Python class wont add to objectStore - python

for some reason when I try to add an object to a dictionary in a class, where the dictionary belongs to another class and objects are added/removed by class functions it always seems to fail adding.
Heres the datahandler :
class datastore():
def __init__(self, dict=None):
self.objectStore = {}
self.stringStore = {}
if dict is not None:
self.objectStore = dict
def __addobj__(self,obj,name):
print("adddedval")
self.objectStore[name] = obj
def __getobject__(self,name):
_data = self.objectStore.get(name)
return _data
def __ripobj__(self,name,append):
if isinstance(append, object):
self.objectStore[name] = append
def __returnstore__(self):
return self.objectStore
def __lst__(self):
return self.objectStore.items()
and heres the trigger code to try to add the item :
if self.cmd=="addtkinstance-dev":
print("Adding a tk.Tk() instance to dataStore")
#$$ below broken $$#
_get = datastore.__dict__["__returnstore__"](self.dat)
_get["test-obj"] = tk.Tk()
datastore.__init__(self.dat, dict=_get)
#--------------------------------------------#
tool(tk.Tk(), "test-obj", datastore())
and also heres the init for the class that trys to add the object
class cmdproc(tk.Tk, datastore):
def __init__(self,lst,variable_mem,restable):
self.pinst = stutils(lst,restable,variable_mem)
self.vinst = varutils(variable_mem,lst,restable)
self.tki = tkhandler()
self.dat = datastore(dict=None)
datastore.__init__(self, dict=datastore.__returnstore__(self.dat))
tk.Tk.__init__(self)
self.lst = lst
self.vdat = variable_mem
self.restable = restable
please help this is seriously baffling me
(note that tkhandler dosn't have to do with anything)

Related

how to create a python object from a json paylaod, without declaring each variable manually

basically I've got a booking class with fields each declared manually. I am curious if theres a more neat solution for the given task.
class Booking:
def __init__(self, json_data):
self.referenceNumber = json_data["referenceNumber"]
self.fromDate = json_data["fromDate"]
self.preferredDate1 = json_data["preferredDate1"]
self.preferredTimeFrom = json_data["preferredTimeFrom"]
self.time = json_data["time"]
self.partySize = json_data["partySize"]
self.budgetAmountTotal = json_data["budgetAmountTotal"]
self.budgetAmountPerPerson = json_data["budgetAmountPerPerson"]
self.budgetCurrencySign = json_data["budgetCurrencySign"]
self.venueName = json_data["venueName"]
self.venueId = json_data["venueId"]
self.cityName = json_data["cityName"]
self.clientName = json_data["clientName"]
self.clientContactName = json_data["clientContactName"]
self.status = json_data["status"]
self.statusText = json_data["statusText"]
self.assigneeId = json_data["assigneeId"]
self.assignee = json_data["assignee"]
self.lastAction = json_data["lastAction"]
self.inquiryChannel = json_data["inquiryChannel"]
self.venueDateFormat = json_data["venueDateFormat"]
self.bookingId = json_data["bookingId"]
self.inquiryHold = json_data["inquiryHold"]
self.isSpaceSelectedForHolds = json_data["isSpaceSelectedForHolds"]
self.id = json_data["id"]
bonus if i am not given an unresolved reference warning when I am calling for the attribute.
A simple self.__dict__.update(json_data) might do the trick.
Given the code in the question, access to attributes would be, for example, in the style of:
Booking().fromDate
However, if you don't mind accessing the value by its key name then you can greatly simplify the code as follows:
class Booking:
def __init__(self, json_data):
self._json = json.data
def __getitem__(self, key):
return self._json.get(key)
Then (for example)...
pd = {'fromDate': '2022/10/18'}
print(Booking(pd)['fromDate'])
How about this?
def set_attr_from_json(obj, json_data):
for key, value in json_data.items():
setattr(obj, key, value)
class Booking:
def __init__(self, json_data):
set_attr_from_json(self, json_data)
Since you want to control how your class attributes should be built, I think you should use metaclass like this
import json
from types import SimpleNamespace
class BookingMeta(type):
def __call__(self, json_data):
obj = super().__call__(json_data)
obj = json.loads(json.dumps(json_data), object_hook=lambda d: SimpleNamespace(**d))
return obj
class Booking(metaclass=BookingMeta):
def __init__(self, json_data):
pass
b = Booking({"name": {"first_name": "hello", "last_name": "world"}, "age": 23, "sub": ["maths", "Science"]})
print(b.name.first_name)
print(b.age)
#hello
#23

