We Keep Coding

Optimize performance - writing out Prime Numbers

The issue is Prime Numbers -that the solution is not implemented effectively.
I hear about eratosthenes sieve.
What are the other methods of implementing prime numbers - in a more efficient way?
n = int(input())
suma = 0
m = 0
while m < n:
if n > 100000:
break
x = int(input())
if 1 < x < 10000:
for i in range(x):
if x % (i + 1) == 0:
suma += 1
if suma == 2 and x != 2:
m += 1
print('o')
suma = 0
else:
m += 1
print('x')
suma = 0
The one of solution: https://medium.com/#dhruvpatel1057/generate-prime-numbers-in-python-using-segmented-sieve-of-eratosthenes-245b79da6687

You are using a very naive approach for primality checking.
As a general naive but not so much method, I'd recommend using Wilson's theorem as prime checker. Using math.factorial instead of a python loop should provide you with some reasonable speed increase while keeping the code fairly simple.

I hear about eratosthenes sieve - but not idea, how to implement it.
That's not the sieve of eratosthenes proper but what people usually talk about when they mention it is that when you find a prime you go through all your candidates and remove its factors ("sieving" them out hence the name) and the new first candidate is the next prime in the sequence.
There are more efficient primality tests than sieving everything though, check the "primality test" wikipedia page for examples.

This code will generate the amount of prime numbers the user asked for. It is very efficient, and can work out the first thousand prime numbers in milliseconds.
amount = int(input("Enter the amount of prime numbers you would like to see: "))
primes = []
num = 1
while len(primes) < amount:
num += 1
# If num is bigger than 1, and is 2 or is odd, and when divided by all the number from 3 to num's square root plus 1 (excluding even numbers), there is always a remainder.
if num > 1 and (num == 2 or num % 2 != 0) and all(num % divisor != 0 for divisor in range(3, int(num ** 0.5) + 1, 2)):
primes.append(num)
print(f"The first {amount} prime numbers are:\n{primes}")

this is sample code , make a list of prime, and from this list check the number to process is getting divided or not , if it is not getting divided then it is prime else it is not
# your code goes here
x = int(input())
prime =[]
for i in range(2,x):
if i not in prime:
if prime == []:
prime.append(i)
else:
check = 1
for j in prime:
if i%j==0:
check = 0
break
if check:
prime.append(i)
print(prime)

My Code for Perfect Number

So far, I've learned about for loops, if statements, and counting so it would be great to get feedback using only these topics. I was trying to solve the Perfect Number problem where the divisors excluding the number add up to that number. So for 6, The divisors 1,2,3 add up to 6. I've tried looking at other posts, but I wanted to know why my code specifically isn't working. I've tried solving the problem, and I feel that I'm almost there. I just have one issue. This is what I have so far:
#
num = 30
for i in range(1,num+1):
count = 0
for k in range(1,num+1):
if i%k == 0 and i!=k:
count += k
if count == i:
print(k,'Perfect',i)
#
The output on shell gives me this:
3 Perfect 6
8 Perfect 24
14 Perfect 28
#
I know that 24 is not a perfect number. The highest divisor for 24 excluding 24 should be 12, but I'm getting 8. This is why it's showing me that 24 is perfect. Can anyone clarify why I'm not able to get 12?

You have to count all divisors, before you make a conclusion, your code goes up to 8 for 24, then sums up all divisors so far and declares 24 a perfect number, not waiting for other divisors to appear.
Your code should looks like this:
for i in range(1,num+1):
count = 0
for k in range(1,i): # no point searching for numbers greater than i
if i%k == 0 :
count += k
if count == i:
print('Perfect',i)
and produce:
('Perfect', 6)
('Perfect', 28)

Your problem is that you're checking whether count == i in the wrong place. You need to check after the entire count summation is finished, not after each addition to the count sum.
num = 30
for i in range(1,num+1):
count = 0
for k in range(1,num+1):
if i%k == 0 and i != k:
count += k
if count == i:
print(k,'Perfect',i)
Also, if you want slightly more efficient code, you could do the subtraction afterwards instead of checking each value. Also, as lenik suggested, you only need to count to i (since i can't have any divisors larger than itself.) Even more efficiently, one could just use a Sieve of Eratosthenes-like approach, and count to sqrt(i)+1, finding the corresponding factors along the way:
from math import sqrt
num = 30
for i in range(1,num+1):
count = 0
for k in range(1,sqrt(i) + 1):
if i%k == 0:
count += k
factor = count/k
# The conditional is necessary in case i is a perfect square.
if k != factor:
count += factor
if count - i == i:
print(k,'Perfect',i)

