I have a dataframe with some columns containing nan. I'd like to drop those columns with certain number of nan. For example, in the following code, I'd like to drop any column with 2 or more nan. In this case, column 'C' will be dropped and only 'A' and 'B' will be kept. How can I implement it?
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
dff = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(10,3), columns=list('ABC'))
dff.iloc[3,0] = np.nan
dff.iloc[6,1] = np.nan
dff.iloc[5:8,2] = np.nan
print dff
There is a thresh param for dropna, you just need to pass the length of your df - the number of NaN values you want as your threshold:
In [13]:
dff.dropna(thresh=len(dff) - 2, axis=1)
Out[13]:
A B
0 0.517199 -0.806304
1 -0.643074 0.229602
2 0.656728 0.535155
3 NaN -0.162345
4 -0.309663 -0.783539
5 1.244725 -0.274514
6 -0.254232 NaN
7 -1.242430 0.228660
8 -0.311874 -0.448886
9 -0.984453 -0.755416
So the above will drop any column that does not meet the criteria of the length of the df (number of rows) - 2 as the number of non-Na values.
You can use a conditional list comprehension:
>>> dff[[c for c in dff if dff[c].isnull().sum() < 2]]
A B
0 -0.819004 0.919190
1 0.922164 0.088111
2 0.188150 0.847099
3 NaN -0.053563
4 1.327250 -0.376076
5 3.724980 0.292757
6 -0.319342 NaN
7 -1.051529 0.389843
8 -0.805542 -0.018347
9 -0.816261 -1.627026
Here is a possible solution:
s = dff.isnull().apply(sum, axis=0) # count the number of nan in each column
print s
A 1
B 1
C 3
dtype: int64
for col in dff:
if s[col] >= 2:
del dff[col]
Or
for c in dff:
if sum(dff[c].isnull()) >= 2:
dff.drop(c, axis=1, inplace=True)
I recommend the drop-method. This is an alternative solution:
dff.drop(dff.loc[:,len(dff) - dff.isnull().sum() <2], axis=1)
Say you have to drop columns having more than 70% null values.
data.drop(data.loc[:,list((100*(data.isnull().sum()/len(data.index))>70))].columns, 1)
You can do this through another approach as well like below for dropping columns having certain number of na values:
df = df.drop( columns= [x for x in df if df[x].isna().sum() > 5 ])
For dropping columns having certain percentage of na values :
df = df.drop(columns= [x for x in df if round((df[x].isna().sum()/len(df)*100),2) > 20 ])
Related
This should be straightforward, but the closest thing I've found is this post:
pandas: Filling missing values within a group, and I still can't solve my problem....
Suppose I have the following dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame({'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, 1, 3, np.nan, 3], 'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C']})
name value
0 A 1
1 A NaN
2 B NaN
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C NaN
8 C 3
and I'd like to fill in "NaN" with mean value in each "name" group, i.e.
name value
0 A 1
1 A 1
2 B 2
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
I'm not sure where to go after:
grouped = df.groupby('name').mean()
Thanks a bunch.
One way would be to use transform:
>>> df
name value
0 A 1
1 A NaN
2 B NaN
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C NaN
8 C 3
>>> df["value"] = df.groupby("name").transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df
name value
0 A 1
1 A 1
2 B 2
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
fillna + groupby + transform + mean
This seems intuitive:
df['value'] = df['value'].fillna(df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean'))
The groupby + transform syntax maps the groupwise mean to the index of the original dataframe. This is roughly equivalent to #DSM's solution, but avoids the need to define an anonymous lambda function.
#DSM has IMO the right answer, but I'd like to share my generalization and optimization of the question: Multiple columns to group-by and having multiple value columns:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
'category': ['X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y'],
'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C'],
'other_value': [10, np.nan, np.nan, 20, 30, 10, 30, np.nan, 30],
'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, 1, 3, np.nan, 3],
}
)
... gives ...
category name other_value value
0 X A 10.0 1.0
1 X A NaN NaN
2 X B NaN NaN
3 X B 20.0 2.0
4 X B 30.0 3.0
5 X B 10.0 1.0
6 Y C 30.0 3.0
7 Y C NaN NaN
8 Y C 30.0 3.0
In this generalized case we would like to group by category and name, and impute only on value.