Class object not returning value

class Friend:
all = []
def __init__(self):
self.__fname = None
self.__lname = None
self.__fid = None
#property
def fname(self):
return self.__fname
#fname.setter
def fname(self, value):
self.__fname = value
#property
def lname(self):
return self.__lname
#lname.setter
def lname(self, value):
self.__lname = value
#property
def fid(self):
return self.__fid
#fid.setter
def fid(self, value):
self.__fid = value
#DB Class
class db_friend()
def db_load_friend(self, obj, fname,lname):
obj.fname = fname
obj.lname = lname
obj.fid = "XYZ"
obj.all.append(obj)
# function that acts on the friend class
def manage_friend():
fname = "Joe"
lname = "Root"
objfriend = Friend()
db_friend.db_load_friend(objfriend, fname,lname)
print (objfriend.fname) # this is not working
print (objfriend.fid) #this is not working
for user in objfriend.all:
print (objfriend.fid) #this is working
Both objfriend.fname and objfriend.fid is printing no value. I am trying to load the objfriend object by passing to the db_load_friend method of the db class. I am able to see the values if I loop through the "all" variable. May I know why this is not working or using the static variable "all" is the only way to do it?
You need to create an instance of db_friend so you can call the db_load_friend() method:
def manage_friend():
fname = "Joe"
lname = "Root"
objfriend = Friend()
objdbfriend = db_friend()
objdbfriend.db_load_friend(objfriend, fname,lname)
print (objfriend.fname)
print (objfriend.fid)
for user in objfriend.all:
print (objfriend.fid) #this is working
Or, since db_load_friend() doesn't need to use self, you could make it a static method.
class db_friend()
#staticmethod
def db_load_friend(obj, fname,lname):
obj.fname = fname
obj.lname = lname
obj.fid = "XYZ"
obj.all.append(obj)

Should I Use DAO Objects In Python __init__?

In python, which is better:
class MyAPI:
def __init__(self):
self.dao = MyDAO()
def getsomething(self):
something = self.dao.grabSomething()
newsomething = operateon(something)
return newsomething
def getsomethingelse()
somethingelse = self.dao.grabSomethingElse()
newsomethingelse = operateon(somethingelse)
return newsomethingelse
OR
class MyAPI:
def getsomething(self):
dao = MyDAO()
something = dao.grabSomething()
newsomething = operateon(something)
return newsomething
def getsomethingelse()
dao = MyDAO()
somethingelse = dao.grabSomethingElse()
newsomethingelse = operateon(somethingelse)
return newsomethingelse
I am a complete python noob coming from a java spring background and I am really trying to understand the difference here.

Python class recording attributes without specifying self ?

I have a question regarding a Python class I use in Blender. Basically, I wonder how the class works because some attributes are recorded without me specifically writing self.value = something. Here's the code:
class DialogOperator(bpy.types.Operator):
bl_idname = "object.dialog_operator"
bl_label = "Save/Load animation"
saving = bpy.props.BoolProperty(name="Save ? Else load.")
path_to_anim = bpy.props.StringProperty(name="Path to folder")
anim_name = bpy.props.StringProperty(name="Animation name:")
# path_to_anim += "/home/mehdi/Blender/Scripts/"
def execute(self, context):
# print('This is execute with: Saving: {} Name:{}'.format(self.saving, self.path_to_anim))
if self.saving:
self.launch_save()
message = 'Animation {} saved at {}'.format(self.anim_name, self.path_to_anim)
else:
self.launch_load()
message = 'Animation {} loaded'.format(self.anim_name)
self.report({'INFO'}, message)
return {'FINISHED'}
def invoke(self, context, event):
wm = context.window_manager
return wm.invoke_props_dialog(self)
def launch_load(self):
full_path = self.path_to_anim + self.anim_name
target_armature = Humanoid(bpy.data.objects['Armature'])
load_all(full_path, target_armature, 'LastLoaded')
def launch_save(self):
full_path = self.path_to_anim + self.anim_name
source_armature = Humanoid(bpy.data.objects['Armature'])
curves = source_armature.get_curves()
save_all(curves, source_armature,full_path)
Now, how come saving, path_to_anim and anim_name are considered as attributes (I'm able to call them in execute() and launch()) even though I did not write self.saving = saving
Thanks !
This is because saving,path_to_anim and anim_name are class attributes. They are defined for the class and not for a particular instance. They are shared among the instances. Here is a link for further explanation class-instance-attributes-python

Method changes all instances of class inside list

In my script I have these classes:
class action:
def __init__(self,ac_type,ac_date):
self.ac_type = ac_type
self.ac_date = ac_date
class user:
actions = []
def __init__(self,i_id):
self.ivi_id = i_id
def add(self,act):
self.actions.append(act)
def get_len(self):
return len(self.actions)
I want to create list of "user" elements and add to some of theme actions. I do this in the following way:
for i in range(len(data_queue)):
ind = users_id.index(data_queue[i].i_id);
act = action(0,data_queue[i].added)
users[ind].add(act)
But after running this I see that every action from data_queue was added to every user from users. This is wrong! What shall I change?
The code is using class attribute which is shared by all instances of the class and the class itself.
Use an instance attribute instead:
class user:
def __init__(self,i_id):
self.ivi_id = i_id
self.actions = []
def add(self,act):
self.actions.append(act)
def get_len(self):
return len(self.actions)
BTW, the code is using an index to iterate the sequence data_queue. Just iterate the sequence unless you really need the index.
for queue in data_queue:
ind = users_id.index(queue.i_id)
act = action(0, queue.added)
users[ind].add(act)

Categories