I am plotting the same type of information, but for different countries, with multiple subplots with Matplotlib. That is, I have nine plots on a 3x3 grid, all with the same for lines (of course, different values per line).
However, I have not figured out how to put a single legend (since all nine subplots have the same lines) on the figure just once.
How do I do that?
There is also a nice function get_legend_handles_labels() you can call on the last axis (if you iterate over them) that would collect everything you need from label= arguments:
handles, labels = ax.get_legend_handles_labels()
fig.legend(handles, labels, loc='upper center')
figlegend may be what you're looking for: matplotlib.pyplot.figlegend
An example is at Figure legend demo.
Another example:
plt.figlegend(lines, labels, loc = 'lower center', ncol=5, labelspacing=0.)
Or:
fig.legend(lines, labels, loc = (0.5, 0), ncol=5)
TL;DR
lines_labels = [ax.get_legend_handles_labels() for ax in fig.axes]
lines, labels = [sum(lol, []) for lol in zip(*lines_labels)]
fig.legend(lines, labels)
I have noticed that none of the other answers displays an image with a single legend referencing many curves in different subplots, so I have to show you one... to make you curious...
Now, if I've teased you enough, here it is the code
from numpy import linspace
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# each Axes has a brand new prop_cycle, so to have differently
# colored curves in different Axes, we need our own prop_cycle
# Note: we CALL the axes.prop_cycle to get an itertoools.cycle
color_cycle = plt.rcParams['axes.prop_cycle']()
# I need some curves to plot
x = linspace(0, 1, 51)
functs = [x*(1-x), x**2*(1-x),
0.25-x*(1-x), 0.25-x**2*(1-x)]
labels = ['$x-x²$', '$x²-x³$',
'$\\frac{1}{4} - (x-x²)$', '$\\frac{1}{4} - (x²-x³)$']
# the plot,
fig, (a1,a2) = plt.subplots(2)
for ax, f, l, cc in zip((a1,a1,a2,a2), functs, labels, color_cycle):
ax.plot(x, f, label=l, **cc)
ax.set_aspect(2) # superfluos, but nice
# So far, nothing special except the managed prop_cycle. Now the trick:
lines_labels = [ax.get_legend_handles_labels() for ax in fig.axes]
lines, labels = [sum(lol, []) for lol in zip(*lines_labels)]
# Finally, the legend (that maybe you'll customize differently)
fig.legend(lines, labels, loc='upper center', ncol=4)
plt.show()
If you want to stick with the official Matplotlib API, this is
perfect, otherwise see note no.1 below (there is a private
method...)
The two lines
lines_labels = [ax.get_legend_handles_labels() for ax in fig.axes]
lines, labels = [sum(lol, []) for lol in zip(*lines_labels)]
deserve an explanation, see note 2 below.
I tried the method proposed by the most up-voted and accepted answer,
# fig.legend(lines, labels, loc='upper center', ncol=4)
fig.legend(*a2.get_legend_handles_labels(),
loc='upper center', ncol=4)
and this is what I've got
Note 1
If you don't mind using a private method of the matplotlib.legend module ... it's really much much much easier
from matplotlib.legend import _get_legend_handles_labels
...
fig.legend(*_get_legend_handles_and_labels(fig.axes), ...)
Note 2
I have encapsulated the two tricky lines in a function, just four lines of code, but heavily commented
def fig_legend(fig, **kwdargs):
# Generate a sequence of tuples, each contains
# - a list of handles (lohand) and
# - a list of labels (lolbl)
tuples_lohand_lolbl = (ax.get_legend_handles_labels() for ax in fig.axes)
# E.g., a figure with two axes, ax0 with two curves, ax1 with one curve
# yields: ([ax0h0, ax0h1], [ax0l0, ax0l1]) and ([ax1h0], [ax1l0])
# The legend needs a list of handles and a list of labels,
# so our first step is to transpose our data,
# generating two tuples of lists of homogeneous stuff(tolohs), i.e.,
# we yield ([ax0h0, ax0h1], [ax1h0]) and ([ax0l0, ax0l1], [ax1l0])
tolohs = zip(*tuples_lohand_lolbl)
# Finally, we need to concatenate the individual lists in the two
# lists of lists: [ax0h0, ax0h1, ax1h0] and [ax0l0, ax0l1, ax1l0]
# a possible solution is to sum the sublists - we use unpacking
handles, labels = (sum(list_of_lists, []) for list_of_lists in tolohs)
# Call fig.legend with the keyword arguments, return the legend object
return fig.legend(handles, labels, **kwdargs)
I recognize that sum(list_of_lists, []) is a really inefficient method to flatten a list of lists, but ① I love its compactness, ② usually is a few curves in a few subplots and ③ Matplotlib and efficiency? ;-)
For the automatic positioning of a single legend in a figure with many axes, like those obtained with subplots(), the following solution works really well:
plt.legend(lines, labels, loc = 'lower center', bbox_to_anchor = (0, -0.1, 1, 1),
bbox_transform = plt.gcf().transFigure)
With bbox_to_anchor and bbox_transform=plt.gcf().transFigure, you are defining a new bounding box of the size of your figureto be a reference for loc. Using (0, -0.1, 1, 1) moves this bounding box slightly downwards to prevent the legend to be placed over other artists.
