We Keep Coding

how to terminate a thread from within another thread [duplicate]

How can I start and stop a thread with my poor thread class?
It is in loop, and I want to restart it again at the beginning of the code. How can I do start-stop-restart-stop-restart?
My class:
import threading
class Concur(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
self.stopped = False
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
def run(self):
i = 0
while not self.stopped:
time.sleep(1)
i = i + 1
In the main code, I want:
inst = Concur()
while conditon:
inst.start()
# After some operation
inst.stop()
# Some other operation

You can't actually stop and then restart a thread since you can't call its start() method again after its run() method has terminated. However you can make one pause and then later resume its execution by using a threading.Condition variable to avoid concurrency problems when checking or changing its running state.
threading.Condition objects have an associated threading.Lock object and methods to wait for it to be released and will notify any waiting threads when that occurs. Here's an example derived from the code in your question which shows this being done. In the example code I've made the Condition variable a part of Thread subclass instances to better encapsulate the implementation and avoid needing to introduce additional global variables:
from __future__ import print_function
import threading
import time
class Concur(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
super(Concur, self).__init__()
self.iterations = 0
self.daemon = True # Allow main to exit even if still running.
self.paused = True # Start out paused.
self.state = threading.Condition()
def run(self):
self.resume()
while True:
with self.state:
if self.paused:
self.state.wait() # Block execution until notified.
# Do stuff...
time.sleep(.1)
self.iterations += 1
def pause(self):
with self.state:
self.paused = True # Block self.
def resume(self):
with self.state:
self.paused = False
self.state.notify() # Unblock self if waiting.
class Stopwatch(object):
""" Simple class to measure elapsed times. """
def start(self):
""" Establish reference point for elapsed time measurements. """
self.start_time = time.time()
return self
#property
def elapsed_time(self):
""" Seconds since started. """
try:
return time.time() - self.start_time
except AttributeError: # Wasn't explicitly started.
self.start_time = time.time()
return 0
MAX_RUN_TIME = 5 # Seconds.
concur = Concur()
stopwatch = Stopwatch()
print('Running for {} seconds...'.format(MAX_RUN_TIME))
concur.start()
while stopwatch.elapsed_time < MAX_RUN_TIME:
concur.resume()
# Can also do other concurrent operations here...
concur.pause()
# Do some other stuff...
# Show Concur thread executed.
print('concur.iterations: {}'.format(concur.iterations))

This is David Heffernan's idea fleshed-out. The example below runs for 1 second, then stops for 1 second, then runs for 1 second, and so on.
import time
import threading
import datetime as DT
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def worker(cond):
i = 0
while True:
with cond:
cond.wait()
logger.info(i)
time.sleep(0.01)
i += 1
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG,
format='[%(asctime)s %(threadName)s] %(message)s',
datefmt='%H:%M:%S')
cond = threading.Condition()
t = threading.Thread(target=worker, args=(cond, ))
t.daemon = True
t.start()
start = DT.datetime.now()
while True:
now = DT.datetime.now()
if (now-start).total_seconds() > 60: break
if now.second % 2:
with cond:
cond.notify()

The implementation of stop() would look like this:
def stop(self):
self.stopped = True
If you want to restart, then you can just create a new instance and start that.
while conditon:
inst = Concur()
inst.start()
#after some operation
inst.stop()
#some other operation
The documentation for Thread makes it clear that the start() method can only be called once for each instance of the class.
If you want to pause and resume a thread, then you'll need to use a condition variable.

