Click-Circle game - clicking outside and inside the circle - python

I am trying to code a game that has a red circle in which the user is supposed to click up to 7 times in the window. If the user clicks outside the circle, the circle will change its position to where the user clicked. And the game should end when the user has clicked 3 times inside the circle (does not have to be in a row) or when the user has clicked 7 times in total.
I have coded and done quite most of it I think, its just I cant seem to make it work as I want to.
from graphics import *
def draw_circle(win, c=None):
x = random.randint(0,500)
y = random.randint(0,500)
if var is None:
centa = Point(x,y)
var = Circle(centa,50)
var.setFill(color_rgb(200,0,0))
var.draw(win)
else:
p1 = c.p1
x_dif = (p1.x - x) * -1
y_dif = (p1.y - y) * -1
var.move(x_dif, y_dif)
return (var, x, y)
def main():
win= GraphWin("game",800,800)
score = 0
var,x,y = draw_circle(win)
while score <= 7:
mouseClick2=win.getMouse()
if mouseClick2.y >= y-50 and mouseClick2.y <= y +50 and
mouseClick2.x >= x-50 and mouseClick2.x <= x+50:
score=score + random.randint(0,5)
var,x,y = draw_circle(win, c)
print ("Success!")
print (("the score is, {0}").format(score))
thanks for the help in advance!

I see a couple problems.
your if mouseClick2.y >= y-50... conditional is spread out on two lines, but you don't have a line continuation character.
You never call main().
You don't import random.
You call draw_circle in the while loop with an argument of c, but there is no variable by that name in the global scope. You probably meant to pass in var.
c in draw_circle ostensibly refers to the circle object you want to manipulate, but half the time you manipulate var instead of c.
you assign a value to cvar in the loop, but never use it.
Your else block in draw_circle calculates the movement delta by subtracting the cursor coordinates from c.p1. But c.p1 is the upper-left corner of the circle, not the center of the circle. So your hit detection is off by fifty pixels.
import random
from graphics import *
def draw_circle(win, c=None):
x = random.randint(0,500)
y = random.randint(0,500)
if c is None:
centa = Point(x,y)
c = Circle(centa,50)
c.setFill(color_rgb(200,0,0))
c.draw(win)
else:
center_x = c.p1.x + 50
center_y = c.p1.y + 50
x_dif = (center_x - x) * -1
y_dif = (center_y - y) * -1
c.move(x_dif, y_dif)
return (c, x, y)
def main():
win= GraphWin("game",800,800)
score = 0
var,x,y = draw_circle(win)
while score <= 7:
mouseClick2=win.getMouse()
if mouseClick2.y >= y-50 and mouseClick2.y <= y +50 and \
mouseClick2.x >= x-50 and mouseClick2.x <= x+50:
score=score + random.randint(0,5)
var,x,y = draw_circle(win, var)
print ("Success!")
print (("the score is, {0}").format(score))
main()
Additional possible improvements:
Your hit detection checks whether the cursor is in a 50x50 rectangle centered on the circle. You could instead check whether the cursor is inside the circle if you measured the distance between the cursor and the center, and checked whether it was less than the radius.
var and c could stand to have more descriptive names.
mouseClick2 doesn't make much sense as a name, considering there's no mouseClick1.
The movement delta arithmetic could be simplified: (a-b) * -1 is the same as (b-a).
If you only use a variable's value once, you can sometimes avoid creating the variable at all if you nest expressions.
it might be nice to define constants, such as for the circle's radius, instead of having magic numbers in your code.
You can save five characters by using += to increment the score.
import math
import random
from graphics import *
RADIUS = 50
def draw_circle(win, circle=None):
x = random.randint(0,500)
y = random.randint(0,500)
if circle is None:
circle = Circle(Point(x,y),RADIUS)
circle.setFill(color_rgb(200,0,0))
circle.draw(win)
else:
circle.move(
x - circle.p1.x - RADIUS,
y - circle.p1.y - RADIUS
)
return (circle, x, y)
def main():
win= GraphWin("game",800,800)
score = 0
circle,x,y = draw_circle(win)
while score <= 7:
cursor = win.getMouse()
if math.hypot(cursor.x - x, cursor.y - y) <= RADIUS:
score += random.randint(0,5)
circle,x,y = draw_circle(win, circle)
print ("Success!")
print (("the score is, {0}").format(score))
main()