12 is not perfect 1 + 2 + 3+ 4 + 6 != 12
second for also have problem in count (change it to i+1)
and critical problem was las check was in for
num = 30
for i in range(1,num+1):
count = 0
last = 0
for k in range(1,i):
if i%k == 0:
count += k
last = k
if count == i:
print(last,'Perfect',i)
result :
3 Perfect 6
14 Perfect 28

Part of this prime number program is just not making sense to me

Could someone explain
for k in range(2, 1+int(sqrt(i+1))):
to me? I am having a hard time comprehending how
1+int(sqrt(i+1)
truly works.
I understand 1 is being added to i, and it is being square rooted, and it must be an integer. But I don't comprehend how that achieves the goal of the whole program
from math import sqrt
count = 1
i = 1
while count < 1000:
i += 2
for k in range(2, 1+int(sqrt(i+1))):
if i%k == 0:
break
else:
# print(i) ,
count += 1
# if count%20==0: print ""
print i
whose goal is to find the 1000th prime.

If a number is to be tested for primality, it is sufficient to test all factors up to sqrt(number), because any factor above sqrt(number) has a corresponding factor below sqrt(number).
e.g. if you want to test if 36 is prime, it is sufficient to test up to 6 - for example, 12 is a factor of 36, but its other factor is 3, which you already tested by then.

How to generate the 1000th prime in python?

count = 0
i = 11
while count <= 1000 and i <= 10000:
if i%2 != 0:
if (i%3 == 0 or i%4 == 0 or i%5 == 0 or i%6 == 0 or i%7 == 0 or i%9 == 0):
continue
else:
print i,'is prime.'
count += 1
i+=1
I'm trying to generate the 1000th prime number only through the use of loops. I generate the primes correctly but the last prime i get is not the 1000th prime. How can i modify my code to do so. Thank in advance for the help.
EDIT: I understand how to do this problem now. But can someone please explain why the following code does not work ? This is the code I wrote before I posted the second one on here.
count = 1
i = 3
while count != 1000:
if i%2 != 0:
for k in range(2,i):
if i%k == 0:
print(i)
count += 1
break
i += 1

Let's see.
count = 1
i = 3
while count != 1000:
if i%2 != 0:
for k in range(2,i):
if i%k == 0: # 'i' is _not_ a prime!
print(i) # ??
count += 1 # ??
break
i += 1 # should be one space to the left,
# for proper indentation
If i%k==0, then i is not a prime. If we detect that it's not a prime, we should (a) not print it out, (b) not increment the counter of found primes and (c) we indeed should break out from the for loop - no need to test any more numbers.
Also, instead of testing i%2, we can just increment by 2, starting from 3 - they will all be odd then, by construction.
So, we now have
count = 1
i = 3
while count != 1000:
for k in range(2,i):
if i%k == 0:
break
else:
print(i)
count += 1
i += 2
The else after for gets executed if the for loop was not broken out of prematurely.
It works, but it works too hard, so is much slower than necessary. It tests a number by all the numbers below it, but it's enough to test it just up to its square root. Why? Because if a number n == p*q, with p and q between 1 and n, then at least one of p or q will be not greater than the square root of n: if they both were greater, their product would be greater than n.
So the improved code is:
from math import sqrt
count = 1
i = 1
while count < 1000:
i += 2
for k in range(2, 1+int(sqrt(i+1))):
if i%k == 0:
break
else:
# print(i) ,
count += 1
# if count%20==0: print ""
print i
Just try running it with range(2,i) (as in the previous code), and see how slow it gets. For 1000 primes it takes 1.16 secs, and for 2000 – 4.89 secs (3000 – 12.15 ses). But with the sqrt it takes just 0.21 secs to produce 3000 primes, 0.84 secs for 10,000 and 2.44 secs for 20,000 (orders of growth of ~ n2.1...2.2 vs. ~ n1.5).
The algorithm used above is known as trial division. There's one more improvement needed to make it an optimal trial division, i.e. testing by primes only. An example can be seen here, which runs about 3x faster, and at better empirical complexity of ~ n1.3.
Then there's the sieve of Eratosthenes, which is quite faster (for 20,000 primes, 12x faster than "improved code" above, and much faster yet after that: its empirical order of growth is ~ n1.1, for producing n primes, measured up to n = 1,000,000 primes):
from math import log
count = 1 ; i = 1 ; D = {}
n = 100000 # 20k:0.20s
m = int(n*(log(n)+log(log(n)))) # 100k:1.15s 200k:2.36s-7.8M
while count < n: # 400k:5.26s-8.7M
i += 2 # 800k:11.21-7.8M
if i not in D: # 1mln:13.20-7.8M (n^1.1)
count += 1
k = i*i
if k > m: break # break, when all is already marked
while k <= m:
D[k] = 0
k += 2*i
while count < n:
i += 2
if i not in D: count += 1
if i >= m: print "invalid: top value estimate too small",i,m ; error
print i,m
The truly unbounded, incremental, "sliding" sieve of Eratosthenes is about 1.5x faster yet, in this range as tested here.

