I have a Document model in Python using SQLAlchemy that was designed to work with Postgres. I need to modify the model so it can work with both Postgres and MySQL. The model has a text_ts column that is used for full-text search but it's not supported in MySQL. I also need to modify the document_text_ts_idx index to point to the text column instead of text_ts.
I tried to modify the code by excluding the text_ts column in the model's mapper args and changing the index to point to the text column, but I couldn't figure out the correct syntax for it. I was expecting the model to work with both Postgres and MySQL, but I'm not sure how to make the modifications.
Code:
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, Text, func, Index, Computed
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql import TSVECTOR
Base = declarative_base()
class Document(Base):
__tablename__ = 'document'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
text = Column(Text)
text_ts = Column(TSVECTOR, Computed("to_tsvector('english'::regconfig, text)"))
__mapper_args__ = {
'exclude_properties': ['text_ts']
}
#classmethod
def search(cls, session, query):
return session.query(cls.id, cls.text).filter(cls.text_ts.bool_op("##")(func.plainto_tsquery("english", query))).all()
Index('document_text_ts_idx', Document.text_ts, postgresql_using='gin')
How can I modify the code so that the model can work with both Postgres and MySQL, while still providing full-text search functionality?
Related
What I'm trying to do:
I have a general huge set of models in my Django (v2.3.3) application in PostgreSQL DB, but now for a specific task I need to create a rather complicated aggregation of DB objects. And it would be much easier to work with them if I could only in that thread/process that handles this specific web-request create an in-memory SQLite DB, define a new set of model-classes there (without foreign keys to the global set of models of course), create some objects in that DB, do my calculations and kill that DB upon the response serving. For consistency I would like to use Django models for this small DB as well.
Is this possible? Or do you have some better ideas how to approach this?
Eventually I've ended up with SQLAlchemy + in-memory SQLite solution:
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String, ForeignKey, create_engine
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship, sessionmaker, backref
Base = declarative_base()
engine = create_engine('sqlite:///:memory:')
Session = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = Session()
class Node(Base):
"""A node entity in sankey diagram."""
__tablename__ = 'node'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String) # unique - might include parts from event.extra_data
event = Column(String) # not unique - totally equeals to event.event
Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
I create a very simple database with sqlalchemy as follows:
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
Base = declarative_base()
class Person(Base):
__tablename__ = 'person'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String(250), nullable=False)
engine = create_engine('sqlite:///sqlalchemy_example.db')
# Create all tables in the engine. This is equivalent to "Create Table"
# statements in raw SQL.
Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
Base.metadata.bind = engine
DBSession = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = DBSession()
# Insert a Person in the person table
new_person = Person(name='new person')
session.add(new_person)
session.commit()
and then I tried to read it using pyDAL reference.
from pydal import DAL, Field
db = DAL('sqlite://sqlalchemy_example.db', auto_import=True)
db.tables
>> []
db.define_table('person', Field('name'))
>> OperationalError: table "person" already exists
How do I access the table using pyDAL?
thank you
First, do not set auto_import=True, as that is only relevant if pyDAL *.table migration metadata files exist for the tables, which will not be the case here.
Second, pyDAL does not know the table already exists, and because migrations are enabled by default, it attempts to create the table. To prevent this, you can simply disable migrations:
# Applies to all tables.
db = DAL('sqlite://sqlalchemy_example.db', migrate_enabled=False)
or:
# Applies to this table only.
db.define_table('person', Field('name'), migrate=False)
If you would like pyDAL to take over migrations for future changes to this table, then you should run a "fake migration", which will cause pyDAL to generate a *.table migration metadata file for this table without actually running the migration. To do this, temporarily make the following change:
db.define_table('person', Field('name'), fake_migrate=True)
After leaving the above in place for a single request, the *.table file will be generated, and you can remove the fake_migrate=True argument.
Finally, note that pyDAL expects the id field to be an auto-incrementing integer primary key field.