OBS: Use this solution after you use fig.set_size_inches() and before you use fig.tight_layout()
You just have to ask for the legend once, outside of your loop.
For example, in this case I have 4 subplots, with the same lines, and a single legend.
from matplotlib.pyplot import *
ficheiros = ['120318.nc', '120319.nc', '120320.nc', '120321.nc']
fig = figure()
fig.suptitle('concentration profile analysis')
for a in range(len(ficheiros)):
# dados is here defined
level = dados.variables['level'][:]
ax = fig.add_subplot(2,2,a+1)
xticks(range(8), ['0h','3h','6h','9h','12h','15h','18h','21h'])
ax.set_xlabel('time (hours)')
ax.set_ylabel('CONC ($\mu g. m^{-3}$)')
for index in range(len(level)):
conc = dados.variables['CONC'][4:12,index] * 1e9
ax.plot(conc,label=str(level[index])+'m')
dados.close()
ax.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1.05, 0), loc='lower left', borderaxespad=0.)
# it will place the legend on the outer right-hand side of the last axes
show()
If you are using subplots with bar charts, with a different colour for each bar, it may be faster to create the artefacts yourself using mpatches.
Say you have four bars with different colours as r, m, c, and k, you can set the legend as follows:
import matplotlib.patches as mpatches
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
labels = ['Red Bar', 'Magenta Bar', 'Cyan Bar', 'Black Bar']
#####################################
# Insert code for the subplots here #
#####################################
# Now, create an artist for each color
red_patch = mpatches.Patch(facecolor='r', edgecolor='#000000') # This will create a red bar with black borders, you can leave out edgecolor if you do not want the borders
black_patch = mpatches.Patch(facecolor='k', edgecolor='#000000')
magenta_patch = mpatches.Patch(facecolor='m', edgecolor='#000000')
cyan_patch = mpatches.Patch(facecolor='c', edgecolor='#000000')
fig.legend(handles = [red_patch, magenta_patch, cyan_patch, black_patch], labels=labels,
loc="center right",
borderaxespad=0.1)
plt.subplots_adjust(right=0.85) # Adjust the subplot to the right for the legend
To build on top of gboffi's and Ben Usman's answer:
In a situation where one has different lines in different subplots with the same color and label, one can do something along the lines of:
labels_handles = {
label: handle for ax in fig.axes for handle, label in zip(*ax.get_legend_handles_labels())
}
fig.legend(
labels_handles.values(),
labels_handles.keys(),
loc = "upper center",
bbox_to_anchor = (0.5, 0),
bbox_transform = plt.gcf().transFigure,
)
Using Matplotlib 2.2.2, this can be achieved using the gridspec feature.
In the example below, the aim is to have four subplots arranged in a 2x2 fashion with the legend shown at the bottom. A 'faux' axis is created at the bottom to place the legend in a fixed spot. The 'faux' axis is then turned off so only the legend shows. Result:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.gridspec as gridspec
# Gridspec demo
fig = plt.figure()
fig.set_size_inches(8, 9)
fig.set_dpi(100)
rows = 17 # The larger the number here, the smaller the spacing around the legend
start1 = 0
end1 = int((rows-1)/2)
start2 = end1
end2 = int(rows-1)
gspec = gridspec.GridSpec(ncols=4, nrows=rows)
axes = []
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gspec[start1:end1, 0:2]))
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gspec[start2:end2, 0:2]))
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gspec[start1:end1, 2:4]))
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gspec[start2:end2, 2:4]))
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gspec[end2, 0:4]))
line, = axes[0].plot([0, 1], [0, 1], 'b') # Add some data
axes[-1].legend((line,), ('Test',), loc='center') # Create legend on bottommost axis
axes[-1].set_axis_off() # Don't show the bottom-most axis
fig.tight_layout()
plt.show()
This answer is a complement to user707650's answer on the legend position.
