Given some data of shape 20x45, where each row is a separate data set, say 20 different sine curves with 45 data points each, how would I go about getting the same data, but with shape 20x100?
In other words, I have some data A of shape 20x45, and some data B of length 20x100, and I would like to have A be of shape 20x100 so I can compare them better.
This is for Python and Numpy/Scipy.
I assume it can be done with splines, so I am looking for a simple example, maybe just 2x10 to 2x20 or something, where each row is just a line, to demonstrate the solution.
Thanks!
Ubuntu beat me to it while I was typing this example, but his example just uses linear interpolation, which can be more easily done with numpy.interpolate... (The difference is only a keyword argument in scipy.interpolate.interp1d, however).
I figured I'd include my example, as it shows using scipy.interpolate.interp1d with a cubic spline...
import numpy as np
import scipy as sp
import scipy.interpolate
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Generate some random data
y = (np.random.random(10) - 0.5).cumsum()
x = np.arange(y.size)
# Interpolate the data using a cubic spline to "new_length" samples
new_length = 50
new_x = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), new_length)
new_y = sp.interpolate.interp1d(x, y, kind='cubic')(new_x)
# Plot the results
plt.figure()
plt.subplot(2,1,1)
plt.plot(x, y, 'bo-')
plt.title('Using 1D Cubic Spline Interpolation')
plt.subplot(2,1,2)
plt.plot(new_x, new_y, 'ro-')
plt.show()
One way would be to use scipy.interpolate.interp1d:
import scipy as sp
import scipy.interpolate
import numpy as np
x=np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,45)
y=np.zeros((2,45))
y[0,:]=sp.sin(x)
y[1,:]=sp.sin(2*x)
f=sp.interpolate.interp1d(x,y)
y2=f(np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,100))
If your data is fairly dense, it may not be necessary to use higher order interpolation.
If your application is not sensitive to precision or you just want a quick overview, you could just fill the unknown data points with averages from neighbouring known data points (in other words, do naive linear interpolation).
Related
I want to make a histogram from 30 csv files, and then fit a gaussian function to see if my data is optimal. After that, I need to find the mean and standard deviation of those peaks. The file data size are too large, I do not know if I extract individual column and organize their value range into number of bins correctly.
I know it is a bit long and too many questions, please answer as much as you want, thank you very much!
> this is the links of the data
Below so far I have done (actually not much, coz I am beginner to data visualization.)
Firstly, I import the packages, savgol_filter to make the bin transparent, it seems better.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
from scipy.signal import savgol_filter
And then I convert the dimension and set limit.
def cm2inch(value):
return value/2.54
width = 9
height = 6.75
sliceMin, sliceMax = 300, 1002
Next I load all the data jupyter notebook by iteration 30 times, where I set up two arrays "times" and "voltages" to store the values.
times, voltages = [], []
for i in range(30):
time, ch1 = np.loadtxt(f"{i+1}.txt", delimiter=',', skiprows=5,unpack=True)
times.append(time)
voltages.append(ch1)
t = (np.array(times[0]) * 1e5)[sliceMin:sliceMax]
voltages = (np.array(voltages))[:, sliceMin:sliceMax]
1. I think I should need a hist function to plot the graph. Although I have the plot, but I am not sure if it is the proper way to generate the histogram.
hist, bin_edges = np.histogram(voltages, bins=500, density=True)
hist = savgol_filter(hist, 51, 3)
bin_centres = (bin_edges[:-1] + bin_edges[1:])/2
That is so far I have reached. the amplitude of the 3rd peak is too low, which is not what I expected. But please correct me if my expectation is wrong.
This is my histogram plot
I have updated my plot with the following code
labels = "hist"
if showGraph:
plt.title("Datapoints Distribution over Voltage [mV]", )
plt.xlabel("Voltage [mV]")
plt.ylabel("Data Points")
plt.plot(hist, label=labels)
plt.show()
2.(edited) I am not sure why my label cannot display, could you please correct me?
3.(edited) Besides, I want to make a fit curve by using gaussian function to the histogram. But there are three peaks, so how should I fit the function to them?
def gauss(x, *p):
A, mu, sigma = p
return A*np.exp(-(x-mu)**2/(2.*sigma**2))
4. (edited) I realised that I have not mentioned the mean value yet.
I suppose that if I can locate the maximum value of the peak, then I can find the mean value of the specific peak. Do I need to fit the Gaussian first to find the peak, or I can find the straight ahead? Is it to find the local maximum so I can find it? If yes, how can I proceed it?
