Clear postgresql and alembic and start over from scratch - python

Everything I found about this via searching was either wrong or incomplete in some way. So, how do I:
delete everything in my postgresql database
delete all my alembic revisions
make it so that my database is 100% like new

This works for me:
1) Access your session, in the same way you did session.create_all, do session.drop_all.
2) Delete the migration files generated by alembic.
3) Run session.create_all and initial migration generation again.

If you want to do this without dropping your migration files the steps are:
Drop all the tables in the db that are to be recreated.
Truncate the alembic_version table (so it will start from the beginning) - this is where the most recent version is kept.
The you can run:
alembic upgrade head
and everything will be recreated. I ran into this problem when my migrations got in a weird state during development and I wanted to reset alembic. This worked.

No idea how to mess with alembic, but for the database, you can just log into the SQL console and use DROP DATABASE foo.
Or were you wanting to clear out all the data, but leave the tables there? If so, Truncating all tables in a postgres database has some good answers.

Related

SQL alechmy update database schema

I'm using SQL alechmy for a project, I've got a system running with some important data, but I would like to update my schemas to make new features. What's the best practice here?
Can schemas be updated without dropping all tables and recreate database? (currently I am running into trouble with
manage.py migrate
Not working. Ie. Not picking up new changes to table fields)
Thanks a lot in advance,
C

Heroku Datsbase Migration Error (django.db.utils.DataError)

I have made a website using Django and hosted on Heroku. Everything was working fine until I try to alter my one of the column in the database. The thing is that I alter the column from max_length=1000 to max_length=60 but I forgot that I have entered value more than 60 so I got django.db.utils.DataError error that value is too long for 60.
For this problem solution, I refer one of the solutions available in StackOverflow to remove all the migrated file from its folder except init.py and then do fresh migration. So I tried that and I work with charm and I have changed the value so it could fit the max limit.
But now, when I try to create new column in database it says django.db.utils.ProgrammingError django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: column "column_name" of relation "table" does not exist
Actually, when I try to run my app on the local server it works fine and even it allows me to create a new column in my database but when I try to migrate it to Heroku database it shows django.db.utils.ProgrammingError
make a backup from your server data. clean all the data on your database. delete all the migration.py files just as you read and then makemigrations and migrate again.

Dockerized Django app not applying unique constraint

I have two issues both of which are inter-related
Issue #1
My app has an online Postgres Database that it is using to store data. Because this is a Dockerized app, migrations that I create no longer appear on my local host but are instead stored in the Docker container.
All of the questions I've seen so far do not seem to have issues with making migrations and adding the unique constraint to one of the fields within the table.
I have written shell code to run a python script that returns me the contents of the migrations file in the command prompt window. I was able to obtain the migrations file that was to be applied and added a row to the django_migrations table to specify the same. I then ran makemigrations and migrate but it said there were no changes applied (which leads me to believe that the row which I added into the database should only have automatically been created by django after it had detected migrations on its own instead of me specifying the migrations file and asking it to make the changes). The issue is that now, the new migrations still detect the following change
Migrations for 'mdp':
db4mdp/mdp/migrations/0012_testing.py
- Alter field mdp_name on languages
Despite detecting this apparent 'change', I get the following error,
return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: relation "mdp_mdp_mdp_fullname_281e4228_uniq" already exists
I have already checked on my postgres server using pgadmin4 to check if the constraint has actually been applied on it. And it has with the name next to relation as specified above. So why then, does Django apparently detect this as a change that is to be made. The thing is, if I now remove the new migrations file that I created in my python directory, it probably will run (since the changes have 'apparently' been made in the database) but I won't have the migrations file to keep track of the changes. I don't need if I need to keep the migrations around now that I'm using an online database though. I will not be rolling any changes I make back nor will I be making changes to often. This is just a one/two time thing but I want to resolve the error.
Issue #2
The reason I used 'apparently' in my above issue is that even though the constraints section in my public schema show me that the constraints have been applied, for some reason, when I try to create a new entry into my table with a non-unique string in the field that I've defined as unique, it allows it creation anyway.
You never add anything manually to django_migrations table. Let django do it. If it is not doing it, no matter what, you code is not production ready.
I understand that you are doing your development inside docker. When you do it, you mount your docker volume to local volume. Since you have not mounted that, your migratins will not show in local.
Refer Volumes. It should resolve your issues.
For anyone trying to find an alternate solution to this problem other than mounting volumes due to time constraints, this answer might help but #deosha 's is still the correct way to go about it. I fixed the problem by deleting all my tables and the rows corresponding to migrations to my specific app (it isn't necessary to delete the auth tables etc. because you won't be deleting the rows corresponding to those in the django_migrations table). Following this I used the following within the shell script called by my Dockerfile.
python manage.py makemigrations --name testing
python testing_migrations.py
It needs to be named for the next step. After this line of code I ran the python script testing_migrations which contains the following code:
import os
BASE_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
migrations_file = os.path.join(BASE_DIR, '<path_to_new_migration_file>')
with open(migrations_file, 'r') as file:
print(file.read())
Typically the first migration created for the app you have made will be /0001_testing.py (which is why naming it was necessary earlier). Since the contents of this file are visible to the container while it is up and running, you will be able to print the contents of the file. Then run the migrate command. This creates a column in the django_migrations table that makes it appear to django that the migration has been applied. However, on your local machine this migrations file doesn't exist. So copy the contents of the file from the print statement above and put it into a .py file with the same name as mentioned above and save it in the migrations folder of the above on your local device.
You can follow this method for all successive migrations by repeating the process and incrementing the number in the testing_migrations file as required.
Squashing migrations once you're done making the table will help. If you're doing this all in development and have no requirement to roll-back the changes to the database schema then just put this into production after deleting all the migrations files and the rows in your django_migrations table corresponding to your app as was done initially. Drop your tables and let your first new migrations file re-create them and then import in your data once again.
This is not the recommended method. Use deosha's if you're not on a time crunch.