My first try on user707650's solution failed due to overlaps of the legend and the subplot's title.
In fact, the overlaps are caused by fig.tight_layout(), which changes the subplots' layout without considering the figure legend. However, fig.tight_layout() is necessary.
In order to avoid the overlaps, we can tell fig.tight_layout() to leave spaces for the figure's legend by fig.tight_layout(rect=(0,0,1,0.9)).
Description of tight_layout() parameters.
All of the previous answers are way over my head, at this state of my coding journey, so I just added another Matplotlib aspect called patches:
import matplotlib.patches as mpatches
first_leg = mpatches.Patch(color='red', label='1st plot')
second_leg = mpatches.Patch(color='blue', label='2nd plot')
thrid_leg = mpatches.Patch(color='green', label='3rd plot')
plt.legend(handles=[first_leg ,second_leg ,thrid_leg ])
The patches aspect put all the data i needed on my final plot (it was a line plot that combined three different line plots all in the same cell in Jupyter Notebook).
Result
(I changed the names form what I named my own legend.)
Related
I'm trying to plot a figure without tickmarks or numbers on either of the axes (I use axes in the traditional sense, not the matplotlib nomenclature!). An issue I have come across is where matplotlib adjusts the x(y)ticklabels by subtracting a value N, then adds N at the end of the axis.
This may be vague, but the following simplified example highlights the issue, with '6.18' being the offending value of N:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import random
prefix = 6.18
rx = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
ry = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
plt.plot(rx,ry,'ko')
frame1 = plt.gca()
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_xticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_yticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_xticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_yticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
plt.show()
The three things I would like to know are:
How to turn off this behaviour in the first place (although in most cases it is useful, it is not always!) I have looked through matplotlib.axis.XAxis and cannot find anything appropriate
How can I make N disappear (i.e. X.set_visible(False))
Is there a better way to do the above anyway? My final plot would be 4x4 subplots in a figure, if that is relevant.
Instead of hiding each element, you can hide the whole axis:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
Or, you can set the ticks to an empty list:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_ticks([])
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_ticks([])
In this second option, you can still use plt.xlabel() and plt.ylabel() to add labels to the axes.
If you want to hide just the axis text keeping the grid lines:
frame1 = plt.gca()
frame1.axes.xaxis.set_ticklabels([])
frame1.axes.yaxis.set_ticklabels([])
Doing set_visible(False) or set_ticks([]) will also hide the grid lines.
If you are like me and don't always retrieve the axes, ax, when plotting the figure, then a simple solution would be to do
plt.xticks([])
plt.yticks([])
I've colour coded this figure to ease the process.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
You can have full control over the figure using these commands, to complete the answer I've add also the control over the spines:
ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
# X AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['bottom'].set_visible(False)
# BLUE
ax.set_xticklabels([])
# RED
ax.set_xticks([])
# RED AND BLUE TOGETHER
ax.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
# Y AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
# YELLOW
ax.set_yticklabels([])
# GREEN
ax.set_yticks([])
# YELLOW AND GREEN TOGHETHER
ax.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
I was not actually able to render an image without borders or axis data based on any of the code snippets here (even the one accepted at the answer). After digging through some API documentation, I landed on this code to render my image
plt.axis('off')
plt.tick_params(axis='both', left=False, top=False, right=False, bottom=False, labelleft=False, labeltop=False, labelright=False, labelbottom=False)
plt.savefig('foo.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight', pad_inches=0.0)
I used the tick_params call to basically shut down any extra information that might be rendered and I have a perfect graph in my output file.
Somewhat of an old thread but, this seems to be a faster method using the latest version of matplotlib:
set the major formatter for the x-axis
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(plt.NullFormatter())
One trick could be setting the color of tick labels as white to hide it!
plt.xticks(color='w')
plt.yticks(color='w')
or to be more generalized (#Armin Okić), you can set it as "None".
