raw_input in python variable to cmd - python

How can I take this code, and take the raw_input and add "ping" before it in cmd, so it'll look like this in command prompt: [ping (raw_input)]
HERE IS THE CODE:
RS_usr = raw_input('input user here: ')
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT
p = Popen(['cmd.exe'], stdout=PIPE, stdin=PIPE, stderr=STDOUT)
out,err = p.communicate(input=RS_usr)
print(out)

If I understood you correctly you should change a couple of lines in your script:
p = Popen(['cmd.exe', '/k', 'set PROMPT=[Hello, (' + RS_usr + ')]' ], stdout=PIPE, stdin=PIPE, stderr=STDOUT)
out,err = p.communicate()

Related

Python subprocess Popen get command output when using os.waitpid()

How to extract the stdout of the executed command when I use waitpid() during subprocess.Popen()?
p = subprocess.Popen(['ls'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
retcode = os.waitpid(p.pid, 0)[1]
When I use,
p.communicate()
it returns empty ('','')
ok, I use it like this now:
p = subprocess.Popen(['ls'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
err = p.stderr.read()
retcode = os.waitpid(p.pid, 0)[1]

python subprocess handle exception

I am trying to handle exception and errors from Popen, but I can handle it onle from send. How can I handle it from tar and pigz ?
here is my code:
try:
tar = Popen("tar cPf - %s" %pth, shell=True, stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE)
pigz = Popen("pigz -1 -kc", stdin=tar.stdout, shell=True, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
send = Popen("./s3cmd -c ./.s3cfg sync - s3://%s/%s.tar.gz" %(bucket_name,filename), stdin=pigz.stdout, shell=True, stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE)
send_err = send.communicate()[1]
tar.stdout.close()
pigz.stdout.close()
tar.wait()
pigz.wait()
if send_err:
print send_err
return False
else:
return True
except:
return False

Multiple line shell commands using Python commands module

I'm trying to write a Python function that transforms a given coordinate system to another using gdal. Problem is that I'm trying to execute the command as one string, but in shell, I have to press enter before entering the coordinates.
x = 1815421
y = 557301
ret = []
tmp = commands.getoutput( 'gdaltransform -s_srs \'+proj=lcc +lat_1=34.03333333333333
+lat_2=35.46666666666667 +lat_0=33.5 +lon_0=-118 +x_0=2000000 +y_0=500000 +ellps=GRS80
+units=m +no_defs\' -t_srs epsg:4326 \n' + str(x) + ' ' + str(y) )
I tried it using '\n', but that doesn't work.
My guess is that you run gdaltransform by pressing Enter and the coordinates are read by the program itself from its stdin, not the shell:
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
p = Popen(['gdaltransform', '-s_srs', ('+proj=lcc '
'+lat_1=34.03333333333333 '
'+lat_2=35.46666666666667 '
'+lat_0=33.5 '
'+lon_0=-118 +x_0=2000000 +y_0=500000 +ellps=GRS80 '
'+units=m +no_defs'), '-t_srs', 'epsg:4326'],
stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, universal_newlines=True) # run the program
output = p.communicate("%s %s\n" % (x, y))[0] # pass coordinates
from subprocess import *
c = 'command 1 && command 2 && command 3'
# for instance: c = 'dir && cd C:\\ && dir'
handle = Popen(c, stdin=PIPE, stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, shell=True)
print handle.stdout.read()
handle.flush()
If i'm not mistaken, the commands will be executed over a "session" and thus keeping whatever niformation you need in between the commands.
More correctly, using shell=True (from what i've been tought) is that it's supposed to be used if given a string of commands rather than a list. If you'd like to use a list suggestions are to do as follows:
import shlex
c = shlex.split("program -w ith -a 'quoted argument'")
handle = Popen(c, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE, stdin=PIPE)
print handle.stdout.read()
And then catch the output, Or you could work with a open stream and use handle.stdin.write() but it's a bit tricky.
Unless you only want to execute, read and die, .communicate() is perfect, or just .check_output(<cmd>)
Good information n how Popen works can be found here (altho different topic): python subprocess stdin.write a string error 22 invalid argument
Solution
Anyway, this should work (you have to redirect STDIN and STDOUT):
from subprocess import *
c = 'gdaltransform -s_srs \'+proj=lcc +lat_1=34.03333333333333 +lat_2=35.46666666666667 +lat_0=33.5 +lon_0=-118 +x_0=2000000 +y_0=500000 +ellps=GRS80 +units=m +no_defs\' -t_srs epsg:4326 \n' + str(x) + ' ' + str(y) + '\n'
handle = Popen(c, stdin=PIPE, stderr=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, shell=True)
print handle.stdout.read()
handle.flush()

