We Keep Coding

How to use different functions in for loop in each iteration without using exec?

I am creating a program which fits various curves to data. I am creating a number of functions which define a fit by doing the following:
for i in range(len(Funcs2)):
func = "+".join(Funcs2[i])
func = func.format("[0:3]","[3:6]")
exec('def Trial1{0}(x,coeffs): return {1}'.format(i, func))
exec('def Trial1{0}_res(coeffs, x, y): return y - Trial1{0}
(x,coeffs)'.format(i))
How do I then call each function of these created functions in turn. At the moment i am doing the following:
for i in range(len(Funcs2)):
exec('Trial1{0}_coeffs,Trial1{0}_cov,Trial1{0}_infodict,Trial1{0}_
mesg,Trial1{0}_flag =
scipy.optimize.leastsq(Trial1{0}_res,x02, args=(x, y),
full_output = True)'.format(i))
In this loop, each created function is called in each iteration of the loop.The problem is that i have to keep using exec() to do want I want to do. This is probably bad practice and there must be another way to do it.
Also, i cannot use libraries other than numpy,scipy and matplotlib
Sorry for the bad formatting. The box can only take lines of code that are so long.

Functions are first-class objects in python! You can put them in containers like lists or tuples, iterate through them, and then call them. exec() or eval() are not required.
To work with functions as objects instead of calling them, omit the parentheses.
EG:
def plus_two(x):
return x+2
def squared(x):
return x**2
def negative(x):
return -x
functions = (plus_two, squared, negative)
for i in range(1, 5):
for func in functions:
result = func(i)
print('%s(%s) = %s' % (func.__name__, i, result))
--> OUTPUT
plus_two(1) = 3
squared(1) = 1
negative(1) = -1
plus_two(2) = 4
squared(2) = 4
negative(2) = -2
plus_two(3) = 5
squared(3) = 9
negative(3) = -3
plus_two(4) = 6
squared(4) = 16
negative(4) = -4

How to define multiple functions changing internal values?

I think my question should be more clearly understood by this short code:
fs = []
for k in range(0, 10):
def f(x):
return x + 2*k
fs.append(f)
fs[0](1)
# expecting 1 but 19(=1+2*9)
How do I instead make f return what I want? Please note that f cannot receive k as an argument.
(What I'm actually trying to do is prepare multiple constraint functions that are fed to scipy.optimize.minimize)

The typical way to fix this is to do something like:
def f(x, k=k):
return x + 2*k
For the most part, this shouldn't affect your "f cannot receive k as an argument" condition because it isn't a required argument.
A related, but different approach would be to define f out of the loop.
def f(k, x):
return x + 2*k
Then in the loop use functools.partial.
import functools
fs = []
for k in range(10):
fs.append(functools.partial(f, k))
In this approach, your function won't accept a value for k even if you try to pass one.

Basically the problem is that the variable k, in this case, continually changes as the loop iterates. This means that all things which are pointing to the variable "k" are pointing to the same value at all times.
There are a couple of ways to solve this. This is perhaps the most common.
def f(x, k=k):
# This sets k as a locally bound variable which is evaluated
# at the time the function is created.
return x + 2*k
The detriment is that this solution will allow a later function to call the newly created functions with a different value of k. This means you could call f("cat","dog") and get "catdogdog" as a return. While this is not the end of the world, it certainly isn't intended.
However, you could also do something like this:
def f_maker(k):
# Create a new function whose variable "k" does not exist in outside scope.
def f(x):
return x + 2*k
return f
fs = []
for k in range(0, 10):
fs.append(f_maker(k))
fs[0](1)

calculating current value based on previous value

i would like to perform a calculation using python, where the current value (i) of the equation is based on the previous value of the equation (i-1), which is really easy to do in a spreadsheet but i would rather learn to code it
i have noticed that there is loads of information on finding the previous value from a list, but i don't have a list i need to create it! my equation is shown below.
h=(2*b)-h[i-1]
can anyone give me tell me a method to do this ?
i tried this sort of thing, but that will not work as when i try to do the equation i'm calling a value i haven't created yet, if i set h=0 then i get an error that i am out of index range
i = 1
for i in range(1, len(b)):
h=[]
h=(2*b)-h[i-1]
x+=1

h = [b[0]]
for val in b[1:]:
h.append(2 * val - h[-1]) # As you add to h, you keep up with its tail
for large b list (brr, one-letter identifier), to avoid creating large slice
from itertools import islice # For big list it will keep code less wasteful
for val in islice(b, 1, None):
....

