Add list as child of tree with python 3 - python

I have looked at many very similar questions and cannot figure it out so:
I have a string like this:
{121{12}12{211}2}
I want to read the string into a tree like this:
I am confused as how to tell python to add a whole list as a child node?
I would also like to know how to change the current node to the parent of the old current node?
Here is my code so far:
class Node:
def __init__(self,val):
self.value = val
self.children = []
#init Node class so we can pass in values as nodes and set children to empty list
def add_child(self, obj):
self.children.append(obj)
s=[]
for i in filedata:
if i == leftbrace:
n = Node(i)
#create new child of current node
s = []
#reset list s to blank
if i == rightbrace:
n.add_child(s)
#add list s to current node
#make parent of current node the new current node
else:
s.append(i)
#add i to list s
for c in n.children:
print (c.data)

To make something like this work, it is easiest if you use recursion. Here is one way that this can be done.
Code:
class Node:
def __init__(self, stream):
val = []
children = []
while True:
try:
# get the next character from the stream
ch = next(stream)
# if this is an open brace, then recurse to a child
if ch == '{':
children.append(Node(stream))
# if this is a close brace, we are done on this level
elif ch == '}':
break
# otherwise add this character to our value
else:
val.append(ch)
# stream is empty, we are done
except StopIteration:
break
self.value = ''.join(val)
self.children = children
#classmethod
def from_string(cls, string):
stream = iter(string)
tree_top = Node(stream)
# assert that the string started with '{' and was one top node
assert len(tree_top.children) == 1 and tree_top.value == ''
return tree_top.children[0]
def __str__(self):
return self.value
def __repr__(self):
return "Node('%s', <%d children>)" % (
self.value, len(self.children))
def tree_string(self, level=0):
yield '-' + " " * level + str(self)
for child in self.children:
for child_string in child.tree_string(level+1):
yield child_string
tree = '{121{12}12{211}2}'
for line in Node.from_string(tree).tree_string():
print(line)
Results:
-121122
- 12
- 211

Related

adding childern to tree stucture and print

I am trying to implement an n-arry tree based on this post :
[here][1]
and I am getting an error when trying to define a function that adds children:
class node(object):
def __init__(self, value, children = []):
self.value = value
self.children = children
def __str__(self, level=0):
ret = "\t"*level+repr(self.value)+"\n"
for child in self.children:
ret += child.__str__(level+1)
return ret
# trying to implement this method si that I can get rid of
# calling root.children[0].children
def add_child(self, obj):
self.children.append(obj)
def __repr__(self):
return '<tree node representation>'
root = node('grandmother')
root.children = [node('daughter'), node('son')]
root.children[0].children = [node('granddaughter'), node('grandson')]
root.children[1].children = [node('granddaughter'), node('grandson')]
root.add_child([node((1)), node(2)]) # error
print (root)
I want to be able to to create a tree and print it.
[1]: Printing a Tree data structure in Python
If you name a method add_child, it should add a child, not children. And if you add children, you should extend the list, not just append the given list on its end.
Working example:
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, value, children=None):
if children is None:
children = []
self.value = value
self.children = children
def __str__(self, level=0):
ret = "\t" * level + repr(self.value) + "\n"
for child in self.children:
ret += child.__str__(level + 1)
return ret
def add_children(self, obj):
self.children.extend(obj)
root = Node('grandmother')
root.children = [Node('daughter'), Node('son')]
root.children[0].children = [Node('granddaughter'), Node('grandson')]
root.children[1].children = [Node('granddaughter'), Node('grandson')]
root.add_children([Node(1), Node(2)])
print(root)
Output:
'grandmother'
'daughter'
'granddaughter'
'grandson'
'son'
'granddaughter'
'grandson'
1
2
You call add_child with an entire list object. Within add_child you use the method list.append which adds the entire list object to the list itself.
Solution 1: call add_child by specifying the nodes directly:
root.add_child(node((1))
root.add_child(node((2))
Solution 2: change the implementation of add_child by using list.extend instead of list.append. The former adds each element within the supplied argument to the list, while the latter adds the entire argument to the list.
def add_child(self, obj):
self.children.extend(obj)

