We Keep Coding

How can i align star field FIT images taken with CCD in PYTHON?

I have seven of star field images taken with CCD. Extensions of them are FIT. I'm trying to align them by Python but, i have confused. This time is my very first attempt to align images. I found a few module related with alignment of fits images but they seem to me very confusing. I need a help.

The APLpy module (https://aplpy.github.io/) does what you need to do.
However, it might not be the most straightforward thing to use for a first-timer.
What I would recommend is using PyRAF, which is a python wrapper for the IRAF data reduction software developed by NOAO (National Optical Astronomy Organization) in the 80's/90's to deal with CCD data reduction.
You can get pyraf by typing pip install pyraf. Once you have pyraf, I would recommend following Josh Wallawender's IRAF tutorial; skip to Section V ("Basic Reduction Steps for Imaging Data"). Keep in mind you are using PyRAF, so any IRAF-specific things (sections I-IV) don't necessarily apply to you. PyRAF is a much easier to use system.
The specific PyRAF tasks you need are imalign and imcombine. You'll also need to give a file with the rough shifts between each image (the help file for imalign is a fantastic resource, btw, and you can access it via epar imalign and clicking on the "Help" button when the GUI pops up).
I hope this gives you a starting point. There are other ways to do image combining in python, but astropy is kind of finicky for first-time users.

.asc viewer using Kivy

I want to develop a 3D file viewer in kivy and python that reads and displays .asc mesh files of the format:
x1,y1,z1
x2,y2,z2
........
xi,yi,zi
What I have thought so far is to use a method similar to beginShape() of Processing so as to begin drawing a 3D shape then use a for-loop to append each point respectively.
I have also found that kivy example which parses .obj files and then displays them. Do you have any ideas on how can I make a similar ascparser and try to display my files?
Any help is greatly appreciated

I have also found that kivy example which parses .obj files and then displays them. Do you have any ideas on how can I make a similar ascparser and try to display my files?
Your best strategy at the moment is probably to read the objparser and try to understand what it is doing. The important thing is building a list of points and normals, which are passed to opengl via a Mesh with a custom vertex_format and custom shaders. In principle it wouldn't be very hard to do the same thing for your own filetype just by comparison with the .obj code, though you will need some understanding of what's going on (you can read about opengl and read the kivy source, if you haven't already) to make significant changes.
This is really an advanced topic right now, Kivy has very few pre-built wrappers to 3d opengl rendering. The backend is fully capable (so the 3d rendering example isn't that complex, for instance), but you probably do need some understanding of what's going on to accomplish things like your own task.
There are also a few other examples of 3d rendering in Kivy, which you might find helpful. nskrypnik has several repositories doing just this (see kivy-trackball, kivy-3dpicking, kivy-rotation3d), and seems to have begun implementing a proper 3d api in the kivy3 repo, though this is not complete and I suggest it as something you can learn about by reading, not something that can necessarily do what you want right now. The other nice example I've seen is a 3d inspector POC by tito, though it's just a proof of concept and not a polished product.

Render 3D model orthographically in Python

I want to write a tool in Python that will help me create isometric tiles from 3D-models. You see, I'm not a very proficient artist and free 3D-models are plentisome, and creating something like a table or chair is much easer in 3D than in painting.
This script will load a 3D model in orthographic projection and take pictures from four directions so it can be used in a game. I've tried this in Blender, but the results are inconsistent, very difficult to control and take very long time to create simple sprites.
Rolling my own script will probably let me do neat things too, especially batch-genetration, maybe on texture changes, shading, etc. The game itself will probably be made in Python tpp, so maybe I could generate on the fly. (Edit: and automatically creat cut out see-through walls for when they face camera)
Now my question, what Python libraries can do something like this? I've checked both Pyglet and Panda3D, but I haven't even been able to load a model, let alone set it to orthographic projection.

I found this code:
www.pygame.org/wiki/OBJFileLoader
It let me load and display an .obj file of a cube from Blender with ease. It runs PyOpenGL so it should let me do everything OpenGL can. Never knew OpenGL was so low-level, didn't realize I'd have to write my own loaders and everything.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure I can modify this to project isometrically, rotate the object and grab shots and combine them into sprites. Thanks you guys!

Since you looked at Panda3D - if you can convert your model to the 'egg' format (which blender/maya may do), then you could be able to import it.
https://www.panda3d.org/manual/index.php/Loading_Models
https://www.panda3d.org/manual/index.php/Models_and_Actors
http://www.panda3d.org/manual/index.php/Converting_from_Blender
Note: sources of this was 'python 3d mesh loader' in a popular search engine - this looks viable to me. I now need to try installing it and some code...

Can 3D OpenGL game written in Python look good and run fast?