This can be solved as follows:
df['value'] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
Notice the column list in the group-by clause, and that we select the value column right after the group-by. This makes the transformation only be run on that particular column. You could add it to the end, but then you will run it for all columns only to throw out all but one measure column at the end. A standard SQL query planner might have been able to optimize this, but pandas (0.19.2) doesn't seem to do this.
Performance test by increasing the dataset by doing ...
big_df = None
for _ in range(10000):
if big_df is None:
big_df = df.copy()
else:
big_df = pd.concat([big_df, df])
df = big_df
... confirms that this increases the speed proportional to how many columns you don't have to impute:
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
def generate_data():
...
t = datetime.now()
df = generate_data()
df['value'] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
print(datetime.now()-t)
# 0:00:00.016012
t = datetime.now()
df = generate_data()
df["value"] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))['value']
print(datetime.now()-t)
# 0:00:00.030022
On a final note you can generalize even further if you want to impute more than one column, but not all:
df[['value', 'other_value']] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value', 'other_value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
Shortcut:
Groupby + Apply + Lambda + Fillna + Mean
>>> df['value1']=df.groupby('name')['value'].apply(lambda x:x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df.isnull().sum().sum()
0
This solution still works if you want to group by multiple columns to replace missing values.
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, np.nan,np.nan, 4, 3],
'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C'],'class':list('ppqqrrsss')})
>>> df['value']=df.groupby(['name','class'])['value'].apply(lambda x:x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df
value name class
0 1.0 A p
1 1.0 A p
2 2.0 B q
3 2.0 B q
4 3.0 B r
5 3.0 B r
6 3.5 C s
7 4.0 C s
8 3.0 C s
I'd do it this way
df.loc[df.value.isnull(), 'value'] = df.groupby('group').value.transform('mean')
The featured high ranked answer only works for a pandas Dataframe with only two columns. If you have a more columns case use instead:
df['Crude_Birth_rate'] = df.groupby("continent").Crude_Birth_rate.transform(
lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
To summarize all above concerning the efficiency of the possible solution
I have a dataset with 97 906 rows and 48 columns.
I want to fill in 4 columns with the median of each group.
The column I want to group has 26 200 groups.
The first solution
start = time.time()
x = df_merged[continuous_variables].fillna(df_merged.groupby('domain_userid')[continuous_variables].transform('median'))
print(time.time() - start)
0.10429811477661133 seconds
The second solution
start = time.time()
for col in continuous_variables:
df_merged.loc[df_merged[col].isnull(), col] = df_merged.groupby('domain_userid')[col].transform('median')
print(time.time() - start)
0.5098445415496826 seconds
The next solution I only performed on a subset since it was running too long.
start = time.time()
for col in continuous_variables:
x = df_merged.head(10000).groupby('domain_userid')[col].transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.median()))
print(time.time() - start)
11.685635566711426 seconds
The following solution follows the same logic as above.
start = time.time()
x = df_merged.head(10000).groupby('domain_userid')[continuous_variables].transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.median()))
print(time.time() - start)
42.630549907684326 seconds
So it's quite important to choose the right method.
Bear in mind that I noticed once a column was not a numeric the times were going up exponentially (makes sense as I was computing the median).
def groupMeanValue(group):
group['value'] = group['value'].fillna(group['value'].mean())
return group
dft = df.groupby("name").transform(groupMeanValue)
I know that is an old question. But I am quite surprised by the unanimity of apply/lambda answers here.
Generally speaking, that is the second worst thing to do after iterating rows, from timing point of view.