When using the object oriented API, the Axes object has two useful methods for removing the axis text, set_xticklabels() and set_xticks().
Say you create a plot using
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1)
ax.plot(x, y)
If you simply want to remove the tick labels, you could use
ax.set_xticklabels([])
or to remove the ticks completely, you could use
ax.set_xticks([])
These methods are useful for specifying exactly where you want the ticks and how you want them labeled. Passing an empty list results in no ticks, or no labels, respectively.
You could simply set xlabel to None, straight in your axis. Below an working example using seaborn
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
tips = sns.load_dataset("tips")
ax = sns.boxplot(x="day", y="total_bill", data=tips)
ax.set(xlabel=None)
plt.show()
Just do this in case you have subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(16, 8))
ax[0].set_yticklabels([]) # x-axis
ax[0].set_xticklabels([]) # y-axis
I'm trying to plot a figure without tickmarks or numbers on either of the axes (I use axes in the traditional sense, not the matplotlib nomenclature!). An issue I have come across is where matplotlib adjusts the x(y)ticklabels by subtracting a value N, then adds N at the end of the axis.
This may be vague, but the following simplified example highlights the issue, with '6.18' being the offending value of N:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import random
prefix = 6.18
rx = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
ry = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
plt.plot(rx,ry,'ko')
frame1 = plt.gca()
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_xticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_yticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_xticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_yticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
plt.show()
The three things I would like to know are:
How to turn off this behaviour in the first place (although in most cases it is useful, it is not always!) I have looked through matplotlib.axis.XAxis and cannot find anything appropriate
How can I make N disappear (i.e. X.set_visible(False))
Is there a better way to do the above anyway? My final plot would be 4x4 subplots in a figure, if that is relevant.
Instead of hiding each element, you can hide the whole axis:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
Or, you can set the ticks to an empty list:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_ticks([])
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_ticks([])
In this second option, you can still use plt.xlabel() and plt.ylabel() to add labels to the axes.
If you want to hide just the axis text keeping the grid lines:
frame1 = plt.gca()
frame1.axes.xaxis.set_ticklabels([])
frame1.axes.yaxis.set_ticklabels([])
Doing set_visible(False) or set_ticks([]) will also hide the grid lines.
If you are like me and don't always retrieve the axes, ax, when plotting the figure, then a simple solution would be to do
plt.xticks([])
plt.yticks([])
I've colour coded this figure to ease the process.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
You can have full control over the figure using these commands, to complete the answer I've add also the control over the spines:
ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
# X AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['bottom'].set_visible(False)
# BLUE
ax.set_xticklabels([])
# RED
ax.set_xticks([])
# RED AND BLUE TOGETHER
ax.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
# Y AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
# YELLOW
ax.set_yticklabels([])
# GREEN
ax.set_yticks([])
# YELLOW AND GREEN TOGHETHER
ax.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
I was not actually able to render an image without borders or axis data based on any of the code snippets here (even the one accepted at the answer). After digging through some API documentation, I landed on this code to render my image
plt.axis('off')
plt.tick_params(axis='both', left=False, top=False, right=False, bottom=False, labelleft=False, labeltop=False, labelright=False, labelbottom=False)
plt.savefig('foo.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight', pad_inches=0.0)
I used the tick_params call to basically shut down any extra information that might be rendered and I have a perfect graph in my output file.
Somewhat of an old thread but, this seems to be a faster method using the latest version of matplotlib:
set the major formatter for the x-axis
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(plt.NullFormatter())
One trick could be setting the color of tick labels as white to hide it!
plt.xticks(color='w')
plt.yticks(color='w')
or to be more generalized (#Armin Okić), you can set it as "None".
When using the object oriented API, the Axes object has two useful methods for removing the axis text, set_xticklabels() and set_xticks().
Say you create a plot using
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1)
ax.plot(x, y)
If you simply want to remove the tick labels, you could use
ax.set_xticklabels([])
or to remove the ticks completely, you could use
ax.set_xticks([])
These methods are useful for specifying exactly where you want the ticks and how you want them labeled. Passing an empty list results in no ticks, or no labels, respectively.
