We Keep Coding

Wrapping shared pointer object with SWIG don't give access to class member functions

I have a C++ CameraManager class that manages a list of Camera objects.
The camera objects are managed by a std::list, as shared pointers, i.e. each list item is of type: shared_ptr < Camera > .
I can obtain a Camera from a CameraManager object as
std::shared_ptr<Camera> c = cameraManager.getCamera();
Creating a Python module using Swig, the above is translated to python code as:
camera = cameraManager.getCamera()
The camera Python object above, however, don't allow me to access any of the Camera classes functions. Python says is an object of type: 'Swig object of type 'std::shared_ptr *' at ####
Adding the following in the Swig interface file
%include <std_shared_ptr.i>
%shared_ptr(Camera)
before including
%include "aiCamera.h"
don't change the behavior in the resulting Python module. Any ideas what might be missing?
Additional info:
The C++ code uses a typedef:
typedef CameraSP std::shared_ptr<Camera>;
The Camera class is derived from a base class, that is virtually empty.
class MVR_API MVRObject
{
public:
MVRObject();
MVRObject(const MVRObject& obj);
virtual ~MVRObject();
};
The code is compiled using VS 2013 and CMake. The CMake code looks like this:
set_source_files_properties(${PyModule}.i PROPERTIES CPLUSPLUS ON)
set_source_files_properties(${PyModule}.i PROPERTIES SWIG_FLAGS "-threads")
SWIG_ADD_LIBRARY(${PyModule}
TYPE MODULE
LANGUAGE python
SOURCES ${PyModule}.i
)
SWIG_LINK_LIBRARIES (${PyModule}
${PYTHON_LIB_FOLDER}/Python37.lib
dslFoundation
aimvr
)
# INSTALL PYTHON BINDINGS
# Get the python site packages directory by invoking python
execute_process(COMMAND python -c "import site; print(site.getsitepackages()[0])" OUTPUT_VARIABLE PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES OUTPUT_STRIP_TRAILING_WHITESPACE)
message("PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES = ${PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES}")
SET(SWIG_RUNTIME ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/mvr_swigpyrun.h)
execute_process(COMMAND ${SWIG_EXECUTABLE} -python -external-runtime ${SWIG_RUNTIME})
UPDATE:
The problem was not Swig and usage of shared pointers. It was a third party library having its own implementation of shared_ptr. Resolving the shared pointers by namespace names fixed the problem and the resulting Python module started working as expected.

The question above are dealing with a C/C++ API from Allied Vision, controlling their cameras. They have defined their own shared pointer class and named it using the same name as the std shared pointer class, i.e. shared_ptr.
The client code for this API is using std::shared_ptr's, and at some point the usage of a shared_ptr, without specifying the namespace caused the above problems with Swig.
By explicitly specifying the std namespace when using a shared_ptr, the problems were resolved and the resulting swigged objects, using shared pointers, started working perfectly fine.

Loading vs linking in Cython modules

While exploring Cython compile steps, I found I need to link C libraries like math explicitly in setup.py. However, such step was not needed for numpy. Why so? Is numpy being imported through usual python import mechanism? If that is the case, we need not explicitly link any extension module in Cython?
I tried to rummage through the official documentation, but unfortunately there was no explanation as to when an explicit linking is required and when it will be dealt automatically.