What I would do here is
df.loc[df['value'].isna(), 'value'] = df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean')
Or using fillna
df['value'] = df['value'].fillna(df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean'))
I've checked with timeit (because, again, unanimity for apply/lambda based solution made me doubt my instinct). And that is indeed 2.5 faster than the most upvoted solutions.
To fill all the numeric null values with the mean grouped by "name"
num_cols = df.select_dtypes(exclude='object').columns
df[num_cols] = df.groupby("name").transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
df.fillna(df.groupby(['name'], as_index=False).mean(), inplace=True)
You can also use "dataframe or table_name".apply(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean())).
I am trying to compare two columns in pandas. I know I can do:
# either using Pandas' equals()
df1[col].equals(df2[col])
# or this
df1[col] == df2[col]
However, what I am looking for is to compare these columns elment-wise and when they are not matching print out both values. I have tried:
if df1[col] != df2[col]:
print(df1[col])
print(df2[col])
where I get the error for 'The truth value of a Series is ambiguous'
I believe this is because the column is treated as a series of boolean values for the comparison which causes the ambiguity. I also tried various forms of for loops which did not resolve the issue.
Can anyone point me to how I should go about doing what I described?
This might work for you:
import pandas as pd
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'col1': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'col1': [1, 2, 9, 4, 7]})
if not df2[df2['col1'] != df1['col1']].empty:
print(df1[df1['col1'] != df2['col1']])
print(df2[df2['col1'] != df1['col1']])
Output:
col1
2 3
4 5
col1
2 9
4 7
You need to get hold of the index where the column values are not matching. Once you have that index then you can query the individual DFs to get the values.
Please try the fallowing and is if this helps:
for ind in (df1.loc[df1['col1'] != df2['col1']].index):
x = df1.loc[df1.index == ind, 'col1'].values[0]
y = df2.loc[df2.index == ind, 'col1'].values[0]
print(x, y )
Solution
Try this. You could use any of the following one-line solutions.
# Option-1
df.loc[df.apply(lambda row: row[col1] != row[col2], axis=1), [col1, col2]]
# Option-2
df.loc[df[col1]!=df[col2], [col1, col2]]
Logic:
Option-1: We use pandas.DataFrame.apply() to evaluate the target columns row by row and pass the returned indices to df.loc[indices, [col1, col2]] and that returns the required set of rows where col1 != col2.
Option-2: We get the indices with df[col1] != df[col2] and the rest of the logic is the same as Option-1.
Dummy Data
I made the dummy data such that for indices: 2,6,8 we will find column 'a' and 'c' to be different. Thus, we want only those rows returned by the solution.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
a = np.arange(10)
c = a.copy()
c[[2,6,8]] = [0,20,40]
df = pd.DataFrame({'a': a, 'b': a**2, 'c': c})
print(df)
Output:
a b c
0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1
2 2 4 0
3 3 9 3
4 4 16 4
5 5 25 5
6 6 36 20
7 7 49 7
8 8 64 40
9 9 81 9
Applying the solution to the dummy data
We see that the solution proposed returns the result as expected.
col1, col2 = 'a', 'c'
result = df.loc[df.apply(lambda row: row[col1] != row[col2], axis=1), [col1, col2]]
print(result)
Output:
a c
2 2 0
6 6 20
8 8 40
This should be straightforward, but the closest thing I've found is this post:
pandas: Filling missing values within a group, and I still can't solve my problem....
Suppose I have the following dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame({'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, 1, 3, np.nan, 3], 'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C']})
name value
0 A 1
1 A NaN
2 B NaN
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C NaN
8 C 3
and I'd like to fill in "NaN" with mean value in each "name" group, i.e.
name value
0 A 1
1 A 1
2 B 2
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
I'm not sure where to go after:
grouped = df.groupby('name').mean()
Thanks a bunch.