Python subprocess: how to use pipes thrice? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do I use subprocess.Popen to connect multiple processes by pipes?
(9 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I'd like to use subprocess on the following line:
convert ../loxie-orig.png bmp:- | mkbitmap -f 2 -s 2 -t 0.48 | potrace -t 5 --progress -s -o ../DSC00232.svg
I found thank to other posts the subprocess documentation but in the example we use only twice pipe.
So, I try for two of the three commands and it works
p1 = subprocess.Popen(['convert', fileIn, 'bmp:-'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
# p2 = subprocess.Popen(['mkbitmap', '-f', '2', '-s', '2', '-t', '0.48'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p3 = subprocess.Popen(['potrace', '-t' , '5', '-s' , '-o', fileOut], stdin=p1.stdout,stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p1.stdout.close() # Allow p1 to receive a SIGPIPE if p3 exits.
output = p3.communicate()[0]
Can you help me for the third command?
Thank you very much.
Just add a third command following the same example:
p1 = subprocess.Popen(['convert', fileIn, 'bmp:-'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p2 = subprocess.Popen(['mkbitmap', '-f', '2', '-s', '2', '-t', '0.48'],
stdin=p1.stdout, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p1.stdout.close()
p3 = subprocess.Popen(['potrace', '-t' , '5', '-s' , '-o', fileOut],
stdin=p2.stdout,stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p2.stdout.close()
output = p3.communicate()[0]
def runPipe(cmds):
try:
p1 = subprocess.Popen(cmds[0].split(' '), stdin = None, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
prev = p1
for cmd in cmds[1:]:
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd.split(' '), stdin = prev.stdout, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
prev = p
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
p.wait()
returncode = p.returncode
except Exception, e:
stderr = str(e)
returncode = -1
if returncode == 0:
return (True, stdout.strip().split('\n'))
else:
return (False, stderr)
Then execute it like:
runPipe(['ls -1','head -n 2', 'head -n 1'])
Use subprocess.Popen() with the option shell=True, and you can pass it your entire command as a single string.
This is the simplest solution and makes it possible to embed a complicated pipeline in python without head-scratching; but in some cases it might not work, e.g. (as #torek commented) if there are spaces in the filenames passed for input or output. In that case, take the trouble to build up the robust solution in the accepted answer.