pyautogui.moveTo does not seem to generate a mouse event

I use pyautogui to test much of the functionality in my python application. It seems to work fine for left mouse down, up, and right down and up, as well as key down, and keyup. However, when I am see no mouse events for the mouse move calls.
Why not?
How can I test the functionality of my software that has hooked into mouse move events?
import pyHook
import threading
import win32con
import pythoncom
import time
import pyautogui
class WindowsHooksWrapper(object):
"""
Provides a means to subscribe to keyboard and mouse events via Windows Hooks
It is important to note that:
* A thread specific hook (one that is not injected via dll injection) must be registered on the
same thread with the windows msg pump or it will not work and no indication of error is given
"""
def __init__(self):
self.consuming_keyboard_events = False
self.consuming_mouse_events = False
self.hook_manager = None
self.started = False
self.thread = threading.Thread(target=self.thread_proc)
def __del__(self):
self.stop()
def start(self):
if self.started:
self.stop()
self.started = True
self.thread.start()
def stop(self):
if not self.started:
return
self.started = False
self.thread.join()
def consume_mouse_events(self, should_consume_events):
"""
Tell the windows hooks wrapper to consume mouse events or not.
Consumed events will not be passed to other hooks or the process they were intended for.
Injected events will be passed on.
:param should_consume_events: set to True to consume mouse events. Otherwise, False
"""
if should_consume_events:
print 'Consuming mouse events'
else:
print 'No longer consuming mouse events'
self.consuming_mouse_events = should_consume_events
def consume_keyboard_events(self, should_consume_events):
"""
Tell the windows hooks wrapper to consume keyboard events or not.
Consumed events will not be passed to other hooks or the process they were intended for.
Injected events will be passed on.
:param should_consume_events: set to True to consume keyboard events. Otherwise, False
"""
if should_consume_events:
print 'Consuming keyboard events'
else:
print 'No longer consuming keyboard events'
self.consuming_keyboard_events = should_consume_events
def on_keyboard_event(self, event):
"""
Called back from pyHooks library on a keyboard event
:param event: event passed from pyHooks
:return: True if we are to pass the event on to other hooks and the process it was intended
for. False to consume the event.
"""
# Provide a means to stop consuming events while we are consuming all input
if event.KeyID == win32con.VK_ESCAPE:
self.consuming_keyboard_events = False
self.consuming_mouse_events = False
# Consume the event
print 'Escape key hit. Turning input blocking off.'
return False
if not self.consuming_keyboard_events or event.Injected:
print 'MessageName:', event.MessageName
print 'Message:', event.Message
print 'Time:', event.Time
print 'Window:', event.Window
print 'WindowName:', event.WindowName
print 'Ascii:', event.Ascii, chr(event.Ascii)
print 'Key:', event.Key
print 'KeyID:', event.KeyID
print 'ScanCode:', event.ScanCode
print 'Extended:', event.Extended
print 'Injected:', event.Injected
print 'Alt', event.Alt
print 'Transition', event.Transition
print '---'
# Send the event to other handlers and its target
return True
else:
# Consume the event. Any other hooks will not receive the event, nor will the process
# the event was intended for.
print 'Consumed keyboard event'
return False
def on_mouse_event(self, event):
"""
Called back from pyHooks library on a mouse event
:param event: event passed from pyHooks
:return: True if we are to pass the event on to other hooks and the process it was intended
for. False to consume the event.
"""
if not self.consuming_mouse_events or event.Injected:
# Send the event to pub sub
print 'MessageName:', event.MessageName
print 'Message:', event.Message
print 'Time:', event.Time
print 'Window:', event.Window
print 'WindowName:', event.WindowName
print 'Position:', event.Position
print 'Wheel:', event.Wheel
print 'Injected:', event.Injected
print '---'
# Send the event to other handlers and its target
return True
else:
# Consume the event. Any other hooks will not receive the event, nor will the process
# the event was intended for.
print 'Consumed mouse event'
return False
def thread_proc(self):
print "Thread started"
# Evidently, the hook must be registered on the same thread with the windows msg pump or
# it will not work and no indication of error is seen
# Also note that for exception safety, when the hook manager goes out of scope, the
# documentation says that it unregisters all outstanding hooks
self.hook_manager = pyHook.HookManager()
self.hook_manager.KeyAll = self.on_keyboard_event
self.hook_manager.HookKeyboard()
self.hook_manager.MouseAll = self.on_mouse_event
self.hook_manager.HookMouse()
while self.started:
pythoncom.PumpWaitingMessages()
print "Thread exiting..."
self.hook_manager.UnhookKeyboard()
self.hook_manager.UnhookMouse()
self.hook_manager = None
def main():
hook_wrapper = WindowsHooksWrapper()
hook_wrapper.start()
hook_wrapper.consume_keyboard_events(True)
hook_wrapper.consume_mouse_events(True)
pyautogui.moveTo(100, 50)
pyautogui.moveTo(200, 200)
time.sleep(30)
hook_wrapper.stop()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Expected to see mouse move print out in the output.

