HTTP framework for a python based server serving mobile applications - python

I am working on building a python powered back-end server for a mobile application. I am using MongoDB hosted on the Cloud for storage. The communication between the Application and the server will be mostly JSON. There wont be any HTML involved in this transfer as such.
I am looking for a framework to build my server. I did some research and found (django, Pylons etc) are for full stack server and is not needed for my requirements.
I am confused on how to go about selecting an HTTP framework (web.py, cherrypy etc).
also, i might use Mongoengine as the ODM. I am not sure if this decision is anyway going to affect the framework selection
any ideas?

I'd recommend bottle or flask, both of which are very minimal and impose no constraints on you whatsoever. In the case of bottle, it's particularly easy to build a simple RESTful server since it will automatically return JSON from a route that returns a dict:
from bottle import route, run
#route('/user_info/:id'):
def user_info(id):
user = get_user(id) # ...do something, lookup user, whatever
return {'first_name': user.first_name, 'last_name': user.last_name}
run()

Pyramid Framework doesnt enforce a templating engine (not a full stack) or a persistence/storage system. It has json and jsonp renderer (no html at all).
It also has a scaffold for jquery mobile app (I havent tried this, so I dont know).

I personally prefer web.py, but in your case it is possible to start with basic wsgi app, or something simple as http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/ because it doesn't enforce a specific template engine or database adapter.

Related

Should I have a NodeJS server for react server-side rendering?

I have a API server which is written in python.
And I wanted to render my react components on server side.
So I searched the best practices and result was having a nodeJS server.
But in my thoughts, this is weird because I have to build a another server with different language. This is bad at maintainable, and maybe have an overload.
So I want to know having nodeJS server is usual. and also how do big companies do server-side rendering.
If it is as simple as wanting to use Python with React, you can use python-react to render React components.
As noted above, if you are using Flask, the templating is in Jinja2, but that isn't necessarily mutually exclusive to using React in your project.
This resource on using Flask/React may be of use to you, as well.

Python framework for an extremely lightweight python webservice

I want to develop an extremely lightweight web service with a RESTful JSON API. I will do all the session management on the server side. The solution will receive several 100k (or more) API calls an hour and return (compressed) JSON as response, it should be able to scale effortlessly.
Security is naturally important, but I want to avoid heavy weight frameworks like Django etc, and preferably will use a webserver like nginx or lighttpd instead of Apache.
At the server end, this is all I need:
user session management
security (protection against atleast the more common attacks such as cross site request forgery etc)
url routing
http utilities (e.g. compression)
I am aware of web2py, but its deployment options seems 'not well though out' at best - so far, I have been unable to get it to work with Apache, despite following the user manuals.
Can anyone suggest a python framework (and web server) best suited for this task?
if you want to go really lightweight, you might try wsgi itself without a framework, or maybe Flask. I understand wsgi runs on lighttpd, you'll get some hits on a Google search.
Try Pyramid. It's fast, lightweight and with a lot of options to configure your enviroment as you like...

Deciding to WSGI or Django for new web app

I'm in the process of setting up a new web app and deciding whether to just do it with WSGI or go the full framework route with Django.
The app's foremost requirements:
1) The app has no UI what so ever and all of the data is exposed to clients via a REST api with JSON.
2) It will have data to persist so MongoDB & probably Amazon's SimpleDB will be used for the database side.
Is there a reason to use Django or can I get marginal speed improvement with WSGI only?
Previous server-side apps I've built were either with Java/Struts and Groovy/Grails on the JVM. My understanding is that Django is an MVC framework similar to Rails and Grails.
I've also played around with Google App Engine which uses WSGI as thin layer above your code for managing and routing requests.
I suggest you consider something between those two extremes. Flask is lightweight, very easy to use, and connects to your web server via wsgi. You can use regular python database connectors with it, and a few databases even have Flask-specific extension modules.
I have worked with Django for a couple of projects and I like it a lot, but since you are going to use mongoDB and a lot of JSON I suggest you use NodeJS as server side, with Express as framework, you can see a brief tutorial here:
http://howtonode.org/express-mongodb
One of the advantages of this is that you will use only javascript all along your project, I began working with this technology the last month in a Hackathon, and I can tell you that I'm very impressed of how fast and simple it is.
I've worked a bit with some django "apps" ,its really easy, but setting up the "apps" can be a bit of a long process. Django has a lot of nice features that you won't be using and I agree that you might be on one "extreme" here.

Using Django minus the web server

I'm writing a syndication client, with the aim being to have a client for devices, and a web site that has the same functionality. I shall develop the website using Django - this is already decided; the client shall be written in python with both a CLI and a PyQt4 GUI. I have been writing the clinet first, and it's fairly database-heavy, as everything is cached to enable it to be read while offline.
It struck me today that it would make sense to use Django models for my application, to reduce the repetition of effort between the client and the website. My question is how easy it is to seperate this, and how much of Django I will need in my client to use Django's models. AFAIK I should not need to run the server, but what else is needed? I had an idea of generating the same html for my client as the website, but showing it withing Qt widgets rather than serving pages for a browser.
Has anyone tried this sort of thing before? I'm starting on this already, but it would be good to get a warning of potential dead-ends or things that will create a maintainance nightmare...
Read up on standalone Django scripts and you'll be on your path to victory. Basically all you're really doing is referencing the Django settings.py (which Django expects) and then using models without web views or urls.
If all you're really interested in is using Django's ORM to manage your models and database interaction, you might want to consider using SQLAlchemy instead.
You'll still have to run the Django app as a web server, but you can restrict it to serve to only localhost or something. And sure, you can use QtWebKit as the client.

How can I make WSGI(Python) stateful?

I'm quite new in Python world. I come from java and ABAP world, where their application server are able to handle stateful request.
Is it also possible in python using WSGI?
Or stateful and stateless are handled in other layer?
Usually, you don't work with "bare" WSGI. You work with web-frameworks, such as Pylons or TurboGears2.
And these contain a session-middleware, based on WSGI - called "Beaker". But if you work with the framework, you don't have to worry about that - you just use it.
But if you insist, you can of course use Beaker standalone.
I prefer working directly on wsgi, along with mako and psycopg.
It's good to know about Beaker, though I usually don't hold state in the server because I believe it reduces scalability. I either put it in the user's cookie, in the database tied to a token in the user's cookie, or in a redirect url.
Your question is a little vague and open-ended. First of all, WSGI itself isn't a framework, it's just the glue to connect a framework to the web server. Secondly, I'm not clear on what you mean when you say "state" -- do you mean storing information about a client on the server? If so, web frameworks (Pylons, Django, etc) allow you to store that kind of information in web session variables.

Categories