link several Popen commands with pipes

I know how to run a command using cmd = subprocess.Popen and then subprocess.communicate.
Most of the time I use a string tokenized with shlex.split as 'argv' argument for Popen.
Example with "ls -l":
import subprocess
import shlex
print subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(r'ls -l'), stdin = subprocess.PIPE, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0]
However, pipes seem not to work... For instance, the following example returns noting:
import subprocess
import shlex
print subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(r'ls -l | sed "s/a/b/g"'), stdin = subprocess.PIPE, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0]
Can you tell me what I am doing wrong please?
Thx
I think you want to instantiate two separate Popen objects here, one for 'ls' and the other for 'sed'. You'll want to pass the first Popen object's stdout attribute as the stdin argument to the 2nd Popen object.
Example:
p1 = subprocess.Popen('ls ...', stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
p2 = subprocess.Popen('sed ...', stdin=p1.stdout, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
print p2.communicate()
You can keep chaining this way if you have more commands:
p3 = subprocess.Popen('prog', stdin=p2.stdout, ...)
See the subprocess documentation for more info on how to work with subprocesses.
I've made a little function to help with the piping, hope it helps. It will chain Popens as needed.
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
import shlex
def run(cmd):
"""Runs the given command locally and returns the output, err and exit_code."""
if "|" in cmd:
cmd_parts = cmd.split('|')
else:
cmd_parts = []
cmd_parts.append(cmd)
i = 0
p = {}
for cmd_part in cmd_parts:
cmd_part = cmd_part.strip()
if i == 0:
p[i]=Popen(shlex.split(cmd_part),stdin=None, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
else:
p[i]=Popen(shlex.split(cmd_part),stdin=p[i-1].stdout, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
i = i +1
(output, err) = p[i-1].communicate()
exit_code = p[0].wait()
return str(output), str(err), exit_code
output, err, exit_code = run("ls -lha /var/log | grep syslog | grep gz")
if exit_code != 0:
print "Output:"
print output
print "Error:"
print err
# Handle error here
else:
# Be happy :D
print output
shlex only splits up spaces according to the shell rules, but does not deal with pipes.
It should, however, work this way:
import subprocess
import shlex
sp_ls = subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(r'ls -l'), stdin = subprocess.PIPE, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
sp_sed = subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(r'sed "s/a/b/g"'), stdin = sp_ls.stdout, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
sp_ls.stdin.close() # makes it similiar to /dev/null
output = sp_ls.communicate()[0] # which makes you ignore any errors.
print output
according to help(subprocess)'s
Replacing shell pipe line
-------------------------
output=`dmesg | grep hda`
==>
p1 = Popen(["dmesg"], stdout=PIPE)
p2 = Popen(["grep", "hda"], stdin=p1.stdout, stdout=PIPE)
output = p2.communicate()[0]
HTH
"""
Why don't you use shell
"""
def output_shell(line):
try:
shell_command = Popen(line, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE, shell=True)
except OSError:
return None
except ValueError:
return None
(output, err) = shell_command.communicate()
shell_command.wait()
if shell_command.returncode != 0:
print "Shell command failed to execute"
return None
return str(output)
Thank #hernvnc, #glglgl, and #Jacques Gaudin for the answers. I fixed the code from #hernvnc. His version will cause hanging in some scenarios.
import shlex
from subprocess import PIPE
from subprocess import Popen
def run(cmd, input=None):
"""Runs the given command locally and returns the output, err and exit_code."""
if "|" in cmd:
cmd_parts = cmd.split('|')
else:
cmd_parts = []
cmd_parts.append(cmd)
i = 0
p = {}
for cmd_part in cmd_parts:
cmd_part = cmd_part.strip()
if i == 0:
if input:
p[i]=Popen(shlex.split(cmd_part),stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
else:
p[i]=Popen(shlex.split(cmd_part),stdin=None, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
else:
p[i]=Popen(shlex.split(cmd_part),stdin=p[i-1].stdout, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
i = i +1
# close the stdin explicitly, otherwise, the following case will hang.
if input:
p[0].stdin.write(input)
p[0].stdin.close()
(output, err) = p[i-1].communicate()
exit_code = p[0].wait()
return str(output), str(err), exit_code
# test case below
inp = b'[ CMServer State ]\n\nnode node_ip instance state\n--------------------------------------------\n1 linux172 10.90.56.172 1 Primary\n2 linux173 10.90.56.173 2 Standby\n3 linux174 10.90.56.174 3 Standby\n\n[ ETCD State ]\n\nnode node_ip instance state\n--------------------------------------------------\n1 linux172 10.90.56.172 7001 StateFollower\n2 linux173 10.90.56.173 7002 StateLeader\n3 linux174 10.90.56.174 7003 StateFollower\n\n[ Cluster State ]\n\ncluster_state : Normal\nredistributing : No\nbalanced : No\ncurrent_az : AZ_ALL\n\n[ Datanode State ]\n\nnode node_ip instance state | node node_ip instance state | node node_ip instance state\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n1 linux172 10.90.56.172 6001 P Standby Normal | 2 linux173 10.90.56.173 6002 S Primary Normal | 3 linux174 10.90.56.174 6003 S Standby Normal'
cmd = "grep -E 'Primary' | tail -1 | awk '{print $3}'"
run(cmd, input=inp)

Categories