how to start afresh with database in django. Sqlflush and sqlclear don't seem to work

I have 6 models in two files(benef and petition) in addition to the user information. There are some inter dependencies. When I changed the model, there was some error. so I thought of starting afresh and want to drop all tables.
I ran sqlflush and Sqlclear with following result.
Sqlflush result is
BEGIN;
DELETE FROM "django_admin_log";
DELETE FROM "auth_permission";
DELETE FROM "auth_group";
DELETE FROM "auth_group_permissions";
DELETE FROM "django_session";
DELETE FROM "auth_user_groups";
DELETE FROM "auth_user_user_permissions";
DELETE FROM "benef_beneficiary_information";
DELETE FROM "petition_employer";
DELETE FROM "petition_job";
DELETE FROM "nashvegas_migration";
DELETE FROM "benef_beneficiary";
DELETE FROM "auth_user";
DELETE FROM "benef_beneficiaryname";
DELETE FROM "petition_petition";
DELETE FROM "django_content_type";
COMMIT;
Finished "C:\pyProjs\immiFile\manage.py sqlflush" execution.
Sqlclear benef result is
BEGIN;
DROP TABLE "benef_beneficiary_information";
DROP TABLE "benef_beneficiary";
DROP TABLE "benef_beneficiaryname";
COMMIT;
Finished "C:\pyProjs\immiFile\manage.py sqlclear benef" execution.
sqlclear petition result is
BEGIN;
DROP TABLE "petition_petition";
DROP TABLE "petition_job";
DROP TABLE "petition_employer";
COMMIT;
Finished "C:\pyProjs\immiFile\manage.py sqlclear petition" execution.
But then when I run the project and go to admin, I still see the old tables and when I click on them, the error related to field comes, which was originally caused by model change. The data is not relevant
OperationalError at /admin/benef/beneficiary/
no such column: benef_beneficiary.last_edited_by_id
I want to start afresh. What is the solution?
I am using Django 1.8 and Python 2.7
From the documentation:
sqlflush: Prints the SQL statements that would be executed for the flush command.
It just prints the statements that would be executed. It doesn't touch the database (same goes for sqlclear). You need to use flush instead.
Also note this from the documentation on flush:
Removes all data from the database and re-executes any
post-synchronization handlers. The table of which migrations have been
applied is not cleared.
If you would rather start from an empty database and re-run all
migrations, you should drop and recreate the database and then run
migrate instead.
I want to start afresh. What is the solution?
The sure fire way, which will delete everything (including your data):
Shut down the application (if you are using runserver, make sure its stopped)
Delete the database from the database server. If you are using sqlite, simply delete the db file.
Delete all migration directories created under your app(s).
Type ./manage.py makemigrations
Type ./manage.py migrate

Alembic Second Database First Revision

My goal is to add a second database to my current project, using alembic. I have the default alembic folder, and using 'alembic init alembic_second' I created a second folder structure. I modified the env.py in the second folder and the root alembic.ini. When I run
alembic -n 'alembic_second' revision -m "create second" --head=base --version-path=alembic_second/versions --autogenerate
the output is:
postgresql:// (all the correct second database connection stuff)
INFO [alembic.migration] Context impl PostgresqlImpl.
INFO [alembic.migration] Will assume transactional DDL.
ERROR [alembic.util] Target database is not up to date.
FAILED: Target database is not up to date.
postgresql://(all the correct second database info)
The solution here doesn't work for me because my new versions folder is empty, my problem is I can't run my FIRST migration on this new database. As you can see in my terminal input, I am specifying the new versions folder.
Also, I put a print statement in my second env.py, and I am successfully seeing that, so it is hitting the correct env.py.
Any ideas on how to get past this error and create my first revision?
Thank you!
It turns out that after I sorted through differences between the two database structures, the core problem was the same as the one I linked to, I just needed to add all of the proper flags to make it work with two databases.
Running:
alembic -n 'alembic_second' stamp head --version-path=alembic_second/versions
solved my problems.

Categories