You could simply set xlabel to None, straight in your axis. Below an working example using seaborn
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
tips = sns.load_dataset("tips")
ax = sns.boxplot(x="day", y="total_bill", data=tips)
ax.set(xlabel=None)
plt.show()
Just do this in case you have subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(16, 8))
ax[0].set_yticklabels([]) # x-axis
ax[0].set_xticklabels([]) # y-axis
I am trying to create a nice plot which joins a 4x4 grid of subplots (placed with gridspec, each subplot is 8x8 pixels ). I constantly struggle getting the spacing between the plots to match what I am trying to tell it to do. I imagine the problem is arising from plotting a color bar on the right side of the figure, and adjusting the location of the plots in the figure to accommodate. However, it appears that this issue crops up even without the color bar included, which has further confused me. It may also have to do with the margin spacing. The images shown below are produced by the associated code. As you can see, I am trying to get the space between the plots to go to zero, but it doesn't seem to be working. Can anyone advise?
fig = plt.figure('W Heat Map', (18., 15.))
gs = gridspec.GridSpec(4,4)
gs.update(wspace=0., hspace=0.)
for index in indices:
loc = (i,j) #determined by the code
ax = plt.subplot(gs[loc])
c = ax.pcolor(physHeatArr[index,:,:], vmin=0, vmax=1500)
# take off axes
ax.axis('off')
ax.set_aspect('equal')
fig.subplots_adjust(right=0.8,top=0.9,bottom=0.1)
cbar_ax = heatFig.add_axes([0.85, 0.15, 0.05, 0.7])
cbar = heatFig.colorbar(c, cax=cbar_ax)
cbar_ax.tick_params(labelsize=16)
fig.savefig("heatMap.jpg")
Similarly, in making a square figure without the color bar:
fig = plt.figure('W Heat Map', (15., 15.))
gs = gridspec.GridSpec(4,4)
gs.update(wspace=0., hspace=0.)
for index in indices:
loc = (i,j) #determined by the code
ax = plt.subplot(gs[loc])
c = ax.pcolor(physHeatArr[index,:,:], vmin=0, vmax=400, cmap=plt.get_cmap("Reds_r"))
# take off axes
ax.axis('off')
ax.set_aspect('equal')
fig.savefig("heatMap.jpg")
When the axes aspect ratio is set to not automatically adjust (e.g. using set_aspect("equal") or a numeric aspect, or in general using imshow), there might be some white space between the subplots, even if wspace and hspaceare set to 0. In order to eliminate white space between figures, you may have a look at the following questions
How to remove gaps between *images* in matplotlib?
How to combine gridspec with plt.subplots() to eliminate space between rows of subplots
How to remove the space between subplots in matplotlib.pyplot?
You may first consider this answer to the first question, where the solution is to build a single array out of the individual arrays and then plot this single array using pcolor, pcolormesh or imshow. This makes it especially comfortable to add a colorbar later on.
Otherwise consider setting the figuresize and subplot parameters such that no whitespae will remain. Formulas for that calculation are found in this answer to the second question.
An adapted version with colorbar would look like this:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.colors
import matplotlib.cm
import numpy as np
image = np.random.rand(16,8,8)
aspect = 1.
n = 4 # number of rows
m = 4 # numberof columns
bottom = 0.1; left=0.05
top=1.-bottom; right = 1.-0.18
fisasp = (1-bottom-(1-top))/float( 1-left-(1-right) )
#widthspace, relative to subplot size
wspace=0 # set to zero for no spacing
hspace=wspace/float(aspect)
#fix the figure height
figheight= 4 # inch
figwidth = (m + (m-1)*wspace)/float((n+(n-1)*hspace)*aspect)*figheight*fisasp
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=n, ncols=m, figsize=(figwidth, figheight))
plt.subplots_adjust(top=top, bottom=bottom, left=left, right=right,
wspace=wspace, hspace=hspace)
#use a normalization to make sure the colormapping is the same for all subplots
norm=matplotlib.colors.Normalize(vmin=0, vmax=1 )
for i, ax in enumerate(axes.flatten()):
ax.imshow(image[i, :,:], cmap = "RdBu", norm=norm)
ax.axis('off')
# use a scalarmappable derived from the norm instance to create colorbar
sm = matplotlib.cm.ScalarMappable(cmap="RdBu", norm=norm)
sm.set_array([])
cax = fig.add_axes([right+0.035, bottom, 0.035, top-bottom])
fig.colorbar(sm, cax=cax)
plt.show()
I can't seem to get the horizontal gap between subplots to disappear. Any suggestions?
