We Keep Coding

How to overwrite self after reading yaml? [duplicate]

I would like to replace an object instance by another instance inside a method like this:
class A:
def method1(self):
self = func(self)
The object is retrieved from a database.

It is unlikely that replacing the 'self' variable will accomplish whatever you're trying to do, that couldn't just be accomplished by storing the result of func(self) in a different variable. 'self' is effectively a local variable only defined for the duration of the method call, used to pass in the instance of the class which is being operated upon. Replacing self will not actually replace references to the original instance of the class held by other objects, nor will it create a lasting reference to the new instance which was assigned to it.

As far as I understand, If you are trying to replace the current object with another object of same type (assuming func won't change the object type) from an member function. I think this will achieve that:
class A:
def method1(self):
newObj = func(self)
self.__dict__.update(newObj.__dict__)

It is not a direct answer to the question, but in the posts below there's a solution for what amirouche tried to do:
Python object conversion
Can I dynamically convert an instance of one class to another?
And here's working code sample (Python 3.2.5).
class Men:
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
def who_are_you(self):
print("I'm a men! My name is " + self.name)
def cast_to(self, sex, name):
self.__class__ = sex
self.name = name
def method_unique_to_men(self):
print('I made The Matrix')
class Women:
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
def who_are_you(self):
print("I'm a women! My name is " + self.name)
def cast_to(self, sex, name):
self.__class__ = sex
self.name = name
def method_unique_to_women(self):
print('I made Cloud Atlas')
men = Men('Larry')
men.who_are_you()
#>>> I'm a men! My name is Larry
men.method_unique_to_men()
#>>> I made The Matrix
men.cast_to(Women, 'Lana')
men.who_are_you()
#>>> I'm a women! My name is Lana
men.method_unique_to_women()
#>>> I made Cloud Atlas
Note the self.__class__ and not self.__class__.__name__. I.e. this technique not only replaces class name, but actually converts an instance of a class (at least both of them have same id()). Also, 1) I don't know whether it is "safe to replace a self object by another object of the same type in [an object own] method"; 2) it works with different types of objects, not only with ones that are of the same type; 3) it works not exactly like amirouche wanted: you can't init class like Class(args), only Class() (I'm not a pro and can't answer why it's like this).

Yes, all that will happen is that you won't be able to reference the current instance of your class A (unless you set another variable to self before you change it.) I wouldn't recommend it though, it makes for less readable code.
Note that you're only changing a variable, just like any other. Doing self = 123 is the same as doing abc = 123. self is only a reference to the current instance within the method. You can't change your instance by setting self.
What func(self) should do is to change the variables of your instance:
def func(obj):
obj.var_a = 123
obj.var_b = 'abc'
Then do this:
class A:
def method1(self):
func(self) # No need to assign self here

In many cases, a good way to achieve what you want is to call __init__ again. For example:
class MyList(list):
def trim(self,n):
self.__init__(self[:-n])
x = MyList([1,2,3,4])
x.trim(2)
assert type(x) == MyList
assert x == [1,2]
Note that this comes with a few assumptions such as the all that you want to change about the object being set in __init__. Also beware that this could cause problems with inheriting classes that redefine __init__ in an incompatible manner.

Yes, there is nothing wrong with this. Haters gonna hate. (Looking at you Pycharm with your in most cases imaginable, there's no point in such reassignment and it indicates an error).
A situation where you could do this is:
some_method(self, ...):
...
if(some_condition):
self = self.some_other_method()
...
return ...
Sure, you could start the method body by reassigning self to some other variable, but if you wouldn't normally do that with other parametres, why do it with self?

One can use the self assignment in a method, to change the class of instance to a derived class.
Of course one could assign it to a new object, but then the use of the new object ripples through the rest of code in the method. Reassiging it to self, leaves the rest of the method untouched.
class aclass:
def methodA(self):
...
if condition:
self = replace_by_derived(self)
# self is now referencing to an instance of a derived class
# with probably the same values for its data attributes
# all code here remains untouched
...
self.methodB() # calls the methodB of derivedclass is condition is True
...
def methodB(self):
# methodB of class aclass
...
class derivedclass(aclass):
def methodB(self):
#methodB of class derivedclass
...
But apart from such a special use case, I don't see any advantages to replace self.

