We Keep Coding

Kafka consumer script hangs when executed as a docker entrypoint [duplicate]

I have a Python (2.7) app which is started in my dockerfile:
CMD ["python","main.py"]
main.py prints some strings when it is started and goes into a loop afterwards:
print "App started"
while True:
time.sleep(1)
As long as I start the container with the -it flag, everything works as expected:
$ docker run --name=myapp -it myappimage
> App started
And I can see the same output via logs later:
$ docker logs myapp
> App started
If I try to run the same container with the -d flag, the container seems to start normally, but I can't see any output:
$ docker run --name=myapp -d myappimage
> b82db1120fee5f92c80000f30f6bdc84e068bafa32738ab7adb47e641b19b4d1
$ docker logs myapp
$ (empty)
But the container still seems to run;
$ docker ps
Container Status ...
myapp up 4 minutes ...
Attach does not display anything either:
$ docker attach --sig-proxy=false myapp
(working, no output)
Any ideas whats going wrong? Does "print" behave differently when ran in background?
Docker version:
Client version: 1.5.0
Client API version: 1.17
Go version (client): go1.4.2
Git commit (client): a8a31ef
OS/Arch (client): linux/arm
Server version: 1.5.0
Server API version: 1.17
Go version (server): go1.4.2
Git commit (server): a8a31ef

Finally I found a solution to see Python output when running daemonized in Docker, thanks to #ahmetalpbalkan over at GitHub. Answering it here myself for further reference :
Using unbuffered output with
CMD ["python","-u","main.py"]
instead of
CMD ["python","main.py"]
solves the problem; you can see the output now (both, stderr and stdout) via
docker logs myapp
why -u ref
- print is indeed buffered and docker logs will eventually give you that output, just after enough of it will have piled up
- executing the same script with python -u gives instant output as said above
- import logging + logging.warning("text") gives the expected result even without -u
what it means by python -u ref. > python --help | grep -- -u
-u : force the stdout and stderr streams to be unbuffered;

In my case, running Python with -u didn't change anything. What did the trick, however, was to set PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 as environment variable:
docker run --name=myapp -e PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 -d myappimage
[Edit]: Updated PYTHONUNBUFFERED=0 to PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 after Lars's comment. This doesn't change the behavior and adds clarity.

If you want to add your print output to your Flask output when running docker-compose up, add the following to your docker compose file.
web:
environment:
- PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
https://docs.docker.com/compose/environment-variables/

See this article which explain detail reason for the behavior:
There are typically three modes for buffering:
If a file descriptor is unbuffered then no buffering occurs whatsoever, and function calls that read or write data occur immediately (and will block).
If a file descriptor is fully-buffered then a fixed-size buffer is used, and read or write calls simply read or write from the buffer. The buffer isn’t flushed until it fills up.
If a file descriptor is line-buffered then the buffering waits until it sees a newline character. So data will buffer and buffer until a \n is seen, and then all of the data that buffered is flushed at that point in time. In reality there’s typically a maximum size on the buffer (just as in the fully-buffered case), so the rule is actually more like “buffer until a newline character is seen or 4096 bytes of data are encountered, whichever occurs first”.
And GNU libc (glibc) uses the following rules for buffering:
Stream Type Behavior
stdin input line-buffered
stdout (TTY) output line-buffered
stdout (not a TTY) output fully-buffered
stderr output unbuffered
So, if use -t, from docker document, it will allocate a pseudo-tty, then stdout becomes line-buffered, thus docker run --name=myapp -it myappimage could see the one-line output.
And, if just use -d, no tty was allocated, then, stdout is fully-buffered, one line App started surely not able to flush the buffer.
Then, use -dt to make stdout line buffered or add -u in python to flush the buffer is the way to fix it.

Since I haven't seen this answer yet:
You can also flush stdout after you print to it:
import time
if __name__ == '__main__':
while True:
print('cleaner is up', flush=True)
time.sleep(5)

Try to add these two environment variables to your solution PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 and PYTHONIOENCODING=UTF-8

You can see logs on detached image if you change print to logging.
main.py:
import time
import logging
print "App started"
logging.warning("Log app started")
while True:
time.sleep(1)
Dockerfile:
FROM python:2.7-stretch
ADD . /app
WORKDIR /app
CMD ["python","main.py"]

If anybody is running the python application with conda you should add --no-capture-output to the command since conda buffers to stdout by default.
ENTRYPOINT ["conda", "run", "--no-capture-output", "-n", "my-app", "python", "main.py"]

As a quick fix, try this:
from __future__ import print_function
# some code
print("App started", file=sys.stderr)
This works for me when I encounter the same problems. But, to be honest, I don't know why does this error happen.

I had to use PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in my docker-compose.yml file to see the output from django runserver.

If you aren't using docker-compose and just normal docker instead, you can add this to your Dockerfile that is hosting a flask app
ARG FLASK_ENV="production"
ENV FLASK_ENV="${FLASK_ENV}" \
PYTHONUNBUFFERED="true"
CMD [ "flask", "run" ]

When using python manage.py runserver for a Django application, adding environment variable PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 solve my problem. print('helloworld', flush=True) also works for me.
However, python -u doesn't work for me.