Controlling a python thread with a function

Thanks to those who helped me figure out I needed to use threading to run a loop in a control script I have run, I now have an issue to try and control the thread - by starting or stopping it based on a function:
I want to start a process to get a motor to cycle through a movement based on a 'start' parameter sent to the controlling function, also I want to send a 'stop' parameter to stop the thread too - here's where I got to:
def looper():
while True:
print 'forward loop'
bck.ChangeDutyCycle(10)
fwd.ChangeDutyCycle(0)
time.sleep(5)
print 'backwards loop'
bck.ChangeDutyCycle(0)
fwd.ChangeDutyCycle(20)
time.sleep(5)
def looper_control(state):
t = threading.Thread(target=looper)
if state == 'start':
t.start()
elif state == 'stop':
t.join()
print 'looper stopped!!'
This starts the thread okay when I call looper_control('start') but throws an error when looper_control('stop'):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 657, in join
raise RuntimeError("cannot join thread before it is started")
RuntimeError: cannot join thread before it is started
EDIT: looper_control called from here
if "motor" in tmp:
if tmp[-1:] == '0':
#stop both pin
MotorControl('fwd',0,0)
print 'stop motors'
looper_control('stop')
elif tmp[-1:] == '2':
#loop the motor
print 'loop motors'
looper_control('start')
UPDATE: Ive not been able to stop the thread using the method suggested - I thought I had it!
here's where I am:
class sliderControl(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self,stop_event):
super(sliderControl,self).__init__()
self.stop_event = stop_event
def run(self):
while self.stop_event:
print 'forward loop'
bck.ChangeDutyCycle(10)
fwd.ChangeDutyCycle(0)
time.sleep(5)
print 'backwards loop'
bck.ChangeDutyCycle(0)
fwd.ChangeDutyCycle(20)
time.sleep(5)
def looper_control(state,stop_event):
if state == 'start':
t = sliderControl(stop_event=stop_event)
t.start()
elif state == 'stop':
#time.sleep(3)
stop_event.set()
#t.join()
print 'looper stopped!!'
called via:
if tmp[-1:] == '0':
#stop both pin
MotorControl('fwd',0,0)
print 'stop motors'
#stop_thread_event = threading.Event()
print 'stopping thread'
print stop_thread_event
looper_control('stop',stop_thread_event)
elif tmp[-1:] == '2':
#loop the motor
print 'loop motors'
global stop_thread_event
stop_thread_event = threading.Event()
print stop_thread_event
looper_control('start', stop_thread_event)
It looked like a separate thread event was being called by loop and stop, so I thought a global would sort it out but its just not playing ball. When I start the loop - it runs, but when I try to stop it, I get looper stopped!! , but the process just keeps running

Your top-level thread routine will need to become an event handler that listens to a Queue object (as in from Queue import Queue) for messages, then handles them based on state. One of those messages can be a shutdown command, in which case the worker thread function simply exits, allowing the main thread to join it.
Instead of time.sleep, use threading.Timer with the body of the timer sending a message into your event queue.
This is a substantial refactoring. But especially if you plan on adding more conditions, you'll need it. One alternative is to use a package that handles this kind of thing for you, maybe pykka.

To stop a python thread you can use threading.Event()
try this:
class YourClass(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, stop_event):
super(YourClass, self).__init__()
self.stop_event = stop_event
def run(self):
while not self.stop_event.is_set():
# do what you need here (what you had in looper)
def looper_control(state, stop_event):
if state == 'start':
t = YourClass(stop_event=stop_event)
t.start()
elif state == 'stop':
stop_event.set()
and call to looper_control:
stop_thread_event = threading.Event()
looper_control(state, stop_thread_event)

you only can "start" once a thread
but you can lock and unlock the thread.
the best way to stop and start a thread is with mutex, Example:
#!/usr/bin/python
import threading
from time import sleep
mutex2 = threading.Lock()
#This thread add values to d[]
class Hilo(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
def run(self):
while True:
mutex2.acquire()
#Add values to d[]
d.append("hi from Peru")
mutex2.release()
sleep(1)
d=[];
hilos = [Hilo()]
#Stop Thread
#If you have more threads you need make a mutex for every thread
mutex2.acquire()
#Start treades, but the thread is lock
for h in hilos:
h.start()
#so you need do
#unlock THREAD<
mutex2.release()
#>START THREAD
#Sleep for 4 seconds
sleep(4)
#And print d[]
print d
print "------------------------------------------"
#WAIT 5 SECONDS AND STOP THE THREAD
sleep(5)
try:
mutex2.acquire()
except Exception, e:
mutex2.release()
mutex2.acquire()
#AND PRINT d[]
print d
#AND NOW YOUR TRHEAD IS STOP#
#When the thread is lock(stop), you only need call: mutex2.release() for unlock(start)
#When your thread is unlock(start) and you want lock(stop):
#try:
# mutex2.acquire()
#except Exception, e:
# mutex2.release()
# mutex2.acquire()

How do I detect if a thread died, and then restart it?