One way would be to use transform:
>>> df
name value
0 A 1
1 A NaN
2 B NaN
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C NaN
8 C 3
>>> df["value"] = df.groupby("name").transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df
name value
0 A 1
1 A 1
2 B 2
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 B 1
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
fillna + groupby + transform + mean
This seems intuitive:
df['value'] = df['value'].fillna(df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean'))
The groupby + transform syntax maps the groupwise mean to the index of the original dataframe. This is roughly equivalent to #DSM's solution, but avoids the need to define an anonymous lambda function.
#DSM has IMO the right answer, but I'd like to share my generalization and optimization of the question: Multiple columns to group-by and having multiple value columns:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
'category': ['X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'X', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y'],
'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C'],
'other_value': [10, np.nan, np.nan, 20, 30, 10, 30, np.nan, 30],
'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, 1, 3, np.nan, 3],
}
)
... gives ...
category name other_value value
0 X A 10.0 1.0
1 X A NaN NaN
2 X B NaN NaN
3 X B 20.0 2.0
4 X B 30.0 3.0
5 X B 10.0 1.0
6 Y C 30.0 3.0
7 Y C NaN NaN
8 Y C 30.0 3.0
In this generalized case we would like to group by category and name, and impute only on value.
This can be solved as follows:
df['value'] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
Notice the column list in the group-by clause, and that we select the value column right after the group-by. This makes the transformation only be run on that particular column. You could add it to the end, but then you will run it for all columns only to throw out all but one measure column at the end. A standard SQL query planner might have been able to optimize this, but pandas (0.19.2) doesn't seem to do this.
Performance test by increasing the dataset by doing ...
big_df = None
for _ in range(10000):
if big_df is None:
big_df = df.copy()
else:
big_df = pd.concat([big_df, df])
df = big_df
... confirms that this increases the speed proportional to how many columns you don't have to impute:
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
def generate_data():
...
t = datetime.now()
df = generate_data()
df['value'] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
print(datetime.now()-t)
# 0:00:00.016012
t = datetime.now()
df = generate_data()
df["value"] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))['value']
print(datetime.now()-t)
# 0:00:00.030022
On a final note you can generalize even further if you want to impute more than one column, but not all:
df[['value', 'other_value']] = df.groupby(['category', 'name'])['value', 'other_value']\
.transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
Shortcut:
Groupby + Apply + Lambda + Fillna + Mean
>>> df['value1']=df.groupby('name')['value'].apply(lambda x:x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df.isnull().sum().sum()
0
This solution still works if you want to group by multiple columns to replace missing values.
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({'value': [1, np.nan, np.nan, 2, 3, np.nan,np.nan, 4, 3],
'name': ['A','A', 'B','B','B','B', 'C','C','C'],'class':list('ppqqrrsss')})
>>> df['value']=df.groupby(['name','class'])['value'].apply(lambda x:x.fillna(x.mean()))
>>> df
value name class
0 1.0 A p
1 1.0 A p
2 2.0 B q
3 2.0 B q
4 3.0 B r
5 3.0 B r
6 3.5 C s
7 4.0 C s
8 3.0 C s
I'd do it this way
df.loc[df.value.isnull(), 'value'] = df.groupby('group').value.transform('mean')
The featured high ranked answer only works for a pandas Dataframe with only two columns. If you have a more columns case use instead:
df['Crude_Birth_rate'] = df.groupby("continent").Crude_Birth_rate.transform(
lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
To summarize all above concerning the efficiency of the possible solution
I have a dataset with 97 906 rows and 48 columns.
I want to fill in 4 columns with the median of each group.
The column I want to group has 26 200 groups.
The first solution
start = time.time()
x = df_merged[continuous_variables].fillna(df_merged.groupby('domain_userid')[continuous_variables].transform('median'))
print(time.time() - start)
0.10429811477661133 seconds
The second solution
start = time.time()
for col in continuous_variables:
df_merged.loc[df_merged[col].isnull(), col] = df_merged.groupby('domain_userid')[col].transform('median')
print(time.time() - start)
0.5098445415496826 seconds
The next solution I only performed on a subset since it was running too long.
start = time.time()
for col in continuous_variables:
x = df_merged.head(10000).groupby('domain_userid')[col].transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.median()))
print(time.time() - start)
11.685635566711426 seconds
The following solution follows the same logic as above.
start = time.time()
x = df_merged.head(10000).groupby('domain_userid')[continuous_variables].transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.median()))
print(time.time() - start)
42.630549907684326 seconds
So it's quite important to choose the right method.