Call of a cdef-function corresponds more or less just to a jump to an address in the memory - the one from which the command should be read/executed. The question is how this address is provided. There are some cases we need to consider:
A. inline functions
The code of those functions is either inlined or the definition of the function is in the same translation unit, thus the address is known to the linker at the link time (or even compiler at compile-time) - no need for additional libraries.
An example are header-only libraries.
Consequences: Only include path(s) should be provided in setup.py.
B. static linking
The definition/functionality we need is in another translation unit/library - the target-address of the jump is calculated at the link-time and cannot be changed anymore afterwards.
An example are additional c/cpp-files or static libraries which are added to extension-definition.
Consequences: Static library should be added to setup.py, i.e. library-path and library name along with include paths.
C. dynamic linking
The necessary functionality is provided in a shared object/dll. The address to jump to is calculated during the runtime from loader and can be replaced at program start by exchanging the loaded shared objects.
An example are stdlibc++ (usually added automatically by g++) or libm, which is not automatically added to linker command by gcc.
Consequences: Dynamic library should be added to setup.py, i.e. library-path and library name, maybe r-path + include paths. Shared object/dll must be provided at the run time. More (than one probably would like to know) information about Cython/Python using dynamic libraries can be found in this SO-post.
D. Calling via a pointer
Linker is needed only when we call a function via its name. If we call it via a function-pointer, we don't need a linker/loader because the address of the function is already known - the value in the function pointer.
Example: Cython-generated modules uses this machinery to enable access to its cdef-functions exported through pxd-file. It creates a data structure (which is stored as variable __pyx_capi__ in the module itself) of function-pointers, which is filled by the loader once the so/dll is loaded via ldopen (or whatever Windows' equivalent). The lookup in the dictionary happens only once when the module is loaded and the addresses of functions are cached, so the calls during the run time have almost no overhead.
We can inspect it, for example via
#foo.pyx:
cdef void doit():
print("doit")
#foo.pxd
cdef void doit()
>>> cythonize -3 -i foo.pyx
>>> python -c "import foo; print(foo.__pyx_capi__)"
{'doit': <capsule object "void (void)" at 0x7f7b10bb16c0>}
Now, calling a cdef function from another module is just jumping to the corresponding address.
Consequences: We need to cimport the needed funcionality.
Numpy is a little bit more complicated as it uses a sophisticated combination of A and D in order to postpone the resolution of symbols until the run time, thus not needing shared-object/dlls at link time (but at run time!).
Some functionality in numpy-pxd file can be directly used because they are inlined (or even just defines), for example PyArray_NDIM, basically everything from ndarraytypes.h. This is the reason one can use cython's ndarrays without much ado.
Other functionality (basically everything from ndarrayobject.h) cannot be accessed without calling np.import_array() in an initialization step, for example PyArray_FromAny. Why?
The answer is in the header __multiarray_api.h which is included in ndarrayobject.h, but cannot be found in the git-repository as it is generated during the installation, where the definition of PyArray_FromAny can be looked up:
...
static void **PyArray_API=NULL; //usually...
...
#define PyArray_CheckFromAny \
(*(PyObject * (*)(PyObject *, PyArray_Descr *, int, int, int, PyObject *)) \
PyArray_API[108])
...
PyArray_CheckFromAny isn't a name of a function, but a define fo a function pointer saved in PyArray_API, which is not initialized (i.e. is NULL), when module is first loaded! Btw, there is also a (private) function called PyArray_CheckFromAny, which is what the function pointer actually points to - and because the public version is a define there is no name collision when linked...
The last piece of the puzzle - the function _import_array (more or less the working horse behind np.import_array) is an inline function (case A), so only include path is needed, to be able to use it.
_import_array uses a similar approach to Cython's __pyx_capi__ to get the function pointers: The field is called _ARRAY_API and can be inspected via:
>>> import numpy.core._multiarray_umath as macore
>>> macore._ARRAY_API
<capsule object NULL at 0x7f17d85f3810>
More info about how PyArray_API can be initialized can be found in this SO-answer of mine.
However, when using functionality from numpy/math.pxd, one has to staticly link numpy's math-library (see for example this SO-question).

PyImport_Import fails - Returns NULL

First off, yes I have seen this and this, however they didn't resolve my problem/error.
So, I'm trying to call a Python function from C/C++, but when PyImport_Import() is called it returns NULL.
Code:
PyObject* fname = PyBytes_FromString("hello");
PyObject* module = PyImport_Import(fname);
Where hello is my hello.py file in the same directory as the executable. I have no idea where my error is, could some please point me to it?

