We Keep Coding

How to change a default parameter programatically? [duplicate]

In Python, is it possible to redefine the default parameters of a function at runtime?
I defined a function with 3 parameters here:
def multiplyNumbers(x,y,z):
return x*y*z
print(multiplyNumbers(x=2,y=3,z=3))
Next, I tried (unsuccessfully) to set the default parameter value for y, and then I tried calling the function without the parameter y:
multiplyNumbers.y = 2;
print(multiplyNumbers(x=3, z=3))
But the following error was produced, since the default value of y was not set correctly:
TypeError: multiplyNumbers() missing 1 required positional argument: 'y'
Is it possible to redefine the default parameters of a function at runtime, as I'm attempting to do here?

Just use functools.partial
multiplyNumbers = functools.partial(multiplyNumbers, y = 42)
One problem here: you will not be able to call it as multiplyNumbers(5, 7, 9); you should manually say y=7
If you need to remove default arguments I see two ways:
Store original function somewhere
oldF = f
f = functools.partial(f, y = 42)
//work with changed f
f = oldF //restore
use partial.func
f = f.func //go to previous version.

Technically, it is possible to do what you ask… but it's not a good idea. RiaD's answer is the Pythonic way to do this.
In Python 3:
>>> def f(x=1, y=2, z=3):
... print(x, y, z)
>>> f()
1 2 3
>>> f.__defaults__ = (4, 5, 6)
4 5 6
As with everything else that's under the covers and hard to find in the docs, the inspect module chart is the best place to look for function attributes.
The details are slightly different in Python 2, but the idea is the same. (Just change the pulldown at the top left of the docs page from 3.3 to 2.7.)
If you're wondering how Python knows which defaults go with which arguments when it's just got a tuple… it just counts backward from the end (or the first of *, *args, **kwargs—anything after that goes into the __kwdefaults__ dict instead). f.__defaults = (4, 5) will set the defaults to y and z to 4 and 5, and with default for x. That works because you can't have non-defaulted parameters after defaulted parameters.
There are some cases where this won't work, but even then, you can immutably copy it to a new function with different defaults:
>>> f2 = types.FunctionType(f.__code__, f.__globals__, f.__name__,
... (4, 5, 6), f.__closure__)
Here, the types module documentation doesn't really explain anything, but help(types.FunctionType) in the interactive interpreter shows the params you need.
The only case you can't handle is a builtin function. But they generally don't have actual defaults anyway; instead, they fake something similar in the C API.

yes, you can accomplish this by modifying the function's func.__defaults__ tuple
that attribute is a tuple of the default values for each argument of the function.
for example, to make pandas.read_csv always use sep='\t', you could do:
import inspect
import pandas as pd
default_args = inspect.getfullargspec(pd.read_csv).args
default_arg_values = list(pd.read_csv.__defaults__)
default_arg_values[default_args.index("sep")] = '\t'
pd.read_csv.__defaults__ = tuple(default_arg_values)

use func_defaults as in
def myfun(a=3):
return a
myfun.func_defaults = (4,)
b = myfun()
assert b == 4
check the docs for func_defaults here
UPDATE: looking at RiaD's response I think I was too literal with mine. I don't know the context from where you're asking this question but in general (and following the Zen of Python) I believe working with partial applications is a better option than redefining a function's defaults arguments

Assign results of function call in one line in python

How can I assign the results of a function call to multiple variables when the results are stored by name (not index-able), in python.
For example (tested in Python 3),
import random
# foo, as defined somewhere else where we can't or don't want to change it
def foo():
t = random.randint(1,100)
# put in a dummy class instead of just "return t,t+1"
# because otherwise we could subscript or just A,B = foo()
class Cat(object):
x = t
y = t + 1
return Cat()
# METHOD 1
# clearly wrong; A should be 1 more than B; they point to fields of different objects
A,B = foo().x, foo().y
print(A,B)
# METHOD 2
# correct, but requires two lines and an implicit variable
t = foo()
A,B = t.x, t.y
del t # don't really want t lying around
print(A,B)
# METHOD 3
# correct and one line, but an obfuscated mess
A,B = [ (t.x,t.y) for t in (foo(),) ][0]
print(A,B)
print(t) # this will raise an exception, but unless you know your python cold it might not be obvious before running
# METHOD 4
# Conforms to the suggestions in the links below without modifying the initial function foo or class Cat.
# But while all subsequent calls are pretty, but we have to use an otherwise meaningless shell function
def get_foo():
t = foo()
return t.x, t.y
A,B = get_foo()
What we don't want to do
If the results were indexable ( Cat extended tuple/list, we had used a namedtuple, etc.), we could simply write A,B = foo() as indicated in the comment above the Cat class. That's what's recommended here , for example.
Let's assume we have a good reason not to allow that. Maybe we like the clarity of assigning from the variable names (if they're more meaningful than x and y) or maybe the object is not primarily a container. Maybe the fields are properties, so access actually involves a method call. We don't have to assume any of those to answer this question though; the Cat class can be taken at face value.
This question already deals with how to design functions/classes the best way possible; if the function's expected return value are already well defined and does not involve tuple-like access, what is the best way to accept multiple values when returning?