Bear in mind that I noticed once a column was not a numeric the times were going up exponentially (makes sense as I was computing the median).
def groupMeanValue(group):
group['value'] = group['value'].fillna(group['value'].mean())
return group
dft = df.groupby("name").transform(groupMeanValue)
I know that is an old question. But I am quite surprised by the unanimity of apply/lambda answers here.
Generally speaking, that is the second worst thing to do after iterating rows, from timing point of view.
What I would do here is
df.loc[df['value'].isna(), 'value'] = df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean')
Or using fillna
df['value'] = df['value'].fillna(df.groupby('name')['value'].transform('mean'))
I've checked with timeit (because, again, unanimity for apply/lambda based solution made me doubt my instinct). And that is indeed 2.5 faster than the most upvoted solutions.
To fill all the numeric null values with the mean grouped by "name"
num_cols = df.select_dtypes(exclude='object').columns
df[num_cols] = df.groupby("name").transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
df.fillna(df.groupby(['name'], as_index=False).mean(), inplace=True)
You can also use "dataframe or table_name".apply(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean())).
I have 254 rows x 474 columns DataFrame data.
I want to find the columns which column's maximum value is not 1. Most of column's maximum value is 1, but some of column's maximum value is not 1.
I use python 3.x environment.
import pandas as pd
data = pd.read_csv("data.csv") # this is my data.
Use DataFrame.loc with : for get all rows and DataFrame.max for filter columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[0,2,1],
'b':[0,0,1],
'c':[3,2,1]})
df1 = df.loc[:, df.max() != 1]
print (df1)
a c
0 0 3
1 2 2
2 1 1
If need columns names only:
c = df.columns[df.max() != 1]
print (c)
Index(['a', 'c'], dtype='object')
I have two DataFrames One with many rows and another one with a few rows and I need to merge these two Dataframes according some conditions (in strings). I used nested loops in Pandas like this:
density = []
for row in df.itertuples():
for row1 in df2.itertuples():
if(row['a'].find(row1['b']))>0:
density.append(row1['c'])
But I receive the error message:
TypeError: tuple indices must be integers, not str
What's wrong?
Consider df and df2
df = pd.DataFrame(dict(
a=['abcd', 'stk', 'shij', 'dfffedeffj', 'abcdefghijk'],
))
df2 = pd.DataFrame(dict(
b=['abc', 'hij', 'def'],
c=[1, 2, 3]
))
You can produce decent-ish speed with get_value and set_value. And I'd store the values in a dataframe
density = pd.DataFrame(index=df.index, columns=df2.index)
for i in df.index:
for j in df2.index:
a = df.get_value(i, 'a')
b = df2.get_value(j, 'b')
if a.find(b) >= 0:
density.set_value(i, j, df2.get_value(j, 'c'))
print(density)
0 1 2
0 1 NaN NaN
1 NaN NaN NaN
2 NaN 2 NaN
3 NaN NaN 3
4 1 2 3
You can also use a composite numpy str functions
t = df2.b.apply(lambda x: df.a.str.contains(x)).values
c = df2.c.values[:, None]
density = pd.DataFrame(
np.where(t, np.hstack([c] * t.shape[1]), np.nan).T,
df.index, df2.index)
The method DataFrame.itertuples returns namedtuples and to access the values in a namedtuple you have to use the dot notation.
density = []
for row in df.itertuples():
for row1 in df2.itertuples():
if row.a.find(row1.b) > 0:
density.append(row1.c)
Nevertheless, this does not produce a merge of the two DataFrames.