Usually, we redirect it to a specific file (by mounting a volume from host and writing it to that file).
Adding a tty using -t is also fine. You need to pick it up in docker logs.
Using large log outputs, I did not have any issue with buffer storing all without putting it in dockers log.

Start django app as service

I want to create service that will be start with ubuntu and will have ability to use django models etc..
This service will create thread util.WorkerThread and wait some data in main.py
if __name__ == '__main__':
bot.polling(none_stop=True)
How I can to do this. I just don't know what I need to looking for.
If you also can say how I can create ubuntu autostart service with script like that, please tell me )
P.S. all django project run via uwsgi in emperor mode.

The easiest way in my opinion is create a script and run on crontab.
First of all create a script to start your django app.
#!/bin/bash
cd /path/to your/virtual environment #path to your virtual environment
. bin/activate #Activate your virtual environment
cd /path/to your/project directory #After that go to your project directory
python manage.py runserver #run django server
Save the script and open crontab with the command:
crontab -e
Now edit the crontab file and write on the last line:
#reboot path/to/your/script.sh
This way is not the best but the easiest, if you are not comfortable with Linux startup service creation.
I hope this help you :)

Take a look at supervisord. It is much easier than daemonizing python script.
Config it something like this:
[program:watcher]
command = /usr/bin/python /path/to/main.py
stdout_logfile = /var/log/main-stdout.log
stdout_logfile_maxbytes = 10MB
stdout_logfile_backups = 5
stderr_logfile = /var/log/main-stderr.log
stderr_logfile_maxbytes = 10MB
stderr_logfile_backups = 5

Ok, that is answer - https://www.raspberrypi-spy.co.uk/2015/10/how-to-autorun-a-python-script-on-boot-using-systemd/
In new versions ubuntu services .conf in /etc/init fail with error Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
But services works using systemd

Docker-compose and pdb

I see that I'm not the first one to ask the question but there was no clear answer to this:
How to use pdb with docker-composer in Python development?
When you ask uncle Google about django docker you get awesome docker-composer examples and tutorials and I have an environment working - I can run docker-compose up and I have a neat developer environment but the PDB is not working (which is very sad).
I can settle with running docker-compose run my-awesome-app python app.py 0.0.0.0:8000 but then I can access my application over http://127.0.0.1:8000 from the host (I can with docker-compose up) and it seems that each time I use run new containers are made like: dir_app_13 and dir_db_4 which I don't desire at all.
People of good will please aid me.
PS
I'm using pdb++ for that example and a basic docker-compose.yml from this django example. Also I experimented but nothing seems to help me. And I'm using docker-composer 1.3.0rc3 as it has Dockerfile pointing support.

Use the following steps to attach pdb on any python script.
Step 1. Add the following in your yml file
stdin_open: true
tty: true
This will enable interactive mode and will attach stdin. This is equivalent for -it mode.
Step 2.
docker attach <generated_containerid>
You'll now get the pdb shell

Try running your web container with the --service-ports option: docker-compose run --service-ports web

If after the adding of
stdin_open: true
tty: true
you started to get issues similar to that:
fd = self._input_fileno()
if fd is not None and fd in ready:
> return ord(os.read(fd, 1))
E TypeError: ord() expected a character, but string of length 0 found
You can try to add ENV LC_ALL en_US.UTF-8 at the top of your Docker file
FROM python:3.8.2-slim-buster as build_base
ENV LC_ALL en_US.UTF-8

Till my experience, docker-compose up command does not provide an interactive shell, but it starts the printing STDOUT to default read-only shell.
Or if you have specified and mapped logs directory, docker-compose up command will print nothing on the attached shell but it sends output to your mapped logs. So you have to attach the container separately once it is running.
when you do docker-compose up, make it in detached mode via -d and connect to the container via
docker exec -it your_container_name bash

Python app does not print anything when running detached in docker

I have a Python (2.7) app which is started in my dockerfile:
CMD ["python","main.py"]
main.py prints some strings when it is started and goes into a loop afterwards:
print "App started"
while True:
time.sleep(1)
As long as I start the container with the -it flag, everything works as expected:
$ docker run --name=myapp -it myappimage
> App started
And I can see the same output via logs later:
$ docker logs myapp
> App started
If I try to run the same container with the -d flag, the container seems to start normally, but I can't see any output:
$ docker run --name=myapp -d myappimage
> b82db1120fee5f92c80000f30f6bdc84e068bafa32738ab7adb47e641b19b4d1
$ docker logs myapp
$ (empty)
But the container still seems to run;
$ docker ps
Container Status ...
myapp up 4 minutes ...
Attach does not display anything either:
$ docker attach --sig-proxy=false myapp
(working, no output)
Any ideas whats going wrong? Does "print" behave differently when ran in background?
Docker version:
Client version: 1.5.0
Client API version: 1.17
Go version (client): go1.4.2
Git commit (client): a8a31ef
OS/Arch (client): linux/arm
Server version: 1.5.0
Server API version: 1.17
Go version (server): go1.4.2
Git commit (server): a8a31ef

