I'm trying to port a python2 package to python3 (not my own) using six so that it's compatible with both. However one of the packages listed in requirements.txt is now included in the python3 stdlib and the pypi version doesn't work in python3 so I want to conditionally exclude it. Doing this in setup.py is easy, I can just do something like:
if sys.version_info[0] == 2:
requirements += py2_requirements
else:
requirements += py3_requirements
But I would like requirements.txt to reflect the correct list too. I can't find anything on this in the pip documentation. so does anyone know how to do it, or if it is even possible?
You can use the environment markers to achieve this in requirements.txt since pip 6.0:
SomeProject==5.4; python_version < '2.7'
SomeProject; sys_platform == 'win32'
It is supported by setuptools too by declaring extra requirements in setup.py:
setup(
...
install_requires=[
'six',
'humanize',
],
extras_require={
':python_version == "2.7"': [
'ipaddress',
],
},
)
See also requirement specifiers.
And Strings for the string versions of corresponding Python commands.
You can create multiple requirements files, put those common packages in a common file, and include them in another pip requirements file with -r file_path
requirements/
base.txt
python2.txt
python3.txt
python2.txt:
-r base.txt
Django==1.4 #python2 only packages
python3.txt:
-r base.txt
Django==1.5 #python3 only packages
pip install -r requirements/python2.txt
Related
I've read a discussion where a suggestion was to use the requirements.txt inside the setup.py file to ensure the correct installation is available on multiple deployments without having to maintain both a requirements.txt and the list in setup.py.
However, when I'm trying to do an installation via pip install -e ., I get an error:
Obtaining file:///Users/myuser/Documents/myproject
Processing /home/ktietz/src/ci/alabaster_1611921544520/work
ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/System/Volumes/Data/home/ktietz/src/ci/alabaster_1611921544520/work'
It looks like pip is trying to look for packages that are available on pip (alabaster) on my local machine. Why? What am I missing here? Why isn't pip looking for the required packages on the PyPi server?
I have done it before the other way around, maintaining the setup file and not the requirements file. For the requirements file, just save it as:
*
and for setup, do
from distutils.core import setup
from setuptools import find_packages
try:
from Module.version import __version__
except ModuleNotFoundError:
exec(open("Module/version.py").read())
setup(
name="Package Name",
version=__version__,
packages=find_packages(),
package_data={p: ["*"] for p in find_packages()},
url="",
license="",
install_requires=[
"numpy",
"pandas"
],
python_requires=">=3.8.0",
author="First.Last",
author_email="author#company.com",
description="Description",
)
For reference, my version.py script looks like:
__build_number__ = "_LOCAL_"
__version__ = f"1.0.{__build_number__}"
Which Jenkins is replacing the build_number with a tag
This question consists of two separate questions, for the rather philosopihc choice of how to arrange setup requirements is actually unrelated to the installation error that you are experiencing.
First about the error: It looks like the project you are trying to install depends on another library (alabaster) of which you apparently also did an editable install using pip3 install -e . that points to this directory:
/home/ktietz/src/ci/alabaster_1611921544520/work
What the error tells you is that the directory where the install is supposed to be located does not exist anymore. You should only install your project itself in editable mode, but the dependencies should be installed into a classical system directory, i. e. without the option -e.
To clean up, I would suggest that you do the following:
# clean up references to the broken editable install
pip3 uninstall alabaster
# now do a proper non-editable install
pip3 install alabaster
Concerning the question how to arrange setup requirements, you should primarily use the install_requires and extras_require options of setuptools:
# either in setup.py
setuptools.setup(
install_requires = [
'dep1>=1.2',
'dep2>=2.4.1',
]
)
# or in setup.cfg
[options]
install_requires =
dep1>=1.2
dep2>=2.4.1
[options.extras_require]
extra_deps_a =
dep3
dep4>=4.2.3
extra_deps_b =
dep5>=5.2.1
Optional requirements can be organised in groups. To include such an extra group with the install, you can do pip3 install .[extra_deps_name].
If you wish to define specific dependency environments with exact versions (e. g. for Continuous Integration), you may use requirements.txt files in addition, but the general dependency and version constraint definitions should be done in setup.cfg or setup.py.
