Here is the code:
plt.figure(figsize=(15,6)) # does not affect the following plot
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.set_xticklabels(q9.columns.values[::-1], fontproperties=label_font, fontsize=14)
sns.barplot(q9.columns.values, q9.iloc[[1]].get_values()[0], palette="GnBu_d", ax=ax)
I had to set the font in this case, so I need the ax object. The final plot is really small, definitely not (15,6). I think by setting ax=ax changed the size of the plot to its default size.
Any idea on how to change the size of the figure in this case?
You are making two figures, with the call to plt.figure and plt.subplots. You are setting the size only on the first figure, but you are using the second figure to draw your barplot.
Related
I'm making a boxplot with a fixed ylim.
Some of my data will result a box which out of the axes range.
I'd like to show the portion of the box out of the axes, but have no idea.
I know that the ax.plot() have a clip_on kwarg to show the line out of the axes range.
But ax.boxplot() seems have no a such kwarg.
I also tried to set ax.set_clip_on(False), but it seems not work.
Is there any idea about this?
Plus: The following is an example to show what I want.
We plot a normal box first:
import matplotlib.pyplot
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.boxplot(x=range(0, 10), positions=[0])
Then we set the ylim to make the whisker out of the axes:
import matplotlib.pyplot
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.boxplot(x=range(0, 10), positions=[0])
ax.set_ylim(2, 8)
My question is how to show the whisker out of the axes in the second boxplot?
I find a way to realize what I want, but not sure if it's the most effective one.
For each element of a boxplot, we can set the single element to avoid cliped.
For example, we can set ax.boxplot(x=range(10), positions=[0], whiskerprops={'clip_on': False}, capprops={'clip_on': False}) to avoid the whisker and cap (the horizontal line at the end of the whisker) cliped.
If the box and median line are also cliped, the medianprops={'clip_on': False} and boxprops={'clip_on': False} kwargs are useful as well.
I'm trying to plot a figure without tickmarks or numbers on either of the axes (I use axes in the traditional sense, not the matplotlib nomenclature!). An issue I have come across is where matplotlib adjusts the x(y)ticklabels by subtracting a value N, then adds N at the end of the axis.
This may be vague, but the following simplified example highlights the issue, with '6.18' being the offending value of N:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import random
prefix = 6.18
rx = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
ry = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
plt.plot(rx,ry,'ko')
frame1 = plt.gca()
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_xticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_yticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_xticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_yticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
plt.show()
The three things I would like to know are:
How to turn off this behaviour in the first place (although in most cases it is useful, it is not always!) I have looked through matplotlib.axis.XAxis and cannot find anything appropriate
How can I make N disappear (i.e. X.set_visible(False))
Is there a better way to do the above anyway? My final plot would be 4x4 subplots in a figure, if that is relevant.
Instead of hiding each element, you can hide the whole axis:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
Or, you can set the ticks to an empty list:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_ticks([])
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_ticks([])
In this second option, you can still use plt.xlabel() and plt.ylabel() to add labels to the axes.
If you want to hide just the axis text keeping the grid lines:
frame1 = plt.gca()
frame1.axes.xaxis.set_ticklabels([])
frame1.axes.yaxis.set_ticklabels([])
Doing set_visible(False) or set_ticks([]) will also hide the grid lines.
If you are like me and don't always retrieve the axes, ax, when plotting the figure, then a simple solution would be to do
plt.xticks([])
plt.yticks([])
I've colour coded this figure to ease the process.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
You can have full control over the figure using these commands, to complete the answer I've add also the control over the spines:
ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
# X AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['bottom'].set_visible(False)
# BLUE
ax.set_xticklabels([])
# RED
ax.set_xticks([])
# RED AND BLUE TOGETHER
ax.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
# Y AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
# YELLOW
ax.set_yticklabels([])
# GREEN
ax.set_yticks([])
# YELLOW AND GREEN TOGHETHER
ax.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
I was not actually able to render an image without borders or axis data based on any of the code snippets here (even the one accepted at the answer). After digging through some API documentation, I landed on this code to render my image
plt.axis('off')
plt.tick_params(axis='both', left=False, top=False, right=False, bottom=False, labelleft=False, labeltop=False, labelright=False, labelbottom=False)
plt.savefig('foo.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight', pad_inches=0.0)
I used the tick_params call to basically shut down any extra information that might be rendered and I have a perfect graph in my output file.
