I have a class Duplicates that checks for duplicates within 40 words.
I have a class Window that creates and runs the main window where i post the result.
I have a class popWindow that creates a Toplevel window when asking user for what to do with a possible double.
My problem is closing the popWindow once a choice is submited.
the version I have that actualy runs and posts an aswer (the text with marked duplicates) uses quit to terminate the window (meaning the popup is still there in the way) or to simply have multiple popups till you are done.
class Duplicates:
def markWord(self):
self.appendMarkedWord(self.word)
self.checked.append(self.word)
self.pop.topLevel_exit()
return ""
class popUpWindow:
temp = Button( self, font = 8,
text = "Allowed this run only",
command = app.newFile.markWord
)
temp.place( x = 178,
y = 55
)
if I instead use .destroy() the window shuts but the program stops running and that is worse.
How do i work around this so it shuts the window but still continues to run the program?
Ok, after many many hours it seemed the real problem was destroy() was not stopping my popUpWindow.mainloop() so I now have altered my exit code to first do quit() and then do destroy(). This is not what i have seen as examples at all and it seems to me that destroy() on toplevel mainloop is not terminating it (destroy() works fine on my root.mainloop).
def topLevel_exit(self):
self.pop.quit()
self.pop.destroy()
If you call destroy() on a toplevel window, it will not stop the application from running. If your application stops, there must be more to your code that what you're telling us. Without question, the right way to get rid of the popup is to call destroy on the instance of the Toplevel.
A way to hide the window and keep the program running would be to use .withdraw() on the window, and .reiconify() to get it back (if needed). Or you could use .destroy() on a Toplevel window. If you need examples just ask, hope this helps you.
The solution for me was:
def topLevel_exit(self):
self.top.quit()
self.top.destroy()
I do not know if this is common praxis but is what I had to do since destroy was not stoping my top.mainloop()
If you use a topLevel window, self.pop.destroy() should still work as you are using mainloop()
Otherwise use quit() or both but in my opinion of all of these, I prefer destroy()
Related
Now i understand the concept of instance variables and classes, I've never had a problem with them before and I use them frequently. However when I make my MainWindow class, everything is peachy until i try accessing instance variables.
http://pastebin.com/tDs5EJhi is the full code, but at this point it's just placing labels and frames and whatnot, no actual logic is going on. The window looks fine and nothing bad happens.
My question comes to be when I try changing things inside of the window externally. I figured I could just make an instance of the class and change variables from there (namely instancevariable.ImageCanvas.itemconfig()) like i can normally, but Tkinter isn't being nice about it and I think it's a result of Tkinter's mainloop().
Here's the tidbit of my class MainWindow() that i'm having trouble with (ln 207)
...
self.C4 = Tk.PhotoImage(file="temp.png")
self.card4 = self.CardCanvas.create_image(120,46,image=self.C4, state=Tk.NORMAL)
#self.CardCanvas.itemconfig(4, state=Tk.HIDDEN) # < It works here
...
self.root.mainloop()
window = MainWindow()
window.CardCanvas.itemconfig(4, state=Tk.HIDDEN) # < It doesn't work here
That's how i learned how to edit instance variables. When the window pops up, the itemconfig command doesn't actually apply like it would were it inside the class (or maybe it did and the window just didn't update?) and after closing the window I get this error:
_tkinter.TclError: invalid command name
which I assume is just because it's trying to apply a method to variables that don't exist anymore, now that the window has closed.
So I guess here's my big question - I have a MainWindow class, and from what I can tell, nothing can be changed from outside of the class because the Tk.mainloop() is running and won't stop to let other code after it run, like the itemconfig. How do I go about changing those variables? Code after the instance variable declaration doesn't seem to run until the MainWindow() is closed.
You are correct that code after mainloop doesn't run. It does, but only after the GUI has been destroyed. Tkinter is designed for the call to mainloop be the last (or very nearly last) line of executable code. Once it is called, all other work must be done as reaction to events. That is the essence of GUI programming.
The answer to "how do I go about changing the variables" is simple: do it before you call mainloop, or do it in reaction to an event. For example, do it in a callback to a button, do it in a function bound to an event, or to a time-based event via after, and so on.
