I want to have some sort of reference to a function but I do not know if I need to use a def f(x) or a lambda of some kind.
For instance I'd like to print f(3) and have it output 9a, or is this not how python works?
Second question: Assuming I have a working function, how do I return the degree of it?
To create a function, you define it. Functions can do anything, but their primary use pattern is taking parameters and returning values. You have to decide how exactly it transforms parameters into the return value.
For instance, if you want f(x) to return a number, then a should also be a numeric variable defined globally or inside the function:
In [1]: def f(x):
...: a = 2.5
...: return a * x**2
...:
In [2]: f(3)
Out[2]: 22.5
Or maybe you want it to return a string like this:
In [3]: def f(x):
...: return str(x**2) + 'a'
...:
In [4]: f(3)
Out[4]: '9a'
You have to specify your needs if you need more help.
EDIT: As it turns out, you want to work with polynomials or algebraic functions as objects and do some algebraic stuff with them. Python will allow doing that, but not using standard data types. You can define a class for a polynomial and then define any methods or functions to get the highest power or anything else. But Polynomial is not a built-in data type. There may be some good libraries defining such classes, though.
Python (and most other computer languages) don't do algebra, which is what you'll need if you want symbolic output like this. But you could have a function f(a,x) which returns the result for particular (numerical) values of a:
def f(a, x):
return a*x*x
But if you want a program or language which actually does algebra for you, check out sympy or commercial programs like Mathematica.
If you are just working with polynomials, and you just need a data structure which deals well with them, check out numpy and its polynomial class.
I normally use lambda for short and simple functions:
f = lambda a, x: a * x**2
here a and x are parameters of my function. You need to enter a and x
f(2,4)
If you want a as a constant parameter eg. a=2:
f = lambda x: 2 * x**2
f(5)
if you have a list of input values of x, you can combine map with lambda.
it is straighforward and easily readable.
(*map(lambda x: 3 * x**2, [1,2,3,4]),)
or
list(map(lambda x: 3 * x**2, [1,2,3,4])
cheers!
def func():
print "F(x) = 2x + 3"
x = int(raw_input('Enter an integer value for x: '))
Fx = 2 * x + 3
return Fx
print func()
have fun :)
Cheese,
you can use the def function in Python to create a math function, you could type this:
def f(x):
return(2x + (3 + 3) * 11 + 88) # <- you could make your own function.
print(f(3))
Log:
220
Like THAT
or in this:
def f(a, x):
return((a + x) ** (a * x))
then...
print(f(1, 2))
Log...
6
Related
Let's say I have an procedural code in python like this,
x = np.random.randint(0, 9, (4,4))
def foo(x):
y = np.rot90(x)
y = np.rot90(y)
return y
# This can be written as
y = rot90(rot90(x))
The above foo function can be written as a composition of functions as all the functions take single argument and returns the single argument.
Consider the another foo function as below which is bit complicated than the previous where all the arity of the functions are not same upon applying the functions
def swap_a_with_b(x, a, b):
x[x==b] = 100
x[x==a] = b
x[x==100] = a
return x
def foo(x):
a, b = np.argsort(np.bincount(x.flatten()))[-2:]
return swap_a_with_b(x, a, b)
how can I write the function foo in the form of composition of functions, where primitive function can be any numpy functions and swap_a_with_b, I can use all the primitive functions, extra helper function swap_a_with_b and any anonymous lambda function.
I know it can be done if we use functools.partial to define a specific function for the specific values of a and b for the higher order function swap_a_with_b, but can we do this as just a function composition with lambda ?
I'm trying to do the following: I want to write a function translate(f, c) that takes a given function f (say we know f is a function of a single variable x) and a constant c and returns a new function that computes f(x+c).
I know that in Python functions are first-class objects and that I can pass f as an argument, but I can't think of a way to do this without passing x too, which kind of defeats the purpose.
The trick is for translate to return a function instance.
def translate(f, c):
def func(x):
return f(x + c)
return func
Now the variable x is "free", and the names f and c are coming from an enclosing scope.