5. (edited) I know how to find the standard deviation from a single list, if I want to do similar logic, how to implement the code?
sample = [1,2,3,4,5,5,5,5,10]
standard_deviation = np.std(sample, ddof=1)
print(standard_deviation)
Feedback to suggestions:
I try to implement the gaussian fit, below are the packages I import.
from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
Here isthe gaussian function, I put my 30 datasets voltages as the parameter of the Gaussian Mixture fit, which print our lots of values regarding mu and variance.
gmm = GaussianMixture(n_components=1)
gmm.fit(voltages)
print(gmm.means_, gmm.covariances_)
mu = gmm.means_[0][0]
variance = gmm.covariances_[0][0][0]
print(mu, variance)
I process the code one by one. There is an error on the second line:
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6,6))
Xs = np.arange(min(voltages), max(voltages), 0.05)
The truth value of an array with more than one element is ambiguous.
Use a.any() or a.all()
I search from the web that, to use this is to indicate there is only one value, like if there are[T,T,F,F,T], you can have 4 possibilities.
I edit my code to:
Xs = np.arange(min(np.all(voltages)), max(np.all(voltages)), 0.05)
which gives me this:
'numpy.bool_' object is not iterable
I understand it is not a boolean object. At this stage, I do not know how to proceed the gaussian curve fit. Can anyone provides me an alternate way to do it?
To plot a histogram, the most vanilla matplotlib function, hist, is my go-to. Basically, if I have a list of samples, then I can plot a histogram of them with 100 bins via:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.hist(samples, bins=100)
plt.show()
If you'd like to fit normal distribution(s) to your data, the best model for that is a Gaussian Mixture Model, which you can find more info about via scikit-learn's GMM page. That said, this is the code I use to fit a singular gaussian distribution to a dataset. If I wanted to fit k normal distributions, I'd need to use n_components=k. I've also included the resulting plot:
from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
data = np.random.uniform(-1,1, size=(800,1))
data += np.random.uniform(-1,1, size=(800,1))
gmm = GaussianMixture(n_components=1)
gmm.fit(data)
print(gmm.means_, gmm.covariances_)
mu = gmm.means_[0][0]
variance = gmm.covariances_[0][0][0]
print(mu, variance)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6,6))
Xs = np.arange(min(data), max(data), 0.05)
ys = 1.0/np.sqrt(2*np.pi*variance) * np.exp(-0.5/variance * (Xs + mu)**2)
ax.hist(data, bins=100, label='data')
px = ax.twinx()
px.plot(Xs, ys, c='r', linestyle='dotted', label='fit')
ax.legend()
px.legend(loc='upper left')
plt.show()
As for question 3, I'm not sure which axis you'd like to capture the standard deviations of. If you'd like to get the standard deviation of columns, you can use np.std(data, axis=1), and use axis=0 for row-by-row standard deviation.
I'm wondering if there is a good way to match a Gaussian normal to a histogram in the form of a numpy array np.histogram(array, bins).
How can such a curve been plotted on the same graph and adjusted in height and width to the histogram?
You can fit your histogram using a Gaussian (i.e. normal) distribution, for example using scipy's curve_fit. I have written a small example below. Note that depending on your data, you may need to find a way to make good guesses for the starting values for the fit (p0). Poor starting values may cause your fit to fail.
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.stats import norm
def fit_func(x,a,mu,sigma,c):
"""gaussian function used for the fit"""
return a * norm.pdf(x,loc=mu,scale=sigma) + c
#make up some normally distributed data and do a histogram
y = 2 * np.random.normal(loc=1,scale=2,size=1000) + 2
no_bins = 20
hist,left = np.histogram(y,bins=no_bins)
centers = left[:-1] + (left[1] - left[0])
#fit the histogram
p0 = [2,0,2,2] #starting values for the fit
p1,_ = curve_fit(fit_func,centers,hist,p0,maxfev=10000)
#plot the histogram and fit together
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
ax.hist(y,bins=no_bins)
x = np.linspace(left[0],left[-1],1000)
y_fit = fit_func(x, *p1)
ax.plot(x,y_fit,'r-')
plt.show()
I'm new to Python and having some trouble with matplotlib. I currently have data that is contained in two numpy arrays, call them x and y, that I am plotting on a scatter plot with coordinates for each point (x, y) (i.e I have points x[0], y[0] and x1, y1 and so on on my plot). I have been using the following code segment to color the points in my scatter plot based on the spatial density of nearby points (found this on another stackoverflow post):
http://prntscr.com/abqowk
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.stats import gaussian_kde
x = np.random.normal(size=1000)
y = x*3 + np.random.normal(size=1000)
xy = np.vstack([x,y])
z = gaussian_kde(xy)(xy)
idx = z.argsort()
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
ax.scatter(x,y,c=z,s=50,edgecolor='')
plt.show()
Output:
I've been using it without being sure exactly how it works (namely the point density calculation - if someone could explain how exactly that works, would also be much appreciated).
