I've searched and found this Append a dictionary to a dictionary but that clobbers keys from b if they exist in a..
I'd like to essentially recursively append 1 dictionary to another, where:
keys are unique (obviously, it's a dictionary), but each dictionary is fully represented in the result such that a.keys() and b.keys() are both subsets of c.keys()
if the same key is in both dictionaries, the resulting key contains a list of values from both, such that a[key] and b[key] are in c[key]
the values could be another dictionary, (but nothing deeper than 1 level), in which case the same logic should apply (append values) such that a[key1][key2] and b[key1][key2] are in c[key][key2]
The basic example is where 2 dictionary have keys that don't overlap, and I can accomplish that in multiple ways.. c = {**a, **b} for example, so I haven't covered that below
A trickier case:
a = {
"key1": "value_a1"
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": "value_b1"
"key3": "value_b3"
}
c = combine(a, b)
c >> {
"key1": ["value_a1", "value_b1"],
"key2": "value_a2",
"key3": "value_b3"
}
An even trickier case
a = {
"key1": {
"sub_key_1": ["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_a2"],
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_a3"
},
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": {
"sub_key_1": ["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_b1"],
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_b3"
},
"key3": "value_b3" # I'm okay with converting this to a list even if it's not one
}
c = combine(a, b)
c >> {
"key1": {
"sub_key_1": ["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_a2", "sub_value_b1"], #sub_value_a1 is not duplicated
"sub_key_2": ["sub_value_a3", "sub_value_b3"]
},
"key2": "value_a2",
"key3": "value_b3" # ["value_b3"] this would be okay, following from the code comment above
}
Caveats:
Python 3.6
The examples show lists being created as_needed, but I'm okay with every non-dict value being a list, as mentioned in the code comments
The values within the lists will always be strings
I tried to explain as best I could but can elaborate more if needed. Been working on this for a few days and keep getting stuck on the sub key part
There is no simple built-in way of doing this, but you can recreate the logic in python.
def combine_lists(a: list, b: list) -> list:
return a + [i for i in b if i not in a]
def combine_strs(a: str, b: str) -> str:
if a == b:
return a
return [a, b]
class EMPTY:
"A sentinel representing an empty value."
def combine_dicts(a: dict, b: dict) -> dict:
output = {}
keys = list(a) + [k for k in b if k not in a]
for key in keys:
aval = a.get(key, EMPTY)
bval = b.get(key, EMPTY)
if isinstance(aval, list) and isinstance(bval, list):
output[key] = combine_lists(aval, bval)
elif isinstance(aval, str) and isinstance(bval, str):
output[key] = combine_strs(aval, bval)
elif isinstance(aval, dict) and isinstance(bval, dict):
output[key] = combine_dicts(aval, bval)
elif bval is EMPTY:
output[key] = aval
elif aval is EMPTY:
output[key] = bval
else:
raise RuntimeError(
f"Cannot combine types: {type(aval)} and {type(bval)}"
)
return output
Sounds like you want a specialised version of dict. So, you could subclass it to give you the behaviour you want. Being a bit of a Python noob, I started with the answer here : Subclassing Python dictionary to override __setitem__
Then I added the behaviour in your couple of examples.
I also added a MultiValue class which is a subclass of list. This makes it easy to tell if a value in the dict already has multiple values. Also it removes duplicates, as it looks like you don't want them.
class MultiValue(list):
# Class to hold multiple values for a dictionary key. Prevents duplicates.
def append(self, value):
if isinstance(value, MultiValue):
for v in value:
if not v in self:
super(MultiValue, self).append(v)
else:
super(MultiValue, self).append(value)
class MultiValueDict(dict):
# dict which converts a key's value to a MultiValue when the key already exists.
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.update(*args, **kwargs)
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
# optional processing here
if key in self:
existing_value = self[key]
if isinstance(existing_value, MultiValueDict) and isinstance(value, dict):
existing_value.update(value)
return
if isinstance(existing_value, MultiValue):
existing_value.append(value)
value = existing_value
else:
value = MultiValue([existing_value, value])
super(MultiValueDict, self).__setitem__(key, value)
def update(self, *args, **kwargs):
if args:
if len(args) > 1:
raise TypeError("update expected at most 1 arguments, "
"got %d" % len(args))
other = dict(args[0])
for key in other:
self[key] = other[key]
for key in kwargs:
self[key] = kwargs[key]
def setdefault(self, key, value=None):
if key not in self:
self[key] = value
return self[key]
Example 1:
a = {
"key1": "value_a1",
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": "value_b1",
"key3": "value_b3"
}
# combine by creating a MultiValueDict then using update to add b to it.
c = MultiValueDict(a)
c.update(b)
print(c)
# gives {'key1': ['value_a1', 'value_b1'], 'key2': 'value_a2', 'key3': 'value_b3'}
Example 2: The value for key1 is created as a MultiValueDict and the value for the sub_key_1 is a MultiValue, so this may not fit what you're trying to do. It depends how you're building you data set.