I am working on a large program that opens new windows from a desktop widget. The desktop widget has a 'ticker' style label that displays a piece of text representing an iteration through a list. My problem is when I first wrote the program I called mainloop() with each new window I opened. The result was the new window and program would run as designed, but the ticker would freeze. Even upon closing the newly created window, the ticker would not restart. So I removed the mainloop() line. The result of this is the ticker continues to run and I can work within the new window, but everything is soooo laggy. I suspect this has something to do with the after() method?
Attached is a test code that I am using to try to sort this out before applying the correct code to my program. And I'm sure you can tell by reading the code, but I am self taught and an absolute newb, so please dumb down the explanations if possible. Thank so much!
from tkinter import *
def new_window():
nw = Tk()
item = Text(nw)
item.grid()
L = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
root = Tk()
Button(root, text = 'Open', command = new_window).grid(row = 1)
while True:
for i in L:
num = Label(root, text = i)
num.grid(row = 0)
root.after(2500)
num.update()
root.mainloop()
A tkinter application should always have exactly one instance ofTk, and you should call mainloop exactly once. If you have more than one instance the program will not likely work the way you expect. It's possible to make it work, but unless you understand exactly what is happening under the hood you should stick to this rule of thumb.
If you need more windows, create instances of Toplevel. You should not call mainloop for each extra window.
Also, you shouldn't have an infinite loop where you call after the way that you do. mainloop is already an infinite loop, you don't need another. There are several examples on this website of using after to call a function at regular intervals without creating a separate loop.
I'm writing a 'wizard' type Python Tkinter GUI that collects information from the user and then performs several actions based on the user's entries: file copying, DB updates, etc. The processing normally takes 30-60 seconds and during that time, I want to:
Provide the user with text updates on the activity and progress
Prevent the user from closing the app until it's finished what it's doing
I started on the route of having the text updates appear in a child window that's configured to be trainsient and using wait_window to pause the main loop until the activities are done. This worked fine for other custom dialog boxes I created which have OK/cancel buttons that call the window's destroy method. The basic approach is:
def myCustomDialog(parent,*args):
winCDLG = _cdlgWin(parent,*args)
winCDLG.showWin()
winCDLG.dlgWin.focus_set()
winCDLG.dlgWin.grab_set()
winCDLG.dlgWin.transient(parent)
winCDLG.dlgWin.wait_window(winCDLG.dlgWin)
return winCDLG.userResponse
class _cdlgWin():
def __init__(self,parent,*args):
self.parent = parent
self.dlgWin = tk.Toplevel()
self.userResponse = ''
def showWin(self):
#Tkinter widgets and geometry defined here
def _btnOKClick(self):
#self.userResponse assigned from user entry/entries on dialog
self.dlgWin.destroy()
def _btnCancelClick(self):
self.dlgWin.destroy()
However this approach isn't working for the new monitor-and-update dialog I want to create.
First, because there's no user-initiated action to trigger the copy/update activities and then the destroy, I have to put them either in showWin, or in another method. I've tried both ways but I'm stuck between a race condition (the code completes the copy/update stuff but then tries to destroy the window before it's there), and never executing the copy/update stuff in the first place because it hits the wait_window before I can activate the other method.
If I could figure out a way past that, then the secondary problem (preventing the user from closing the child window before the work's done) is covered by the answers below.
So... is there any kind of bandaid I could apply to make this approach work the way I want? Or do I need to just scrap this because it can't work? (And if it's the latter, is there any way I can accomplish the original goal?)
self.dlgWin.overrideredirect(1) will remove all of the buttons (make a borderless window). Is that what you're looking for?