Putting Stack in descending order using push and pop in python

accepts strings from user and generates stack till it gets the input "End"
Next, it should sort the given stack in a decent order
Finally, print the sorted stack
I cannot seem to get the logic right using only push and pop methods whereby push is a function putting elements to the top of the stack and pop is a function removing the top element of the stack and storing it. I am only allowed to use push and pop, the sorting algorithm is the only one I cant do.
from Stack import Stack
def display_(S_):
node = S_.list.head
while node != None:
print(node.data)
node = node.next
def Sorting_Stack(stack,k):
v = 0
ar = 0
temp = Stack()
for i in range(k):
v = stack.pop()
temp.push(v)
node = stack.list.head
tnode = temp.list.head
if tnode.data > node.data:
ar = temp.pop()
stack.push(ar)
display_(stack)
if __name__ == '__main__':
stack = Stack()
string = ""
k = 0
while string!='End':
string = input()
if string == 'End':
break
else:
stack.push(string)
k += 1
Sorting_Stack(stack, k)
#this is Stack.py--------
from Node import Node
from LinkedList import LinkedList
class Stack:
def __init__(self):
self.list = LinkedList()
def push(self, new_item):
# Create a new node to hold the item
new_node = Node(new_item)
# Insert the node as the list head (top of stack)
self.list.prepend(new_node)
def pop(self):
# Copy data from list's head node (stack's top node)
popped_item = self.list.head.data
# Remove list head
self.list.remove_after(None)
# Return the popped item
return popped_item
#Stack Class
class Stack:
def __init__(self):
self.stack = []
def push(self,item):
if item == 'End':
self.sort()
else:
self.stack.append(item)
def pop(self):
if len(self.stack) == 0:
print("Stack Is Empty")
else:
self.stack.pop()
def sort(self):
self.stack.sort()
print(self.stack)
logic For giving Inputs
s = Stack()
item = None
while item !='End':
print("Type 'End' For Ending the Stack Push Operation")
item = input("Enter Item: ")
s.push(item)
s.push(item)
Program will take inputs till we give input as 'End'.
After given 'End' as Input it will sort the stack and print it.

Trie Implementation in Python -- Print Keys

I Implemented a Trie data structure using python, now the problem is it doesn't display the keys that Trie is stored in its data structure.
class Node:
def __init__(self):
self.children = [None] * 26
self.endOfTheWord = False
class Trie:
def __init__(self):
self.root = self.getNode()
def getNode(self):
return Node()
def charToIndex(self ,ch):
return ord(ch) - ord('a')
def insert(self ,word):
current = self.root
for i in range(len(word)):
index = self.charToIndex(word[i])
if current.children[index] is None:
current.children[index] = self.getNode()
current = current.children[index]
current.endOfTheWord = True
def printKeys(self):
str = []
self.printKeysUtil(self.root ,str)
def printKeysUtil(self ,root ,str):
if root.endOfTheWord == True:
print(''.join(str))
return
for i in range(26):
if root.children[i] is not None:
ch = chr(97) + chr(i)
str.append(ch)
self.printKeysUtil(root.children[i] ,str)
str.pop()
You could perform a pre-order traversal of the nodes, and wherever you find an end-of-word marker, you zoom up to the root, capturing the letters as you go, in order to get the full word... except that to accomplish this, you would need to store the parent node in each node.
def printKeysUtil(self ,root ,str):
if root.endOfTheWord == True:
print(''.join(str))
return
for i in range(26):
if root.children[i] is not None:
ch = chr(97+i)
str.append(ch)
self.printKeysUtil(root.children[i] ,str)
str.pop()

