Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I know that scikit-learn has an implementation for Restricted Boltzmann Machines, but does it have an implementation for Deep Belief Networks?
It does not, but it appears that the nolearn module does.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/nolearn
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 12 days ago.
Improve this question
1.Program to Interface Not Implementation
2.Encapsulate What Varies
3.Depend on Abstractions, Not Concrete classes
4.Favor Composition over Inheritance
5.Strive for Loosely Coupled System
In your own words, in less than 4 lines, please explain which of these is most important and why?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
**SIGNATURE 1** **SIGNATURE 2**
How do I compare both signatures, I've tried Harris Corner detection but the results weren't satisfactory. I'm new to image-processing, please guide me.
The oldest Machine Learning technique is from Bromley et. al. in 1993: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2987189.2987282
you could try and reproduce this.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been using the Simple Blob Detection algorithm from the OpenCV library (for Python) for a research project. I would like to reference this particular method algorithm in my paper.
Does anyone know from where this method is from and indicate me a good to reference to cite? The openCV source code does not refer to any particular literature.
Thanks
It uses the Connected-component labeling algorithm.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I've recently been making many types of maps and graphs using Python.
All of the maps were made inside of matplotlib with Basemap, which has the dependencies of GEOS and Proj4. I'm making these for a professor that I'm working for at my university.
I am not entirely sure of the proper way to give credit to the software that was used to generate these in case any of the graphics I've been making get put into a publication.
What is the appropriate way to cite software?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for an implementation of Continuous Wavelet Transform for Python that includes Haar Wavelet.
I would like to reproduce the experiment given by MathWorks for Matlab, at this link.
I tried with Pyscellania but I obtain completely different coefficients.
Is there a Python implementation of the CWT out there that includes the Haar Wavalet apart from Pyscellania?
Your request is clear.
Have you tried Pyscellania's normalised or standard Haar Wavelet?
Maybe you are just using the wrong one.