As far as I know, window control buttons are implemented by the window manager, so I think it is not possible to just remove one of them with Tkinter (I am not 100% sure though). The common solution for this problem is to set a callback to the protocol WM_DELETE_WINDOW and use it to control the behaviour of the window:
class _cdlgWin():
def __init__(self,parent,*args):
self.parent = parent
self.dlgWin = tk.Toplevel()
self.dlgWin.protocol('WM_DELETE_WINDOW', self.close)
self.userResponse = ''
def close(self):
tkMessageBox.showwarning('Warning!',
'The pending action has not finished yet')
# ...
i'm hoping anyone can help me out here. i'm having an issue with a tkinter gui i built. the issue only happens in windows. My GUI creates a results frame with some labels in it, when it's time to calculate something else, the user clicks on the "newPort" button and that button is supposed to remove the results frame and set to False some instance attributes internal to the calculation. The issue i'm having, which is apparent only in windows is that sometimes the results frame, and its descendant labels don't disappear every time. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. The instance variable is correctly set to False but the widgets are still visible on the main GUI. The GUI also contains a couple checkboxes and radiobuttons but they don't impact the creation of the results frame nor its expected destruction. I have not been able to pin point a pattern of actions the user takes before clicking on the newPort button which causes the frame and labels to not get destroyed. This happens when i freeze my app with py2exe, as well as running the app from the python interpreter within the eclipse IDE. I have not tried running the app from the python interpreter directly (i.e. without the IDE) and this problem does not happen on my Mac when i run the app using the eclipse python interpreter. Thanks very much all! My code looks like this:
import Tkinter as TK
class widget(object):
def __init__(self,parent=None):
self.parent = TK.Frame(parent)
self.parent.grid()
self.frame = TK.Frame(self.parent)
self.frame.grid()
newLedger = TK.Button(self.parent,command=self.newPort).grid()
self.calcButton = TK.Button(self.frame,command=self.showResults)
self.calcButton.grid()
self.calcVariable = True
def newPort(self):
self.calcVariable = False
try:
self.second.grid_forget()
self.first.grid_forget()
self.resultsFrame.grid_forget()
self.second.destroy()
self.first.destroy()
self.resultsFrame.destroy()
except:
raise
self.frame.update_idletasks()
def showResults(self):
self.resultsFrame = TK.Frame(self.frame)
self.resultsFrame.grid()
self.first = TK.Label(self.resultsFrame,text='first')
self.first.grid()
self.second = TK.Label(self.resultsFrame,text='second')
self.second.grid()
if __name__ == '__main__':
root = TK.Tk()
obj = widget(root)
root.mainloop()
You don't need to destroy or call grid_forget on the labels, and you don't need to call grid_forget on the resultsFrame; when you destroy the resultsFrame it will cause all off its children to be destroyed, and when these widgets are destroyed they will no longer be managed by grid.
The only way I can get widgets to not be destroyed is if I click on the "calc" button twice in a row without clicking on the "new" button in-between. I'm doing this by running your program from the command line.
I'm writing an app that doesn't have a main window (it runs inside a Python interpreter in another app), and I thought I had a good solution for getting Tkinter to cooperate--I made the Tkinter.Tk class into a Borg.
class RootWindow(Tk):
""" Invisible window that serves as the default parent
of all others.
"""
groupDict = {}
def __init__(self):
self.__dict__ = self.groupDict
if self.__dict__ == {}: # first instance
Tk.__init__(self)
self.withdraw()
Then I have my Windows, which are subclassed from Tkinter.Toplevel, default to parent=RootWindow(). The result should be that I can create any number of Windows and they'll use the same root.
It works once fine for the first Window, but after that things get all messed up. :(
see pic
What am I doing wrong? Is this even a feasible solution?
Thanks
EDIT: I should add that even though there's other stuff running in the picture, the problem can be duplicated just by using RootWindow as the parent of a Tkinter.Toplevel.
EDIT: I overrode Window.mainloop so everything uses the RootWindow event loop.
def mainloop(self):
self.master.wait_window(self)
Then I create each visible window like this:
test = Window()
test.mainloop()
It seems to work because the windows do show up, but their contents are packed in an odd way that's hard to describe. It alternates between no contents at all and having everything squished horizontally and expanded vertically.
One problem appears to be that you are forgetting to start the event loop. Or, based on further edits of your question, you may be starting more than one main loop. You need exactly one main loop that is run from the root window.
Tkinter certainly allows an arbitrary number of top level windows, but your question doesn't appear to have enough details to show what is wrong unless my first guess is correct.