotting two figures respectively and include them as two subfigures in latex.
When I am faced with this situation, I simply hard code the axes placement on the figure, then things will line up...
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
ax = plt.axes([0.15, 0.65, 0.8, 0.3])
ax.plot(range(100), range(100))
ax2 = plt.axes([0.15, 0.15, 0.8, 0.3])
ax2.plot(range(100), range(10000, 110000, 1000))
If you set the left value of fig.subplots_adjust to a constant for both plots, the left edges should be in the same place, e.g.:
fig.subplots_adjust(left = 0.12) # you might need to adjust 0.12 to your needs
Put that in your scripts for both your figures and that should align them both nicely.
Related
I've been working hard on a package of functions for my work, and I'm stuck on a layout problem. Sometimes I need to work with a lot of columns subplots (1 row x N columns) and the standard matplotlib legend sometimes is not helpful and makes it hard to visualize all the data.
I've been trying to create something like the picture below. I already tried to create a subplot for the curves and another one for the legends (and display the x-axis scale as a horizontal plot). Also, I tried to spine the x-axis, but when I have a lot of curves plotted inside the same subplots the legend becomes huge.
The following image is from a software. I'd like to create a similar look. Notice that these legends are "static": it remains fixed independent of the zooming. Another observation is, I don't need all the ticks or anything like that.
What I'm already have is the following (the code is a mess, becouse I'm trying many different solutions and it is not organized nor pythonic yet.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,2, sharey = True)
ax[0].semilogx(np.zeros_like(dados.Depth)+0.02, dados.Depth)
ax[0].semilogx(dados.AHT90, dados.Depth, label = 'aht90')
ax[0].set_xlim(0.2,2000)
ax[0].grid(True, which = 'both', axis = 'both')
axres1 = ax[0].twiny()
axres1.semilogx(dados.AHT90, dados.Depth, label = 'aht90')
axres1.set_xlim(0.2 , 2000)
axres1.set_xticks(np.logspace(np.log10(0.2),np.log10(2000),2))
axres1.spines["top"].set_position(("axes", 1.02))
axres1.get_xaxis().set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
axres1.tick_params(axis='both', which='both', labelsize=6)
axres1.set_xlabel('sss')#, labelsize = 5)
axres2 = ax[0].twiny()
axres2.semilogx(dados.AHT10, dados.Depth, label = 'aht90')
axres2.set_xlim(0.2 , 2000)
axres2.set_xticks(np.logspace(np.log10(0.2),np.log10(2000),2))
axres2.spines["top"].set_position(("axes", 1.1))
axres2.get_xaxis().set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
axres2.tick_params(axis='both', which='both', labelsize=6)
axres2.set_xlabel('aht10')#, labelsize = 5)
fig.show()
and the result is:
But well, I'm facing some issues on make a kind of make it automatic. If I add more curves, the prameter "set position" it is not practical to keep setting the position "by hand"
set_position(("axes", 1.02))
and another problem is, more curves I add, that kind of "legend" keep growing upward, and I have to adjust the subplot size with
fig.subplots_adjust(top=0.75)
And I'm also want to make the adjustment automatic, without keeping updating that parameter whenever I add more curves
I'm trying to create a video of many figures, so I need the axis to remain steady across multiple, independent figures. However, the y-axis changes scale, so the framing of the axis keeps moving as the ticklabels change. I'm trying to manually tell matplotlib exactly what size the whole figure should be and tell it exactly the position of the axis within the figure, but it's not working properly.
Here's what a base figure looks like:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig=plt.figure(figsize=(8,4),facecolor=(0.5,0.5,0.5))
ax=fig.add_subplot()
ax.plot([5,10],[800,900])
plt.show()
Here is one way for how I'm trying to change it if I want the axis frame to start at left=0.5, bottom=0.5, width=0.2, and height=0.2. I've tried many different ways, and all have failed, so this is illustrative of what I'm trying to do:
fig=plt.figure(figsize=(8,4),facecolor=(0.5,0.5,0.5))
ax=fig.add_axes((0.5,0.5,0.2,0.2))
ax.plot([5,10],[800,900])
plt.show()
Now, I want it to look more like this so that the black box of the axis frame will be in the exact same position for every figure, and each figure will be the exact same size. That way, when I make it an animation, the black frame won't be jerking around. (Obviously, I wouldn't make the buffer that big in the real video.)
You need to use ax.set_position.