I have an application that fires up a series of threads. Occassionally, one of these threads dies (usually due to a network problem). How can I properly detect a thread crash and restart just that thread? Here is example code:
import random
import threading
import time
class MyThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, pass_value):
super(MyThread, self).__init__()
self.running = False
self.value = pass_value
def run(self):
self.running = True
while self.running:
time.sleep(0.25)
rand = random.randint(0,10)
print threading.current_thread().name, rand, self.value
if rand == 4:
raise ValueError('Returned 4!')
if __name__ == '__main__':
group1 = []
group2 = []
for g in range(4):
group1.append(MyThread(g))
group2.append(MyThread(g+20))
for m in group1:
m.start()
print "Now start second wave..."
for p in group2:
p.start()
In this example, I start 4 threads then I start 4 more threads. Each thread randomly generates an int between 0 and 10. If that int is 4, it raises an exception. Notice that I don't join the threads. I want both group1 and group2 list of threads to be running. I found that if I joined the threads it would wait until the thread terminated. My thread is supposed to be a daemon process, thus should rarely (if ever) hit the ValueError Exception this example code is showing and should be running constantly. By joining it, the next set of threads doesn't begin.
How can I detect that a specific thread died and restart just that one thread?
I have attempted the following loop right after my for p in group2 loop.
while True:
# Create a copy of our groups to iterate over,
# so that we can delete dead threads if needed
for m in group1[:]:
if not m.isAlive():
group1.remove(m)
group1.append(MyThread(1))
for m in group2[:]:
if not m.isAlive():
group2.remove(m)
group2.append(MyThread(500))
time.sleep(5.0)
I took this method from this question.
The problem with this, is that isAlive() seems to always return True, because the threads never restart.
Edit
Would it be more appropriate in this situation to use multiprocessing? I found this tutorial. Is it more appropriate to have separate processes if I am going to need to restart the process? It seems that restarting a thread is difficult.
It was mentioned in the comments that I should check is_active() against the thread. I don't see this mentioned in the documentation, but I do see the isAlive that I am currently using. As I mentioned above, though, this returns True, thus I'm never able to see that a thread as died.

I had a similar issue and stumbled across this question. I found that join takes a timeout argument, and that is_alive will return False once the thread is joined. So my audit for each thread is:
def check_thread_alive(thr):
thr.join(timeout=0.0)
return thr.is_alive()
This detects thread death for me.

You could potentially put in an a try except around where you expect it to crash (if it can be anywhere you can do it around the whole run function) and have an indicator variable which has its status.
So something like the following:
class MyThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, pass_value):
super(MyThread, self).__init__()
self.running = False
self.value = pass_value
self.RUNNING = 0
self.FINISHED_OK = 1
self.STOPPED = 2
self.CRASHED = 3
self.status = self.STOPPED
def run(self):
self.running = True
self.status = self.RUNNING
while self.running:
time.sleep(0.25)
rand = random.randint(0,10)
print threading.current_thread().name, rand, self.value
try:
if rand == 4:
raise ValueError('Returned 4!')
except:
self.status = self.CRASHED
Then you can use your loop:
while True:
# Create a copy of our groups to iterate over,
# so that we can delete dead threads if needed
for m in group1[:]:
if m.status == m.CRASHED:
value = m.value
group1.remove(m)
group1.append(MyThread(value))
for m in group2[:]:
if m.status == m.CRASHED:
value = m.value
group2.remove(m)
group2.append(MyThread(value))
time.sleep(5.0)

Python threading: can I sleep on two threading.Event()s simultaneously?

If I have two threading.Event() objects, and wish to sleep until either one of them is set, is there an efficient way to do that in python? Clearly I could do something with polling/timeouts, but I would like to really have the thread sleep until one is set, akin to how select is used for file descriptors.
So in the following implementation, what would an efficient non-polling implementation of wait_for_either look like?
a = threading.Event()
b = threading.Event()
wait_for_either(a, b)