A couple of problems are obvious. First, since you're starting at 11, you've already skipped over the first 5 primes, so count should start at 5.
More importantly, your prime detection algorithm just isn't going to work. You have to keep track of all the primes smaller than i for this kind of simplistic "sieve of Eratosthanes"-like prime detection. For example, your algorithm will think 11 * 13 = 143 is prime, but obviously it isn't.
PGsimple1 here is a correct implementatioin of what the prime detection you're trying to do here, but the other algorithms there are much faster.

Are you sure you are checking for primes correctly? A typical solution is to have a separate "isPrime" function you know that works.
def isPrime(num):
i = 0
for factor in xrange(2, num):
if num%factor == 0:
return False
return True
(There are ways to make the above function more effective, such as only checking odds, and only numbers below the square root, etc.)
Then, to find the n'th prime, count all the primes until you have found it:
def nthPrime(n):
found = 0
guess = 1
while found < n:
guess = guess + 1
if isPrime(guess):
found = found + 1
return guess

your logic is not so correct.
while :
if i%2 != 0:
if (i%3 == 0 or i%4 == 0 or i%5 == 0 or i%6 == 0 or i%7 == 0 or i%9 == 0):
this cannot judge if a number is prime or not .
i think you should check if all numbers below sqrt(i) divide i .

Here's a is_prime function I ran across somewhere, probably on SO.
def is_prime(n):
return all((n%j > 0) for j in xrange(2, n))
primes = []
n = 1
while len(primes) <= 1000:
if is_prime(n):
primes.append(n)
n += 1
Or if you want it all in the loop, just use the return of the is_prime function.
primes = []
n = 1
while len(primes) <= 1000:
if all((n%j > 0) for j in xrange(2, n)):
primes.append(n)
n += 1

This is probably faster: try to devide the num from 2 to sqrt(num)+1 instead of range(2,num).
from math import sqrt
i = 2
count = 1
while True:
i += 1
prime = True
div = 2
limit = sqrt(i) + 1
while div < limit:
if not (i % div):
prime = False
break
else:
div += 1
if prime:
count += 1
if count == 1000:
print "The 1000th prime number is %s" %i
break

Try this:
def isprime(num):
count = num//2 + 1
while count > 1:
if num %count == 0:
return False
count -= 1
else:
return True
num = 0
count = 0
while count < 1000:
num += 1
if isprime(num):
count += 1
if count == 1000:
prime = num
Problems with your code:
No need to check if i <= 10000.
You are doing this
if i%2 != 0:
if (i%3 == 0 or i%4 == 0 or i%5 == 0 or i%6 == 0 or i%7 == 0 or i%9 == 0):
Here, you are not checking if the number is divisible by a prime number greater than 7.
Thus your result: most probably divisible by 11
Because of 2. your algorithm says 17 * 13 * 11 is a prime(which it is not)