I'm not really a python guy, but I see that your hitbox is wrong. If there are any other issues then comment it/them to me.
Solving hitbox to be circle:
What you have already written is good to have thing but you should check if click was in circle not square. Pythagoras triangle is solution for this.
Check:
if (math.sqrt(delta_x **2 + delta_y **2) <= circle_radius)
where delta_x and delta_y is center coordinate minus mouse position

Related

How to check if a moving picture is touched to another moving picture

def check_crash():
(x,y) = c.coords(my_car)
for car in other_carss :
(car_x,car_y) = c.coords(car)
if y < (car_y+ other_cars_height) and (y + my_car_height) >= (car_y+ other_cars_height):
if x > car_x and x < (car_x + other_cars_width):
c.delete(car)
lose_a_life()
root.after(100, check_crash)
The canvas has a method named find_overlapping which will return all objects that overlap a given rectangle.

Generate "scattered" items, that do not overlap

This is a question that i had to solve, but have been banging my head against a wall for the past 5 days. There must be something really simple that i am missing, or misunderstanding, as the logic seems 100% correct in my head, but it just won't work.
I need to draw "scattered" houses, that do not over lap, 100 of them.
I have to use turtle to draw them, so i have X and Y coordinates.
And X and Y list for verification purposes, to see if a house is already in that place.
What i am doing is drawing a "house" (square with a triangle on top) on the randomized coordinates,
I loop while the number of houses is less than 100.
On each loop i randomize the x and y coordinates, from where i start drawing each house with turtle.
I check if the value is already in the X and Y verification lists, and also if my new X and Y are +/- the size of the house (treating it as a square)
import turtle
import time
import random
t = turtle.Turtle()
turtle.screensize(1920,1000)
x_verif = []
y_verif = []
t.speed(0)
collision = None
def square():
for s in range(0, 4):
t.forward(90)
t.left(90)
def triangle():
for s in range(0, 2):
t.left(-60)
t.forward(52)
def house():
square()
t.left(90)
t.forward(90)
triangle()
def scatter():
print("a")
house()
x1 = random.randint(-850, 850)
y1 = random.randint(-380, 380)
count = 0
while count < 100:
print("a2")
i = 0
u = 0
collision = False
for tries in range (0, 2):
print("a3")
x_verif.append(x1)
y_verif.append(y1)
while u < 100:
print("a4")
print(x_verif, y_verif, x1, y1)
while i < len(x_verif):
x1 = random.randint(-850, 850)
y1 = random.randint(-380, 380)
print(x1, y1)
if x1 not in x_verif and (x1 > x_verif[i]+91 or x1 < x_verif[i]-91):
if y1 not in y_verif and (y1 > y_verif[i]+142 or y1 < y_verif[i]-142):
collision = False
else:
collision = True
if collision == False:
t.penup()
t.hideturtle()
t.setx(x1)
t.sety(y1)
t.pendown()
house()
x_verif.append(x1)
y_verif.append(y1)
count += 1
i+= 1
u += 1
scatter()
Sorry for the ugly code, and the simplicity behind it. I would love to use list comprehensions for this, but i do not know where my logic fails at the moment. This is like my 100th try, as of this version it only draws the initial house and i think it loops infinitely somewhere....
My problem lies in looping through the whole lists for every new value. Do i need to loop through them every time, or is there some IF condition that I can use? Edit: It keeps on looping through random values, but none of them are accepted by the two IF statements that i'm using.
On a side note: With my current code they also change direction of drawing every time... No idea why is that happening....
Edit: I am very thankful for all the solutions! I'm struggling with the note at the beginning of the question. It says that it should only take a couple more lines to do the last one, compared to the first one..... Are they joking?
This turned out to be a trickier problem than I assumed from the description. My approach was to treat, and store, a house as two polygons, a square and a triangle. I randomly test draw (pen up) a house and compare all the points in its polygons to see if they are inside existing house polygons, and vice versa. If no overlap, draw the house for real. The solution is not efficient, but it allows tight packing of houses than a simple diameter-based approach.
The point in triangle routine is based on one from GeeksForGeeks.org
I have one slight fudge factor in my code that still needs to be polished out. But overall it seems to achieve the objective:
from turtle import Screen, Turtle
from random import randint
