We Keep Coding

Load and execute a full python script from a raw link?

I'm facing some problems trying to load a full python script from my pastebin/github pages.
I followed this link, trying to convert the raw into a temp file and use it like a module: How to load a python script from a raw link (such as Pastebin)?
And this is my test (Using a really simple python script as raw, my main program is not so simple unfortunately): https://trinket.io/python/0e95ba50c8
When I run the script (that now is creating a temp file in the current directory of the .py file) I get this error:
PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'C:\\Users\\BOT\\Images\\tempxm4xpwpz.py'
Otherwise I also treid the exec() function... No better results unfortunately.
With this code:
import requests as rq
import urllib.request
def main():
code = "https://pastebin.com/raw/MJmYEKqh"
response = urllib.request.urlopen(code)
data = response.read()
exec(data)
I get this error:
File "<string>", line 10, in <module>
File "<string>", line 5, in hola
NameError: name 'printest' is not defined
Since my program is more complex compared to this simple test, I don't know how to proceed...
Basically What I want to achieve is to write the full script of my program on GitHub and connect it to a .exe so if I upgrade the raw also my program is updated. Avoiding to generate and share (only with my friends) a new .exe everytime...
Do you think is possible? If so.. what am I doing wrong?
PS: I'm also open to other possibilities to let my friends update the program without downloading everytime the .exe, as soon as they don't have to install anything (that's why I'm using .exe).

Disclaimer: it is really not a good idea to run an unverified (let alone untrusted) code. That being said if you really want to do it...
Probably the easiest and "least-dirty" way would be to run whole new process. This can be done directly in python. Something like this should work (inspiration from the answer you linked in your question):
import urllib.request
import tempfile
import subprocess
code = "https://pastebin.com/raw/MJmYEKqh"
response = urllib.request.urlopen(code)
data = response.read()
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix='.py') as source_code_file:
source_code_file.write(data)
source_code_file.flush()
subprocess.run(['python3', source_code_file.name])
You can also make your code with exec run correctly:
What may work:
exec(data, {}) -- All you need to do, is to supply {} as second argument (that is use exec(data, {})). Function exec may receive two additional optional arguments -- globals and locals. If you supply just one, it will use the same directory for locals. That is the code within the exec would behave like sort-of "clean" environment, at the top-level. Which is something you aim for.
exec(data, globals()) -- Second option is to supply the globals from your current scope. This will also work, though you probably has no need to give the execucted code access to your globals, given that that code will set-up everything inside anyway
What does not work:
exec(data, {}, {}) -- In this case the executed code will have two different dictionaries (albeit both empty) for locals and globals. As such it will behavie "as-in" (I'm not really sure about this part, but as I tested it, it seams as such) the function. Meaning that it will add the printest and hola functions to the local scope instead of global scope. Regardless, I expected it to work -- I expected it will just query the printest in the hola function from the local scope instead of global. However, for some reason the hola function in this case gets compiled in such a way it expects printest to be in global scope and not local, which is not there. I really did not figured out why. So this will result in the NameError
exec(data, globals(), locals()) -- This will provide access to the state from the caller function. Nevertheless, it will crash for the very same reason as in the previous case
exec(data) -- This is just a shorthand for exec(data, globals(), locals()

python script that takes command line arguments needs to be called from another python script

I completely understand that I should have written the script right the first time, but the fact is I have a script that generates a data file based upon two values passed to it from the command line- like this:
[sinux1~]: ./sim_gen.py 100 .3
I need to call this script from within another script, iterating over a range of values. I searched around and after navigating through all of the "you shouldn't," I tried :
exec(open("./sim_gen.py 100 .3").read())
And this doesn't seem to work.
Help?

Let's break this down into pieces:
exec(open("./sim_gen.py 100 .3").read())
This is equivalent to:
f = open("./sim_gen.py 100 .3")
contents = f.read()
exec(contents)
That open is the same open you use for, say, reading a text file or a CSV. You're asking for a file named "sim_gen.py 100 .3" in the current directory. Do you have one? Of course not. So the open fails.
The best solution is, as you already know, to rewrite sim_gen.py so that you can import it and call a function and pass the arguments to it.
Failing that, the cleanest answer is probably to just run the Python script as a subprocess:
import subprocess
import sys
subprocess.run([sys.executable, "./sim_gen.py", "100", ".3"])
Notice that this is effectively the same thing you're doing when you run the script from your shell, so if it was OK there, it's almost surely OK here.
If you really need to exec for some reason, you will need to do something really hacky, and temporarily change argv for that script's code:
import sys
_argv = sys.argv
try:
sys.argv = ["./sim_gen.py", "100", ".3"]
with open("./sim_gen.py 100 .3"):
exec(f.read())
finally:
sys.argv = _argv
Although really, unless the point of running this is to silently modify your own module's globals or the like, you (a) almost certainly don't really need exec, and (b) want to pass an explicit globals argument even if you do really need it.

