I believe that I am simply failing to search correctly, so please redirect me to the appropriate question if this is the case.
I have a list of orders for an ecommerce platform. I then have two tables called checkout_orderproduct and catalog_product structured as:
|______________checkout_orderproduct_____________|
| id | order_id | product_id | qty | total_price |
--------------------------------------------------
|_____catalog_product_____|
| id | name | description |
---------------------------
I am trying to get all of the products associated with an order. My thought is something along the lines of:
for order in orders:
OrderProduct.objects.filter(order_id=order.id, IM_STUCK_HERE)
What should the second part of the query be so that I get back a list of products such as
["Fruit", "Bagels", "Coffee"]
products = (OrderProduct.objects
.filter(order_id=order.id)
.values('product_id'))
Product.objects.filter(id__in=products)
Or id__in=list(products): see note "Performance considerations" link.
Related
I have the following models which represent songs and the plays of each song:
from django.db import models
class Play(models.Model):
play_day = models.PositiveIntegerField()
source = models.CharField(
'source',
choices=(('radio', 'Radio'),('streaming', 'Streaming'), )
)
song = models.ForeignKey(Song, verbose_name='song')
class Song(models.Model):
name = models.CharField('Name')
Image I have the following entries:
Songs:
|ID | name |
|---|---------------------|
| 1 | Stairway to Heaven |
| 2 | Riders on the Storm |
Plays:
|ID | play_day | source | song_id |
|---|----------|-----------|---------|
| 1 | 2081030 | radio | 1 |
| 1 | 2081030 | streaming | 1 |
| 2 | 2081030 | streaming | 2 |
I would like to list all the tracks as follows:
| Name | Day | Sources |
|---------------------|------------|------------------|
| Stairway to Heaven | 2018-10-30 | Radio, Streaming |
| Riders on the Storm | 2018-10-30 | Streaming |
I am using Django==1.9.2, django_tables2==1.1.6 and django-filter==0.13.0 with PostgreSQL.
Problem:
I'm using Song as the model of the table and the filter, so the queryset starts with a select FROM song. However, when joining the Play table, I get two entries in the case of "Stairway to Heaven" (I know, even one is too much: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD1KqbDdmuE).
What I tried:
I tried putting a distinct to the Song, though this yields the problem that I cannot sort for other columns than the Song.id (supposing I do distinct on that column)
Aggregate: this yields a final state, actually, a dictionary and which cannot be used with django_tables.
I found this solution for PostgreSQL Selecting rows ordered by some column and distinct on another though I don't know how to do this with django.
Question:
What would be the right approach to show one track per line "aggregating" information from references using Django's ORM?
I think that the proper way to do it is to use the array_agg postgresql function (http://postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/functions-aggregate.html and http://lorenstewart.me/2017/12/03/postgresqls-array_agg-function).
Django seems to actually support this (in v. 2.1 at least: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/ref/contrib/postgres/aggregates/) thus that seems like the way to go.
Unfortunately I don't have time to test it right now so I can't provide a thorough answer; however try something like: Song.objects.all().annotate(ArrayAgg(...))
I am new to Python and am currently trying to create a Web-form to edit customer data. The user selects a customer and gets all DSL-Products linked to the customer. What I am now trying is to get the maximum downstream possible for a customer. So when the customer got DSL1, DSL3 and DSL3 then his MaxDownstream is 550. Sorry for my poor english skills.
Here is the structure of my tables..
Customer_has_product:
Customer_idCustomer | Product_idProduct
----------------------------
1 | 1
1 | 3
1 | 4
2 | 5
3 | 3
Customer:
idCustomer | MaxDownstream
----------------------------
1 |
2 |
3 |
Product:
idProduct | Name | downstream
-------------------------------------------------
1 | DSL1 | 50
2 | DSL2 | 100
3 | DSL3 | 550
4 | DSL4 | 400
5 | DSL5 | 1000
And the code i've got so far:
db_session = Session(db_engine)
customer_object = db_session.query(Customer).filter_by(
idCustomer=productform.Customer.data.idCustomer
).first()
productlist = request.form.getlist("DSLPRODUCTS_PRIVATE")
oldproducts = db_session.query(Customer_has_product.Product_idProduct).filter_by(
Customer_idCustomer=customer_object.idCustomer)
id_list_delete = list(set([r for r, in oldproducts]) - set(productlist))
for delid in id_list_delete:
db_session.query(Customer_has_product).filter_by(Customer_idCustomer=customer_object.idCustomer,
Product_idProduct=delid).delete()
db_session.commit()
for product in productlist:
if db_session.query(Customer_has_product).filter_by(
Customer_idCustomer=customer_object.idCustomer,
Product_idProduct=product
).first() is not None:
continue
else:
product_link_to_add = Customer_has_product(
Customer_idCustomer=productform.Customer.data.idCustomer,
Product_idProduct=product
)
db_session.add(product_link_to_add)
db_session.commit()
What you want to do is JOIN the tables onto each other. All relational database engines support joins, as does SQLAlchemy.
So how do you do that in SQLAlchemy?
You have two options, really. One is to use the Query builder of SQLAlchemy's ORM, the other is using SQLAlchemy Core (upon which the ORM is built) directly. I really prefer the later, because it maps more directly to SELECT statements, but I'm going to show both.
Using SQLAlchemy Core
How to do a join in Core is documented here. First argument is the table to JOIN to, second argument is the JOIN-condition.
from sqlalchemy import select, func
query = select(
[
Customer.idCustomer,
func.max(Product.downstream),
]
).select_from(
Customer.__table__
.join(Customer_has_product.__table__,
Customer_has_product.Customer_idCustomer ==
Customer.idCustomer)
.join(Product.__table__,
Product.idProduct == Customer_has_product.Product_idProduct)
).group_by(
Customer.idCustomer
)
# Now we can execute the built query on the database.
result = db_session.execute(query).fetchall()
print(result) # Should now give you the correct result.