This is an extension of SO setup.py ignores full path dependencies, instead looks for "best match" in pypi
I am trying to write setup.py to install a proprietary package from a .tar.gz file on an internal web site. Unfortunately for me the prop package name duplicates a public package in the public PyPI, so I need to force install of the proprietary package at a specific version. I'm building a docker image from a Debian-Buster base image, so pip, setuptools and tox are all freshly installed, the image brings python 3.8 and pip upgrades itself to version 21.2.4.
Solution 1 - dependency_links
I followed the instructions at the post linked above to put the prop package in install_requires and dependency_links. Here are the relevant lines from my setup.py:
install_requires=["requests", "proppkg==70.1.0"],
dependency_links=["https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz#egg=proppkg-70.1.0"]
Installation is successful in Debian-Buster if I run python3 setup.py install in my package directory. I see the proprietary package get downloaded and installed.
Installation fails if I run pip3 install . also tox (version 3.24.4) fails similarly. In both cases, pip shows a message "Looking in indexes" then fails with "ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement".
Solution 2 - PEP 508
Studying SO answer pip ignores dependency_links in setup.py which states that dependency_links is deprecated, I started over, revised setup.py to have:
install_requires=[
"requests",
"proppkg # https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz#egg=proppkg-70.1.0"
],
Installation is successful in Debian-Buster if I run pip3 install . in my package directory. Pip shows a message "Looking in indexes" but still downloads and installs the proprietary package successfully.
Installation fails in Debian-Buster if I run python3 setup.py install in my package directory. I see these messages:
Searching for proppkg# https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz#egg=proppkg-70.1.0
..
Reading https://pypi.org/simple/proppkg/
..
error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse(...).
Tox also fails in this scenario as it installs dependencies.
Really speculating now, it almost seems like there's an ordering issue. Tox invokes pip like this:
python -m pip install --exists-action w .tox/.tmp/package/1/te-0.3.5.zip
In that output I see "Collecting proppkg# https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz#egg=proppkg-70.1.0" as the first step. That install fails because it fails to import package requests. Then tox continues collecting other dependencies. Finally tox reports as its last step "Collecting requests" (and that succeeds). Do I have to worry about ordering of install steps?
I'm starting to think that maybe the proprietary package is broken. I verified that the prop package setup.py has requests in its install_requires entry. Not sure what else to check.
Workaround solution
My workaround is installing the proprietary package in the docker image as a separate step before I install my own package, just by running pip3 install https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz. The setup.py has the PEP508 URL in install_requires. Then pip and tox find the prop package in the pip cache, and work fine.
Please suggest what to try for the latest pip and tox, or if this is as good as it gets, thanks in advance.
Update - add setup.py
Here's a (slightly sanitized) version of my package's setup.py
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
def get_version():
"""
read version string
"""
version_globals = {}
with open("te/version.py") as fp:
exec(fp.read(), version_globals)
return version_globals['__version__']
setup(
name="te",
version=get_version(),
packages=find_packages(exclude=["tests.*", "tests"]),
author="My Name",
author_email="email#mycompany.com",
description="My Back-End Server",
entry_points={"console_scripts": [
"te-be=te.server:main"
]},
python_requires=">=3.7",
install_requires=["connexion[swagger-ui]",
"Flask",
"gevent",
"redis",
"requests",
"proppkg # https://site.mycompany.com/path/to/proppkg-70.1.0.tar.gz#egg=proppkg-70.1.0"
],
package_data={"te": ["openapi_te.yml"]},
include_package_data=True, # read MANIFEST.in
)
In my tox.ini file, the dependencies are installed via the requirements.txt file which is also used by setup.py, as follows:
The requirements.txt file contains the acceptable range of django packages, depending on the python version installed, as follows:
Django>=1.11,<2 ; python_version == '2.7'
Django>=1.11,<3 ; python_version > '3'
For python3, I want to make sure the tests run on django 2.0 as well as the latest django 2.1+ that will be installed by default, obeying the version constraints specified in the requirements.txt file. To achieve that, I force the installation of the desired django version with commands, as follows:
[tox]
envlist = {py27,py3}-django111,py3-django{20,21}
[testenv]
deps =
-r{toxinidir}/requirements.txt
commands =
django111: pip install 'Django>=1.11,<1.12'
py3-django20: pip install 'Django>=2.0,<2.1'
py3-django21: pip install 'Django>=2.1'
pytest
Ideally I could just add to the deps variable like so:
[testenv]
deps =
-r{toxinidir}/requirements.txt
django111: Django>=1.11,<1.12
py3-django20: Django>=2.0,<2.1
py3-django21: Django>=2.1
commands =
pytest
But pip does not support double requirements and will throw an error even though there is no conflict in how the version constraints are specified.
