We Keep Coding

What are the differences between Generics, Views, Viewsets and Mixins in Django?

I am new to Django and Django-Rest. I am confused about when I should use these? what are their advantages and disadvantages? I have only seen this- http://www.cdrf.co
The only thing I know is there are a lot of ways to do 1 thing. But this is totally unclear to me.

In Django, these four terms we use frequently for different purposes in the projects. I have tried to collect and share the actual meaning with the links to details description of each term. Please check if you find these helpful.
Generic views:
“Django’s generic views... were developed as a shortcut for common usage patterns... They take certain common idioms and patterns found in view development and abstract them so that you can quickly write common views of data without having to repeat yourself.”
— Django Documentation
Read more details
Views:
A view function, or view for short, is simply a Python function that takes a Web request and returns a Web response. This response can be the HTML contents of a Web page, or a redirect, or a 404 error, or an XML document, or an image . . . or anything, really. The view itself contains whatever arbitrary logic is necessary to return that response. This code can live anywhere you want, as long as it’s on your Python path. There’s no other requirement–no “magic,” so to speak. For the sake of putting the code somewhere, the convention is to put views in a file called views.py, placed in your project or application directory.
Read more details
Viewsets:
Django REST framework allows you to combine the logic for a set of related views in a single class, called a ViewSet. In other frameworks, you may also find conceptually similar implementations named something like 'Resources' or 'Controllers'.
A ViewSet class is simply a type of class-based View, that does not provide any method handlers such as .get() or .post(), and instead provides actions such as .list() and .create().
The method handlers for a ViewSet are only bound to the corresponding actions at the point of finalizing the view, using the .as_view() method.
Read more details
Mixins:
The mixin classes provide the actions that are used to provide the basic view behavior. Note that the mixin classes provide action methods rather than defining the handler methods, such as .get() and .post(), directly. This allows for more flexible composition of behavior.
The mixin classes can be imported from rest_framework.mixins.
Read more details

django programming - "create" methods in admin, model or view

Baseline: I'm building a django based application that is heavily using the admin interface as it spares me a lot of work in developing own CRUD routines. By now I came across several situations where i have models that hold some general information (say parents) and often have foreignkey-relations to derived models (say childs).
I realized that i sometimes implemented my routines to create child objects within the admin-class, sometimes within the model class(method being called from within some admin routine) or sometimes even within view-classes (e.g. as reaction to POST requests on some custom forms). It feels now, that my design is not very consistent (the effects of changing some model parameters being distributed over a lot of files) and i should refactor before it gets to big a mess.
So what is the best approach? Where should one concentrate methods that create/modify related objects (keeping in mind that i often want to give some feedback-messages related to process) ?

If your code is about a Model class, add it to models.py. This makes sense when the classes have to be added to database (migrations)
If your code is related to views, attach it to views.py. This makes sense when the code handles requests.
If your code is related to admin, attach it to admins.py. This makes sense when the code is related to admin interface.
If your code is generic, used in multiple places, refactor it into a separate file, and import that file elsewhere.
Your use case isn't exactly clear to me, so I'm taking a stab in the dark here - You can have the Models in models.py and create a separate file to create objects for models with child objects containing the code that's related to creating parent-child objects with given data. Then use this as an import in the admin and views wherever applicable.
Something like:
# foo in views.py and admin.py
def foo():
data = {} # get all data
make_parent_child(data) # create parent-child objects

How do you actually use a reusable django app in a project?

This question has been troubling me for some days now and I've tried asking in many places for advice, but it seems that nobody can answer it clearly or even provide a reference to an answer.
I've also tried searching for tutorials, but I just cannot find any type of tutorial that explains how you would use a reusable third-party django app (most tutorials explain how to write them, none explain how to use them).
Also, I've taken a look here:
How to re-use a reusable app in Django - it doesn't explain how to actually use it IN a project itself
and here:
How to bind multiple reusable Django apps together? - the answer by aquaplanet kind of makes sense, but I thought I would ask this question to solve the mental block I am facing in trying to understand this.
In order to best explain this, let me do so by example (note, it is not something I am actually building).
I am creating a project that acts like Reddit. I will have users, links and voting/points. Based on this crude example, I will want to reuse 3 (arbitrary) third-party apps: user, voting/points and links.
I decide to use each of them as any other python package (meaning that they will be treated as a package and none of their code should be touched) [would this method actually work? Or do you have to be able to edit third-party apps to build a project??)
With these apps now within my project, I will use a main app to handle all the template stuff (meaning everything I see on the frontend will be in a single app).
I will then either use that same main app for custom logic (in views.py) or I will break up that logic among different apps (but will still use a single frontend-only app).
From the 3 paragraphs above, is this structure applicable (or can it work) ?
Now lets say that this structure is applicable and I am using a single main app for the frontend and custom logic.
What would I write in models.py? How would I integrate things from the 3 reusable apps into the main models.py file?
How would I reference the reusable apps in views.py? Lets take the example of contrib.auth
With this built-in app, for logging out I would write:
from django.contrib.auth import logout
from django.contrib.auth.decorators import login_required
from django.shortcuts import redirect
#login_required
def user_logout(request):
logout(request)
return redirect('/home/')
Although the above code is simple, is that basically how things would be done with any reusable app?
My question is very long, but I think that this reusable app issue is something a lot of developers aren't quite clear about themselves and maybe this answer will help a lot of others who have heard about the promises of reusable apps, but fail to understand how to actually use them.