Here is a non-polling non-excessive thread solution: modify the existing Events to fire a callback whenever they change, and handle setting a new event in that callback:
import threading
def or_set(self):
self._set()
self.changed()
def or_clear(self):
self._clear()
self.changed()
def orify(e, changed_callback):
e._set = e.set
e._clear = e.clear
e.changed = changed_callback
e.set = lambda: or_set(e)
e.clear = lambda: or_clear(e)
def OrEvent(*events):
or_event = threading.Event()
def changed():
bools = [e.is_set() for e in events]
if any(bools):
or_event.set()
else:
or_event.clear()
for e in events:
orify(e, changed)
changed()
return or_event
Sample usage:
def wait_on(name, e):
print "Waiting on %s..." % (name,)
e.wait()
print "%s fired!" % (name,)
def test():
import time
e1 = threading.Event()
e2 = threading.Event()
or_e = OrEvent(e1, e2)
threading.Thread(target=wait_on, args=('e1', e1)).start()
time.sleep(0.05)
threading.Thread(target=wait_on, args=('e2', e2)).start()
time.sleep(0.05)
threading.Thread(target=wait_on, args=('or_e', or_e)).start()
time.sleep(0.05)
print "Firing e1 in 2 seconds..."
time.sleep(2)
e1.set()
time.sleep(0.05)
print "Firing e2 in 2 seconds..."
time.sleep(2)
e2.set()
time.sleep(0.05)
The result of which was:
Waiting on e1...
Waiting on e2...
Waiting on or_e...
Firing e1 in 2 seconds...
e1 fired!or_e fired!
Firing e2 in 2 seconds...
e2 fired!
This should be thread-safe. Any comments are welcome.
EDIT: Oh and here is your wait_for_either function, though the way I wrote the code, it's best to make and pass around an or_event. Note that the or_event shouldn't be set or cleared manually.
def wait_for_either(e1, e2):
OrEvent(e1, e2).wait()

I think the standard library provides a pretty canonical solution to this problem that I don't see brought up in this question: condition variables. You have your main thread wait on a condition variable, and poll the set of events each time it is notified. It is only notified when one of the events is updated, so there is no wasteful polling. Here is a Python 3 example:
from threading import Thread, Event, Condition
from time import sleep
from random import random
event1 = Event()
event2 = Event()
cond = Condition()
def thread_func(event, i):
delay = random()
print("Thread {} sleeping for {}s".format(i, delay))
sleep(delay)
event.set()
with cond:
cond.notify()
print("Thread {} done".format(i))
with cond:
Thread(target=thread_func, args=(event1, 1)).start()
Thread(target=thread_func, args=(event2, 2)).start()
print("Threads started")
while not (event1.is_set() or event2.is_set()):
print("Entering cond.wait")
cond.wait()
print("Exited cond.wait ({}, {})".format(event1.is_set(), event2.is_set()))
print("Main thread done")
Example output:
Thread 1 sleeping for 0.31569427100177794s
Thread 2 sleeping for 0.486548134317051s
Threads started
Entering cond.wait
Thread 1 done
Exited cond.wait (True, False)
Main thread done
Thread 2 done
Note that wit no extra threads or unnecessary polling, you can wait for an arbitrary predicate to become true (e.g. for any particular subset of the events to be set). There's also a wait_for wrapper for the while (pred): cond.wait() pattern, which can make your code a bit easier to read.

One solution (with polling) would be to do sequential waits on each Event in a loop
def wait_for_either(a, b):
while True:
if a.wait(tunable_timeout):
break
if b.wait(tunable_timeout):
break
I think that if you tune the timeout well enough the results would be OK.
The best non-polling I can think of is to wait for each one in a different thread and set a shared Event whom you will wait after in the main thread.
def repeat_trigger(waiter, trigger):
waiter.wait()
trigger.set()
def wait_for_either(a, b):
trigger = threading.Event()
ta = threading.Thread(target=repeat_trigger, args=(a, trigger))
tb = threading.Thread(target=repeat_trigger, args=(b, trigger))
ta.start()
tb.start()
# Now do the union waiting
trigger.wait()
Pretty interesting, so I wrote an OOP version of the previous solution:
class EventUnion(object):
"""Register Event objects and wait for release when any of them is set"""
def __init__(self, ev_list=None):
self._trigger = Event()
if ev_list:
# Make a list of threads, one for each Event
self._t_list = [
Thread(target=self._triggerer, args=(ev, ))
for ev in ev_list
]
else:
self._t_list = []
def register(self, ev):
"""Register a new Event"""
self._t_list.append(Thread(target=self._triggerer, args=(ev, )))
def wait(self, timeout=None):
"""Start waiting until any one of the registred Event is set"""
# Start all the threads
map(lambda t: t.start(), self._t_list)
# Now do the union waiting
return self._trigger.wait(timeout)
def _triggerer(self, ev):
ev.wait()
self._trigger.set()