Using SQLAlchemy ORM
To simplify this it's best to declare some [relationships on your models][2].joinis documented [here][2]. First argument tojoin` is the model to join onto and the second argument is the JOIN-condition again.
Without the relationships you'll have to do it like this.
result = (db_session
.query(Customer.idCustomer, func.max(Product.downstream))
.join(Customer_has_product,
Customer_has_product.Customer_idCustomer ==
Customer.idCustomer)
.join(Product,
Product.idProduct == Customer_has_product.Product_idProduct)
.group_by(Customer.idCustomer)
).all()
print(result)
This should be enough to get the idea on how to do this.
I have table that is holding some data about users. There are two fields there like and smile. I need to get data from table, grouped by user_id that will show if user has likes or smiles. Query that I would write in SQL looks like:
select sum(smile) > 0 as has_smile,
sum(like) > 0 as has_like,
user_id
from ratings
group by user_id.
This would provide output like:
| has_smile | has_like | user_id |
+-----------+----------+---------+
| 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 |
Is there any chance this query can be translated to SQLAlchemy (Flask-SQLAlchemy to be precise)? I know there is db.func.sum but I don't know how to add comparison there, and to have label. What I did for now is:
cls.query.with_entities("user_id").group_by(user_id).\
add_columns(db.func.sum(cls.smile).label("has_smile"),
db.func.sum(cls.like).label("has_like")).all()
but that will return exact number of smiles/likes instead of just 1/0 if there is or there is not smile/like.
Thanks to operator overloading you'd do comparison the way you're used to doing in Python in general:
db.func.sum(cls.smile) > 0
which produces an SQL expression object that you can then give a label to:
(db.func.sum(cls.smile) > 0).label('has_smile')
I have a table defined like so:
Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
-------------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
id | uuid | not null | plain | |
user_id | uuid | | plain | |
area_id | integer | | plain | |
vote_amount | integer | | plain | |
I want to be able to generate a rank 'column' when I query this database. This rank column would be ordered by the vote_amount column. I have attempted to create a query to do this, it looks like so:
subq_rank = db.session.query(user_stories).add_columns(db.func.rank.over(partition_by=user_stories.user_id, order_by=user_stories.vote_amount).label('rank')).subquery('slr')
data = db.session.query(user_stories).select_entity_from(subq_rank).filter(user_stories.area_id == id).group_by(-subq_rank.c.rank).limit(50).all()
Hopefully my attempt will give you an idea of what I am trying to achieve.
Thanks.
Well, if you need in each query these columns better I would do it in DB. I would create a view which contains the column rank, and in the query I call this view to show directly the data in code:
CREATE VIEW [ranking_user_stories] AS
SELECT TOP 50 * FROM
(SELECT *, rank() over (partition by user_stories.user_id order by user_stories.vote_amount ASC) AS ranking
FROM user_stories
WHERE user_stories.area_id = id) uS
ORDER BY vote_amount ASC
It's the same logic than your code but in SQL, if your are using MySQL, just change TOP 50 to LIMIT 50 (and put at the end of query). I don't see the sense to put the last group by by ranking, but if you need it:
CREATE VIEW [ranking_user_stories] AS
SELECT TOP 50 MAX(id) AS id, user_id, area_id, MAX(vote_amount) AS vote_amount, ranking FROM
(SELECT *, rank() over (partition by user_stories.user_id order by user_stories.vote_amount ASC) AS ranking
FROM user_stories
WHERE user_stories.area_id = id) uS
ORDER BY MAX(vote_amount) ASC
GROUP BY user_id, area_id, ranking
I've got the following two tables:
User
userid | email | phone
1 | some#email.com | 555-555-5555
2 | some#otheremail.com | 555-444-3333
3 | one#moreemail.com | 333-444-1111
4 | last#one.com | 123-333-2123
UserTag
id | user_id | tag
1 | 1 | tag1
2 | 1 | tag2
3 | 1 | cool_tag
4 | 1 | some_tag
5 | 2 | new_tag
6 | 2 | foo
6 | 4 | tag1
I want to run a query in SQLAlchemy to join those two tables and return all users who do NOT have the tags "tag1" or "tag2". In this case, the query should return users with userid 2, and 3. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I need the opposite of this query:
users.join(UserTag, User.userid == UserTag.user_id)
.filter(
or_(
UserTag.tag.like('tag1'),
UserTag.tag.like('tag2')
))
)
I have been going at this for hours but always end up with the wrong users or sometimes all of them. An SQL query which achieves this would also be helpful. I'll try to convert that to SQLAlchemy.
Not sure how this would look in SQLAlchemy, but hopefully and explanation of why the query is the way it is will help you get there.
This is an outer join - you want all the records from one table (User) even if there are no records in the other table (UserTag) if we put User first it would be a left join. Beyond that you want all the records that don't have a match in the UserTag for a specific filter.
SELECT user.user_id, email, phone
FROM user LEFT JOIN usertag
ON usertag.user_id = user.user_id
AND usertag.tag IN ('tag1', 'tag2')
WHERE usertag.user_id IS NULL;
SQL will go like this
select u.* from user u join usertag ut on u.id = ut.user_id and ut.tag not in ('tag1', 'tag2');
I have not used SQLAlchemy so you need to convert it to equivalent SQLAlchemy query.
Hope it helps.
Thanks.
Assuming your model defines a relationship as below:
class User(Base):
...
class UserTag(Base):
...
user = relationship("User", backref="tags")
the query follows:
qry = session.query(User).filter(~User.tags.any(UserTag.tag.in_(tags))).order_by(User.id)