a = {
"key1": MultiValueDict({
"sub_key_1": MultiValue(["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_a2"]),
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_a3"
}),
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": MultiValueDict({
"sub_key_1": MultiValue(["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_b1"]),
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_b3"
}),
"key3": "value_b3" # I'm okay with converting this to a list even if it's not one
}
c = MultiValueDict(a)
c.update(b)
print(c)
# gives {'key1': {'sub_key_1': ['sub_value_a1', 'sub_value_a2', 'sub_value_b1'], 'sub_key_2': ['sub_value_a3', 'sub_value_b3']}, 'key2': 'value_a2', 'key3': 'value_b3'}
a = {
"key1": "value_a1",
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": "value_b1",
"key3": "value_b3"
}
def appendValues(ax,cx):
if type(ax)==list:#is key's value in a, a list?
cx.extend(ax)#if it is a list then extend
else:#key's value in a, os not a list
cx.append(ax)#so use append
cx=list(set(cx))#make values unique with set
return cx
def combine(a,b):
c={}
for x in b:#first copy b keys and values to c
c[x]=b[x]
for x in a:#now combine a with c
if not x in c:#this key is not in c
c[x]=a[x]#so add it
else:#key exists in c
if type(c[x])==list:#is key's value in c ,a list?
c[x]=appendValues(a[x],c[x])
elif type(c[x])==dict:#is key's value in c a dictionary?
c[x]=combine(c[x],a[x])#combine dictionaries
else:#so key';'s value is not list or dict
c[x]=[c[x]]#make value a list
c[x]=appendValues(a[x],c[x])
return c
c = combine(a, b)
print(c)
print("==========================")
a = {
"key1": {
"sub_key_1": ["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_a2"],
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_a3"
},
"key2": "value_a2"
}
b = {
"key1": {
"sub_key_1": ["sub_value_a1", "sub_value_b1"],
"sub_key_2": "sub_value_b3"
},
"key3": "value_b3" # I'm okay with converting this to a list even if it's not one
}
c = combine(a, b)
print(c)
I have this structure, converted using json.load(json)
jsonData = [ {
thing: [
name: 'a name',
keys: [
key1: 23123,
key2: 83422
]
thing: [
name: 'another name',
keys: [
key1: 67564,
key2: 93453
]
etc....
} ]
I have key1check = 67564,
I want to check if a thing's key1 matches this value
if key1check in val['thing']['keys']['key1'] for val in jsonData:
print ('key found, has name of: {}'.format(jsonData['thing']['name'])
Should this work? Is there a better was to do this?
Not quite:
in is for inclusion in a sequence, such as a string or a list. You're comparing integer values, so a simple == is what you need.
Your given structure isn't legal Python: you have brackets in several places where you're intending a dictionary; you need braces instead.
Otherwise, you're doing fine ... but you should not ask us if it will work: ask the Python interpreter by running the code.
Try this for your structure:
jsonData = [
{ "thing": {
"name": 'a name',
"keys": {
"key1": 23123,
"key2": 83422
} } },
{ "thing": {
"name": 'another name',
"keys": {
"key1": 67564,
"key2": 93453
} } }
]
You can loop through #Prune 's dictionary using something like this as long as the structure is consistent.
for item in jsonData:
if item['thing']['keys']['key1'] == key1check:
print("true")
else:
print("false")
I basically have a file with this structure:
root \
{
field1 {
subfield_a {
"value1"
}
subfield_b {
"value2"
}
subfield_c {
"value1"
"value2"
"value3"
}
subfield_d {
}
}
field2 {
subfield_a {
"value1"
}
subfield_b {
"value1"
}
subfield_c {
"value1"
"value2"
"value3"
"value4"
"value5"
}
subfield_d {
}
}
}
I want to parse this file with python to get a multidimensional array that contains all the values of a specific subfield (for examples subfield_c). E.g. :
tmp = magic_parse_function("subfield_c",file)
print tmp[0] # [ "value1", "value2", "value3"]
print tmp[1] # [ "value1", "value2", "value3", "value4", "value5"]
I'm pretty sure I've to use the pyparsing class, but I don't where to start to set the regex (?) expression. Can someone give me some pointers ?