I am using flaks python and sqlalchemy to connect to a huge db, where a lot of stats are saved. I need to create some useful insights with the use of these stats, so I only need to read/get the data and never modify.
The issue I have now is the following:
Before I can access a table I need to replicate the table in my models file. For example I see the table Login_Data in the DB. So I go into my models and recreate the exact same table.
class Login_Data(Base):
__tablename__ = 'login_data'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
date = Column(Date, nullable=False)
new_users = Column(Integer, nullable=True)
def __init__(self, date=None, new_users=None):
self.date = date
self.new_users = new_users
def get(self, id):
if self.id == id:
return self
else:
return None
def __repr__(self):
return '<%s(%r, %r, %r)>' % (self.__class__.__name__, self.id, self.date, self.new_users)
I do this because otherwise I cant query it using:
some_data = Login_Data.query.limit(10)
But this feels unnecessary, there must be a better way. Whats the point in recreating the models if they are already defined. What shall I use here:
some_data = [SOMETHING HERE SO I DONT NEED TO RECREATE THE TABLE].query.limit(10)
Simple question but I have not found a solution yet.
Thanks to Tryph for the right sources.
To access the data of an existing DB with sqlalchemy you need to use automap. In your configuration file where you load/declare your DB type. You need to use the automap_base(). After that you can create your models and use the correct table names of the DB without specifying everything yourself:
from sqlalchemy.ext.automap import automap_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
import stats_config
Base = automap_base()
engine = create_engine(stats_config.DB_URI, convert_unicode=True)
# reflect the tables
Base.prepare(engine, reflect=True)
# mapped classes are now created with names by default
# matching that of the table name.
LoginData = Base.classes.login_data
db_session = Session(engine)
After this is done you can now use all your known sqlalchemy functions on:
some_data = db_session.query(LoginData).limit(10)
You may be interested by reflection and automap.
Unfortunately, since I never used any of those features, I am not able to tell you more about them. I just know that they allow to use the database schema without explicitly declaring it in Python.
I am using SQLAlchemy as ORM for a python project. I have created few models/schema and it is working fine. Now I need to query a existing MySQL database, no insert/update just the select statement.
How can I create a wrapper around the tables of this existing database? I have briefly gone through the sqlalchemy docs and SO but couldn't find anything relevant. All suggest execute method, where I need to write the raw sql queries, while I want to use the SQLAlchemy query method in same way as I am using with the SA models.
For example if the existing db has table name User then I want to query it using the dbsession ( only the select operation, probably with join)
You seem to have an impression that SQLAlchemy can only work with a database structure created by SQLAlchemy (probably using MetaData.create_all()) - this is not correct. SQLAlchemy can work perfectly with a pre-existing database, you just need to define your models to match database tables. One way to do that is to use reflection, as Ilja Everilä suggests:
from sqlalchemy import Table
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
Base = declarative_base()
class MyClass(Base):
__table__ = Table('mytable', Base.metadata,
autoload=True, autoload_with=some_engine)
(which, in my opinion, would be totally fine for one-off scripts but may lead to incredibly frustrating bugs in a "real" application if there's a potential that the database structure may change over time)
Another way is to simply define your models as usual taking care to define your models to match the database tables, which is not that difficult. The benefit of this approach is that you can map only a subset of database tables to you models and even only a subset of table columns to your model's fields. Suppose you have 10 tables in the database but only interested in users table from where you only need id, name and email fields:
import sqlalchemy as sa
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
Base = declarative_base()
class User(Base):
id = sa.Column(sa.Integer, primary_key=True)
name = sa.Column(sa.String)
email = sa.Column(sa.String)
(note how we didn't need to define some details which are only needed to emit correct DDL, such as the length of the String fields or the fact that the email field has an index)
SQLAlchemy will not emit INSERT/UPDATE queries unless you create or modify models in your code. If you want to ensure that your queries are read-only you may create a special user in the database and grant that user SELECT privileges only. Alternatively/in addition, you may also experiment with rolling back the transaction in your application code.
