Remove preinstalled python from Mac OSX 10.8 - python

I want to move to python 3.0 and therefore remove the default python 2.7 (2.6,2.5...) installation on my mac. Including all the installed packages, $PATH,...
Does the python installer from python.org oder MacPorts installer provide an uninstaller, or is there a way to do this manually?

That's a COMPLETELY TERRIBLE idea, and you should never do that. You're likely to break dependencies and requirements for various software that expect to find the default Python in the default location.
Install your choice of Python 3 ( MacPorts, Python.org, whatever ). Update your local $PATH variables to use that Python / PythonPath.
If you don't trust my opinion, here's what official Python.org docs say:
http://docs.python.org/2/using/mac.html
The Apple-provided build of Python is installed in /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework and /usr/bin/python, respectively. You should never modify or delete these, as they are Apple-controlled and are used by Apple- or third-party software. Remember that if you choose to install a newer Python version from python.org, you will have two different but functional Python installations on your computer, so it will be important that your paths and usages are consistent with what you want to do.

Related

So many pythons, which do I need?

It seems I have several Python versions installed on my Mac (High Sierra). Do I really need more than one each of Python 2.7 and the most recent Python3?
I am primarily concerned about confusion when adding modules to the environments.
Here are the python executables I can find, excluding symlinks. Do I need them all? Does Apple need one version just for the OS? (Maybe that's Ruby I'm thinking of._)
/usr/bin/python
/usr/local/Cellar/python/2.7.13/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python
/usr/local/Cellar/python/2.7.13/bin/python
/usr/local/Cellar/python/2.7.13/share/python
/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.1/libexec/bin/python
On MacOS, you need to have the system-installed Python 2 in /usr/bin/python because some system functionality depends on it.
If you have other versions installed via Homebrew or etc, that's strictly optional. For developing code in Python, definitely install a recent version of Python 3; you should not be developing new code in the legacy version 2. It will run out of support in a year or so, and many important third-party libraries etc have already abandoned support for it.
If you do need to maintain Python 2 code, having a Homebrew version of the most recent Python 2.7.13 is probably a good idea. The system /usr/bin/python is at version 2.7.10 as of MacOS Mojave; and if we extrapolate from Apple's update policy history for third-party open-source software in the system, it will probably remain there for many years.
Homebrew is just one of many ways to install additional Python versions, but since this is what you seem to be using already (as indicated by the /usr/local/Cellar paths) I will not go into alternatives.
For switching between versions, virtualenv is the common baseline, though there are many add-ons like pyenv etc which add convenience features or alternative models for switching between projects which require different versions of Python and various packages.
Note: this answer might be primarily based opinioned.
First, in macos, I encourage you to use brew to install python. So, if you want to instal Python 3 run:
$ brew install python
Probably it is already installed, so to update it run:
$ brew upgrade python
This will upgrade to the latest version of Python 3. In general, if you start a new project you should use Python 3. Remember that Python 2 will be deprecated at the end of this year 2019.
Second, I highly recommend you to use virtual environments to avoid having issues with dependencies. You can create a virtual environment running:
$ python3 -m venv .ven
This will create a virtual environment in .venv in your current working directory.
As an alternative you can use pipenv to track dependencies too which I also encourage you to install using brew.
$ brew install pipenv
Then you create a virtual environment running:
$ pipenv --three
Keep in mind that you will have two versions of Python in your machine python which is Python 2 (installed by default in your machine) and python3 which is Python 3. Then, if you want to run Python 2 just type python, while if you want to run Python 3 type python3.
Finally, you can also keep track of several python versions using pyenv. This is very useful if you need to use multiple versions of Python for example Python 3.1, 3.2, 3.3..., 3.6, 3.7.1, 3.7.2, 3.7.3, etc.
This is what has been useful in my experience using macOS. You could also use Docker to completely isolate your environment, but probably the first two points is enough if you are a beginner.
While Python 3.x is what python solutions should be implemented in today, many existing python applications, modules, etc, are implemented and maintained in 2.7 or lower. Sometimes you'll find multiple versions of python on your computer because applications you've downloaded in the past had you install them so their application would work properly on your machine. As long as you don't want, or need applications that may depend on past versions of python, you can update to the latest one and delete the old versions.
If you are planning on developing in python, and you can use the latest version, you should definitely do so. If you rid of the versions of python on your machine, applications, modules/scripts, etc may not work or function properly.
Python comes pre-installed on Mac OS X, but it is not required to be on your machine for your computer to function, just the applications that may be on your machine that may use Python.