TL;DR:
Nope & it depends...
Some (Very) Common Reusable Apps
django.contrib.admin
django.contrib.auth
django.contrib.staticfiles
... those are all reusable Django apps, that happen to be shipped with Django (most of them were not, at some point in time)
Ok, some other reusable apps that don't ship with Django:
django-rest-framework
django-registration
South
Those are all truly reusable apps, and nothing less. There are very many more apps like that.
How do they do it?
To me your question looks more like "how do I build reusable apps", then "how to use them". Actually using them is very different from app to app, because they do very different things. There is only one rule: RTFM No way around that either.
Often, they rely on one or more of the following:
additional value(s) in settings.py
addition (usually one include statement) to urls.py
subclassing and/or mixins for Models, Forms, Fields, Views etc.
template tags and/or filters
management commands
...
Those are all powerful ways though which your app can provide functionality to other apps. There is no recipe (AFAIK) to make a reusable app, because there are so many different scenarios to consider. It all depends on what exactly your app should do.
Reusable apps provide functionalities
I'd argue that it's important to not think of reusable apps as "working together" with other app, but instead recognize that that they "provide functionality." The details of the functionality provided should dictate the way the target developer is supposed to use your library.
Not everything should be reusable
Obviously enough, even though many apps can "in principle" be reusable, it often makes little sense to do so, because it is way faster to clump things together (and make them just "work together").

I'm not sure why you think you need a main app for the "frontend" stuff. The point of a reusable app is that it takes care of everything, you just add (usually) a single URL to include the urls.py of the app, plus your own templates and styling as required.
And you certainly don't need to wrap the app's views in your own views, unless you specifically want to override some functionality.
I don't understand at all your question about models. There's no such thing as a "main" models file, and using a reusable app's models is just the same as using models from any of your own apps.
Normally you would not edit a third-party app, that would make it very hard to integrate updates. Just install the app in your virtualenv (you are using virtualenv, of course!) with pip, which will put it in the lib directory, and you can reference it just like any other app. Make sure you add it to INSTALLED_APPS.

Class Based Views VS Function Based Views

I always use FBVs (Function Based Views) when creating a django app because it's very easy to handle. But most developers said that it's better to use CBVs (Class Based Views) and use only FBVs if it is complicated views that would be a pain to implement with CBVs.
Why? What are the advantages of using CBVs?

The single most significant advantage is inheritance. On a large project it's likely that you will have lots of similar views. Rather than write the same code again and again, you can simply have your views inherit from a base view.
Also django ships with a collection of generic view classes that can be used to do some of the most common tasks. For example the DetailView class is used to pass a single object from one of your models, render it with a template and return the http response. You can plug it straight into your url conf..
url(r'^author/(?P<pk>\d+)/$', DetailView.as_view(model=Author)),
Or you could extend it with custom functionality
class SpecialDetailView(DetailView):
model = Author
def get_context_data(self, *args, **kwargs):
context = super(SpecialDetailView, self).get_context_data(*args, **kwargs)
context['books'] = Book.objects.filter(popular=True)
return context
Now your template will be passed a collection of book objects for rendering.
A nice place to start with this is having a good read of the docs (Django 4.0+).
Update
ccbv.co.uk has comprehensive and easy to use information about the class based views you already have available to you.

When I started with DJango I never used CBVs because of their learning curve and a bit complex structure. Fast forward over two years, I use FBVs only at few places. Where I am sure the code will be really simple and is going to stay simple.
Major benefit of CBVs and Multiple Inheritence that comes along with them is that I can completely avoid writing signals, helper methods and copy paste code. Especially in the cases where the app does much more than basic CRUD operations. Views with multiple inheritance are multiple times easier to debug that a code with signals and helper methods, especially if it is an unknown code base.
Apart from Multiple inheritence CBVs by provide different methods to do dispatching, retrieving templates, handling different request types, passing template context variables, validating forms, and much more out of the box. These make code modular and hence maintainable.

