How is using SQLAlchemy different in Flask framework - python

I've written things in SQLAlchemy that work fine but the same workflow/commands seem to be askew when doing them in Flask. For example, these types of lines are getting flagged as "undefined":
metadata = MetaData(db)
abc = Table('abc', metadata, autoload=True)
s = select([abc.name])
I do have from flask.ext.sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemy at the top.
Is there something else I need to be doing additionally or instead?
(For reference, I'm running it at pythonanywhere)

Importing SQLAlchemy will not give you direct access to the names inside that module. You should also be aware that using the flask_sqlalchemy (formerly flask.ext.sqlalchemy) module uses a somewhat different mechanism to access SQLAlchemy features. This means that any attempt to transfer your current knowledge of SQLAlchemy shouold be informed by a study of the flask_sqlalchemy documentation.
Typically you will create a Flask application and then pass that to a call to SQLAlchemy as in this example. The relevant code is shown below.
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:////tmp/test.db'
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
The db object now has the Model, Column and the various datatypes as attributes, so you can define a table/model in the following way.
class User(db.Model):
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
username = db.Column(db.String(80), unique=True)
email = db.Column(db.String(120), unique=True)
def __init__(self, username, email):
self.username = username
self.email = email
def __repr__(self):
return '<User %r>' % self.username
I personally am not fond of this particular access model, since it forces me to qualify the various names inside the db namespace rather than simply importing them from a module and using them unqualified, but it seems to work (at least for relatively uncomplicated databases).
If you are an experienced SQLAlchemy user you might want to consider using the standard access mechanisms, though this may render you vulnerable to subtle bugs due to unanticipated thread/web session interactions. I have also heard that it can be tricky to deploy multiple databases. I have no direct evidence of this, so please regard it as anecdotal.

Related

Python SQLalchemy access huge DB data without creating models

I am using flaks python and sqlalchemy to connect to a huge db, where a lot of stats are saved. I need to create some useful insights with the use of these stats, so I only need to read/get the data and never modify.
The issue I have now is the following:
Before I can access a table I need to replicate the table in my models file. For example I see the table Login_Data in the DB. So I go into my models and recreate the exact same table.
class Login_Data(Base):
__tablename__ = 'login_data'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
date = Column(Date, nullable=False)
new_users = Column(Integer, nullable=True)
def __init__(self, date=None, new_users=None):
self.date = date
self.new_users = new_users
def get(self, id):
if self.id == id:
return self
else:
return None
def __repr__(self):
return '<%s(%r, %r, %r)>' % (self.__class__.__name__, self.id, self.date, self.new_users)
I do this because otherwise I cant query it using:
some_data = Login_Data.query.limit(10)
But this feels unnecessary, there must be a better way. Whats the point in recreating the models if they are already defined. What shall I use here:
some_data = [SOMETHING HERE SO I DONT NEED TO RECREATE THE TABLE].query.limit(10)
Simple question but I have not found a solution yet.
Thanks to Tryph for the right sources.
To access the data of an existing DB with sqlalchemy you need to use automap. In your configuration file where you load/declare your DB type. You need to use the automap_base(). After that you can create your models and use the correct table names of the DB without specifying everything yourself:
from sqlalchemy.ext.automap import automap_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
import stats_config
Base = automap_base()
engine = create_engine(stats_config.DB_URI, convert_unicode=True)
# reflect the tables
Base.prepare(engine, reflect=True)
# mapped classes are now created with names by default
# matching that of the table name.
LoginData = Base.classes.login_data
db_session = Session(engine)
After this is done you can now use all your known sqlalchemy functions on:
some_data = db_session.query(LoginData).limit(10)
You may be interested by reflection and automap.
Unfortunately, since I never used any of those features, I am not able to tell you more about them. I just know that they allow to use the database schema without explicitly declaring it in Python.