What to do after upgrading from Python 2 to Python 3?

Recently I've installed Python 3 after using 2 for quite a while, so I have many libraries for Python that I've installed using pip. I've already started using the symlink python3, but what else do I need to do to change over?
For example, while I have made the alias python=python3, I don't know about the modules I've installed with pip. I was using a version of pip for Python 2, but does that mean modules were written for Python 2 and not 3? Do I now need to start using pip3 (or make a corresponding alias pip=pip3 or pip=pip3.5)? If modules were installed using the command pip, does that mean I have to reinstall them for Python 3 using pip3? If I do need to reinstall them for 3, should I start removing them from my Python 2 env as cleanup?
And another question that seems like it may entail a lot of work: How should I change all my virtual environments for Python projects? They were all Python 2 envs, and now I'm not sure whether it's necessary, useful, or possible to reinstall or upgrade the modules within them to the corresponding ones for Python 3.
Sorry if this seems like a duplicate question - I've searched and only found resources regarding "how to upgrade" rather than "what to do after upgrading". Thanks for your help!
It is strongly recommended not to symlink python to Python 3, at least on Debian-based Linux distros. Debian utility scripts use both Python 3 and 2.7 to work (which means you already had a copy of Python 3 somewhere...), and as a consequence Debian-based distributions ship both versions. Symlinking can cause unexpected breakages. This may or may not be true on other systems, however, but with such ambiguity it is probably useful not to try.
Instead, live with symlinking python3 to Python 3. Leave python alone.
pip is usually symlinked to the corresponding pip program for 2.7. Use pip3 to specify you want to use the pip program for Python 3. If you use pip, you'll find modules for Python 3 being installed to Python 2.7 site directories and nothing will work as you expect it to. There should be no reason why you can't symlink pip to pip3, but I'd still not recommend it - it's better to tread cautiously in this regard.
You don't need to change your current virtual environments. Just create new ones with virtualenv, pointing to the correct Python program to use. This is the whole point of virtual environments: to sandbox different Python versions, so that neither of them adversely interact with each other.
If you have projects you really want to ship to Python 3, I'd recommend using a version control system to back up your current files, and then reproducing them in a new virtual environment configured for Python 3. This is quick, simple and painless.

Is it ok to install both Python 2.7 and 3.5?

Supposedly Python 2.7 is included native to OSX 10.8 and above (if I remember correctly), but I recently installed Python 3.5 to use for projects while I work through UDacity. Lo and behold, the UDacity courses seem to use 2.7 - wups! So instead of trying to uninstall 3.5 (this procedure seemed to scary for neophytes such as myself), I simply installed 2.7 in addition to the recently installed 3.5 and just run the 2.7 IDLE and Shell. Is this ok, or will I run into problems down the road?
I have installed two versions, 2.7, 3.4 and I do not have any problem by now. 3.4 I am using for my work project in eclipse environment, 2.7 for udacity course, like You ;).
As long as you keep your installation folders organized, you should have no issues having both on your computer, besides one thing. The path environment variable for python will determine which version is used by default, so I would say stick to one version, or make sure to make your programs as backwards compatible as possible. I have run into this issue on Windows, since I installed Python 3.4 before 2.7, and therefore to run older code, I have to manually select the python executable. In terms of libraries, I believe that for each python version, the libraries are completely separate, so you should be good there.
As others have said, if the installation directory is different it should be no problem at all.
One thing that'll make your life easier for switching between the two is to use an IDE such as PyCharm, you just have to change a drop down to switch between the two versions.
It should be fine. Its actually pretty common to have multiple Python environments. It helps to prevent dependency conflicts between your projects. That is what is happening when you are using tools like pyenv and virtualenv.
Using tools like pyenv and virtualenv may also help you with the path problems that others mentioned. They have commands to set up the path so that their version of pip, python, etc are used.
Im not sure about OSX, but with windows 10 my environment variables for 2.7 were overwritten with the 3.5 path. Not a tough fix, but a little confusing, since it was months later when I needed 2.7 again.
You can also use Anaconda for maintaining two versions of Python:
Download Anaconda for both Python versions
Open .bashrc
Add the path to new Anaconda you have installed for, e.g.:
export PATH="/home/paras/anaconda3/bin:$PATH"
Now there will be 2 export paths: one for Python 2 and one for Python 3. Comment the one which you don't want.
I have the same problem and it is not necessary to uninstall on version of python. Please take care to not mix them up - When you search them up on the start menu. You can make a desktop shortcut saying 2.6 and 3.5.