Some views are best implemented as CBVs, and others are best implemented as FBVs.
If you aren’t sure which method to choose, see the following chart:

SOME WORDS FROM TWO SCOOPS
Tip Alternative Apporach - Staying With FBVs
Some developer prefer to err on the side of using FBVs for most views and CBVs only for views that need to be subclassed. That strategy is fine as well.

Class based views are excellent if you want to implement a fully functional CRUD operations in your Django application, and the same will take little time & effort to implement using function based views.
I will recommend you to use function based views when you are not going to implement any CRUD on your site/application means your intension is to simply render the template.
I had created a simple CRUD based application using class based views which is live. Visit http://filtron.pythonanywhere.com/view/ (will/won't be working now) and enjoy. Then you will know the importance of it.

I have been using FBVs in most of the cases where I do not see a real opportunity of extending views. As documented in the docs, I consider going for CBVs if the following two characteristics suit my use-case.
Organization of code related to specific HTTP methods (GET, POST, etc.) can be addressed by separate methods instead of conditional branching.
Object oriented techniques such as mixins (multiple inheritance) can be used to factor code into reusable components.

Function-Based Views(FBVs) are:
Easy to use but the
Code is not reusable by inheritance.
Recommended to use
Class-Based Views(CBVs) are:
Too much learning curve because it's really complicated
Code is reusable by inheritance.
Not recommended to use (FBVs are much beter)

How do you manage your Django applications?

I just wanted to try to build a project with django. Therefore I have a (basic) question on how to manage such a project. Since I cannot find any guidelines or so on how to split a project into applications.
Let's take a kind of SO as an example. Which applications would you use?
I'd say there should be the applications "users" and "questions". But what if there was a topic system with static articles, too. Maybe they also could receive votes.
How to build the apps structure then? One app for "questions", "votes" and "topics" or just one app "content"?
I have no idea what to do. Maybe it's because I know not very much about Django yet, but I'm interested either...

There aren't hard-and-fast rules, but I would say it's better to err on the side of more specialized applications. Ideally an application should handle just one functional concern: i.e. "tagging" or "commenting" or "auth/auth" or "posts." This type of design will also help you reuse available open source applications instead of reinventing the wheel (i.e. Django comes with auth and comments apps, django-tagging or django-taggable can almost certainly do what you need, etc).
Generic foreign keys can help you decouple applications such as tagging or commenting that might be applied to models from several other applications.

You should try and separate the project in as much applications as possible. For most projects an application will not contain more than 5 models. For example a project like SO would have separate applications for UsersProfiles, Questions, Tags (there's a ready one in django for this), etc. If there was a system with static pages that'd be a separate application too (there are ready ones for this purpose). You should also try and make your applications as generic as possible, so you may reuse them in other projects. There's a good presentation on reusable apps.

Just like any set of dependencies... try to find the most useful stand-alone aspects of the project and make those stand-alone apps. Other Django Apps will have higher level functionality, and reuse the parts of the lowest level apps that you have set up.
In my project, I have a calendar app with its own Event object in its models. I also have a carpool database set up, and for the departure time and the duration I use the calendar's Event object right in my RideShare tables. The carpooling database is calendar-aware, and gets all the nice .ics export and calendar views from the calendar app for 'free.'
There are some tricks to getting the Apps reusable, like naming the templates directory: project/app2/templates/app2/index.html. This lets you refer to app2/index.html from any other app, and get the right template. I picked that one up looking at the built-in reusable apps in Django itself. Pinax is a bit of a monster size-wise but it also demonstrates a nice reusable App structure.
If in doubt, forget about reusable apps for now. Put all your messages and polls in one app and get through one rev. You'll discover during the process what steps feel unnecessary, and could be broken out as something stand-alone in the future.

A good question to ask yourself when deciding whether or not to write an app is "could I use this in another project?". If you think you could, then consider what it would take to make the application as independent as possible; How can you reduce the dependancies so that the app doesn't rely on anything specific to a particular project.
Some of the ways you can do this are:
Giving each app its own urls.py
Allowing model types to be passed in as parameters rather than explicitly declaring what models are used in your views. Generic views use this principle.
Make your templates easily overridden by having some sort of template_name parameter passed in your urls.py
Make sure you can do reverse url lookups with your objects and views. This means naming your views in the urls.py and creating get_absolute_url methods on your models.
In some cases like Tagging, GenericForeignKeys can be used to associate a model in your app to any other model, regardless of whether it has ForeignKeys "looking back" at it.

I'll tell you how I am approaching such question: I usually sit with a sheet of paper and draw the boxes (functionalities) and arrows (interdependencies between functionalities). I am sure there are methodologies or other things that could help you, but my approach usually works for me (YMMV, of course).
Knowing what a site is supposed to be is basic, though. ;)