Function not defined when Importing Maya Python Script

I have a tool I wrote in python that works completely fine when running in the maya script editor. However, I want to be able to import the script from the script directory. Which should be simple, and I am shocked I can't find the solution while searching the web.
My script format is like this example:
import maya.cmds as cmds
# GUI code with buttons, they call the functions below.
#
#
def function1():
#commands that do things
def function2():
#commands that do things
#List of functions continues
Like I said, the program functions perfectly when run in the script editor. When saving the script to the directory and using this method:
import module
reload (module)
module.function()
The GUI loads fine, but then when pushing the gui buttons, it says the functions are not defined. I don't understand what I am missing? If the script was loaded, shouldn't the functions be defined? Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

Just because the GUI loads doesn't mean that all of your functions loaded properly. You need to put your file, (module.py) in a directory that is visible to your PYTHONPATH. If you're in Maya, you can also put it in the MAYA_SCRIPT_PATH
The PYTHONPATH / MAYA_SCRIPT_PATH are environment variables that you set before launching Maya. In a default Maya installation, some places where you could put your module.py file would be:
(Windows) C:\Users\YOUR_USER_NAME\Documents\maya\scripts
(Linux) ~/maya/scripts
(Mac) - Not sure, put probably also ~/maya/scripts
If you want to know where else you can place it, you run this
import os
print(os.getenv('MAYA_SCRIPT_PATH', ''))
print(os.getenv('PYTHONPATH', ''))
Any location in that list that you have write permissions to is OK to add your module.py file.
Also, it's worth noting that in your example module.function() would fail. It'd need to be module.function1() or module.function2() but I assume you know that. Hope this helps

Sup guys
So i know this is an old question that has already been answered but I have some extra information that helps in regards to GUI functions not working. (same error)
and there's basically nothing on this anywhere.
so the script director only helps when loading in the module through the shelf but will still return the same error "fuction is not defined"
this has todo with how the function is called through the UI element.
example.
this is will allow you to call function in the script editor
but gives you the function not defined error when the module is imported
def GUI_function():
pm.button( command = "function()")
def function():
do stuff
this on the other hand works.
def GUI_function():
pm.button( command = function)
def function(*_):
do stuff
i don't know why but maya tends to think function() is a nodetype
so remove the brackets if you not using arguments and you good to go

Proper position of imports & definitions in called scripts?

I have one script that calls another - let's call them master.py and fetch.py. I suppose the second script could be integrated into the first, but it does have distinct functionality - so keeping them separate seems like a good way to force myself to learn how to call outside scripts.
Here's the basic structure of fetch.py:
<import block>
infiles = <paths>
arcpy.env.workspace = os.path.dirname(infile)
ws = arcpy.env.workspace
newfile_list = []
def main():
name = <name>
if not arcpy.Exists(name + ".gdb"):
global ws
new_gdb = DM.CreateFileGDB(ws, name + ".gdb")
newfile_list.append(new_gdb)
other_func1()
other_func2()
print "\nNew files from fetch.py:"
for i in newfile_list:
print " " + i
def other_func1():
stuff
def other_func2():
stuff
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
And master.py:
<import block>
infiles = <paths>
def f1():
stuff
def f2():
stuff
import fetch
fetch.main()
f1()
f2()
The problems, concerning placement of the import block & file definitions of fetch.py:
When I put them inside main() and run it as a standalone script, my arcpy functions don't work because my various imports haven't run yet. Putting them ahead of main() and making them global, solves this problem.
But when I put them outside of main() as you see here, I get an error saying the local variable ws is referenced before assignment. I think this may have to do with my calling fetch.main(), where the initial lines don't get read. (I was able to make it work by declaring global ws, but don't know if this is advisable.)
How do I structure fetch.py so that the import statements and file definitions get read, both when run as a standalone script and when called?

Instead of rewriting your code for you, I will try to point you to some ideas from the developer philosophy toolkit to get you on the way how to refine your approach.
My feeling is that you should contemplate YAGNI and KISS when thinking about your code.
In your comment you write:
I'm keeping the 'fetch' script separate because finding feature orientation seems like a useful stand-alone tool down the road.
Like I say: YAGNI and KISS: If you need it as a standalone tool in the future then split it out in the future. For now keep it simple and put the code that belongs together in one module and make it callable exactly the way you need it. When you work with it and understand the problem better and see what else is needed, you can then add other ways of calling your script. There is no reason why you shouldn't keep all the code in one module while it is still manageable and just add different ways to call it.
If the time comes that you want to organize your code into several modules you can refactor it in a way that you pull out the things you do on the module level at the moment (either into functions or maybe even classes). Then you can control exactly what should happen when and you can control the order of things better.
As further reading in regards to structuring a Python project I would recommend the pypa sample project and Starting A Python Project The Right Way. The problems you have with imports will likely cease to exist if you structure your code and your project in a sensible, pythonic way.

Execute python script inside a python script

I have a scenario where i want to dynamically generate a python script - inside my main python script - store it as a string and then when need be, execute this dynamically generated script from my main script.
Is this possible, if so how?
thanks

For a script in a file use exec
For a script in a string use eval
!!! But !!!
before you use strings passed in from an external source, sanity check them!
Otherwise you expose the ability to execute arbitrary code from
within you program,
so range check your variables!
You do not ever want to be asking the question:
"excuse me mam, did you really name your son Robert'); DROP TABLE students; -- "?
If you dont understand the reference - see this quick cartoon...
http://xkcd.com/327/
but when you EVAL - you are taking full responsibility for the instructions that you are eval'ing.

Read up on the execfile() function.
http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html?highlight=exec#execfile

May want to look at the statement exec: http://docs.python.org/release/2.5.2/ref/exec.html

If you want to execute the script within the context of the main script, you might want to check eval [ http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/functions.html#eval ]

Not sure how wise this is but isn't the exec function what you use if you need to execute Python code?

There is precedence for what you are trying to do. The collections.namedtuple function builds a template string which is passed to exec in order to build a dynamically defined class.

As of Python version 3.11, execfile (which was the most convenient function) is not listed as built-in function anymore.
#George Lambert answer is the way to go. I'll add just some code for quick reference.
Run script within script
To run the script "run_me.py" within the script "main.py" do this:
run_me.py be like
print("hello_world")
main.py be like
with open("run_me.py", "r") as fl:
exec(fl.read())
Run code contained in a string
To run the code contained in a string us eval:
main.py be like
string_w_py_code = "print('hello world')"
eval(string_w_py_code)