Somewhat of an old thread but, this seems to be a faster method using the latest version of matplotlib:
set the major formatter for the x-axis
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(plt.NullFormatter())
One trick could be setting the color of tick labels as white to hide it!
plt.xticks(color='w')
plt.yticks(color='w')
or to be more generalized (#Armin Okić), you can set it as "None".
When using the object oriented API, the Axes object has two useful methods for removing the axis text, set_xticklabels() and set_xticks().
Say you create a plot using
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1)
ax.plot(x, y)
If you simply want to remove the tick labels, you could use
ax.set_xticklabels([])
or to remove the ticks completely, you could use
ax.set_xticks([])
These methods are useful for specifying exactly where you want the ticks and how you want them labeled. Passing an empty list results in no ticks, or no labels, respectively.
You could simply set xlabel to None, straight in your axis. Below an working example using seaborn
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
tips = sns.load_dataset("tips")
ax = sns.boxplot(x="day", y="total_bill", data=tips)
ax.set(xlabel=None)
plt.show()
Just do this in case you have subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(16, 8))
ax[0].set_yticklabels([]) # x-axis
ax[0].set_xticklabels([]) # y-axis
I have this simple piece of code where I try to plot simple graph while limiting number of x ticks. There are hundreds of items in iters variable and if they get plotted it would just create one fat black line.
However, ax.locator_params does not work and the number of ticks aren't reduced.
I have tried setting it on plt object, but no help.
I also tried specifying x and y axes in locator_params, but no help as well.
Finally, I have tried moving ax.locator_params before and after ax.plot, but nothing seemed to help. I am completely out of ideas.
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(20,10))
ax.locator_params(tight=True, nbins=4)
ax.plot(iters, vals)
plt.xticks(rotation=30)
plt.show()
locator_params() with nbins= is only supported for numerical axes where the tick positions are set via MaxNLocator.
To get the same effect with text ticks, the current ticks can be stored in a list (get_xticks) and then be replaced by a subset. Note that changes to ticks (and to limits) should be called after the main plot functions.
xticks = ax.get_xticks()
ax.set_xticks(xticks[::len(xticks) // 4]) # set new tick positions
ax.tick_params(axis='x', rotation=30) # set tick rotation
ax.margins(x=0) # set tight margins
I'm trying to plot a figure without tickmarks or numbers on either of the axes (I use axes in the traditional sense, not the matplotlib nomenclature!). An issue I have come across is where matplotlib adjusts the x(y)ticklabels by subtracting a value N, then adds N at the end of the axis.
This may be vague, but the following simplified example highlights the issue, with '6.18' being the offending value of N:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import random
prefix = 6.18
rx = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
ry = [prefix+(0.001*random.random()) for i in arange(100)]
plt.plot(rx,ry,'ko')
frame1 = plt.gca()
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_xticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
for xlabel_i in frame1.axes.get_yticklabels():
xlabel_i.set_fontsize(0.0)
xlabel_i.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_xticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
for tick in frame1.axes.get_yticklines():
tick.set_visible(False)
plt.show()
The three things I would like to know are:
How to turn off this behaviour in the first place (although in most cases it is useful, it is not always!) I have looked through matplotlib.axis.XAxis and cannot find anything appropriate
How can I make N disappear (i.e. X.set_visible(False))
Is there a better way to do the above anyway? My final plot would be 4x4 subplots in a figure, if that is relevant.
Instead of hiding each element, you can hide the whole axis:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
Or, you can set the ticks to an empty list:
frame1.axes.get_xaxis().set_ticks([])
frame1.axes.get_yaxis().set_ticks([])
In this second option, you can still use plt.xlabel() and plt.ylabel() to add labels to the axes.
If you want to hide just the axis text keeping the grid lines:
frame1 = plt.gca()
frame1.axes.xaxis.set_ticklabels([])
frame1.axes.yaxis.set_ticklabels([])
Doing set_visible(False) or set_ticks([]) will also hide the grid lines.