I am planning to write an simple 3d(isometric view) game in Java using jMonkeyEngine - nothing to fancy, I just want to learn something about OpenGL and writing efficient algorithms (random map generating ones).
When I was planning what to do, I started wondering about switching to Python. I know that Python didn't come into existence to be a tool to write 3d games, but is it possible to write good looking games with this language?
I have in mind 3d graphics, nice effects and free CPU time to power to rest of game engine? I had seen good looking java games - and too be honest, I was rather shocked when I saw level of detail achieved in Runescape HD.
On the other hand, pygame.org has only 2d games, with some starting 3d projects. Are there any efficient 3d game engines for python? Is pyopengl the only alternative? Good looking games in python aren't popular or possible to achieve?
I would be grateful for any information / feedback.

If you are worried about 3D performance: Most of the performance-critical parts will be handled by OpenGL (in a C library or even in hardware), so the language you use to drive it should not matter too much.
To really find out if performance is a problem, you'd have to try it. But there is no reason why it cannot work in principle.
At any rate, you could still optimize the critical parts, either in Python or by dropping to C. You still gain Python's benefit for most of the game engine which is less performance-critical.

Yes. Eve Online does it.
http://support.eve-online.com/Pages/KB/Article.aspx?id=128

I did a EuroPython talk about my amateur attempts to drive OpenGL from Python:
http://pyvideo.org/video/381/pycon-2011--algorithmic-generation-of-opengl-geom
The latest version of the code I'm talking about is here:
https://github.com/tartley/gloopy
It's billed as a 'library', but that was naive of me: It's a bunch of personal experimental code.
Nevertheless, it demonstrates that you can move around hundreds of bits of geometry at 60fps from Python.
Although the demo above is fairly bare-bones in that it uses simply geometry and untextured faces, one thing I found is that more detailed geometry, texture mapping or other more modern graphics effects don't substantially affect the framerate. Or at least they don't affect it any worse than using the same effects in a C program. These are run on the GPU, so it doesn't make any difference at all if your program is written in Python.
One thing that is performance-sensitive from Python is if you are creating dynamic geometry on the CPU side, e.g. moving individual vertices within a shape, by bending or melting the shape. Doing this sort of per-vertex calculation in Python, then constructing a new ctypes array from the result, then shunting this geometry to the GPU, every frame, will be slow. Instead you should probably be doing this in a vertex shader.
On the other hand, if you just want affine transformations (moving objects around, rotating them, opening chests of drawers, rotating car wheels, bending a jointed robot arm) then all of this can be done by the GPU and the fact your program is written in Python makes little difference to the performance.

You might want to check out Python-Ogre. I just messed with it myself, nothing serious, but seems pretty good.

I would recommend pyglet which is a similar system to pygame, but with full bindings to OpenGL. You can start with simple 2D games to get the hang of the system and work up to 3D later. It is a more modern system than PyGame which is built around SDL which itself is a bit long in the tooth these days.

Perhaps a wee bit off topic but, if your goal is to learn Python, how about creating a game using IronPython and XNA? XNA is not OpenGL though, yet I find it an extremely simple 2D/3D engine which is fast and supports Shader Model 3.0.

Check out the Frets on Fire project -- an open source Guitar Hero alternative. It's written in Python and has decent 3D graphics in OpenGL. I would suggest checking out its sources for hints on libraries etc.

There was a Vampires game out a few years ago where most if not all of the code was in Python. Not sure if the 3D routines were in them, but it worked fine.

PIL vs RMagick/ruby-gd

For my next project I plan to create images with text and graphics. I'm comfortable with ruby, but interested in learning python. I figured this may be a good time because PIL looks like a great library to use. However, I don't know how it compares to what ruby has to offer (e.g. RMagick and ruby-gd). From what I can gather PIL had better documentation (does ruby-gd even have a homepage?) and more features. Just wanted to hear a few opinions to help me decide.
Thanks.
Vince

PIL is a good library, use it. ImageMagic (what RMagick wraps) is a very heavy library that should be avoided if possible. Its good for doing local processing of images, say, a batch photo editor, but way too processor inefficient for common image manipulation tasks for web.
EDIT: In response to the question, PIL supports drawing vector shapes. It can draw polygons, curves, lines, fills and text. I've used it in a project to produce rounded alpha corners to PNG images on the fly over the web. It essentially has most of the drawing features of GDI+ (in Windows) or GTK (in Gnome on Linux).

PIL has been around for a long time and is very stable, so it's probably a good candidate for your first Python project. The PIL documentation includes a helpful tutorial, which should get you up to speed quickly.

ImageMagic is a huge library and will do everything under the sun, but many report memory issues with the RMagick variant and I have personally found it to be an overkill for my needs.
As you say ruby-gd is a little thin on the ground when it comes to English documentation.... but GD is a doddle to install on post platforms and there is a little wrapper with some helpful examples called gruby thats worth a look. (If you're after alpha transparency make sure you install the latest GD lib)
For overall community blogy help, PIL's the way.