As pointed out by #pad, you simply need to handle the base case of receiving the first sample.
However, your equation makes no use of i other than to retrieve the previous result. It's looking more like a running filter than something which needs to maintain a list of past values (with an array which might never stop growing).
If that is the case, and you only ever want the most recent value,then you might want to go with a generator instead.
def gen():
def eqn(b):
eqn.h = 2*b - eqn.h
return eqn.h
eqn.h = 0
return eqn
And then use thus
>>> f = gen()
>>> f(2)
4
>>> f(3)
2
>>> f(2)
0
>>>
The same effect could be acheived with a true generator using yield and send.

First of, do you need all the intermediate values? That is, do you want a list h from 0 to i? Or do you just want h[i]?
If you just need the i-th value you could us recursion:
def get_h(i):
if i>0:
return (2*b) - get_h(i-1)
else:
return h_0
But be aware that this will not work for large i, as it will exceed the maximum recursion depth. (Thanks for pointing this out kdopen) In that case a simple for-loop or a generator is better.
Even better is to use a (mathematically) closed form of the equation (for your example that is possible, it might not be in other cases):
def get_h(i):
if i%2 == 0:
return h_0
else:
return (2*b)-h_0
In both cases h_0 is the initial value that you start out with.

h = []
for i in range(len(b)):
if i>0:
h.append(2*b - h[i-1])
else:
# handle i=0 case here

You are successively applying a function (equation) to the result of a previous application of that function - the process needs a seed to start it. Your result looks like this [seed, f(seed), f(f(seed)), f(f(f(seed)), ...]. This concept is function composition. You can create a generalized function that will do this for any sequence of functions, in Python functions are first class objects and can be passed around just like any other object. If you need to preserve the intermediate results use a generator.
def composition(functions, x):
""" yields f(x), f(f(x)), f(f(f(x)) ....
for each f in functions
functions is an iterable of callables taking one argument
"""
for f in functions:
x = f(x)
yield x
Your specs require a seed and a constant,
seed = 0
b = 10
The equation/function,
def f(x, b = b):
return 2*b - x
f is applied b times.
functions = [f]*b
Usage
print list(composition(functions, seed))
If the intermediate results are not needed composition can be redefined as
def composition(functions, x):
""" Returns f(x), g(f(x)), h(g(f(x)) ....
for each function in functions
functions is an iterable of callables taking one argument
"""
for f in functions:
x = f(x)
return x
print composition(functions, seed)
Or more generally, with no limitations on call signature:
def compose(funcs):
'''Return a callable composed of successive application of functions
funcs is an iterable producing callables
for [f, g, h] returns f(g(h(*args, **kwargs)))
'''
def outer(f, g):
def inner(*args, **kwargs):
return f(g(*args, **kwargs))
return inner
return reduce(outer, funcs)
def plus2(x):
return x + 2
def times2(x):
return x * 2
def mod16(x):
return x % 16
funcs = (mod16, plus2, times2)
eq = compose(funcs) # mod16(plus2(times2(x)))
print eq(15)
While the process definition appears to be recursive, I resisted the temptation so I could stay out of maximum recursion depth hades.
I got curious, searched SO for function composition and, of course, there are numerous relavent Q&A's.

Python: A better way to write n compositions of a function?