What about this?
def translate_func(f, c):
return lambda x: f(x + c)
To be used like, e.g.:
import math
g = translate_func(math.sin, 10)
print(g(1) == math.sin(10 + 1))
# True
EDIT
Note that this design pattern of a function taking a function as a parameter and returning another function is quite common in Python and goes by the name of "function decoration", with an associated convenience syntax. See PEP318 for more info on it.
def transalte(f, c):
def _inner(x):
return f(x+c)
return _inner
I've been trying this now for hours. I think I don't understand a basic concept, that's why I couldn't answer this question to myself so far.
What I'm trying is to implement a simple mathematical function, like this:
f(x) = x**2 + 1
After that I want to derive that function.
I've defined the symbol and function with:
x = sympy.Symbol('x')
f = sympy.Function('f')(x)
Now I'm struggling with defining the equation to this function f(x). Something like f.exp("x**2 + 1") is not working.
I also wonder how I could get a print out to the console of this function after it's finally defined.
sympy.Function is for undefined functions. Like if f = Function('f') then f(x) remains unevaluated in expressions.
If you want an actual function (like if you do f(1) it evaluates x**2 + 1 at x=1, you can use a Python function
def f(x):
return x**2 + 1
Then f(Symbol('x')) will give a symbolic x**2 + 1 and f(1) will give 2.
Or you can assign the expression to a variable
f = x**2 + 1
and use that. If you want to substitute x for a value, use subs, like
f.subs(x, 1)
Here's your solution:
>>> import sympy
>>> x = sympy.symbols('x')
>>> f = x**2 + 1
>>> sympy.diff(f, x)
2*x
Another possibility (isympy command prompt):
>>> type(x)
<class 'sympy.core.symbol.Symbol'>
>>> f = Lambda(x, x**2)
>>> f
2
x ↦ x
>>> f(3)
9
Calculating the derivative works like that:
>>> g = Lambda(x, diff(f(x), x))
>>> g
x ↦ 2x
>>> g(3)
6
Have a look to:
Sympy how to define variables for functions, integrals and polynomials
You can define it according to ways:
a python function with def as describe above
a python expression g=x**2 + 1
I recommended :
first, define a symbolic variable
x = sympy.symbols('x')
second, define a symbolic function
f = sympy.Function('f')(x)
define a formula
f = x**x+1
if you have so many variable can use this function
def symbols_builder(arg):
globals()[arg]=sp.symbols(str(arg))
if you have so many functions can use this function
def func_build(name, *args):
globals()[name]=sp.Function(str(name))(args)
I have a rather lengthy equation that I need to integrate over using scipy.integrate.quad and was wondering if there is a way to add lambda functions to each other. What I have in mind is something like this
y = lambda u: u**(-2) + 8
x = lambda u: numpy.exp(-u)
f = y + x
int = scipy.integrate.quad(f, 0, numpy.inf)
The equations that I am really using are far more complicated than I am hinting at here, so for readability it would be useful to break up the equation into smaller, more manageable parts.
Is there a way to do with with lambda functions? Or perhaps another way which does not even require lambda functions but will give the same output?
In Python, you'll normally only use a lambda for very short, simple functions that easily fit inside the line that's creating them. (Some languages have other opinions.)
As #DSM hinted in their comment, lambdas are essentially a shortcut to creating functions when it's not worth giving them a name.
If you're doing more complex things, or if you need to give the code a name for later reference, a lambda expression won't be much of a shortcut for you -- instead, you might as well define a plain old function.
So instead of assigning the lambda expression to a variable:
y = lambda u: u**(-2) + 8
You can define that variable to be a function:
def y(u):
return u**(-2) + 8
Which gives you room to explain a bit, or be more complex, or whatever you need to do:
def y(u):
"""
Bloopinate the input
u should be a positive integer for fastest results.
"""
offset = 8
bloop = u ** (-2)
return bloop + offset
Functions and lambdas are both "callable", which means they're essentially interchangable as far as scipy.integrate.quad() is concerned.
To combine callables, you can use several different techniques.
def triple(x):
return x * 3
def square(x):
return x * x
def triple_square(x):
return triple(square(x))
def triple_plus_square(x):
return triple(x) + square(x)
def triple_plus_square_with_explaining_variables(x):
tripled = triple(x)
squared = square(x)
return tripled + squared
There are more advanced options that I would only consider if it makes your code clearer (which it probably won't). For example, you can put the callables in a list:
all_the_things_i_want_to_do = [triple, square]
Once they're in a list, you can use list-based operations to work on them (including applying them in turn to reduce the list down to a single value).