Flask SQL Alchemy with declarative ORM extension

I am using sqlalchemy ORM with declarative extensions in a Flask project for a web API.
The Flask documentation shows how to execute query properly inside an endpoint here
Now this is all good, but what if i want to execute a group by query. For example given the user domain object in the flask documentation:
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'users'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String(50), unique=True)
email = Column(String(120), unique=True)
I want to retrieve the sum of ids for all the users with the same name (doesn't make sense, take it as toy example for sake of simplicity!).
In pure SQL i could do it easily with:
select name, sum(id) from user group by name
However inside an endpoint the reccomanded way to execute a query (again see here) is to start from a ref to the domain object User, for instance:
User.query.filter(User.name == 'admin').first()
To execute a group-by query I would rather use something like this (which indeed works!):
#see database module http://flask.pocoo.org/docs/0.12/patterns/sqlalchemy/#declarative)
from database import db_session
#app.route('/')
def index():
db_session.query(func.sum(User.id).label('num_id'), User.name).group_by(User.name).all()
In this case the query starts from db_session.
Is this correct and safe? Remeamber we are in a concurrent application inside Flask.
Any help?
It's fine.
But I usually use .with_entities(*entities) for such cases:
User.query.filter(filters).with_entities(User.name.label('name'), func.count(User.id).label('count')).group_by(User.name)

Associate "external' class model with flask sqlalchemy

We use a central class model for a wide variety of python modules. This model is defined using SQLAlchemy. The classes all inherit from declarative_base.
For example, our model definitions look something like this:
Base = declarative_base()
class Post(Base):
__tablename__ = 'Posts'
id = Column(INT, primary_key=True, autoincrement=True)
body = Column(TEXT)
timestamp = Column(TIMESTAMP)
user_id = Column(INT, ForeignKey('Users.uid'))
We have been building a flask web-application in which we employ this same model. We have discovered a tricky problem in that flask-sqlalchemy appears to be designed in such a way that it expects all classes used in its model to have been defined by passing in an active instance of the session. Here is an example of a "proper" flask-sqalchemy class model definition:
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:////tmp/test.db'
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
class User(db.Model):
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
username = db.Column(db.String(80), unique=True)
email = db.Column(db.String(120), unique=True)
Note that the above example for flask-sqlalchemy requires an already-instantiated sql session. This has horrified us, because we are completely at a loss as to how to integrate our SqlAlchemy model into flask. We really want to use the flask-security suite in particular.
This problem has been brought up before on SO. Here, for example:
How to use flask-sqlalchemy with existing sqlalchemy model?
Our requirements are different from those of whoever accepted the response there. The response points out that one loses the ability to use User.query, but this is precisely one of the things we must retain.
It is not feasible to abandon our nice, elegant, central class model definition in favor of what flask-sqlalchemy appears to require. Is there any way for us to associate our model with the SQLAlchemy() object? Bonus points for getting us the .query() method on our classes which appears to be required by flask-security.
Solution:
As of today, the best way to do this is as follows:
Implement or import sqlalchemy base
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
base = declarative_base()
class Base(base):
__abstract__ = True
uid = Column(Integer, primary_key=True, autoincrement=True)
Register the external base:
from flask_sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemy
from model.base import Base
app = Flask(__name__)
db = SQLAlchemy(app, model_class=Base)
Archived for posterity:
I spent a lot of time looking for an answer to this. This is a lot easier to do today than it was when I originally asked the question, but it still isn't exactly simple.
For anyone who decides to do security themselves, I recommend the following excellent exposition of common design patterns which use flask, but which avoid employing unnecessary dependencies like flask-security:
https://exploreflask.com/users.html
UPDATE:
For anyone interested, a patch has been in the works for some time related to this. As of now it still isn't released, but you can check its progress here:
https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask-sqlalchemy/pull/250#issuecomment-77504337
UPDATE:
I have taken the code from the above mentioned patch and created a local override for the SQLAlchemy object which allows one to register an external base. I think this is the best option available until such time as FSA gets around to adding this officially. Here is the code from that class for anyone interested. Tested working with Flask-SqlAlchemy 2.2
Patching in register_external_base:
import flask_sqlalchemy
'''Created by Isaac Martin 2017. Licensed insofar as it can be according to the standard terms of the MIT license: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License. The author accepts no liability for consequences resulting from the use of this software. '''
class SQLAlchemy(flask_sqlalchemy.SQLAlchemy):
def __init__(self, app=None, use_native_unicode=True, session_options=None,
metadata=None, query_class=flask_sqlalchemy.BaseQuery, model_class=flask_sqlalchemy.Model):
self.use_native_unicode = use_native_unicode
self.Query = query_class
self.session = self.create_scoped_session(session_options)
self.Model = self.make_declarative_base(model_class, metadata)
self._engine_lock = flask_sqlalchemy.Lock()
self.app = app
flask_sqlalchemy._include_sqlalchemy(self, query_class)
self.external_bases = []
if app is not None:
self.init_app(app)
def get_tables_for_bind(self, bind=None):
"""Returns a list of all tables relevant for a bind."""
result = []
for Base in self.bases:
for table in flask_sqlalchemy.itervalues(Base.metadata.tables):
if table.info.get('bind_key') == bind:
result.append(table)
return result
def get_binds(self, app=None):
"""Returns a dictionary with a table->engine mapping.
This is suitable for use of sessionmaker(binds=db.get_binds(app)).
"""
app = self.get_app(app)
binds = [None] + list(app.config.get('SQLALCHEMY_BINDS') or ())
retval = {}
for bind in binds:
engine = self.get_engine(app, bind)
tables = self.get_tables_for_bind(bind)
retval.update(dict((table, engine) for table in tables))
return retval
#property
def bases(self):
return [self.Model] + self.external_bases
def register_base(self, Base):
"""Register an external raw SQLAlchemy declarative base.
Allows usage of the base with our session management and
adds convenience query property using self.Query by default."""
self.external_bases.append(Base)
for c in Base._decl_class_registry.values():
if isinstance(c, type):
if not hasattr(c, 'query') and not hasattr(c, 'query_class'):
c.query_class = self.Query
if not hasattr(c, 'query'):
c.query = flask_sqlalchemy._QueryProperty(self)
# for name in dir(c):
# attr = getattr(c, name)
# if type(attr) == orm.attributes.InstrumentedAttribute:
# if hasattr(attr.prop, 'query_class'):
# attr.prop.query_class = self.Query
# if hasattr(c , 'rel_dynamic'):
# c.rel_dynamic.prop.query_class = self.Query
To be used like so:
app = Flask(__name__)
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
db.register_base(base)