Without knowing a whole bunch of information about how your system is set up and the contents of the Python files involved, it's difficult to diagnose your problem. Far better to let the Python runtime tell you what is wrong.
The documentation states
PyObject* PyImport_ImportModule(const char *name)
...
Return a new reference to the imported module, or NULL with an exception set on failure
(emphasis mine)
The exception handling documentation states that you can call PyErr_Print() to print the current exception to stderr.
So to put this into practice:
PyObject* fname = PyBytes_FromString("hello");
PyObject* module = PyImport_Import(fname);
if (module == nullptr)
{
PyErr_Print();
std::exit(1);
}
This will at least get you started on figuring out the error.
For future convenience, you probably want to create your own C++ exception class to wrap Python errors (and to avoid peppering your code with things like calls to exit).

I thought that PyBytes_FromString was the the 3.x alternative of PyString_From.
I was wrong. PyUnicode_FromString is the correct alternative.
(Thanks to #wakjah for given me the tip of using error handling)

CPython - Compile dails, PyDateTime_FromTimestamp not declared?

I'm writing a V8 add-on to convert javascript objects to python, and vice-versa. I'm able to convert all sorts of types, but PyDateTime_FromTimestamp (which is specified as existing in the cpython docs: https://docs.python.org/2/c-api/datetime.html#c.PyDateTime_FromTimestamp) is apparently undefined, causing compilation to fail.
../src/py_object_wrapper.cc:189:13: error: use of undeclared identifier
'PyDateTime_FromTimestamp'
return PyDateTime_FromTimestamp(value->NumberValue());
Anybody know what's going on?

Since you haven't given us enough information to debug anything, I'm going to take a wild guess at the most likely problem.
Notice that at the top of the documentation you linked to it says:
Various date and time objects are supplied by the datetime module. Before using any of these functions, the header file datetime.h must be included in your source (note that this is not included by Python.h), and the macro PyDateTime_IMPORT must be invoked, usually as part of the module initialisation function. The macro puts a pointer to a C structure into a static variable, PyDateTimeAPI, that is used by the following macros.
If you just forgot the macro, this would compile but then crash at runtime, as PyDateTimeAPI will be NULL.
But if you forgot to #include the datetime.h, that would cause exactly what you're seeing.

How does module loading work in CPython?

How does module loading work in CPython under the hood? Especially, how does the dynamic loading of extensions written in C work? Where can I learn about this?
I find the source code itself rather overwhelming. I can see that trusty ol' dlopen() and friends is used on systems that support it but without any sense of the bigger picture it would take a long time to figure this out from the source code.
An enormous amount could be written on this topic but as far as I can tell, almost nothing has been — the abundance of webpages describing the Python language itself makes this difficult to search for. A great answer would provide a reasonably brief overview and references to resources where I can learn more.
I'm mostly concerned with how this works on Unix-like systems simply because that's what I know but I am interested in if the process is similar elsewhere.
To be more specific (but also risk assuming too much), how does CPython use the module methods table and initialization function to "make sense" of dynamically loaded C?