HOUSES = 100
HOUSE_SIZE = 90
WINDOW_WIDTH, WINDOW_HEIGHT = 1920, 1000
# assumes roof is an isosceles triangle
ROOF_SIDE = HOUSE_SIZE * 3**0.5 / 3
ROOF_HEIGHT = ROOF_SIDE // 2
FONT_SIZE = HOUSE_SIZE // 3
FONT = ('Arial', FONT_SIZE, 'normal')
def square(turtle, identity=None):
turtle.begin_poly()
for _ in range(3):
turtle.forward(HOUSE_SIZE)
turtle.right(90)
turtle.end_poly()
turtle.forward(HOUSE_SIZE/2 - FONT_SIZE/2) # visually finish square
if identity: # label each house with a number
turtle.penup()
turtle.right(90)
turtle.forward(HOUSE_SIZE/2)
turtle.write(identity, align='center', font=FONT)
turtle.backward(HOUSE_SIZE/2)
turtle.left(90)
turtle.pendown()
turtle.forward(HOUSE_SIZE/2 + FONT_SIZE/2) # visually finish square
turtle.right(90) # return to original orientation
return turtle.get_poly()
def triangle(turtle):
turtle.begin_poly()
turtle.forward(HOUSE_SIZE)
turtle.left(150)
turtle.forward(ROOF_SIDE)
turtle.end_poly()
turtle.left(60)
turtle.forward(ROOF_SIDE) # visually finish triangle
turtle.right(210) # return to original orientation
return turtle.get_poly()
def house(turtle, identity=None):
return (square(turtle, identity), triangle(turtle))
def area_of_triangle(p1, p2, p3):
x1, y1 = p1
x2, y2 = p2
x3, y3 = p3
return abs((x1 * (y2 - y3) + x2 * (y3 - y1) + x3 * (y1 - y2))) // 2
def is_inside_triangle(point, triangle):
p1, p2, p3 = triangle
a = area_of_triangle(p1, p2, p3)
b = area_of_triangle(point, p2, p3)
c = area_of_triangle(p1, point, p3)
d = area_of_triangle(p1, p2, point)
return abs(a - (b + c + d)) < 5 # 5 == fudge factor, sigh
def is_inside_square(point, square):
x, y = point
p1, p2, p3, p4 = square
_, y1 = p1
x2, _ = p2
_, y3 = p3
x4, _ = p4
return x4 <= x <= x2 and y3 <= y <= y1
def scatter(turtle):
houses = []
count = 0
while count < HOUSES:
x = randint(-WINDOW_WIDTH/2, WINDOW_WIDTH/2 - HOUSE_SIZE)
y = randint(HOUSE_SIZE - WINDOW_HEIGHT/2, WINDOW_HEIGHT/2 - ROOF_HEIGHT)
turtle.penup()
turtle.goto(x, y)
proposed_square, proposed_triangle = house(turtle) # test draw invisible house
turtle.pendown()
collision = False
for point in proposed_square + proposed_triangle: # does proposed house collide with houses?
for square, triangle in houses:
if is_inside_square(point, square) or is_inside_triangle(point, triangle):
collision = True
break
if collision:
break
for square, triangle in houses: # do houses collide with proposed house?
for point in square + triangle:
if is_inside_square(point, proposed_square) or is_inside_triangle(point, proposed_triangle):
collision = True
break
if collision:
break
if not collision:
count += 1
houses.append(house(turtle, identity=count)) # actually draw new house
print(count)
screen = Screen()
screen.screensize(WINDOW_WIDTH, WINDOW_HEIGHT)
screen.tracer(False)
turtle = Turtle()
turtle.hideturtle()
scatter(turtle)
screen.tracer(True)
screen.exitonclick()
This problem is simplified somewhat by the consistent orientation of houses. If the houses were randomly oriented, compass-wise, the square overlap calculations would be more complex.
The solution could be made more efficient by doing triangle overlap with triangle, square overlap with triangle, etc. tests instead of simply "point inside". We could also push the collision logic down into the square() and triangle() routines to throw an error as soon as there's a collsion, rather than completing a house and then testing.
Given the size of the screen area, size of a house, the number of houses, and the random scattering, I believe it may be possible for an idividual run of the program to stall trying to place a house where there may not be available space:
Defo no the best way to do it but
import turtle
import time
import random
t = turtle.Turtle()
turtle.screensize(1920,1000)
x_verif = []
y_verif = []
t.speed(0)
collision = None
def square():
for s in range(0, 4):
t.forward(90)
t.left(90)
def triangle():
for s in range(0, 2):
t.left(-60)
t.forward(52)
def house():
square()
t.left(90)
t.forward(90)
triangle()
t.left(30) #returning to 90 degrres
def scatter():
beenAt = [] #this will hold every place that there is a house
for i in range(100):
t.penup()
loop = True
while loop == True:
area = random.randint(-850, 850)
for i in range(91): #looping for the size of the house
if area+i in beenAt: #if the number chosen plus i is in beenAt stop because we cant use that place
break
if i == 90: #if at the finial part of our loop then draw house
t.goto(area, 0)
t.pendown()
for i in range(area, area + 91):
beenAt.append(i) #add to been at list every place we have drawn
house()
loop = False
scatter()