I wrote a function "rep" that takes a function f and takes n compositions of f.
So rep(square,3) behaves like this: square(square(square(x))).
And when I pass 3 into it, rep(square,3)(3)=6561.
There is no problem with my code, but I was wondering if there was a way to make it "prettier" (or shorter) without having to call another function or import anything. Thanks!
def compose1(f, g):
"""Return a function h, such that h(x) = f(g(x))."""
def h(x):
return f(g(x))
return h
def rep(f,n):
newfunc = f
count=1
while count < n:
newfunc = compose1(f,newfunc)
count+=1
return newfunc

If you're looking for speed, the for loop is clearly the way to go. But if you're looking for theoretical academic acceptance ;-), stick to terse functional idioms. Like:
def rep(f, n):
return f if n == 1 else lambda x: f(rep(f, n-1)(x))

def rep(f, n):
def repeated(x):
for i in xrange(n):
x = f(x)
return x
return repeated
Using a for loop instead of while is shorter and more readable, and compose1 doesn't really need to be a separate function.

While I agree that repeated composition of the same function is best done with a loop, you could use *args to compose an arbitrary number of functions:
def identity(x):
return x
def compose(*funcs):
if funcs:
rest = compose(*funcs[1:])
return lambda x: funcs[0](rest(x))
else:
return identity
And in this case you would have:
def rep(f,n):
funcs = (f,)*n # tuple with f repeated n times
return compose(*funcs)
And as DSM kindly pointed out in the comments, you could remove the recursion like so:
def compose(*funcs):
if not funcs:
return identity
else:
def composed(x):
for f in reversed(funcs):
x = f(x)
return x
return composed
(also note that you can replace x with *args if you also want to support arbitrary arguments to the functions you're composing, but I left it at one argument since that's how you have it in the original problem)

Maybe someone will find this solution useful
Compose number of functions
from functools import reduce
def compose(*functions):
return reduce(lambda x, y: (lambda arg: x(y(arg))), functions)
Use list comprehensions to generate list of functions
def multi(how_many, func):
return compose(*[func for num in range(how_many)])
Usage
def square(x):
return x * x
multi(3, square)(3) == 6561

Python functions within lists

So today in computer science I asked about using a function as a variable. For example, I can create a function, such as returnMe(i) and make an array that will be used to call it. Like h = [help,returnMe] and then I can say h1 and it would call returnMe("Bob"). Sorry I was a little excited about this. My question is is there a way of calling like h.append(def function) and define a function that only exists in the array?
EDIT:
Here Is some code that I wrote with this!
So I just finished an awesome FizzBuzz with this solution thank you so much again! Here's that code as an example:
funct = []
s = ""
def newFunct(str, num):
return (lambda x: str if(x%num==0) else "")
funct.append(newFunct("Fizz",3))
funct.append(newFunct("Buzz",5))
for x in range(1,101):
for oper in funct:
s += oper(x)
s += ":"+str(x)+"\n"
print s

You can create anonymous functions using the lambda keyword.
def func(x,keyword='bar'):
return (x,keyword)
is roughly equivalent to:
func = lambda x,keyword='bar':(x,keyword)
So, if you want to create a list with functions in it:
my_list = [lambda x:x**2,lambda x:x**3]
print my_list[0](2) #4
print my_list[1](2) #8

Not really in Python. As mgilson shows, you can do this with trivial functions, but they can only contain expressions, not statements, so are very limited (you can't assign to a variable, for example).
This is of course supported in other languages: in Javascript, for example, creating substantial anonymous functions and passing them around is a very idiomatic thing to do.

You can create the functions in the original scope, assign them to the array and then delete them from their original scope. Thus, you can indeed call them from the array but not as a local variable. I am not sure if this meets your requirements.
#! /usr/bin/python3.2
def a (x): print (x * 2)
def b (x): print (x ** 2)
l = [a, b]
del a
del b
l [0] (3) #works
l [1] (3) #works
a (3) #fails epicly

You can create a list of lambda functions to increment by every number from 0 to 9 like so:
increment = [(lambda arg: (lambda x: arg + x))(i) for i in range(10)]
increment[0](1) #returns 1
increment[9](10) #returns 19
Side Note:
I think it's also important to note that this (function pointers not lambdas) is somewhat like how python holds methods in most classes, except instead of a list, it's a dictionary with function names pointing to the functions. In many but not all cases instance.func(args) is equivalent to instance.__dict__['func'](args) or type(class).__dict__['func'](args)