You can make the instance a singleton element of the class
and mark the methods with #classmethod.
from enum import IntEnum
from collections import namedtuple
class kind(IntEnum):
circle = 1
square = 2
def attr(y): return [getattr(y, x) for x in 'k l b u r'.split()]
class Shape(namedtuple('Shape', 'k,l,b,u,r')):
self = None
#classmethod
def __repr__(cls):
return "<Shape({},{},{},{},{}) object at {}>".format(
*(attr(cls.self)+[id(cls.self)]))
#classmethod
def transform(cls, func):
cls.self = cls.self._replace(**func(cls.self))
Shape.self = Shape(k=1, l=2, b=3, u=4, r=5)
s = Shape.self
def nextkind(self):
return {'k': self.k+1}
print(repr(s)) # <Shape(1,2,3,4,5) object at 139766656561792>
s.transform(nextkind)
print(repr(s)) # <Shape(2,2,3,4,5) object at 139766656561888>

Python: Check if a method uses #staticmethod [duplicate]

assume following class definition:
class A:
def f(self):
return 'this is f'
#staticmethod
def g():
return 'this is g'
a = A()
So f is a normal method and g is a static method.
Now, how can I check if the funcion objects a.f and a.g are static or not? Is there a "isstatic" funcion in Python?
I have to know this because I have lists containing many different function (method) objects, and to call them I have to know if they are expecting "self" as a parameter or not.

Lets experiment a bit:
>>> import types
>>> class A:
... def f(self):
... return 'this is f'
... #staticmethod
... def g():
... return 'this is g'
...
>>> a = A()
>>> a.f
<bound method A.f of <__main__.A instance at 0x800f21320>>
>>> a.g
<function g at 0x800eb28c0>
>>> isinstance(a.g, types.FunctionType)
True
>>> isinstance(a.f, types.FunctionType)
False
So it looks like you can use types.FunctionType to distinguish static methods.

Your approach seems a bit flawed to me, but you can check class attributes:
(in Python 2.7):
>>> type(A.f)
<type 'instancemethod'>
>>> type(A.g)
<type 'function'>
or instance attributes in Python 3.x
>>> a = A()
>>> type(a.f)
<type 'method'>
>>> type(a.g)
<type 'function'>

To supplement the answers here, in Python 3 the best way is like so:
import inspect
class Test:
#staticmethod
def test(): pass
isstatic = isinstance(inspect.getattr_static(Test, "test"), staticmethod)
We use getattr_static rather than getattr, since getattr will retrieve the bound method or function, not the staticmethod class object. You can do a similar check for classmethod types and property's (e.g. attributes defined using the #property decorator)
Note that even though it is a staticmethod, don't assume it was defined inside the class. The method source may have originated from another class. To get the true source, you can look at the underlying function's qualified name and module. For example:
class A:
#staticmethod:
def test(): pass
class B: pass
B.test = inspect.getattr_static(A, "test")
print("true source: ", B.test.__qualname__)
Technically, any method can be used as "static" methods, so long as they are called on the class itself, so just keep that in mind. For example, this will work perfectly fine:
class Test:
def test():
print("works!")
Test.test()
That example will not work with instances of Test, since the method will be bound to the instance and called as Test.test(self) instead.
Instance and class methods can be used as static methods as well in some cases, so long as the first arg is handled properly.
class Test:
def test(self):
print("works!")
Test.test(None)
Perhaps another rare case is a staticmethod that is also bound to a class or instance. For example:
class Test:
#classmethod
def test(cls): pass
Test.static_test = staticmethod(Test.test)
Though technically it is a staticmethod, it is really behaving like a classmethod. So in your introspection, you may consider checking the __self__ (recursively on __func__) to see if the method is bound to a class or instance.