TLDR short version bolded.
References to the Python source code are based on version 2.7.6.
Python imports most extensions written in C through dynamic loading. Dynamic loading is an esoteric topic that isn't well documented but it's an absolute prerequisite. Before explaining how Python uses it, I must briefly explain what it is and why Python uses it.
Historically C extensions to Python were statically linked against the Python interpreter itself. This required Python users to recompile the interpreter every time they wanted to use a new module written in C. As you can imagine, and as Guido van Rossum describes, this became impractical as the community grew. Today, most Python users never compile the interpreter once. We simply "pip install module" and then "import module" even if that module contains compiled C code.
Linking is what allows us to make function calls across compiled units of code. Dynamic loading solves the problem of linking code when the decision for what to link is made at runtime. That is, it allows a running program to interface with the linker and tell the linker what it wants to link with. For the Python interpreter to import modules with C code, this is what's called for. Writing code that makes this decision at runtime is quite uncommon and most programmers would be surprised that it's possible. Simply put, a C function has an address, it expects you to put certain data in certain places, and it promises to have put certain data in certain places upon return. If you know the secret handshake, you can call it.
The challenge with dynamic loading is that it's incumbent upon the programmer to get the handshake right and there are no safety checks. At least, they're not provided for us. Normally, if we try to call a function name with an incorrect signature we get a compile or linker error. With dynamic loading we ask the linker for a function by name (a "symbol") at runtime. The linker can tell us if that name was found but it can’t tell us how to call that function. It just gives us an address - a void pointer. We can try to cast to a function pointer of some sort but it is solely up to the programmer to get the cast correct. If we get the function signature wrong in our cast, it’s too late for the compiler or linker to warn us. We’ll likely get a segfault after the program careens out of control and ends up accessing memory inappropriately. Programs using dynamic loading must rely on pre-arranged conventions and information gathered at runtime to make proper function calls. Here's a small example before we tackle the Python interpreter.
File 1: main.c
/* gcc-4.8 -o main main -ldl */
#include <dlfcn.h> /* key include, also in Python/dynload_shlib.c */
/* used for cast to pointer to function that takes no args and returns nothing */
typedef void (say_hi_type)(void);
int main(void) {
/* get a handle to the shared library dyload1.so */
void* handle1 = dlopen("./dyload1.so", RTLD_LAZY);
/* acquire function ptr through string with name, cast to function ptr */
say_hi_type* say_hi1_ptr = (say_hi_type*)dlsym(handle1, "say_hi1");
/* dereference pointer and call function */
(*say_hi1_ptr)();
return 0;
}
/* error checking normally follows both dlopen() and dlsym() */
File 2: dyload1.c
/* gcc-4.8 -o dyload1.so dyload1.c -shared -fpic */
/* compile as C, C++ does name mangling -- changes function names */
#include <stdio.h>
void say_hi1() {
puts("dy1: hi");
}
These files are compiled and linked separately but main.c knows to go looking for ./dyload1.so at runtime. The code in main assumes that dyload1.so will have a symbol "say_hi1". It gets a handle to dyload1.so's symbols with dlopen(), gets the address of a symbol using dlsym(), assumes it is a function that takes no arguments and returns nothing, and calls it. It has no way to know for sure what "say_hi1" is -- a prior agreement is all that keeps us from segfaulting.
What I've shown above is the dlopen() family of functions. Python is deployed on many platforms, not all of which provide dlopen() but most have similar dynamic loading mechanisms. Python achieves portable dynamic loading by wrapping the dynamic loading mechanisms of several operating systems in a common interface.
This comment in Python/importdl.c summarizes the strategy.
/* ./configure sets HAVE_DYNAMIC_LOADING if dynamic loading of modules is
supported on this platform. configure will then compile and link in one
of the dynload_*.c files, as appropriate. We will call a function in
those modules to get a function pointer to the module's init function.
*/
As referenced, in Python 2.7.6 we have these dynload*.c files:
Python/dynload_aix.c Python/dynload_beos.c Python/dynload_hpux.c
Python/dynload_os2.c Python/dynload_stub.c Python/dynload_atheos.c
Python/dynload_dl.c Python/dynload_next.c Python/dynload_shlib.c
Python/dynload_win.c
They each define a function with this signature:
dl_funcptr _PyImport_GetDynLoadFunc(const char *fqname, const char *shortname,
const char *pathname, FILE *fp)
These functions contain the different dynamic loading mechanisms for different operating systems. The mechanism for dynamic loading on Mac OS newer than 10.2 and most Unix(-like) systems is dlopen(), which is called in Python/dynload_shlib.c.
Skimming over dynload_win.c, the analagous function for Windows is LoadLibraryEx(). Its use looks very similar.