The drawback of using commands to override the installation is that it needs to remove the django package version installed via requirements.txt to install the desired one. Is there a way to avoid that extra step?
One trick is to move the requirement from requirements.txt into setup.py - where it's loosely pinned so that all your django versions are possible. For example
# setup.py
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
setup(
...
install_requires=[
"Django>=1.11,<2.1",
]
)
and then use your second suggestion in tox.ini
[testenv]
deps =
-r{toxinidir}/requirements.txt
django111: Django>=1.11,<1.12
py3-django20: Django>=2.0,<2.1
py3-django21: Django>=2.1
commands =
pytest
... so long as the Django requirement isn't listed in requirements.txt.
This works because the pip install is split in two parts, the first from tox:deps where you specify the hard requirement, and the second from the equivalent of pip install -e . where the setup.py has the looser requirement.
I'm using this package called Dulwich. While developing, I install it like this:
pip install dulwich --global-option="--pure"
I want to add dulwich as a dependency to the setup.py file for my own package, but i'm not sure how to get it to use that pure flag. If my dependencies just looks like this:
DEPENDENCIES = [
'dulwich',
]
setup(
install_requires=DEPENDENCIES,
...
)
it will fail. I've tried all variations of adding --pure and --global-options but they all fail with errors like:
'install_requires' must be a string or list of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers; Invalid requirement, parse error at "'--pure'"
How am I supposed to correctly add this package as a dependency? The end goal is that I can put my package on PyPi, so that when someone runs
pip install my_package
it will automatically run the equivalent of pip install dulwich --global-option="--pure" as well
I have two libraries, lib1 and lib2 and a program that uses them, program1.
The libraries have setup.py files that look like this:
from distutils.core import setup
setup(name='lib1',
version='0.1.0',
maintainer='foven',
maintainer_email='foven#example.com',
url='example.com/lib1',
packages=[
]
)
The setup.py for lib2 obviously replaces lib1 instances with lib2, but is otherwise the same.
Now program1 has a requirements.txt file, that looks like this:
-e ../lib1
-e ../lib2
I want to use the two libraries from their locations on the filesystem, since I'm not ready to put these into the repository yet. When running pip install -r requirements.txt for program1, this seems to work.
However, if I change the lib1/setup.py file to look like this:
from distutils.core import setup
setup(name='lib1',
version='0.1.0',
maintainer='foven',
maintainer_email='foven#example.com',
url='example.com/lib1',
packages=[
'axel'
]
)
and change program1/requirements.txt to this:
axel == 0.0.4
-e ../lib1
-e ../lib2
running pip install -r requirements.txt from program1 results in an error:
error: package directory 'axel' does not exist
Yet, pip list and pip freeze both indicate that the package is installed.
To me, it seems as though pip is not looking for axel in the normal location for installed packages or in pypi, but I don't have much experience with this, so I could be totally wrong. If I create an empty directory lib1/axel and run pip install -r requirements.txt for program1, it seems to work:
Obtaining file:///C:/Users/foven/code/lib1 (from -r requirements.txt (line 2))
Obtaining file:///C:/Users/foven/code/lib2 (from -r requirements.txt (line 3))
Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): axel==0.0.4 in c:\program files\python35\lib\site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 1))
Installing collected packages: lib1, lib2
Running setup.py develop for lib1
Running setup.py develop for lib2
Successfully installed lib1-0.1.0 lib2-0.1.0
Just to be clear, I'll restate my goal: I want to be able to use the two libraries that only exist on the local filesytem with the program I am working on. What am I doing wrong and how should I setup these libraries and the program to work the way I want?
packages is for listing the packages within the package you're creating. install_requires is for listing the packages your package depends on. You put a dependency, 'axel', in packages. There's no internal package called 'axel', so of course the directory with that name can't be found.
setup(
...,
install_requires=['axel'],
...
)