How about this:
#!/usr/bin/python
from math import sqrt
def is_prime(n):
if n == 2:
return True
if (n < 2) or (n % 2 == 0):
return False
return all(n % i for i in xrange(3, int(sqrt(n)) + 1, 2))
def which_prime(N):
n = 2
p = 1
while True:
x = is_prime(n)
if x:
if p == N:
return n
else:
p += 1
n += 1
print which_prime(1000)

n=2 ## the first prime no.
prime=1 ## we already know 2 is the first prime no.
while prime!=1000: ## to get 1000th prime no.
n+=1 ## increase number by 1
pon=1 ## sets prime_or_not(pon) counter to 1
for i in range(2,n): ## i varies from 2 to n-1
if (n%i)==0: ## if n is divisible by i, n is not prime
pon+=1 ## increases prime_or_not counter if n is not prime
if pon==1: ## checks if n is prime or not at the end of for loop
prime+=1 ## if n is prime, increase prime counter by 1
print n ## prints the thousandth prime no.

Here is yet another submission:
ans = 0;
primeCounter = 0;
while primeCounter < 1000:
ans += 1;
if ans % 2 != 0:
# we have an odd number
# start testing for prime
divisor = 2;
isPrime = True;
while divisor < ans:
if ans % divisor == 0:
isPrime = False;
break;
divisor += 1;
if isPrime:
print str(ans) + ' is the ' + str(primeCounter) + ' prime';
primeCounter += 1;
print 'the 1000th prime is ' + str(ans);

Here's a method using only if & while loops. This will print out only the 1000th prime number. It skips 2. I did this as problem set 1 for MIT's OCW 6.00 course & therefore only includes commands taught up to the second lecture.
prime_counter = 0
number = 3
while(prime_counter < 999):
divisor = 2
divcounter = 0
while(divisor < number):
if(number%divisor == 0):
divcounter = 1
divisor += 1
if(divcounter == 0):
prime_counter+=1
if(prime_counter == 999):
print '1000th prime number: ', number
number+=2

I just wrote this one. It will ask you how many prime number user wants to see, in this case it will be 1000. Feel free to use it :).
# p is the sequence number of prime series
# n is the sequence of natural numbers to be tested if prime or not
# i is the sequence of natural numbers which will be used to devide n for testing
# L is the sequence limit of prime series user wants to see
p=2;n=3
L=int(input('Enter the how many prime numbers you want to see: '))
print ('# 1 prime is 2')
while(p<=L):
i=2
while i<n:
if n%i==0:break
i+=1
else:print('#',p,' prime is',n); p+=1
n+=1 #Line X
#when it breaks it doesn't execute the else and goes to the line 'X'

This will be the optimized code with less number of executions, it can calculate and display 10000 prime numbers within a second.
it will display all the prime numbers, if want only nth prime number, just set while condition and print the prime number after you come out of the loop. if you want to check a number is prime or not just assign number to n, and remove while loop..
it uses the prime number property that
* if a number is not divisible by the numbers which are less than its square root then it is prime number.
* instead of checking till the end(Means 1000 iteration to figure out 1000 is prime or not) we can end the loop within 35 iterations,
* break the loop if it is divided by any number at the beginning(if it is even loop will break on first iteration, if it is divisible by 3 then 2 iteration) so we iterate till the end only for the prime numbers
remember one thing you can still optimize the iterations by using the property *if a number is not divisible with the prime numbers less than that then it is prime number but the code will be too large, we have to keep track of the calculated prime numbers, also it is difficult to find a particular number is a prime or not, so this will be the Best logic or code
import math
number=1
count = 0
while(count<10000):
isprime=1
number+=1
for j in range(2,int(math.sqrt(number))+1):
if(number%j==0):
isprime=0
break
if(isprime==1):
print(number,end=" ")
count+=1