But if your code is like most code, regular functions that just call each other by name will be the simplest to write and easiest to read.
There's no built-in functionality for that, but you can implement it quite easily (with some performance hit, of course):
import numpy
class Lambda:
def __init__(self, func):
self._func = func
def __add__(self, other):
return Lambda(
lambda *args, **kwds: self._func(*args, **kwds) + other._func(*args, **kwds))
def __call__(self, *args, **kwds):
return self._func(*args, **kwds)
y = Lambda(lambda u: u**(-2) + 8)
x = Lambda(lambda u: numpy.exp(-u))
print((x + y)(1))
Other operators can be added in a similar way.
With sympy you can do function operation like this:
>>> import numpy
>>> from sympy.utilities.lambdify import lambdify, implemented_function
>>> from sympy.abc import u
>>> y = implemented_function('y', lambda u: u**(-2) + 8)
>>> x = implemented_function('x', lambda u: numpy.exp(-u))
>>> f = lambdify(u, y(u) + x(u))
>>> f(numpy.array([1,2,3]))
array([ 9.36787944, 8.13533528, 8.04978707])
Use code below to rich same result with writing as less code as possible:
y = lambda u: u**(-2) + 8
x = lambda u: numpy.exp(-u)
f = lambda u, x=x, y=y: x(u) + y(u)
int = scipy.integrate.quad(f, 0, numpy.inf)
As a functional programmer, I suggest generalizing the solutions to an applicative combinator:
In [1]: def lift2(h, f, g): return lambda x: h(f(x), g(x))
In [2]: from operator import add
In [3]: from math import exp
In [4]: y = lambda u: u**(-2) + 8
In [5]: x = lambda u: exp(-u)
In [6]: f = lift2(add, y, x)
In [7]: [f(u) for u in range(1,5)]
Out[7]: [9.367879441171443, 8.385335283236612, 8.160898179478975, 8.080815638888733]
Using lift2, you can combine the output of two functions using arbitrary binary functions in a pointfree way. And most of the stuff in operator should probably be enough for typical mathematical combinations, avoiding having to write any lambdas.
In a similar fasion, you might want to define lift1 and maybe lift3, too.
Say I have the following code
def myfunc(x):
return monsterMathExpressionOf(x)
and I would like to find numerically the solution of myfunc(x) == y for diverse values of y. If y == 0 then there are a lot of root finding procedures available, e.g. from scipy. However, if I'd like to find the solution for e.g. y==1 it seems I have to define a new function
def myfunc1(x):
return myfunc(x) - 1
and then find it's root using available procedures. This way does not work for me as I will need to find a lot of solution by running a loop, and I don't want to redefine the function in each step of the loop. Is there a neater solution?
You don't have to redefine a function for every value of y: just define a single function of y that returns a function of x, and use that function inside your loop:
def wrapper(y):
def myfunc(x):
return monsterMathExpressionOf(x) - y
return myfunc
for y in y_values:
f = wrapper(y)
find_root(f, starting_point, ...)
You can also use functools.partial, which may be more to your liking:
def f(x, y):
return monsterMathExpressionOf(x) - y
for y in y_values:
g = partial(f, y=y)
find_root(g, starting_point, ...)
Read the documentation to see how partial is roughly implemented behind the scenes; you'll see it may not be too different compared to the first wrapper implementation.
#Evert's answer shows how you can do this by using either a closure or by using functools.partial, which are both fine solutions.
Another alternative is provided by many numerical solvers. Consider, for example, scipy.optimize.fsolve. That function provides the args argument, which allows you to pass additional fixed arguments to the function to be solved.
For example, suppose myfunc is x**3 + x
def myfunc(x):
return x**3 + x
Define one additional function that includes the parameter y as an argument:
def myfunc2(x, y):
return myfunc(x) - y
To solve, say, myfunc(x) = 3, you can do this:
from scipy.optimize import fsolve
x0 = 1.0 # Initial guess
sol = fsolve(myfunc2, x0, args=(3,))
Instead of defining myfunc2, you could use an anonymous function as the first argument of fsolve:
sol = fsolve(lambda x, y: myfunc(x) - y, x0, args=(3,))
But then you could accomplish the same thing using
sol = fsolve(lambda x: myfunc(x) - 3, x0)