Finally I found a solution to see Python output when running daemonized in Docker, thanks to #ahmetalpbalkan over at GitHub. Answering it here myself for further reference :
Using unbuffered output with
CMD ["python","-u","main.py"]
instead of
CMD ["python","main.py"]
solves the problem; you can see the output now (both, stderr and stdout) via
docker logs myapp
why -u ref
- print is indeed buffered and docker logs will eventually give you that output, just after enough of it will have piled up
- executing the same script with python -u gives instant output as said above
- import logging + logging.warning("text") gives the expected result even without -u
what it means by python -u ref. > python --help | grep -- -u
-u : force the stdout and stderr streams to be unbuffered;

In my case, running Python with -u didn't change anything. What did the trick, however, was to set PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 as environment variable:
docker run --name=myapp -e PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 -d myappimage
[Edit]: Updated PYTHONUNBUFFERED=0 to PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 after Lars's comment. This doesn't change the behavior and adds clarity.

If you want to add your print output to your Flask output when running docker-compose up, add the following to your docker compose file.
web:
environment:
- PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
https://docs.docker.com/compose/environment-variables/

See this article which explain detail reason for the behavior:
There are typically three modes for buffering:
If a file descriptor is unbuffered then no buffering occurs whatsoever, and function calls that read or write data occur immediately (and will block).
If a file descriptor is fully-buffered then a fixed-size buffer is used, and read or write calls simply read or write from the buffer. The buffer isn’t flushed until it fills up.
If a file descriptor is line-buffered then the buffering waits until it sees a newline character. So data will buffer and buffer until a \n is seen, and then all of the data that buffered is flushed at that point in time. In reality there’s typically a maximum size on the buffer (just as in the fully-buffered case), so the rule is actually more like “buffer until a newline character is seen or 4096 bytes of data are encountered, whichever occurs first”.
And GNU libc (glibc) uses the following rules for buffering:
Stream Type Behavior
stdin input line-buffered
stdout (TTY) output line-buffered
stdout (not a TTY) output fully-buffered
stderr output unbuffered
So, if use -t, from docker document, it will allocate a pseudo-tty, then stdout becomes line-buffered, thus docker run --name=myapp -it myappimage could see the one-line output.
And, if just use -d, no tty was allocated, then, stdout is fully-buffered, one line App started surely not able to flush the buffer.
Then, use -dt to make stdout line buffered or add -u in python to flush the buffer is the way to fix it.

Since I haven't seen this answer yet:
You can also flush stdout after you print to it:
import time
if __name__ == '__main__':
while True:
print('cleaner is up', flush=True)
time.sleep(5)

Try to add these two environment variables to your solution PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 and PYTHONIOENCODING=UTF-8

You can see logs on detached image if you change print to logging.
main.py:
import time
import logging
print "App started"
logging.warning("Log app started")
while True:
time.sleep(1)
Dockerfile:
FROM python:2.7-stretch
ADD . /app
WORKDIR /app
CMD ["python","main.py"]

If anybody is running the python application with conda you should add --no-capture-output to the command since conda buffers to stdout by default.
ENTRYPOINT ["conda", "run", "--no-capture-output", "-n", "my-app", "python", "main.py"]

As a quick fix, try this:
from __future__ import print_function
# some code
print("App started", file=sys.stderr)
This works for me when I encounter the same problems. But, to be honest, I don't know why does this error happen.

I had to use PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in my docker-compose.yml file to see the output from django runserver.

If you aren't using docker-compose and just normal docker instead, you can add this to your Dockerfile that is hosting a flask app
ARG FLASK_ENV="production"
ENV FLASK_ENV="${FLASK_ENV}" \
PYTHONUNBUFFERED="true"
CMD [ "flask", "run" ]

When using python manage.py runserver for a Django application, adding environment variable PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 solve my problem. print('helloworld', flush=True) also works for me.
However, python -u doesn't work for me.

Usually, we redirect it to a specific file (by mounting a volume from host and writing it to that file).
Adding a tty using -t is also fine. You need to pick it up in docker logs.
Using large log outputs, I did not have any issue with buffer storing all without putting it in dockers log.

Can't run monkeyrunner script - java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bad level

I tried this but it shows me the middle finger:
~/Software/android-sdk-linux_x86-1.6_r1/tools$ sudo ./monkeyrunner -v
help.py Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
Bad level "help.py" at
java.util.logging.Level.parse(Level.java:336) at
com.android.monkeyrunner.MonkeyRunnerOptions.processOptions(MonkeyRunnerOptions.java:130)
at
com.android.monkeyrunner.MonkeyRunnerStarter.main(MonkeyRunnerStarter.java:192)
It is on a freshly installed java, jdk, jre, Eclipse, AndroidSDK, ADT
Any ideas?

Why sudo ?
You shouldn't use it.
The other problem is that you are missing the log level for -v:
Usage: monkeyrunner [options] SCRIPT_FILE
-s MonkeyServer IP Address.
-p MonkeyServer TCP Port.
-v MonkeyServer Logging level (ALL, FINEST, FINER, FINE, CONFIG, INFO, WARNING, SEVERE, OFF)
Also, be sure you have help.py in your current working directory or specify its path.