At the bottom of Python/dynload_shlib.c you can see the actual call to dlopen() and to dlsym().
handle = dlopen(pathname, dlopenflags);
/* error handling */
p = (dl_funcptr) dlsym(handle, funcname);
return p;
Right before this, Python composes the string with the function name it will look for. The module name is in the shortname variable.
PyOS_snprintf(funcname, sizeof(funcname),
LEAD_UNDERSCORE "init%.200s", shortname);
Python simply hopes there's a function called init{modulename} and asks the linker for it. Starting here, Python relies on a small set of conventions to make dynamic loading of C code possible and reliable.
Let's look at what C extensions must do to fulfill the contract that makes the above call to dlsym() work. For compiled C Python modules, the first convention that allows Python to access the compiled C code is the init{shared_library_filename}() function. For a module named spam compiled as shared library named “spam.so”, we might provide this initspam() function:
PyMODINIT_FUNC
initspam(void)
{
PyObject *m;
m = Py_InitModule("spam", SpamMethods);
if (m == NULL)
return;
}
If the name of the init function does not match the filename, the Python interpreter cannot know how to find it. For example, renaming spam.so to notspam.so and trying to import gives the following.
>>> import spam
ImportError: No module named spam
>>> import notspam
ImportError: dynamic module does not define init function (initnotspam)
If the naming convention is violated there's simply no telling if the shared library even contains an initialization function.
The second key convention is that once called, the init function is responsible for initializing itself by calling Py_InitModule. This call adds the module to a "dictionary"/hash table kept by the interpreter that maps module name to module data. It also registers the C functions in the method table. After calling Py_InitModule, modules may initialize themselves in other ways such as adding objects. (Ex: the SpamError object in the Python C API tutorial). (Py_InitModule is actually a macro that creates the real init call but with some info baked in like what version of Python our compiled C extension used.)
If the init function has the proper name but does not call Py_InitModule(), we get this:
SystemError: dynamic module not initialized properly
Our methods table happens to be called SpamMethods and looks like this.
static PyMethodDef SpamMethods[] = {
{"system", spam_system, METH_VARARGS,
"Execute a shell command."},
{NULL, NULL, 0, NULL}
};
The method table itself and the function signature contracts it entails is the third and final key convention necessary for Python to make sense of dynamically loaded C. The method table is an array of struct PyMethodDef with a final sentinel entry. A PyMethodDef is defined in Include/methodobject.h as follows.
struct PyMethodDef {
const char *ml_name; /* The name of the built-in function/method */
PyCFunction ml_meth; /* The C function that implements it */
int ml_flags; /* Combination of METH_xxx flags, which mostly
describe the args expected by the C func */
const char *ml_doc; /* The __doc__ attribute, or NULL */
};
The crucial part here is that the second member is a PyCFunction. We passed in the address of a function, so what is a PyCFunction? It's a typedef, also in Include/methodobject.h
typedef PyObject *(*PyCFunction)(PyObject *, PyObject *);
PyCFunction is a typedef for a pointer to a function that returns a pointer to a PyObject and that takes for arguments two pointers to PyObjects. As a lemma to convention three, C functions registered with the method table all have the same signature.
Python circumvents much of the difficulty in dynamic loading by using a limited set of C function signatures. One signature in particular is used for most C functions. Pointers to C functions that take additional arguments can be "snuck in" by casting to PyCFunction. (See the keywdarg_parrot example in the Python C API tutorial.) Even C functions that backup Python functions that take no arguments in Python will take two arguments in C (shown below). All functions are also expected to return something (which may just be the None object). Functions that take multiple positional arguments in Python have to unpack those arguments from a single object in C.
That's how the data for interfacing with dynamically loaded C functions is acquired and stored. Finally, here's an example of how that data is used.
The context here is that we're evaluating Python "opcodes", instruction by instruction, and we've hit a function call opcode. (see https://docs.python.org/2/library/dis.html. It's worth a skim.) We've determined that the Python function object is backed by a C function. In the code below we check if the function in Python takes no arguments (in Python) and if so, call it (with two arguments in C).
Python/ceval.c.
if (flags & (METH_NOARGS | METH_O)) {
PyCFunction meth = PyCFunction_GET_FUNCTION(func);
PyObject *self = PyCFunction_GET_SELF(func);
if (flags & METH_NOARGS && na == 0) {
C_TRACE(x, (*meth)(self,NULL));
}
It does of course take arguments in C - exactly two. Since everything is an object in Python, it gets a self argument. At the bottom you can see that meth is assigned a function pointer which is then dereferenced and called. The return value ends up in x.