If your ax box initially occupies the full figure, you can create a new size relatively to the old one, for example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8, 4), facecolor=(0.5, 0.5, 0.5))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
bbox = ax.get_position()
new_bbox = (bbox.x0+0.40, bbox.y0+0.40, bbox.width*0.5, bbox.height*0.5)
ax.set_position(new_bbox)
ax.plot([5, 10], [800, 900])
plt.show()
How can I center a matlotlib imshow figure after disabling the axes? Example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))
plt.axis('off')
plt.imshow(np.random.randint(10, size=(100, 100)))
plt.show()
Now the image is not really centered, especially if I apply a tight_layout since it does take the axes into account although they are disabled?!
plt.tight_layout()
Same problem occurs if I e.g. add a colorbar. Of course one could adjust the borders manually by command or in the UI, however, I would prefer a more robust solution that works automatically with different image shapes and sizes. Moreover, the figure size should not be changed during centering. Any hints?
The subplot parameters set by the default rc file are
figure.subplot.left : 0.125 ## the left side of the subplots of the figure
figure.subplot.right : 0.9 ## the right side of the subplots of the figure
figure.subplot.bottom : 0.11 ## the bottom of the subplots of the figure
figure.subplot.top : 0.88 ## the top of the subplots of the figure
As you can see, they are asymmetric. You can set them to something symmetric, if you want
rc = {"figure.subplot.left" : 0.1,
"figure.subplot.right" : 0.9,
"figure.subplot.bottom" : 0.1,
"figure.subplot.top" : 0.9 }
plt.rcParams.update(rc)
or
fig.subplots_adjust(left=0.1, bottom=0.1, right=0.9, top=0.9)
The fact that fig.tight_layout() does not produce a centered plot when the axes are off, is considered as bug. This has been fixed and will be working correctly from matplotlib 3.1 on (which will be released in a couple of days or weeks).
I am starting to play around with creating polar plots in Matplotlib that do NOT encompass an entire circle - i.e. a "wedge" plot - by setting the thetamin and thetamax properties. This is something I was waiting for for a long time, and I am glad they have it done :)
However, I have noticed that the figure location inside the axes seem to change in a strange manner when using this feature; depending on the wedge angular aperture, it can be difficult to fine tune the figure so it looks nice.
Here's an example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# get 4 polar axes in a row
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, subplot_kw={'projection': 'polar'},
figsize=(8, 8))
# set facecolor to better display the boundaries
# (as suggested by ImportanceOfBeingErnest)
fig.set_facecolor('paleturquoise')
for i, theta_max in enumerate([2*np.pi, np.pi, 2*np.pi/3, np.pi/3]):
# define theta vector with varying end point and some data to plot
theta = np.linspace(0, theta_max, 181)
data = (1/6)*np.abs(np.sin(3*theta)/np.sin(theta/2))
# set 'thetamin' and 'thetamax' according to data
axes[i//2, i%2].set_thetamin(0)
axes[i//2, i%2].set_thetamax(theta_max*180/np.pi)
# actually plot the data, fine tune radius limits and add labels
axes[i//2, i%2].plot(theta, data)
axes[i//2, i%2].set_ylim([0, 1])
axes[i//2, i%2].set_xlabel('Magnitude', fontsize=15)
axes[i//2, i%2].set_ylabel('Angles', fontsize=15)
fig.set_tight_layout(True)
#fig.savefig('fig.png', facecolor='skyblue')
The labels are in awkward locations and over the tick labels, but can be moved closer or further away from the axes by adding an extra labelpad parameter to set_xlabel, set_ylabel commands, so it's not a big issue.
Unfortunately, I have the impression that the plot is adjusted to fit inside the existing axes dimensions, which in turn lead to a very awkward white space above and below the half circle plot (which of course is the one I need to use).
It sounds like something that should be reasonably easy to get rid of - I mean, the wedge plots are doing it automatically - but I can't seem to figure it out how to do it for the half circle. Can anyone shed a light on this?
EDIT: Apologies, my question was not very clear; I want to create a half circle polar plot, but it seems that using set_thetamin() you end up with large amounts of white space around the image (especially above and below) which I would rather have removed, if possible.
It's the kind of stuff that normally tight_layout() takes care of, but it doesn't seem to be doing the trick here. I tried manually changing the figure window size after plotting, but the white space simply scales with the changes. Below is a minimum working example; I can get the xlabel closer to the image if I want to, but saved image file still contains tons of white space around it.
Does anyone knows how to remove this white space?
