Is the naming convention in django mandatory? - python

In Django you name your files like models.py, views.py, urls.py and so on. I wonder, if this naming convention is mandatory for Django. Will Django's functionality break if you place your models in a file called foo.py? I mean, only the import-line should change, right? Or is there any magic with this named files done by the framework?
Of course, I won't give my files shitty names; but I am just curious.

views, urls can be configured.
url: You can defined your one urls by setting <project>.settings.ROOT_URLCONF, and include your apps' urls.
views: Import your views or use view names as you want.
But for models, there's assumption about the model module name in the django code and other third-party apps. (https://github.com/django/django/blob/stable/1.7.x/django/apps/config.py#L9)

The best is to create modules instead for a couple of reasons:
you'll keep it consistent with Django conventions making it easier for others to work on it
you can give more descriptive appropriate names to your files
you will avoid really long files
So you'd have:
- my_application
- urls
- sub_set_urls_1.py
- etc.
- models
__init__.py <= import your models in here
sub_set_models_1.py
etc.
- views
sub_set_views_1.py
etc.
It's a bit more involved for the models, you need to import the models in __init__.py. Another way is to have a models.py file and put your models somewhere else: Split models.py into several files

Related

Best way to declare additional data and modules in a Django project

Issue #1
I'm looking for the best practice in order to declare the additional data in a Django project. Imagine I need to store a huge list of choices to use in app1/models.py (I have seen a lot of best practices keep declaring those choices in the body of the models). In another scenario, Imagine I need to keep tens of config data in order to use them in my views.py. Is it common to declare them in the function/class?
In my opinion, there would be two common methods in order to do that. (Not sure even recommended at all)
Method #1
I can actually keep them all in my settings.py file and access them with importing (like from django.conf import settings).
settings.py:
...
NBA_TEAMS = (
("red", "Bulls"),
("yellow", "Lakers"),
...
)
Method #2
Keep them all in a file named data.py right next to the settings.py, and try importing it at the end of the settings file like this.
settings.py
...
try:
from .data import NBA_TEAMS, ..
except:
pass
Issue #2
Is there any best practice for creating modules in a Django project? Imagine I need to create a data validator function that receives string data from a form submission in views.py. Where should I keep those kinds of functions/validators/generators?
views.py
from --- import validateUsername
def submission(request):
...
form = ContactForm(request.POST)
if validateUsername(form.cleaned_data['username']):
...
Is there any best practice for these issues? Thank you.
As per my suggestions for both your issues you should create one constants.py and one utils.py file.
Now depends on your use case if you want to use the same constants in multiple apps within your project then define it at the root next to manage.py or if the constants are specific to app then create it under the specific app folder next to views.py file.
Same for utils.py you should define all the utility functions / methods in one utils.py file and use it in all the apps within your project.

Django application override & import path?

Let's have a django project using a 3rd party application.
I'd like to override some of its modules without touching original files.
Simple subclassing is not possible here, need to override code transparently as many other apps rely on original class names and functions.
Project's structure looks like:
django_project/
__init__.py
settings.py
overrides/ <-- here is a subdir with apps overrides
__init__.py
payment/ <-- here is an example of app to override
__init__.py
admin.py
forms.py <-- this file is ignored, original is imported
models.py
tests.py
views.py
settings.py was modified with
INSTALLED_APPS=(
'satchmo_store.shop'
#'payment' # original values
'overrides.payment' # modified app
...
)
The above solution however does not work, because Django does not insert path of added app into modules search path (sys.path).
Django just loads admin.py, models.py, tests.py and views.py, other files like forms.py are ignored.
Is this behaviour documented somewhere ? What exactly placing a module name in INSTALLED_APPS does behind scenes ?
I hacked the situation with hardcoding new modules search path in manage.py and Apache's setting of WSGIPythonPath.
import os.path
import sys
DIRNAME = os.path.dirname(__file__)
APPS_OVERRIDE = os.path.join(DIRNAME, 'overrides')
if not APPS_OVERRIDE in sys.path:
sys.path.insert(1, APPS_OVERRIDE)
I doubt this is the right way. Cann't find a guide describing apps overriding.
So, how can I properly override external Django application in my project ?
The bonus question: Do I need to copy whole application directory tree, not just particular files which are really modified ? As far as I know, Python stops at first matching module path, so it won't import other modules available in following parts of the search path.
Example of how to override your form:
overrides/payment/forms.py
from django import forms
class YourNewFormThingy(forms.Form): pass
overrides/payment/models.py
from satchmo.payment import forms as satchmo_payment_forms
from . import forms
satchmo_payment_forms.SomeForm = forms.YourNewFormThingy
Try including payment as well along with override.payment as satchmo uses payment module to process payments and payment code is flexible enough to include your code as well.