If you are like me and don't always retrieve the axes, ax, when plotting the figure, then a simple solution would be to do
plt.xticks([])
plt.yticks([])
I've colour coded this figure to ease the process.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
You can have full control over the figure using these commands, to complete the answer I've add also the control over the spines:
ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
# X AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['bottom'].set_visible(False)
# BLUE
ax.set_xticklabels([])
# RED
ax.set_xticks([])
# RED AND BLUE TOGETHER
ax.axes.get_xaxis().set_visible(False)
# Y AXIS -BORDER
ax.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
# YELLOW
ax.set_yticklabels([])
# GREEN
ax.set_yticks([])
# YELLOW AND GREEN TOGHETHER
ax.axes.get_yaxis().set_visible(False)
I was not actually able to render an image without borders or axis data based on any of the code snippets here (even the one accepted at the answer). After digging through some API documentation, I landed on this code to render my image
plt.axis('off')
plt.tick_params(axis='both', left=False, top=False, right=False, bottom=False, labelleft=False, labeltop=False, labelright=False, labelbottom=False)
plt.savefig('foo.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight', pad_inches=0.0)
I used the tick_params call to basically shut down any extra information that might be rendered and I have a perfect graph in my output file.
Somewhat of an old thread but, this seems to be a faster method using the latest version of matplotlib:
set the major formatter for the x-axis
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(plt.NullFormatter())
One trick could be setting the color of tick labels as white to hide it!
plt.xticks(color='w')
plt.yticks(color='w')
or to be more generalized (#Armin Okić), you can set it as "None".
When using the object oriented API, the Axes object has two useful methods for removing the axis text, set_xticklabels() and set_xticks().
Say you create a plot using
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1)
ax.plot(x, y)
If you simply want to remove the tick labels, you could use
ax.set_xticklabels([])
or to remove the ticks completely, you could use
ax.set_xticks([])
These methods are useful for specifying exactly where you want the ticks and how you want them labeled. Passing an empty list results in no ticks, or no labels, respectively.
You could simply set xlabel to None, straight in your axis. Below an working example using seaborn
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
tips = sns.load_dataset("tips")
ax = sns.boxplot(x="day", y="total_bill", data=tips)
ax.set(xlabel=None)
plt.show()
Just do this in case you have subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(16, 8))
ax[0].set_yticklabels([]) # x-axis
ax[0].set_xticklabels([]) # y-axis
I want to plot some Data with Matplotlib scatter plot.
I used the following code to plot the Data as a scatter with using the same axes for the different subplots.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
epsilon= np.array([1,2,3,4,5])
f, (ax1, ax2, ax3, ax4) = plt.subplots(4, sharex= True, sharey=True)
ax1.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_100_0, color='r', label='Totaldehnung= 0.000')
ax1.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_100_03, color='g',label='Totaldehnung= 0.003')
ax1.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_100_05, color='b',label='Totaldehnung= 0.005')
ax1.set_title('TOR_R')
ax2.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_111_0,color='r')
ax2.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_111_03,color='g')
ax2.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_111_05,color='b')
ax3.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_110_0,color='r')
ax3.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_110_03,color='g')
ax3.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_110_05,color='b')
ax4.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_234_0,color='r')
ax4.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_234_03,color='g')
ax4.scatter(epsilon, mean_percent_234_05,color='b')
# Fine-tune figure; make subplots close to each other and hide x ticks for
# all but bottom plot.
f.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.13)
plt.setp([a.get_xticklabels() for a in f.axes[:-1]], visible=False)
plt.locator_params(axis = 'y', nbins = 4)
ax1.grid()
ax2.grid()
ax3.grid()
ax4.grid()
plt.show()
Now i want to have a x-axis with smaller space between each point. I tried to change the range but it was not working. Can someone help me?
To make the x ticks come closer you might have to set the dimensions of the figure.
Since, in your case, the figure is already created, Set the size of the plot using set_size_inches method of the figure object.
This question contains a few other ways to do the same.
Adding the following line before the plt.show()
fig.set_size_inches(2,8)
Gives me this :
Which I hope is what you are trying to do.