Why is the tower defense path all messy when I try to eliminate the tower placment on the path?

I want to finish my tower defense game as fast as I can.
I have trouble with if the tower is on the path with a given path list.
It will never work even is I try as hard as I can.
I already tried a lot of times to solve that problem like tech with tim's tower defense youtube tutorial. It made almost perfect sense why it was not working.
But no matter how hard I try, It seems to never work properly.
Find the link to the tutorial here.
WARNING:The video is pretty long.
x, y = tower.x, tower.y
for n, point in enumerate(path):
point_x, point_y = point[0], point[1]
dis_x = abs(point_x - x)
dis_y = abs(point_y - y)
dis = math.sqrt((dis_x - x)**2 + (dis_y - y)**2)
print(dis)
if dis < 130:
return False
return True
You might be thinking 'Why did I do this' so I changed it a bit:
import numpy as np
closest = []
x, y = tower.x, tower.y
for n, point in enumerate(path):
point_x, point_y = point[0], point[1]
dis_x = abs(point_x - x)
dis_y = abs(point_y - y)
dis = math.sqrt((dis_x - x)**2 + (dis_y - y)**2)
print(dis)
if len(closest) <= 2:
if dis < 130:
closest.append(point)
p1 = np.array([x, y])
p2 = np.array(closest[0])
p3 = np.array(closest[1])
dis = np.cross(p2-p1,p3-p1)/np.linalg.norm(p2-p1)
if dis < 90:
return False
return True
I did not recive any error messages, but you can still place towers on some spots on the path,
and you can't place towers on some points not on the path, and I was expecting it to be pretty neat.
As #ImperishableNight stated, the issue is that your function only compares each point on the path and checks if the distance is less than a certain threshold (130 pixels in your case). But this is not enough, since we are not only interested in the end points in each segment of the path, but also all of the points in between. For that, we need to calculate the distance between a point and a line segment.
I have written and commented on the following code using a simple Point class to replace whatever pygame provides. I break the problem up into a bunch of tiny functions to solve your problem. Please let me know if any of this is unclear.
import math
import random
class Point:
def __init__(self, x=0, y=0):
"""
A really simple Point class.
Replaces whatever pygame provides for this example.
"""
self.x = x
self.y = y
def __repr__(self):
"""
A convenient representation of a Point class.
So we see the x and y values when printing these objects.
"""
return "({0}, {1})".format(self.x, self.y)
def gen_rand_point(width, height):
"""
Creates random x and y values for a Point object
"""
rand_x = random.randint(0, width)
rand_y = random.randint(0, height)
point = Point(x=rand_x, y=rand_y)
return point
def gen_rand_point_list(width, height, num_points):
"""