Calculating prime numbers

I am now doing the MIT opencourse thing, and already the second assignment, I feel it has left me out in the cold. http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-00-introduction-to-computer-science-and-programming-fall-2008/assignments/pset1a.pdf
The specifics of it, are to write something that can calculate the 1000th prime number. We only know about the print, ==, =, 1=,if, else, elif, while, %, -,+,*,/, commands I think. We also don't yet know about importing libraries.
My Idea of how it would work is to take an odd number and try to divide it by, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and if %n !=0, then add a number to NumberofPrimes variable starting with 11 as the base of the tests, and assigning it a base value of 4 at the base of NumberofPrimes, though I don't know if that is even right, because I wouldn't know how to display the 1000th prime number.
Am I close?
The latest incarnation of it is as follows:
##calculate the 1000th prime number
potprime = 3
numberofprime = 1
cycle = if potprime%3 = 0:
break
if potpimre%4 = 0:
break
if potprime%5 = 0:
break
if potprime%6 = 0:
break
if potprime%7 = 0:
break
if potprime%8 = 0:
break
if potprime%9 = 0:
break
numberofprime + 1
potprime + 1
if potprime%2 == 0:
potprime = potprime + 1
if potprime != 0:
cycle
Where exactly am I going wrong? Walk me through it step by step. I really want to learn it, though I feel like I am just being left out in the cold here.
At this point, it would be more beneficial for me to see how a proper one could be done rather than doing this. I have been working for 3 hours and have gotten nowhere with it. If anybody has a solution, I would be more than happy to look at it and try to learn from that.

Looks like I am late
It is quite straight forward that if a number is not divisible by any prime number, then that number is itself a prime number. You can use this fact to minimize number of divisions.
For that you need to maintain a list of prime numbers. And for each number only try to divide with prime numbers already in the list. To optimize further it you can discard all prime numbers more than square root of the number to be tested. You will need to import sqrt() function for that.
For example, if you test on 1001, try to test with 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 and 31. That should be enough. Also never try to find out if an even number is prime. So basically if you test an odd number n, then after that test next number: (n + 2)
Have tested the below code. The 1000th prime number is 7919. Not a big number!!
Code may be like:
from math import sqrt
primeList = [2]
num = 3
isPrime = 1
while len(primeList) < 1000:
sqrtNum = sqrt(num)
# test by dividing with only prime numbers
for primeNumber in primeList:
# skip testing with prime numbers greater than square root of number
if num % primeNumber == 0:
isPrime = 0
break
if primeNumber > sqrtNum:
break
if isPrime == 1:
primeList.append(num)
else:
isPrime = 1
#skip even numbers
num += 2
# print 1000th prime number
print primeList[999]

The following code is gross, but since 1000 is indeed a small index, it solves your problem in a fraction of a second (and it uses only the primitives you are supposed to know so far):
primesFound = 0
number = 1
while primesFound < 1000:
number = number + 1 # start from 2
# test for primality
divisor = 2
numberIsPrime = True
while divisor*divisor <= number: # while divisor <= sqrt(number)
if number % divisor == 0:
numberIsPrime = False
break
divisor = divisor + 1
# found one?
if numberIsPrime:
primesFound = primesFound + 1
print number
You can test the solution here.
Now you should find a more efficient solution, optimize and maybe go for the 1000000-th prime...

For one thing, I'm pretty sure that in Python, if you want to have an if statement that tests whether or not A = B, you need to use the == operator, rather then the =.
For another thing, your algorithm would consider the number 143 to be prime, even though 143 = 11 * 13
You need keep track of all the prime numbers that you have already computed - add them to an array. Use that array to determine whether or not a new number that you are testing is prime.

It seems to me that you are jumping into the deep-end after deciding the kiddy-pool is too deep. The prime number project will be assignment 2 or 3 in most beginning programming classes, just after basic syntax is covered. Rather than help you with the algorithm (there are many good ones out there) I'm going to suggest that you attempt to learn syntax with the python shell before you write long programs, since debugging a line is easier than debugging an entire program. Here is what you wrote in a way that will actually run:
count = 4
n = 10 #I'm starting you at 10 because your method
#says that 2, 3, 5, and 7 are not prime
d = [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] #a list containing the ints you were dividing by
def cycle(n): #This is how you define a function
for i in d: #i will be each value in the list d
if not n%i: #this is equal to if n%i == 0
return 0 #not prime (well, according to this anyway)
return 1 #prime
while count < 1000:
count += cycle(n) #adds the return from cycle to count
n += 1
print n - 1
The answer is still incorrect because that is not how to test for a prime. But knowing a little syntax would at least get you that wrong answer, which is better than a lot of tracebacks.
(Also, I realize lists, for loops, and functions were not in the list of things you say you know.)