Removing python and then re-installing on Mac OSX

I was wondering if anyone had tips on how to completely remove a python installation form Mac OSX (10.5.8) ... including virtual environments and its related binaries. Over the past few years I've completely messed up the installed site-packages, virtual-environments, etc. and the only way I can see to fix it is to just uninstall everything and re-install.
I'd like to completely re-do everything and use virtualenv, pip, etc. from the beginning.
On the other hand if anyone knows a way to do this without removing python and re-installing I'd be happy to here about it.
Thanks,
Will
Just for everyone else's reference. I found this in the Python documentation here:
Mac OS X 10.5 comes with Python 2.5.1 pre-installed by Apple. If you wish, you are invited to install the
most recent version of Python from the
Python website
(http://www.python.org). A current
“universal binary” build of Python,
which runs natively on the Mac’s new
Intel and legacy PPC CPU’s, is
available there.
What you get after installing is a
number of things:
* A MacPython 2.5 folder in your Applications folder. In here you find
IDLE, the development environment that
is a standard part of official Python
distributions; PythonLauncher, which
handles double-clicking Python scripts
from the Finder; and the “Build
Applet” tool, which allows you to
package Python scripts as standalone
applications on your system.
* A framework /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework,
which includes the Python executable
and libraries. The installer adds this
location to your shell path. To
uninstall MacPython, you can simply
remove these three things. A symlink
to the Python executable is placed in
/usr/local/bin/.
I removed these and the virtualenv directories. Then I re-installed everything and its working fine now.
You should be able to delete the packages you've installed from /Library/Python/2.*/site-packages/. I do not think any package installers will install by default to /System/Library, which should save you from needing to remove Python itself.
That said, you could also use virtualenv with --no-site-packages, and just ignore whatever packages you've installed system-wide without needing to remove them.

Can EPD Python and MacPorts Python coexist on OS X (matplotlib)?

I've been using MacPorts Python 2.6 on OS X 10.6.
I am considering also installing the Enthought Python Distribution (EPD) on the same machine because it comes preconfigured with matplotlib and other nice data analysis and visualization packages.
Can the two Python distributions co-exist peacefully on the same machine?
What potential problems will I have to look out for (e.g., environment variables)?
I know that building matplotlib through MacPorts is an option, but the process is lengthy (on the order of a full day) and there are open questions about compiling some dependencies on 64bit Intel.
I would like to know about the tradeoffs before committing to one of the two approaches.
I'm not an OSX user, so I can't say for certain, but you should be fine.
EPD bundles its own python interpreter and all required libraries. The installer basically just extracts a tarball into a stand-alone folder.
The linux installer doesn't modify any environment variables (not even $PATH), so I assume the mac installer is similar.
(Because of this, you'll probably want to manually set up aliases to the EPD python/ipython/etc binaries so you can more easily call them without changing your $PATH.)
EPD really should be completely stand-alone, as far as I know. It should be safe to install along-side anything else.
I've used EPD on Windows 7. It works great. Only stalled on me a couple of times with rather large data set.
I also use OSX, and was about to install EPD but hesitating a bit.
I think python 2.7.3 that comes with EPD (early 2013) will become the default python. Normally, upgrading to 2.7 from 2.6 should not be much of problem based on my personal experience. But I am a bit concerned to have 2 versions of 2.7 and what kind of impact it will have on using GAE SDK on my OSX. (Upgrading created a bit of hassle with GAE SKD.)
Here is what EPD readme says:
A full installation will install the following:
* Python framework -- installed into:
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/7.3
Python applications -- installed into
/Applications/Enthought
System fixes -- makes the EPD Python your default one by adding lines to
your .bash_profile to your path.
I think I will sleep on this.

Categories