However, now I'd like to color code by the ratio of the spatial density of points in x,y to that of the spatial density of points in another set of numpy arrays, call them x2, y2. That is, I would like to make a plot such that I can identify how the density of points in x,y compares to the points in x2,y2 on the same scatter plot. Could someone please explain how I could go about doing this?
Thanks in advance for your help!
I've been trying to do the same thing based on that same earlier post, and I think I just figured it out! The trick is to use matplotlib.colors.Normalize() to define a scale and then weight it according to some data set (xnorm,ynorm):
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.colors as mplc
import matplotlib.cm as cm
from scipy.stats import gaussian_kde
def kdeplot(x,y,xnorm,ynorm):
xy = np.vstack([x,y])
z = gaussian_kde(xy)(xy)
wt = 1.0*len(x)/(len(xnorm)*1.0)
norm = mplc.Normalize(vmin=0, vmax=8/wt)
cmap = cm.gnuplot
idx = z.argsort()
x, y, z = x[idx], y[idx], z[idx]
args = (x,y)
kwargs = {'c':z,'s':10,'edgecolor':'','cmap':cmap,'norm':norm}
return args, kwargs
# (x1,y1) is some data set whose density map coloring you
# want to scale to (xnorm,ynorm)
args,kwargs = kdeplot(x1,y1,xnorm,ynorm)
plt.scatter(*args,**kwargs)
I used trial and error to optimize my normalization for my particular data and choice of colormap. Here's what my data looks like scaled to itself; here's my data scaled to some comparison data (which is on the bottom of that image).
I'm not sure this method is entirely general, but it works in my case: I know that my data and the comparison data are in similar regions of parameter space, and they both have gaussian scatter, so I can use a naive linear scaling determined by the number of data points and it results in something that gives the right idea visually.
I have two arrays of data that correspond to x and y values, that I would like to interpolate with a cubic spline.
I have tried to do this, but my interpolated function doesn't pass through my data points.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.interpolate import interp1d
re = np.array([0.2,2,20,200,2000,20000],dtype = float)
cd = np.array([103,13.0,2.72,0.800,0.401,0.433],dtype = float)
plt.yscale('log')
plt.xscale('log')
plt.xlabel( "Reynold's number" )
plt.ylabel( "Drag coefficient" )
plt.plot(re,cd,'x', label='Data')
x = np.linspace(0.2,20000,200000)
f = interp1d(re,cd,kind='cubic')
plt.plot(x,f(x))
plt.legend()
plt.show()
What I end up with looks like this;
Which is clearly an awful representation of my function. What am I missing here?
Thank you.
You can get the result you probably expect (smooth spline on the log axes) by doing this:
f = interp1d(np.log(re),np.log(cd), kind='cubic')
plt.plot(x,np.exp(f(np.log(x))))
This will build the interpolation in the log space and plot it correctly. Plot your data on a linear scale to see how the cubic has to flip to get the tail on the left hand side.
The main thing you are missing is the log scaling on your axes. The spline shown is not an unreasonable result given your input data. Try drawing the plot with plt.xscale('linear') instead of plt.xscale('log'). Perhaps a cubic spline is not the best interpolation technique, at least on the raw data. A better option may be to interpolate on the log of the data insead.
I'm trying to interpolate the following satellite ground track:
The problem is the discontinuity at (lon,lat)->(0,0), which causes a poor fitting curve in this region:
I'm not sure if a parametric interpolation will be the best approach, for now I have just applied a linear interpolation:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy import interpolate
df = pd.read_table('groundtracks', sep='\t')
x = df['lon']
y = df['lat']
f = interpolate.interp1d(x, y, kind='linear')
xnew = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), num=x.count()*2)
ynew = f(xnew)
You shouldn't interpolate near 0, because the satellite was there at two very different points in time.
You should add 360° to the second half of your data (which might correspond with the upper left curve), so that you get a continuous curve from about -30° to 360°. Then interpolate. Then perform the reverse operation: lon[lon>180] -= 360.
As an alternative you might also try splitting the track into its two distinct halves, and interpolating them individually.