Flask Sqlalchemy : relationships between different modules

I'm following the Flask-SQLAlchemy tutorial.
I have Flask 0.9, sqlalchemy 0.7.8 and flask-sqlalchemy 0.16 on python 2.6.
I'm trying to create a "one to many" relationship, like in their tutorial.
class Person(db.Model):
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
name = db.Column(db.String(50))
addresses = db.relationship('Address', backref='person',
lazy='dynamic')
class Address(db.Model):
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
email = db.Column(db.String(50))
person_id = db.Column(db.Integer, db.ForeignKey('person.id'))
After that, I can create the database :
from DataBase.Tables.MyClass import db
db.create_all()
It works well when both classes are created on the same file.
It does not work anymore when I want to create this through 2 different files (2 different modules).
This is just an example (I'm trying to do something much more complicated with plenty of classes and I need the relationship to exist between 2 different modules but I'll simplify it so my question can be easier to understand.)
I have 2 modules : Person and Address, both of them have :
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:///C:\\MyBase\\Base.sqlite'
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
and each of them has the declaration of the class written before.
My main function is in a 3rd module:
from DataBase.Tables.Person import db as person_db
from DataBase.Tables.Address import db as address_db
if __name__ == "__main__":
import DataBase.Tables.Person
import DataBase.Tables.Address
person_db.create_all()
address_db.create_all()
I still get an error in Eclipse:
*sqlalchemy.exc.NoReferencedTableError: Foreign key associated with column 'Address.person_id' could not find table 'person' with which to generate a foreign key to target column 'sid'*
I could find another post with someone suggesting the use of "metadata" but I couldn't find a proper way to use that.
Does anyone have an idea to solve this ?
Thanks !
You need to have only one set of the below, and not a separate copy for each model:
app = Flask(my_app_name)
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:///C:\\MyBase\\Base.sqlite'
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
This can be defined in a separate module (lets call it shared), and imported into each model definition file.
In this case the main module will look more like:
from DataBase.Tables.shared import db
if __name__ == "__main__":
import DataBase.Tables.Person # will load Person model into the db
import DataBase.Tables.Address # will load Address model into the db
db.create_all() # will create all models

How to set up global connection to database?