Creates a list of random points using the previous function.
"""
points = []
for i in range(num_points):
point = gen_rand_point(width, height)
points.append(point)
return points
def points_to_segments(points, loop=False):
"""
Converts a list of points into a list of segments.
Offsets the point list and zips it to create "segments".
A segment is just a tuple containing two Point objects.
"""
starts = points
ends = points[1:] + [points[0]]
segments = list(zip(starts, ends))
if loop:
return segments
else:
return segments[:-1]
def calc_sqr_dist(point_a, point_b):
"""
Calculates the square distance between two points.
Can be useful to save a wasteful math.sqrt call.
"""
delta_x = point_b.x - point_a.x
delta_y = point_b.y - point_a.y
sqr_dist = (delta_x ** 2) + (delta_y ** 2)
return sqr_dist
def calc_dist(point_a, point_b):
"""
Calculates the distance between two points.
When you need a wasteful math.sqrt call.
"""
sqr_dist = calc_sqr_dist(point_a, point_b)
dist = math.sqrt(sqr_dist)
return dist
def calc_dot_product(segment_a, segment_b):
"""
Calculates the dot product of two segments.
Info about what the dot product represents can be found here:
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/805954
"""
a0, a1 = segment_a
b0, b1 = segment_b
ax = a1.x - a0.x
ay = a1.y - a0.y
bx = b1.x - b0.x
by = b1.y - b0.y
dot = (ax * bx) + (ay * by)
return dot
def calc_point_segment_dist(point, segment):
"""
Gets the distance between a point and a line segment.
Some explanation can be found here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/1501725/2588654
"""
start, end = segment
sqr_dist = calc_sqr_dist(start, end)
#what if the segment's start and end are the same?
if sqr_dist == 0:
dist = calc_dist(point, start)
return dist
#what if it is not that easy?
else:
segment_a = (start, point)
segment_b = (start, end)#really is just segment...
dot = calc_dot_product(segment_a, segment_b)
t = float(dot) / sqr_dist
clamped_t = max(0, min(1, t))#clamps t to be just within the segment
#the interpolation is basically like a lerp (linear interpolation)
projection = Point(
x = start.x + (t * (end.x - start.x)),
y = start.y + (t * (end.y - start.y)),
)
dist = calc_dist(point, projection)
return dist
def calc_point_path_dist(point, path):
"""
Gets the distances between the point and each segment.
Then returns the minimum distance of all of these distances.
"""
dists = [calc_point_segment_dist(point, segment) for segment in path]
min_dist = min(dists)
return min_dist
if __name__ == "__main__":
"""
A fun example!
"""
width = 800
height = 600
num_path_points = 5
tower_range = 50
tower = gen_rand_point(width, height)
path_points = gen_rand_point_list(width, height, num_path_points)
path = points_to_segments(path_points)
dist = calc_point_path_dist(tower, path)
in_range = dist <= tower_range
print(dist, in_range)