This is an old question, but I hope this helps someone coming from Google.
The accepted answer is fairly old and will cause an infinite loop for twice-"orified" events.
Here is an implementation using concurrent.futures
import concurrent.futures
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
def wait_for_either(events, timeout=None, t_pool=None):
'''blocks untils one of the events gets set
PARAMETERS
events (list): list of threading.Event objects
timeout (float): timeout for events (used for polling)
t_pool (concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor): optional
'''
if any(event.is_set() for event in events):
# sanity check
pass
else:
t_pool = t_pool or ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=len(events))
tasks = []
for event in events:
tasks.append(t_pool.submit(event.wait))
concurrent.futures.wait(tasks, timeout=timeout, return_when='FIRST_COMPLETED')
# cleanup
for task in tasks:
try:
task.result(timeout=0)
except concurrent.futures.TimeoutError:
pass
Testing the function
import threading
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
def bomb(myevent, sleep_s):
'''set event after sleep_s seconds'''
with lock:
print('explodes in ', datetime.now() + timedelta(seconds=sleep_s))
time.sleep(sleep_s)
myevent.set()
with lock:
print('BOOM!')
lock = threading.RLock() # so prints don't get jumbled
a = threading.Event()
b = threading.Event()
t_pool = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2)
threading.Thread(target=bomb, args=(event1, 5), daemon=True).start()
threading.Thread(target=bomb, args=(event2, 120), daemon=True).start()
with lock:
print('1 second timeout, no ThreadPool', datetime.now())
wait_for_either([a, b], timeout=1)
with lock:
print('wait_event_or done', datetime.now())
print('=' * 15)
with lock:
print('wait for event1', datetime.now())
wait_for_either([a, b], t_pool=t_pool)
with lock:
print('wait_event_or done', datetime.now())

Starting extra threads seems a clear solution, not very effecient though.
Function wait_events will block util any one of events is set.
def wait_events(*events):
event_share = Event()
def set_event_share(event):
event.wait()
event.clear()
event_share.set()
for event in events:
Thread(target=set_event_share(event)).start()
event_share.wait()
wait_events(event1, event2, event3)

Extending Claudiu's answer where you can either wait for:
event 1 OR event 2
event 1 AND even 2
from threading import Thread, Event, _Event
class ConditionalEvent(_Event):
def __init__(self, events_list, condition):
_Event.__init__(self)
self.event_list = events_list
self.condition = condition
for e in events_list:
self._setup(e, self._state_changed)
self._state_changed()
def _state_changed(self):
bools = [e.is_set() for e in self.event_list]
if self.condition == 'or':
if any(bools):
self.set()
else:
self.clear()
elif self.condition == 'and':
if all(bools):
self.set()
else:
self.clear()
def _custom_set(self,e):
e._set()
e._state_changed()
def _custom_clear(self,e):
e._clear()
e._state_changed()
def _setup(self, e, changed_callback):
e._set = e.set
e._clear = e.clear
e._state_changed = changed_callback
e.set = lambda: self._custom_set(e)
e.clear = lambda: self._custom_clear(e)
Example usage will be very similar as before
import time
e1 = Event()
e2 = Event()
# Example to wait for triggering of event 1 OR event 2
or_e = ConditionalEvent([e1, e2], 'or')
# Example to wait for triggering of event 1 AND event 2
and_e = ConditionalEvent([e1, e2], 'and')

Not pretty, but you can use two additional threads to multiplex the events...
def wait_for_either(a, b):
flag = False #some condition variable, event, or similar
class Event_Waiter(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, event):
self.e = event
def run(self):
self.e.wait()
flag.set()
a_thread = Event_Waiter(a)
b_thread = Event_Waiter(b)
a.start()
b.start()
flag.wait()
Note, you may have to worry about accidentally getting both events if they arrive too quickly. The helper threads (a_thread and b_thread) should lock synchronize around trying to set flag and then should kill the other thread (possibly resetting that thread's event if it was consumed).

def wait_for_event_timeout(*events):
while not all([e.isSet() for e in events]):
#Check to see if the event is set. Timeout 1 sec.
ev_wait_bool=[e.wait(1) for e in events]
# Process if all events are set. Change all to any to process if any event set
if all(ev_wait_bool):
logging.debug('processing event')
else:
logging.debug('doing other work')
e1 = threading.Event()
e2 = threading.Event()
t3 = threading.Thread(name='non-block-multi',
target=wait_for_event_timeout,
args=(e1,e2))
t3.start()
logging.debug('Waiting before calling Event.set()')
time.sleep(5)
e1.set()
time.sleep(10)
e2.set()
logging.debug('Event is set')