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# get a half circle polar plot
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots(1, 1, subplot_kw={'projection': 'polar'})
# set facecolor to better display the boundaries
# (as suggested by ImportanceOfBeingErnest)
fig1.set_facecolor('skyblue')
theta_min = 0
theta_max = np.pi
theta = np.linspace(theta_min, theta_max, 181)
data = (1/6)*np.abs(np.sin(3*theta)/np.sin(theta/2))
# set 'thetamin' and 'thetamax' according to data
ax1.set_thetamin(0)
ax1.set_thetamax(theta_max*180/np.pi)
# actually plot the data, fine tune radius limits and add labels
ax1.plot(theta, data)
ax1.set_ylim([0, 1])
ax1.set_xlabel('Magnitude', fontsize=15)
ax1.set_ylabel('Angles', fontsize=15)
fig1.set_tight_layout(True)
#fig1.savefig('fig1.png', facecolor='skyblue')
EDIT 2: Added background color to figures to better show the boundaries, as suggested in ImportanteOfBeingErnest's answer.
It seems the wedge of the "truncated" polar axes is placed such that it sits in the middle of the original axes. There seems so be some constructs called LockedBBox and _WedgeBbox in the game, which I have never seen before and do not fully understand. Those seem to be created at draw time, such that manipulating them from the outside seems somewhere between hard and impossible.
One hack can be to manipulate the original axes such that the resulting wedge turns up at the desired position. This is not really deterministic, but rather looking for some good values by trial and error.
The parameters to adjust in this case are the figure size (figsize), the padding of the labels (labelpad, as already pointed out in the question) and finally the axes' position (ax.set_position([left, bottom, width, height])).
The result could then look like
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# get a half circle polar plot
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(6,3.4), subplot_kw={'projection': 'polar'})
theta_min = 1.e-9
theta_max = np.pi
theta = np.linspace(theta_min, theta_max, 181)
data = (1/6.)*np.abs(np.sin(3*theta)/np.sin(theta/2.))
# set 'thetamin' and 'thetamax' according to data
ax1.set_thetamin(0)
ax1.set_thetamax(theta_max*180./np.pi)
# actually plot the data, fine tune radius limits and add labels
ax1.plot(theta, data)
ax1.set_ylim([0, 1])
ax1.set_xlabel('Magnitude', fontsize=15, labelpad=-60)
ax1.set_ylabel('Angles', fontsize=15)
ax1.set_position( [0.1, -0.45, 0.8, 2])
plt.show()
Here I've set some color to the background of the figure to better see the boundary.
I use autofmt_xdate to plot long x-axis labels in a readable way. The problem is, when I want to combine different subplots, the x-axis labeling of the other subplots disappears, which I do not appreciate for the leftmost subplot in the figure below (two rows high). Is there a way to prevent autofmt_xdate from quenching the other x-axis labels? Or is there another way to rotate the labels? As you can see I experimented with xticks and "rotate" as well, but the results were not satisfying because the labels were rotated around their center, which resulted in messy labeling.
Script that produces plot below:
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from numpy import arange
import numpy
from matplotlib import rc
rc("figure",figsize=(15,10))
#rc('figure.subplot',bottom=0.1,hspace=0.1)
rc("legend",fontsize=16)
fig = plt.figure()
Test_Data = numpy.random.normal(size=20)
fig = plt.figure()
Dimension = (2,3)
plt.subplot2grid(Dimension, (0,0),rowspan=2)
plt.plot(Test_Data)
plt.subplot2grid(Dimension, (0,1),colspan=2)
for i,j in zip(Test_Data,arange(len(Test_Data))):
plt.bar(i,j)
plt.legend(arange(len(Test_Data)))
plt.subplot2grid(Dimension, (1,1),colspan=2)
xticks = [r"%s (%i)" % (a,b) for a,b in zip(Test_Data,Test_Data)]
plt.xticks(arange(len(Test_Data)),xticks)
fig.autofmt_xdate()
plt.ylabel(r'$Some Latex Formula/Divided by some Latex Formula$',fontsize=14)
plt.plot(Test_Data)
#plt.setp(plt.xticks()[1],rotation=30)
plt.tight_layout()
#plt.show()
This is actually a feature of the autofmt_xdate method. From the documentation of the autofmt_xdate method:
Date ticklabels often overlap, so it is useful to rotate them and right align them. Also, a common use case is a number of subplots with shared xaxes where the x-axis is date data. The ticklabels are often long, and it helps to rotate them on the bottom subplot and turn them off on other subplots, as well as turn off xlabels.
If you want to rotate the xticklabels of the bottom right subplot only, use
plt.setp(plt.xticks()[1], rotation=30, ha='right') # ha is the same as horizontalalignment
This rotates the ticklabels 30 degrees and right aligns them (same result as when using autofmt_xdate) for the bottom right subplot, leaving the two other subplots unchanged.