Code:
plt.clf()
fig = plt.figure()
for i in range(6):
ax = fig.add_subplot(3,2,i)
frame_range = [[]]
ax.set_xlim(-100000, 1300000)
ax.set_ylim(8000000, 9100000)
ax.set_aspect(1)
ax.set_xticks([])
ax.set_yticks([])
ax.set_frame_on(False)
ax.add_patch(dt.PolygonPatch(provs[0],fc = 'None', ec = 'black'))
fig.tight_layout(pad=0, w_pad=0, h_pad=0)
plt.subplots_adjust( wspace=0, hspace=0)
plt.savefig(wd + 'example.png')
Examples posted both for this code, and with ticks and frame left in.
You are setting two concurrent rules for your graphs.
One is axes aspect
ax.set_aspect(i)
This will force the plot to always respect the 1:1 proportions.
The other is setting h_space and w_space to be zero. In this case matplotlib will try to change the size of the axes to reduce the spaces to zero. As you set the aspect to be 1 whenever one of the edges touch each other the size of the axes will not change anymore. This produces the gap that keeps the graphs horizontally apart.
There two way to force them to be close to each other.
You can change the figure width to bring them closer to each other.
You can set a the spacing of the left and right edge to bring them closer to each other.
Using the example you gave, I modified few lines to illustrate what can be done with the left and right spacing.
fig = plt.figure()
for i in range(6):
ax = fig.add_subplot(3,2,i)
ax.plot(linspace(-1,1),sin(2*pi*linspace(-1,1)))
draw()
frame_range = [[]]
ax.set_aspect(1)
ax.set_xticks([])
ax.set_yticks([])
# ax.set_frame_on(False)
# ax.add_patch(dt.PolygonPatch(provs[0],fc = 'None', ec = 'black'))
fig.tight_layout(pad=0,w_pad=0, h_pad=0)
subplots_adjust(left=0.25,right=0.75,wspace=0, hspace=0)
The result should be something like the figure bellow.
It is important to keep in mind that if you resize the window the plots will be put apart again, depending if you make it taller/shorter of wider/narrower.
Hope it helps
Is there a way of telling pyplot.text() a location like you can with pyplot.legend()?
Something like the legend argument would be excellent:
plt.legend(loc="upper left")
I am trying to label subplots with different axes using letters (e.g. "A","B"). I figure there's got to be a better way than manually estimating the position.
Thanks
Just use annotate and specify axis coordinates. For example, "upper left" would be:
plt.annotate('Something', xy=(0.05, 0.95), xycoords='axes fraction')
You could also get fancier and specify a constant offset in points:
plt.annotate('Something', xy=(0, 1), xytext=(12, -12), va='top'
xycoords='axes fraction', textcoords='offset points')
For more explanation see the examples here and the more detailed examples here.
I'm not sure if this was available when I originally posted the question but using the loc parameter can now actually be used. Below is an example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.offsetbox import AnchoredText
# make some data
x = np.arange(10)
y = x
# set up figure and axes
f, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
# loc works the same as it does with figures (though best doesn't work)
# pad=5 will increase the size of padding between the border and text
# borderpad=5 will increase the distance between the border and the axes
# frameon=False will remove the box around the text
anchored_text = AnchoredText("Test", loc=2)
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.add_artist(anchored_text)
plt.show()
The question is quite old but as there is no general solution to the problem till now (2019) according to Add loc=best kwarg to pyplot.text(), I'm using legend() and the following workaround to obtain auto-placement for simple text boxes:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.patches as mpl_patches
x = np.linspace(-1,1)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x, x*x)
# create a list with two empty handles (or more if needed)
handles = [mpl_patches.Rectangle((0, 0), 1, 1, fc="white", ec="white",
lw=0, alpha=0)] * 2
# create the corresponding number of labels (= the text you want to display)
labels = []
labels.append("pi = {0:.4g}".format(np.pi))
labels.append("root(2) = {0:.4g}".format(np.sqrt(2)))
# create the legend, supressing the blank space of the empty line symbol and the
# padding between symbol and label by setting handlelenght and handletextpad
ax.legend(handles, labels, loc='best', fontsize='small',
fancybox=True, framealpha=0.7,
handlelength=0, handletextpad=0)
plt.show()
The general idea is to create a legend with a blank line symbol and to remove the resulting empty space afterwards. How to adjust the size of matplotlib legend box? helped me with the legend formatting.