django package organization

I plan to build my project in Django framework. However, I noticed that all Django packages have models.py file. Now, let say I have a set of general purpose functions that I share between several apps in the project and I plan to put these functions definitions in a separate package (or app for that matter?). So, should I create an app "general" and copy-paste these functions into the models.py file? Or can I just create a general.py file in the "general" app directory and leave models.py empty? What is the "Django" way to do that?
Thanks.
models.py file is used to define the structure of database. So you should leave it for defining your database entries. You can make an app named generals and put general.py in that app, and from there you can use it by calling it in any app.
I usually create a utils.py file under my main app that is created from the django-admin.py when starting the project.
I plan to put these functions definitions in a separate package (or app for that matter?)
Before you decide to make this an app (and if you do decide to make it an app), I recommend you take a look at James Bennet keynote on Developing reusable apps and hist post on laying out an application. From one of his slides:
Should this be its own application?
Is it orthogonal to whatever else I’m doing?
Will I need similar functionality on other sites?
Yes? Then I should break it out into a separate application.
If you're cramming too much functionality in one single general purpose app, it might be better to split your general purpose app into multiple reusable apps.
Going back to your original question, Django is expecting a models.py file in every app. So you must have the file even if it's empty.
Inside your models.py, you should only have the application’s model classes. So, you wouldn't be following a best practice if you put inside models.py some miscellaneous code you want to reuse.
From the laying out an application post I mentioned before:
At the application level, I usually drop in a few more files depending on exactly what the application is going to be using:
If the application defines any custom manipulators, I put them in a file called forms.py instead of in the views file.
If there are multiple custom managers in the app, I put them in a file called managers.py instead of the models file.
If I’m defining any custom context processors, I put them in a file called context_processors.py.
If I’m setting up any custom dispatcher signals, they go in a file called signals.py.
If the application is setting up any syndication feeds, the feed classes go in a file called feeds.py. Similarly, sitemap classes go in sitemaps.py.
Middleware classes go in a file called middleware.py.
Any miscellaneous code which doesn’t clearly go anywhere else goes in a file or module called utils.
All of this does not answer directly your original question:
can I just create a general.py file in the "general" app directory and leave models.py empty?
But I hope this gives you additional information to make a decision that better fits your project and requirements.