printing stack in a new line within a class

I have a linked stack class and I'm having the problem of printing the elements in the stack, with each element in a new line. The str function in the linked stack class is printing every element in a new line which is what i wanted but it even prints an extra new line at the end.
class Node:
def __init__(self,item,the_next = None):
self.item = item
self.next = the_next
def __str__(self):
return str(self.item)
class LinkedStack:
def __init__(self):
self.top = None
self.count = 0
def __len__(self):
return self.count
def is_empty(self):
return self.count == 0
def isFull(self):
return False
def reset(self):
self.top = None
self.count = 0
def __str__(self): #im having the issue here whereby it prints a newline even after printing the last element
current = self.top
ans = ""
while not (current is None):
ans += str(current)
ans += '\n'
current = current.next
return ans
if __name__ == "__main__":
L = LinkedStack()
L.push(1)
L.push(2)
L.push(3)
print(L)
The output i get is:
3
2
1
#an extra newline printed here which is not wanted
I'm looking for a way to improvise the str function in the Linked Stack class in order to get rid of the redundant new line at the end. Any help is much appreciated.
Why not simply trim the return value of __str__ like so return ans[:-1] ? Since you always append a new line after adding an element to the string.
On a side note, it could be nicer to write your function like so:
def __str__(self):
strs = []
cur = self.top
while cur is not None:
strs = [str(cur)] + strs
cur = cur.next
return '\n'.join(strs)
You could move the addition of the newline until after you get the next item, and check it is not None before you then append it.
A further optimisation then is to move the break condition to that point:
while True:
ans += str(current)
current = current.next
if current is None:
break
ans += '\n'

In Order Traversal AVL Tree: Name not defined

I was just wondering would anyone be able to help me. I am trying to do an inorder transversal of an AVL tree. But I keep getting an error that my function name 'r_in_order' is not defined. What is happening here and what am I missing? Here is the code:
class Node:
""" A node in a BST. It may have left and right subtrees """
def __init__(self, item, left = None, right = None):
self.item = item
self.left = left
self.right = right
class BST:
""" An implementation of a Binary Search Tree """
def __init__(self):
self.root = None
def recurse_add(self, ptr, item):
if ptr == None:
return Node(item)
elif item < ptr.item:
ptr.left = self.recurse_add(ptr.left, item)
elif item > ptr.item:
ptr.right = self.recurse_add(ptr.right, item)
return ptr
def add(self, item):
""" Add this item to its correct position on the tree """
self.root = self.recurse_add(self.root, item)
def r_count(self, ptr):
if ptr == None:
return 0
else:
return 1 + self.r_count(ptr.left) + self.r_count(ptr.right)
def count(self):
return self.r_count(self.root)
def r_height(self, ptr):
if ptr == None:
return 0
else:
return 1 + max(self.r_height(ptr.left), self.r_height(ptr.right))
def height(self):
return self.r_height(self.root)
def r_in_order(self, ptr):
if ptr != None:
r_in_order(ptr.left)
print(ptr.item + " ", end="")
r_in_order(ptr.right)
def in_order(self):
return self.r_in_order(self.root)
I am then testing the code with this:
import sys
from BST import BST
def main():
# Read each test case
line = sys.stdin.readline()
items = line.strip().split()
nums = [int(item) for item in items]
tree = BST()
for num in nums:
tree.add(num)
print("Print the elements of the tree in order:")
tree.in_order()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
r_in_order is a method of BST. It can only be called on a BST instance (or on the class with an instance as the first argument), but in the definition of r_in_order itself, you try to use it without one. So technically, it doesn't exist in the namespace you're trying to use it in.
Your function definition should be as follows:
def r_in_order(self, ptr):
if ptr != None:
self.r_in_order(ptr.left)
print(ptr.item + " ", end="")
self.r_in_order(ptr.right)
There is no general function r_in_order: you need to add self. to get a reference to the method you're already inside. There's also a syntax error lurking in the print statement. Try this:
def r_in_order(self, ptr):
if ptr != None:
self.r_in_order(ptr.left)
print(ptr.item, " ", end="")
self.r_in_order(ptr.right)
This runs, and yields the below (first line is input).
1 3 7 5 6 4 2
Print the elements of the tree in order:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Categories