I have problem with setting up database connection. I want to set connection, where I can see this connection in all my controllers.
Now I use something like this in my controller:
db = create_engine('mysql://root:password#localhost/python')
metadata = MetaData(db)
email_list = Table('email',metadata,autoload=True)
In development.ini I have:
sqlalchemy.url = mysql://root#password#localhost/python
sqlalchemy.pool_recycle = 3600
How do I set _____init_____.py?
I hope you got pylons working; for anyone else that may later read question I'll present some pointers in the right direction.
First of all, you are only creating a engine and a metadata object. While you can use the engine to create connections directly you would almost always use a Session to manage querying and updating your database.
Pylons automatically setups this for you by creating a engine from your configuration file, then passing it to yourproject.model.__init__.py:init_model() which binds it to a scoped_session object.
This scoped_session object is available from yourproject.model.meta and is the object you would use to query your database. For example:
record = meta.Session.query(model.MyTable).filter(id=42)
Because it is a scoped_session it automatically creates a Session object and associates it with the current thread if it doesn't already exists. Scoped_session passes all action (.query(), .add(), .delete()) down into the real Session object and thus allows you a simple way to interact the database with having to manage the non-thread-safe Session object explicitly.
The scoped_session, Session, object from yourproject.model.meta is automatically associated with a metadata object created as either yourproject.model.meta:metadata (in pylons 0.9.7 and below) or yourproject.model.meta:Base.metadata (in pylons 1.0). Use this metadata object to define your tables. As you can see in newer versions of pylons a metadata is associated with a declarative_base() object named Base, which allows you to use SqlAlchemy's declarative style.
Using this from the controller
from yourproject import model
from yourproject.model import Session
class MyController(..):
def resource(self):
result = Session.query(model.email_list).\
filter(model.email_list.c.id=42).one()
return str(result)
Use real connections
If you really want to get a connection object simply use
from yourproject.model import Session
connection = Session.connection()
result = connection.execute("select 3+4;")
// more connection executions
Session.commit()
However this is all good, but what you should be doing is...
This leaves out that you are not really using SqlAlchemy much. The power of SqlAlchemy really shines when you start mapping your database tables to python classes. So anyone looking into using pylons with a database should take a serious look at what you can do with SqlAlchemy. If SqlAlchemy starts out intimidating simply start out with using its declarative approach, which should be enough for almost all pylons apps.
In your model instead of defining Table constructs, do this:
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, Unicode, ForeignKey
from sqlalchemy.orm import relation
from yourproject.model.meta import Base
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'users'
# primary_key implies nullable=False
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True, index=True)
# nullable defaults to True
name = Column(Unicode, nullable=False)
notes = relation("UserNote", backref="user")
query = Session.query_property()
class UserNote(Base):
__tablename__ = 'usernotess'
# primary_key implies nullable=False
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True, index=True)
userid = Column(Integer, index=True, ForeignKey("User.id"))
# nullable defaults to True
text = Column(Unicode, nullable=False)
query = Session.query_property()
Note the query objects. These are smart object that live on the class and associates your classes with the scoped_session(), Session. This allows you to event more easily extract data from your database.
from sqlalchemy.orm import eagerload
def resource(self):
user = User.query.filter(User.id==42).options(eagerload("notes")).one()
return "\n".join([ x.text for x in user.notes ])
1.0 version of Pylons use declarative syntax. More about this, you can see here .
In mode/init.py you can write somthing like this:
from your_programm.model.meta import Session, Base
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.types import *
def init_model(engine):
Session.configure(bind=engine)
class Foo(Base) :
__tablename__ = "foo"
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String)
...
What you want to do is modify the Globals class in your app_globals.py file to include a .engine (or whatever) attribute. Then, in your controllers, you use from pylons import app_globals and app_globals.engine to access the engine (or metadata, session, scoped_session, etc...).

Categories