You can access an existing table using the automap extension:
from sqlalchemy.ext.automap import automap_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
Base = automap_base()
Base.prepare(engine, reflect=True)
Users = Base.classes.users
session = Session(engine)
res = session.query(Users).first()
Create a table with autoload enabled that will inspect it. Some example code:
from sqlalchemy.sql import select
from sqlalchemy import create_engine, MetaData, Table
CONN_STR = '…'
engine = create_engine(CONN_STR, echo=True)
metadata = MetaData()
cookies = Table('cookies', metadata, autoload=True,
autoload_with=engine)
cols = cookies.c
with engine.connect() as conn:
query = (
select([cols.created_at, cols.name])
.order_by(cols.created_at)
.limit(1)
)
for row in conn.execute(query):
print(row)
Other answers don't mention what to do if you have a table with no primary key, so I thought I would address this. Assuming a table called Customers that has columns for CustomerId, CustomerName, CustomerLocation you could do;
from sqlalchemy.ext.automap import automap_base
from sqlalchemy import create_engine, MetaData, Column, String, Table
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
Base = automap_base()
conn_str = '...'
engine = create_engine(conn_str)
metadata = MetaData()
# you only need to define which column is the primary key. It can automap the rest of the columns.
customers = Table('Customers',metadata, Column('CustomerId', String, primary_key=true), autoload=True, autoload_with=engine)
Base.prepare()
Customers= Base.classes.Customers
session = Session(engine)
customer1 = session.query(Customers).first()
print(customer1.CustomerName)
Assume we have a Postgresql database named accounts. And we already have a table named users.
import sqlalchemy as sa
psw = "verysecret"
db = "accounts"
# create an engine
pengine = sa.create_engine('postgresql+psycopg2://postgres:' + psw +'#localhost/' + db)
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
# define declarative base
Base = declarative_base()
# reflect current database engine to metadata
metadata = sa.MetaData(pengine)
metadata.reflect()
# build your User class on existing `users` table
class User(Base):
__table__ = sa.Table("users", metadata)
# call the session maker factory
Session = sa.orm.sessionmaker(pengine)
session = Session()
# filter a record
session.query(User).filter(User.id==1).first()
Warning: Your table should have a Primary Key defined. Otherwise, Sqlalchemy won't like it.
I'm using SQL Alchemy and have some schema's that are account specific. The name of the schema is derived using the account ID, so I don't have the name of the schema until I hit my application service or repository layer. I'm wondering if it's possible to run a query against an entity that has it's schema dynamically set at runtime?
I know I need to set the __table_args__['schema'] and have tried doing that using the type() built-in, but I always get the following error:
could not assemble any primary key columns for mapped table
I'm ready to give up and just write straight sql, but I really hate to do that. Any idea how this can be done? I'm using SA 0.99 and I do have a PK mapped.
Thanks
from sqlalchemy 1.1,
this can be done easily using using schema_translation_map.
https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/11/changelog/migration_11.html#multi-tenancy-schema-translation-for-table-objects
One option would be to reflect the particular account-dependent tables. Here is the SqlAlchemy Documentation on the matter.
Alternatively, You can create the table with a static schema attribute and update it as needed at runtime and run the queries you need to. I can't think of a non-messy way to do this. So here's the messy option
Use a loop to update the schema property in each table definition whenever the account is switched.
add all the tables that are account-specific to a list.
if the tables are expressed in the declarative syntax, then you have to modify the DeclarativeName.__table__.schema attribute. I'm not sure if you need to also modify DeclarativeName.__table_args__['schema'], but I guess it won't hurt.
If the tables are expressed in the old style Table syntax, then you have to modify the Table.schema attribute.