I happens to have a module to solve this. And it's Python2/3 compatible solution. And it allows to test with method inherit from parent class.
Plus, this module can also test:
regular attribute
property style method
regular method
staticmethod
classmethod
For example:
class Base(object):
attribute = "attribute"
#property
def property_method(self):
return "property_method"
def regular_method(self):
return "regular_method"
#staticmethod
def static_method():
return "static_method"
#classmethod
def class_method(cls):
return "class_method"
class MyClass(Base):
pass
Here's the solution for staticmethod only. But I recommend to use the module posted here.
import inspect
def is_static_method(klass, attr, value=None):
"""Test if a value of a class is static method.
example::
class MyClass(object):
#staticmethod
def method():
...
:param klass: the class
:param attr: attribute name
:param value: attribute value
"""
if value is None:
value = getattr(klass, attr)
assert getattr(klass, attr) == value
for cls in inspect.getmro(klass):
if inspect.isroutine(value):
if attr in cls.__dict__:
bound_value = cls.__dict__[attr]
if isinstance(bound_value, staticmethod):
return True
return False

Why bother? You can just call g like you call f:
a = A()
a.f()
a.g()

Is there a way in a class function to return an instance of the class itself?

I have a class in python with a function and I need that function to explicitly return an instance of that class. I tried this
class a(type):
def __init__(self, n):
self.n = n
def foo() -> a:
return a(self.n + 1)
but I get an error "a is not defined". What should I do? Thanks.

Since OP used annotation in member function. There is a NameError in the annotation also. To fix that. Try following:
Reference:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#id34
Annotating instance and class methods
In most cases the first argument of class and instance methods does
not need to be annotated, and it is assumed to have the type of the
containing class for instance methods, and a type object type
corresponding to the containing class object for class methods. In
addition, the first argument in an instance method can be annotated
with a type variable. In this case the return type may use the same
type variable, thus making that method a generic function.
from typing import TypeVar
T = TypeVar('T', bound='a')
class a:
def __init__(self: T, n: int):
self.n = n
def foo(self: T) -> T:
return a(self.n + 1)
print(a(1).foo().n)
Result:
2

What you are asking works:
class A:
def __init__(self, n):
self.n = n
def foo(self):
return A(self.n + 1)
a = A(1)
b = a.foo()
print(a.n, b.n)
There are sevaral problems with your original code though.
The type hint -> A does not work because A is not defined at that point.
You need to pass self to the foo method as well.
If you subclass type, and want to make use of its features, I suggest you also initialize it by calling super().__init__() and pass on all necessary arguments. You can do that at any point you prefer, but usually it's done in the __init__() method of the subclass.

Class with a registry of methods based on decorators

I have a class that has several methods which each have certain properties (in the sense of quality). I'd like these methods to be available in a list inside the class so they can be executed at once. Note that the properties can be interchangeable so this can't be solved by using further classes that would inherit from the original one. In an ideal world it would look something like this:
class MyClass:
def __init__():
red_rules = set()
blue_rules = set()
hard_rules = set()
soft_rules = set()
#red
def rule_one(self):
return 1
#blue
#hard
def rule_two(self):
return 2
#hard
def rule_three(self):
return 3
#blue
#soft
def rule_four(self):
return 4
When the class is instantiated, it should be easy to simply execute all red and soft rules by combining the sets and executing the methods. The decorators for this are tricky though since a regular registering decorator can fill out a global object but not the class attribute:
def red(fn):
red_rules.add(fn)
return fn
How do I go about implementing something like this?

You can subclass set and give it a decorator method:
class MySet(set):
def register(self, method):
self.add(method)
return method
class MyClass:
red_rules = MySet()
blue_rules = MySet()
hard_rules = MySet()
soft_rules = MySet()
#red_rules.register
def rule_one(self):
return 1
#blue_rules.register
#hard_rules.register
def rule_two(self):
return 2
#hard_rules.register
def rule_three(self):
return 3
#blue_rules.register
#soft_rules.register
def rule_four(self):
return 4
Or if you find using the .register method ugly, you can always define the __call__ method to use the set itself as a decorator:
class MySet(set):
def __call__(self, method):
"""Use set as a decorator to add elements to it."""
self.add(method)
return method
class MyClass:
red_rules = MySet()
...
#red_rules
def rule_one(self):
return 1
...
This looks better, but it's less explicit, so for other collaborators (or future yourself) it might be harder to grasp what's happening here.
To call the stored functions, you can just loop over the set you want and pass in the instance as the self argument:
my_instance = MyClass()
for rule in MyClass.red_rules:
rule(my_instance)
You can also create an utility function to do this for you, for example you can create a MySet.invoke() method:
class MySet(set):
...
def invoke(self, obj):
for rule in self:
rule(obj)
And now just call:
MyClass.red_rules.invoke(my_instance)
Or you could have MyClass handle this instead:
class MyClass:
...
def invoke_rules(self, rules):
for rule in rules:
rule(self)
And then call this on an instance of MyClass:
my_instance.invoke_rules(MyClass.red_rules)