I would strongly recommend either using multiple statements, or just keeping the result object without unpacking its attributes. That said, you can use operator.attrgetter for this:
from operator import attrgetter
a, b, c = attrgetter('a', 'b', 'c')(foo())

How to make two functions share the same non global variable (Python)

Is there a way to make function B to be able to access a non global variable that was declared in only in function A, without return statements from function A.
As asked, the question:
Define two functions:
p: prints the value of a variable
q: increments the variable
such that
Initial value of the variable is 0. You can't define the variable in the global
enviroment.
Variable is not located in the global environment and the only way to change it is by invoking q().
The global enviroment should know only p() and q().
Tip: 1) In python, a function can return more than 1 value. 2) A function can be
assigned to a variable.
# Example:
>>> p()
0
>>> q()
>>> q()
>>> p()
2

The question says the global enviroment should know only p and q.
So, taking that literally, it could be done inline using a single function scope:
>>> p, q = (lambda x=[0]: (lambda: print(x[0]), lambda: x.__setitem__(0, x[0] + 1)))()
>>> p()
0
>>> q()
>>> q()
>>> p()
2

Using the tips provided as clues, it could be done something like this:
def make_p_and_q():
context = {'local_var': 0}
def p():
print('{}'.format(context['local_var']))
def q():
context['local_var'] += 1
return p, q
p, q = make_p_and_q()
p() # --> 0
q()
q()
p() # --> 2

The collection of things that functions can access is generally called its scope. One interpretation of your question is whether B can access a "local variable" of A; that is, one that is defined normally as
def A():
x = 1
The answer here is "not easily": Python lets you do a lot, but local variables are one of the things that are not meant to be accessed inside a function.
I suspect what your teacher is getting at is that A can modify things outside of its scope, in order to send information out without sending it through the return value. (Whether this is good coding practise is another matter.) For example, functions are themselves Python objects, and you can assign arbitrary properties to Python objects, so you can actually store values on the function object and read them from outside it.
def a():
a.key = "value"
a()
print a.key
Introspection and hacking with function objects
In fact, you can sort of get at the constant values defined in A by looking at the compiled Python object generated when you define a function. For example, in the example above, "value" is a constant, and constants are stored on the code object:
In [9]: a.func_code.co_consts
Out[9]: (None, 'value')
This is probably not what you meant.

Firstly, it's bad practise to do so. Such variables make debugging difficult and are easy to lose track of, especially in complex code.
Having said that, you can accomplish what you want by declaring a variable as global:
def funcA():
global foo
foo = 3
def funcB():
print foo # output is 3

That's one weird homework assignment; especially the tips make me suspect that you've misunderstood or left out something.
Anyway, here's a simpler solution than the accepted answer: Since calls to q increment the value of the variable, it must be a persistent ("static") variable of some sort. Store it somewhere other than the global namespace, and tell p about it. The obvious place to store it is as an attribute of q:
def q():
q.x += 1
q.x = 0 # Initialize
def p():
print(q.x)

How to avoid naming unused variables from method return statement in python

I will take an example first so that my question will be clear
Assume,
a,b = method1()
method1 in above statement will return both a,b values, but I will require only variable "b" throughout my program.
Is there any placeholder kind of thing in python so that it is not required to name the variable "a"
Something like,
_,b = method1()
is required. Thanks in advance

In Python versions 2.x, since _ is a valid variable name, what you wrote would work:
>>> _, b = method1()
You could use a name like _ignore to make your intention clearer. If you really need to not keep the variable around, just del _ignore on the next line.
From version 3.0 of Python, you can do this even with an arbitrary number of extra values:
>>> def method():
... return 1, 2, 3
>>> *_, b = foo()
>>> b
3
See What's new in Python 3.0 and PEP 3132 for details.

do not understand closures question in python

def a(b=[]):
b.append(1)
return b
print a()
print a()
All of a sudden i got a list with 2 elems, but how? Shouldn't b be getting set to empty list every time.
Thanks for the help

Default arguments are only evaluated once, when the function is defined. It retains the same object from one invocation to the next, which means that the same list keeps getting appended to. Use a default value of None and check for that instead if you want to get around this.

Nothing to do with closures, at least not in the usual sense.
The default value for b is not "a new empty list"; it is "this particular object which I just created right now while defining the function, initializing it to be an empty list". Every time the function is called without an argument, the same object is used.

The corrected version, for the reasons given in other answers, is:
def a(b=None):
b = [] if b is None else b
b.append(1)
return b

default arguments are evaluated (once) when the function is defined, not each time it is called.
try this:
def a(b=None):
if b is None
b = []
b.append(1)
return b
print a()
print a()