You can let pyparsing take care of the matching and iterating over the input, just define what you want it to match, and pass it the body of the file as a string:
def magic_parse_function(fld_name, source):
from pyparsing import Keyword, nestedExpr
# define parser
parser = Keyword(fld_name).suppress() + nestedExpr('{','}')("content")
# search input string for matching keyword and following braced content
matches = parser.searchString(source)
# remove quotation marks
return [[qs.strip('"') for qs in r[0].asList()] for r in matches]
# read content of file into a string 'file_body' and pass it to the function
tmp = magic_parse_function("subfield_c",file_body)
print(tmp[0])
print(tmp[1])
prints:
['value1', 'value2', 'value3']
['value1', 'value2', 'value3', 'value4', 'value5']
I have two large nested dictionaries in the form
dictOne = "key1": {
"key2": {}
"key3": {
"key4" : {data...}
}
}
dictTwo = "key1": {
"key2": {}
}
Except they are thousands of lines long some of the dicts are nested 10-15 levels in.
I want to find a way to combine them together similar to an EXCEPT in SQL. I want any keys that show up in dictTwo to be deleted from dictOne, but only if the dict under the key doesn't have children.
So in this case the resulting dict would be
dictRes = "key1": {
"key3": {
"key4" : {data...}
}
}
I am assuming there is no easy way to do this, but I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction towards making a method that could accomplish this
Sounds like you need a recursive option.
def dict_parser(target, pruning):
d = {}
for k,v in target.items():
if (not v) and (k in pruning):
continue
if isinstance(v, dict):
d[k] = dict_parser(v, pruning.get(k, {}))
else:
d[k] = v
return d
DEMO:
dictOne = {"key1": {
"key2": {},
"key3": {
"key4" : {"some stuff"}
}
}}
dictTwo = {"key1": {
"key2": {}
}}
dict_parser(dictOne, dictTwo)
# gives:
# # {'key1': {
# # 'key3': {
# # 'key4': {'some stuff'}}}}
I've a dict as follows
{
"key1" : "value1",
"key2" : "value2",
"key3" : "value3",
"key4" : {
"key5" : "value5"
}
}
If the dict has key1==value1, I'll append the dict into a list.
Suppose key1==value1 is not present in the first key value pair, whereas it is inside nested dict as follows:
{
"key2" : "value2",
"key3" : "value3",
"key4" : {
"key5" : "value5",
"key1" : "value1",
"key6" : {
"key7" : "value7",
"key1" : "value1"
}
},
"key8" : {
"key9" : "value9",
"key10" : {
"key11" : "value11",
"key12" : "value12",
"key1" : "value1"
}
}
}
In the above dict, I've to check first whether there is key1=value1. If not, I've to traverse the nested dict and if it found in the nested dict, I've to append that dict to the list. If the nested dict is also a nested dict but key1=value1 is find in the first key value pair, then no need to check the inner dict(Eg key4 has key1=value1 in the in the first key value pair. Hence no need to check the inner one eventhough key6 has key1=value1).
So finally, I'll have the list as follows.
[
{
"key5" : "value5",
"key1" : "value1",
"key6" : {
"key7" : "value7",
"key1" : "value1"
}
},
{
"key11" : "value11",
"key12" : "value12",
"key1" : "value1"
}
]
How to achieve this?
Note: The depth of the dict may vary
if a dict contains key1 and value1 we will add it to the list and finish.
if not, we will got into all the values in the dict that are dict and do the same logic as well
l = []
def append_dict(d):
if d.get("key1") == "value1":
l.append(d)
return
for k,v in d.items():
if isinstance(v, dict):
append_dict(v)
append_dict(d)
print l
an iterative solution will be adding to queue the dict we would like to check:
from Queue import Queue
q = Queue()
l = []
q.put(d)
while not q.empty():
d = q.get()
if d.get("key1") == "value1":
l.append(d)
continue
for k,v in d.items():
if isinstance(v, dict):
q.put(v)
print l
As #shashank noted, usinq a stack instead of a queue will also work
it is BFS vs DFS for searching in the dictionary