Decorators are applied when the function is defined; in a class that's when the class is defined. At this point in time there are no instances yet!
You have three options:
Register your decorators at the class level. This is not as clean as it may sound; you either have to explicitly pass additional objects to your decorators (red_rules = set(), then #red(red_rules) so the decorator factory can then add the function to the right location), or you have to use some kind of class initialiser to pick up specially marked functions; you could do this with a base class that defines the __init_subclass__ class method, at which point you can iterate over the namespace and find those markers (attributes set by the decorators).
Have your __init__ method (or a __new__ method) loop over all the methods on the class and look for special attributes the decorators have put there.
The decorator would only need to add a _rule_name or similar attribute to decorated methods, and {getattr(self, name) for for name in dir(self) if getattr(getattr(self, name), '_rule_name', None) == rule_name} would pick up any method that has the right rule name defined in rule_name.
Make your decorators produce new descriptor objects; descriptors have their __set_name__() method called when the class object is created. This gives you access to the class, and thus you can add attributes to that class.
Note that __init_subclass__ and __set_name__ require Python 3.6 or newer; you'd have to resort to a metaclass to achieve similar functionality in earlier versions.
Also note that when you register functions at the class level, that you need to then explicitly bind them with function.__get__(self, type(cls)) to turn them into methods, or you can explicitly pass in self when calling them. You could automate this by making a dedicated class to hold the rule sets, and make this class a descriptor too:
import types
from collections.abc import MutableSet
class RulesSet(MutableSet):
def __init__(self, values=(), rules=None, instance=None, owner=None):
self._rules = rules or set() # can be a shared set!
self._instance = instance
self._owner = owner
self |= values
def __repr__(self):
bound = ''
if self._owner is not None:
bound = f', instance={self._instance!r}, owner={self._owner!r}'
rules = ', '.join([repr(v) for v in iter(self)])
return f'{type(self).__name__}({{{rules}}}{bound})'
def __contains__(self, ob):
try:
if ob.__self__ is self._instance or ob.__self__ is self._owner:
# test for the unbound function instead when both are bound, this requires staticmethod and classmethod to be unwrapped!
ob = ob.__func__
return any(ob is getattr(f, '__func__', f) for f in self._rules)
except AttributeError:
# not a method-like object
pass
return ob in self._rules
def __iter__(self):
if self._owner is not None:
return (f.__get__(self._instance, self._owner) for f in self._rules)
return iter(self._rules)
def __len__(self):
return len(self._rules)
def add(self, ob):
while isinstance(ob, Rule):
# remove any rule wrappers
ob = ob._function
assert isinstance(ob, (types.FunctionType, classmethod, staticmethod))
self._rules.add(ob)
def discard(self, ob):
self._rules.discard(ob)
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
# share the set with a new, bound instance.
return type(self)(rules=self._rules, instance=instance, owner=owner)
class Rule:
#classmethod
def make_decorator(cls, rulename):
ruleset_name = f'{rulename}_rules'
def decorator(f):
return cls(f, ruleset_name)
decorator.__name__ = rulename
return decorator
def __init__(self, function, ruleset_name):
self._function = function
self._ruleset_name = ruleset_name
def __get__(self, *args):
# this is mostly here just to make Python call __set_name__
return self._function.__get__(*args)
def __set_name__(self, owner, name):
# register, then replace the name with the original function
# to avoid being a performance bottleneck
ruleset = getattr(owner, self._ruleset_name, None)
if ruleset is None:
ruleset = RulesSet()
setattr(owner, self._ruleset_name, ruleset)
ruleset.add(self)
# transfer controrol to any further rule objects
if isinstance(self._function, Rule):
self._function.__set_name__(owner, name)
else:
setattr(owner, name, self._function)
red = Rule.make_decorator('red')
blue = Rule.make_decorator('blue')
hard = Rule.make_decorator('hard')
soft = Rule.make_decorator('soft')
Then just use:
class MyClass:
#red
def rule_one(self):
return 1
#blue
#hard
def rule_two(self):
return 2
#hard
def rule_three(self):
return 3
#blue
#soft
def rule_four(self):
return 4
and you can access self.red_rules, etc. as a set with bound methods:
>>> inst = MyClass()
>>> inst.red_rules
RulesSet({<bound method MyClass.rule_one of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>}, instance=<__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>, owner=<class '__main__.MyClass'>)
>>> inst.blue_rules
RulesSet({<bound method MyClass.rule_two of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>, <bound method MyClass.rule_four of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>}, instance=<__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>, owner=<class '__main__.MyClass'>)
>>> inst.hard_rules
RulesSet({<bound method MyClass.rule_three of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>, <bound method MyClass.rule_two of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>}, instance=<__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>, owner=<class '__main__.MyClass'>)
>>> inst.soft_rules
RulesSet({<bound method MyClass.rule_four of <__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>>}, instance=<__main__.MyClass object at 0x106fe7550>, owner=<class '__main__.MyClass'>)
>>> for rule in inst.hard_rules:
... rule()
...
2
3
The same rules are accessible on the class; normal functions remain unbound:
>>> MyClass.blue_rules
RulesSet({<function MyClass.rule_two at 0x107077a60>, <function MyClass.rule_four at 0x107077b70>}, instance=None, owner=<class '__main__.MyClass'>)
>>> next(iter(MyClass.blue_rules))
<function MyClass.rule_two at 0x107077a60>
Containment testing works as expected:
>>> inst.rule_two in inst.hard_rules
True
>>> inst.rule_two in inst.soft_rules
False
>>> MyClass.rule_two in MyClass.hard_rules
True
>>> MyClass.rule_two in inst.hard_rules
True
You can use these rules to register classmethod and staticmethod objects too:
>>> class Foo:
... #hard
... #classmethod
... def rule_class(cls):
... return f'rule_class of {cls!r}'
...
>>> Foo.hard_rules
RulesSet({<bound method Foo.rule_class of <class '__main__.Foo'>>}, instance=None, owner=<class '__main__.Foo'>)
>>> next(iter(Foo.hard_rules))()
"rule_class of <class '__main__.Foo'>"
>>> Foo.rule_class in Foo.hard_rules
True