If you're using text for any relationships or foreign keys, then that will break, and you have to inspect each table for such hard coded usage and change them
example
user_id = Column(ForeignKey('my_schema.user.id')) needs to be written as user_id = Column(ForeignKey(User.id)). Then you can change the schema of User to my_new_schema. Otherwise, at query time sqlalchemy will be confused because the foreign key will point to my_schema.user.id while the query would point to my_new_schema.user.
I'm not sure if more complicated relationships can be expressed without the use of plain text, so I guess that's the limit to my proposed solution.
Here's an example I wrote up in the terminal:
>>> from sqlalchemy import Column, Table, Integer, String, select, ForeignKey
>>> from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship, backref
>>> from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
>>> B = declarative_base()
>>>
>>> class User(B):
... __tablename__ = 'user'
... __table_args__ = {'schema': 'first_schema'}
... id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
... name = Column(String)
... email = Column(String)
...
>>> class Posts(B):
... __tablename__ = 'posts'
... __table_args__ = {'schema':'first_schema'}
... id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
... user_id = Column(ForeignKey(User.id))
... text = Column(String)
...
>>> str(select([User.id, Posts.text]).select_from(User.__table__.join(Posts)))
'SELECT first_schema."user".id, first_schema.posts.text \nFROM first_schema."user" JOIN first_schema.posts ON first_schema."user".id = first_schema.posts.user_id'
>>> account_specific = [User, Posts]
>>> for Tbl in account_specific:
... Tbl.__table__.schema = 'second_schema'
...
>>> str(select([User.id, Posts.text]).select_from(User.__table__.join(Posts)))
'SELECT second_schema."user".id, second_schema.posts.text \nFROM second_schema."user" JOIN second_schema.posts ON second_schema."user".id = second_schema.posts.user_id'
As you see the same query refers to the second_schema after I update the table's schema attribute.
edit: Although you can do what I did here, using the schema translation map as shown in the the answer below is the proper way to do it.
They are set statically. Foreign keys needs the same treatment, and I have an additional issue, in that I have multiple schemas that contain multiple tables so I did this:
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
staging_dbase = declarative_base()
model_dbase = declarative_base()
def adjust_schemas(staging, model):
for vv in staging_dbase.metadata.tables.values():
vv.schema = staging
for vv in model_dbase.metadata.tables.values():
vv.schema = model
def all_tables():
return staging_dbase.metadata.tables.union(model_dbase.metadata.tables)
Then in my startup code:
adjust_schemas(staging=staging_name, model=model_name)
You can mod this for a single declarative base.
I'm working on a project in which I have to create postgres schemas and tables dynamically and then insert data in proper schema. Here is something I have done maybe it will help someone:
import sqlalchemy
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
from app.models.user import User
engine_uri = "postgres://someusername:somepassword#localhost:5432/users"
engine = create_engine(engine_uri, pool_pre_ping=True)
SessionLocal = sessionmaker(autocommit=False, autoflush=False, bind=engine)
def create_schema(schema_name: str):
"""
Creates a new postgres schema
- **schema_name**: name of the new schema to create
"""
if not engine.dialect.has_schema(engine, schema_name):
engine.execute(sqlalchemy.schema.CreateSchema(schema_name))
def create_tables(schema_name: str):
"""
Create new tables for postgres schema
- **schema_name**: schema in which tables are to be created
"""
if (
engine.dialect.has_schema(engine, schema_name) and
not engine.dialect.has_table(engine, str(User.__table__.name))
):
User.__table__.schema = schema_name
User.__table__.create(engine)
def add_data(schema_name: str):
"""
Add data to a particular postgres schema
- **schema_name**: schema in which data is to be added
"""
if engine.dialect.has_table(engine, str(User.__table__.name)):
db = SessionLocal()
db.connection(execution_options={
"schema_translate_map": {None: schema_name}},
)
user = User()
user.name = "Moin"
user.salary = 10000
db.add(user)
db.commit()