Restricting the area that PyAutoGui's mouse feature will work

I want to make a program that randomly doodles on paint, but when I leave it alone for extended periods of time, it minimizes paint and moves every one of my files around
is there any way to keep pyautogui from moving the mouse outside of a range? Thanks in advance!
import pyautogui, time, random
time.sleep(5)
pyautogui.click() # click to put drawing program in focus
distance = random.randrange(200,300)
while 6 > 0:
pyautogui.dragRel(distance, 0) # move right
distance = random.randrange(-50,50)
pyautogui.dragRel(0, distance) # move down
distance = random.randrange(-50,50)
pyautogui.dragRel(-distance, 0) # move left
distance = random.randrange(-50,50)
pyautogui.dragRel(0, -distance) # move up
I want it to stay within Top left 24,163 Bottom right 1902,996
pyautogui won't do it for you, but you can track the x and y position and ensure it remains within bounds:
import pyautogui, time, random
minx = 24
miny = 163
maxx = 1902
maxy = 996
maxmove = 50
x = (maxx-minx)/2
y = (maxy-miny)/2
time.sleep(5)
pyautogui.moveTo(x, y)
pyautogui.click() # click to put drawing program in focus
def inx(x):
return x <= maxx and x >= minx
def iny(y):
return y <= maxy and y >= miny
def xdrag(x):
distx = random.randrange(maxmove) - maxmove/2
if inx(x + distx):
x = x + distx
pyautogui.dragRel(distx, 0)
def ydrag(y):
disty = random.randrange(maxmove) - maxmove/2
if iny(y + disty):
y = y + disty
pyautogui.dragRel(0, disty)
count = 0
while count < 100: # no infinite loop
xdrag(x)
ydrag(y)
count += 1

Checking if clicks are within a graphic object [Python Graphics Module]

Here is the module I'm using: http://mcsp.wartburg.edu/zelle/python/graphics/graphics.pdf
I want to see whether a user's clicks are within a shape or not. I used the in operator, but I know that is incorrect. Below is a chunk of my code:
win = GraphWin("Click Speed", 700, 700)
theTarget = drawTarget(win, random.randrange(0,685), random.randrange(0,685))
while theTarget in win:
click = win.getMouse()
if click in theTarget:
print("Good job")
I left out the code that draws theTarget shape because it is length and unnecessary. It is a moving circle.
I'm using a while loop so it allows me to constantly get the user's clicks.
How do I go about checking whether or not a user's clicks are in the specified Target shape by using the getMouse() command?
I'm going to have to use this in the future for more abstract shapes (not simple circles).
Circle
For the simple case of a circle, you can determine whether the mouse is inside using the distance formula. For example:
# checks whether pt1 is in circ
def inCircle(pt1, circ):
# get the distance between pt1 and circ using the
# distance formula
dx = pt1.getX() - circ.getCenter().getX()
dy = pt1.getY() - circ.getCenter().getY()
dist = math.sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy)
# check whether the distance is less than the radius
return dist <= circ.getRadius()
def main():
win = GraphWin("Click Speed", 700, 700)
# create a simple circle
circ = Circle(Point(350,350),50)
circ.setFill("red")
circ.draw(win)
while True:
mouse = win.getMouse()
if inCircle(mouse,circ):
print ("Good job")
main()
Oval
For the more advanced example of an ellipse we will need to use a formula found here. Here is the function implemting that:
def inOval(pt1, oval):
# get the radii
rx = abs(oval.getP1().getX() - oval.getP2().getX())/2
ry = abs(oval.getP1().getY() - oval.getP2().getY())/2
# get the center
h = oval.getCenter().getX()
k = oval.getCenter().getY()
# get the point
x = pt1.getX()
y = pt1.getY()
# use the formula
return (x-h)**2/rx**2 + (y-k)**2/ry**2 <= 1
Polygon
For a polygon of abitrary shape we need to reference this. I have converted that to a python equivalent for you. Check the link to see why it works because I am honestly not sure
def inPoly(pt1, poly):
points = poly.getPoints()
nvert = len(points) #the number of vertices in the polygon
#get x and y of pt1
x = pt1.getX()
y = pt1.getY()
# I don't know why this works
# See the link I provided for details
result = False
for i in range(nvert):
# note: points[-1] will give you the last element
# convenient!
j = i - 1
#get x and y of vertex at index i
vix = points[i].getX()
viy = points[i].getY()
#get x and y of vertex at index j
vjx = points[j].getX()
vjy = points[j].getY()
if (viy > y) != (vjy > y) and (x < (vjx - vix) * (y - viy) / (vjy - viy) + vix):
result = not result
return result

Categories