Python : Assert that variable is instance method?

How can one check if a variable is an instance method or not? I'm using python 2.5.
Something like this:
class Test:
def method(self):
pass
assert is_instance_method(Test().method)

inspect.ismethod is what you want to find out if you definitely have a method, rather than just something you can call.
import inspect
def foo(): pass
class Test(object):
def method(self): pass
print inspect.ismethod(foo) # False
print inspect.ismethod(Test) # False
print inspect.ismethod(Test.method) # True
print inspect.ismethod(Test().method) # True
print callable(foo) # True
print callable(Test) # True
print callable(Test.method) # True
print callable(Test().method) # True
callable is true if the argument if the argument is a method, a function (including lambdas), an instance with __call__ or a class.
Methods have different properties than functions (like im_class and im_self). So you want
assert inspect.ismethod(Test().method)

If you want to know if it is precisely an instance method use the following function. (It considers methods that are defined on a metaclass and accessed on a class class methods, although they could also be considered instance methods)
import types
def is_instance_method(obj):
"""Checks if an object is a bound method on an instance."""
if not isinstance(obj, types.MethodType):
return False # Not a method
if obj.im_self is None:
return False # Method is not bound
if issubclass(obj.im_class, type) or obj.im_class is types.ClassType:
return False # Method is a classmethod
return True
Usually checking for that is a bad idea. It is more flexible to be able to use any callable() interchangeably with methods.