Your code for this answer can be condensed merely to this:
prime_count = 1
start_number = 2
number_to_check = 2
while prime_count <= 1000:
result = number_to_check % start_number
if result > 0:
start_number +=1
elif result == 0:
if start_number == number_to_check:
print (number_to_check)
number_to_check +=1
prime_count +=1
start_number =2
else:
number_to_check +=1
start_number = 2

To answer your subsequent question, 'How do I keep track of all the prime numbers?
One way of doing this is to make a list.
primeList = [] # initializes a list
Then, each time you test a number for whether it is prime or not, add that number to primeList
You can do this by using the 'append' function.
primeList.append( potprime ) # adds each prime number to that list
Then you will see the list filling up with numbers so after the first three primes it looks like this:
>>> primeList
[11, 13, 17]

Your math is failing you. A prime number is a number that has 2 divisors: 1 and itself. You are not testing the numbers for primality.

I am very late on this but maybe my answer will be of use to someone. I am doing the same open course at MIT and this is the solution I came up with. It returns the correct 1000th prime and the correct 100,000th prime and various others in between that I have tested. I think this is a correct solution (not the most efficient I am sure but a working solution I think).
#Initialise some variables
candidate = 1
prime_counter = 1
while prime_counter < 1000:
test = 2
candidate = candidate + 2
# While there is a remainder the number is potentially prime.
while candidate%test > 0:
test = test + 1
# No remainder and test = candidate means candidate is prime.
if candidate == test:
prime_counter = prime_counter + 1
print "The 1000th prime is: " + str(candidate)
While I was at it I went on and did the second part of the assignment. The question is posed as follows:
"There is a cute result from number theory that states that for sufficiently large n the product of the primes less than n is less than or equal to e^n and that as n grows, this becomes a tight bound (that is, the ratio of the product of the primes to e^n gets close to 1 as n grows).
Computing a product of a large number of prime numbers can result in a very large number,
which can potentially cause problems with our computation. (We will be talking about how
computers deal with numbers a bit later in the term.) So we can convert the product of a set of primes into a sum of the logarithms of the primes by applying logarithms to both parts of this conjecture. In this case, the conjecture above reduces to the claim that the sum of the
logarithms of all the primes less than n is less than n, and that as n grows, the ratio of this sum to n gets close to 1."
Here is my solution. I print the result for every 1,000th prime up to the 10,000th prime.
from math import *
#Initialise some variables
candidate = 1
prime_counter = 1
sum_logs = log(2)
while prime_counter < 10000:
test = 2
candidate = candidate + 2
# While there is a remainder the number is potentially prime.
while candidate%test > 0:
test = test + 1
# No remainder and test = candidate means candidate is prime.
if candidate == test:
prime_counter = prime_counter + 1
# If the number is prime add its log to the sum of logs.
sum_logs = sum_logs + log(candidate)
if prime_counter%1000 == 0:
# For every 1000th prime print the result.
print sum_logs," ",candidate," ",sum_logs/candidate
print "The 10000th prime is: " + str(candidate)
Cheers,
Adrian

I came up with this solution in my interview, but I didn't get the job :( It has about 1/100 less iterations than the solution above:
from math import *
MAX_IDX=1000
MAX_IDX-=1
num_iter=0
l_pirme_list=[3]
candidate=l_pirme_list[0]
prime_counter=1
while prime_counter < MAX_IDX:
candidate+=2
#Cut the binary number in half. This is quite faster than sqrt()
bin_candidate=format(candidate, "2b")
max_prime_search=int(bin_candidate[:len(bin_candidate)/2+1],2)+1
# max_prime_search=sqrt(candidate)+1
candidate_is_prime=1
for prime_item in l_pirme_list:
num_iter+=1
if candidate % prime_item==0:
candidate_is_prime=0
break
elif prime_item > max_prime_search:
candidate_is_prime=1
break
if candidate_is_prime:
prime_counter+=1
l_pirme_list.append(candidate)
l_pirme_list.insert(0,2)
print "number iterations=", num_iter
print l_pirme_list[MAX_IDX]