django app organization

I have been reading some django tutorial and it seems like all the view functions have to go in a file called "views.py" and all the models go in "models.py". I fear that I might end up with a lot of view functions in my view.py file and the same is the case with models.py.
Is my understanding of django apps correct?
Django apps lets us separate common functionality into different apps and keep the file size of views and models to a minimum? For example: My project can contain an app for recipes (create, update, view, and search) and a friend app, the comments app, and so on.
Can I still move some of my view functions to a different file? So I only have the CRUD in one single file?
First, large files are pretty common in python. Python is not java, which has one class per file, rather one module per file.
Next, views, even as the standard used, is a python module. A module need not be a single file. It can be a directory containing many files, and __init__.py
And then, views.py is only a convention. You, the application programmer are referring to it, and django itself doesn't refer anywhere. So, you are free to put it in as many files and refer appropriate functions to be handed over, the request to, in the urls.py
They don't have to go in views.py. They have to be referenced there.
views.py can include other files. So, if you feel the need, you can create other files in one app that contain your view functions and just include them in views.py.
The same applies to models.py.
Django apps lets us separate common
functionality into different apps and
keep the file size of views and models
to a minimum? For example: My project
can contain an app for recipes
(create, update, view, and search) and
a friend app, the comments app, and so
on.
I don't know about the "to a minimum" part - some apps are just big in views, others big in models. You should strive to partition things well, but sometimes there is just a lot of code. But other than that, this is a fair summary of Django apps, yes.
I also very much dislike long files.
Of course what you read in the other answers is true, but I exploit some very nifty python equivalence:
views.py
and
views/__init__.py
are pretty much functionally equal - by that I mean that if the both contain def my_view() then
from views import my_view
will work the same in both cases!
From there it's easy to structure your long files into smaller ones, yet keeping the naming convention that every django developer is used to:
views/__init__.py
views/largemodel_view.py
then in __init__.py don't forget to import the views from largemodel_view.py.
With large applications I do the same with models though you must remember to set the Meta.app_name:
class MyModel(models.Model):
...
class Meta:
app_name = 'yourappname'
because django will not pick it up magically otherwise for the Admin (but it will still load it, thanks to Python!)
so my apps usually end up looking something like:
project/settings/__init__.py
/..othersettings..
/app_1/models/__init__.py
/...
/views/__init__.py
/...
/templates/
/static/
urls.py
/urls.py
etc.
though of course there's no limit (urls could be split too, etc.etc.)

About 20 models in 1 django app

I have started work on a local app for myself that runs through the browser. Having recently gone through the django tutorial I'm thinking that it might be better to use django rather than just plain python.
There's one problem: I have at least 20 models and each will have many functions. Quite simply it's going to create one huge models file and probably huge views too. How do I split them up?
The models are all related so I can't simply make them into separate apps can I?
This is a pretty common need... I can't imagine wading through a models.py file that's 10,000 lines long :-)
You can split up the models.py file (and views.py too) into a pacakge. In this case, your project tree will look like:
/my_proj
/myapp
/models
__init__.py
person.py
The __init__.py file makes the folder into a package. The only gotcha is to be sure to define an inner Meta class for your models that indicate the app_label for the model, otherwise Django will have trouble building your schema:
class Person(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
class Meta:
app_label = 'myapp'
Once that's done, import the model in your __init__.py file so that Django and sync db will find it:
from person import Person
This way you can still do from myapp.models import Person
"I have at least 20 models" -- this is probably more than one Django "app" and is more like a Django "project" with several small "apps"
I like to partition things around topics or subject areas that have a few (1 to 5) models. This becomes a Django "app" -- and is the useful unit of reusability.
The overall "project" is a collection of apps that presents the integrated thing built up of separate pieces.
This also helps for project management since each "app" can become a sprint with a release at th end.
The models are all related so I cant's
simply make them into separate apps
can I?
You can separate them into separate apps. To use a model in one app from another app you just import it in the same way you would import django.contrib apps.
Having 20 models in one app might be a sign that you should break it up in smaller ones.
The purpose of a Django app is to have a small single-purpose piece of code, that fits nicelly together.
So, if you had a e-commerce site, you might have a shopping_cart app, a billing app, and so on.
Keep in mind that there is really no problem in apps depending on each other (although it's always better if they can be decoupled), but you should not have an app doing two very distinct things.
The article Django tips: laying out an application might help you. As always, take everything you read with a grain of salt (including this answer).
You can break up the models over multiple files. This goes for views as well.
You can split them into separate files and simply have imports at the top of your main models.py field.
Whether you'd really want to is another question.

Categories