I am trying to update a few fields within an array within array
An example document is like this:
{
id: 987654321
tweets: [
{
text: "RT #947FreshFM: A vigil will be held for #SandyHook victims at UMd. at 7pm at Nyumburu Ampitheater. #BlackTerp",
urls: [
],
id: 279718351289348100
},
{
text: "RT #WTOP: McDonnell: If you talk completely about guns, I think you're missing the point. #AskTheGov http://t.co/hbFt7t1n",
urls: [
{
status: null,
domain: null,
url: "http://t.co/hbFt7t1n",
period: null,
resolved_url: null,
annotation: null
}
],
id: 281061376275906560
}
],
}
I want to update the urls array as:
urls: [
{
status: null,
domain: "wtop.com",
url: "http://t.co/hbFt7t1n",
period: null,
resolved_url: "http://wtop.com/?nid=610&sid=3162096",
annotation: null,
annotation2: "guncontrol"
}
],
I am using something like this to do the updating:
collection.update({"id":987654321, "tweets.id":281061376275906560,"tweets.urls.url":"http://t.co/hbFt7t1n"},
{"$set":{
"tweets.urls.resolved_url":"http://wtop.com/?nid=610&sid=3162096",
"tweets.urls.domain": "wtop.com",
"tweets.urls.annotation2":"guncontrol"
}}, False,False)
However it gives me error
can't append to array using string field name [urls]
Any suggestions?
I can't be certain, but this might be what's going on. From your example document, your model has this schema:
{
id: Number,
tweets: Array
}
When you search for the instance of the model in
collection.update( {
"id": 987654321,
"tweets.id": 281061376275906560,
"tweets.urls.url": "http://t.co/hbFt7t1n"
}, ...)`
It's likely that it's not finding the instance of the model you're looking for.
I would try running this script to see if your search criteria are valid:
console.log(collection.find({
"id": 987654321,
"tweets.id": 281061376275906560,
"tweets.urls.url": "http://t.co/hbFt7t1n"
}));
Hope it helps!
Related
I am trying to combine two SQLAlchemyConnectionField. The current error i face is graphql.error.base.GraphQLError: Expected value of type "PostsObject" but got: Tag
My current connections are defined like so posts = SQLAlchemyConnectionField(PostsObject.connection, /* input arguments like posts(name: "") */) Is there a way to add another type or allow to return something like
"data": {
"posts": {
"edges": [
{
"node": "Different table"
},
{
"node": "Other table"
}]}},
I am using graphene_sqlalchemy well anyway thats all thanks !
When I'm trying to update a single field in my dynamodb table with update_item method, for some reason it's updating the whole row.
before updating the table
after updating the table
My updating method:
def operate_likes(self, statistic: dict):
statistic_id = statistic.get('page_id')
table = self.__db.Table('Statistic')
response = table.update_item(
Key={
'page_id': statistic_id
},
UpdateExpression="SET liked_posts_amount = :lpa",
ExpressionAttributeValues={
':lpa': statistic.get('liked_posts_amount')
},
ReturnValues="UPDATED_NEW"
)
My dynamodb scheme:
{
"AttributeDefinitions": [
{
"AttributeName": "page_id",
"AttributeType": "N"
}
],
"TableName": "Statistic",
"KeySchema": [
{
"AttributeName": "page_id",
"KeyType": "HASH"
}
],
"TableStatus": "ACTIVE",
"CreationDateTime": "2022-07-11T11:04:57.318Z",
"ProvisionedThroughput": {
"LastIncreaseDateTime": "1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"LastDecreaseDateTime": "1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"NumberOfDecreasesToday": 0,
"ReadCapacityUnits": 3,
"WriteCapacityUnits": 3
},
"TableSizeBytes": 63,
"ItemCount": 2,
"TableArn": "arn:aws:dynamodb:ddblocal:000000000000:table/Statistic"
}
I was searching the reason causing it but my attempts weren't successful. Any ideas why might this be happening? Feel free to ask for more details.
I am working on a new project in HubSpot that returns nested JSON like the sample below. I am trying to access the associated contacts id, but am struggling to reference it correctly (the id I am looking for is the value '201' in the example below). I've put together this script, but this script only returns the entire associations portion of the JSON and I only want the id. How do I reference the id correctly?
Here is the output from the script:
{'contacts': {'paging': None, 'results': [{'id': '201', 'type': 'ticket_to_contact'}]}}
And here is the script I put together:
import hubspot
from pprint import pprint
client = hubspot.Client.create(api_key="API_KEY")
try:
api_response = client.crm.tickets.basic_api.get_page(limit=2, associations=["contacts"], archived=False)
for x in range(2):
pprint(api_response.results[x].associations)
except ApiException as e:
print("Exception when calling basic_api->get_page: %s\n" % e)
Here is what the full JSON looks like ('contacts' property shortened for readability):
{
"results": [
{
"id": "34018123",
"properties": {
"content": "Hi xxxxx,\r\n\r\nCan you clarify on how the blocking of script happens? Is it because of any CSP (or) the script will decide run time for every URL’s getting triggered from browser?\r\n\r\nRegards,\r\nLogan",
"createdate": "2019-07-03T04:20:12.366Z",
"hs_lastmodifieddate": "2020-12-09T01:16:12.974Z",
"hs_object_id": "34018123",
"hs_pipeline": "0",
"hs_pipeline_stage": "4",
"hs_ticket_category": null,
"hs_ticket_priority": null,
"subject": "RE: call followup"
},
"createdAt": "2019-07-03T04:20:12.366Z",
"updatedAt": "2020-12-09T01:16:12.974Z",
"archived": false
},
{
"id": "34018892",
"properties": {
"content": "Hi Guys,\r\n\r\nI see that we were placed back on the staging and then removed again.",
"createdate": "2019-07-03T07:59:10.606Z",
"hs_lastmodifieddate": "2021-12-17T09:04:46.316Z",
"hs_object_id": "34018892",
"hs_pipeline": "0",
"hs_pipeline_stage": "3",
"hs_ticket_category": null,
"hs_ticket_priority": null,
"subject": "Re: Issue due to server"
},
"createdAt": "2019-07-03T07:59:10.606Z",
"updatedAt": "2021-12-17T09:04:46.316Z",
"archived": false,
"associations": {
"contacts": {
"results": [
{
"id": "201",
"type": "ticket_to_contact"
}
]
}
}
}
],
"paging": {
"next": {
"after": "35406270",
"link": "https://api.hubapi.com/crm/v3/objects/tickets?associations=contacts&archived=false&hs_static_app=developer-docs-ui&limit=2&after=35406270&hs_static_app_version=1.3488"
}
}
}
You can do api_response.results[x].associations["contacts"]["results"][0]["id"].
Sorted this out, posting in case anyone else is struggling with the response from the HubSpot v3 Api. The response schema for this call is:
Response schema type: Object
String results[].id
Object results[].properties
String results[].createdAt
String results[].updatedAt
Boolean results[].archived
String results[].archivedAt
Object results[].associations
Object paging
Object paging.next
String paging.next.after
String paging.next.linkResponse schema type: Object
String results[].id
Object results[].properties
String results[].createdAt
String results[].updatedAt
Boolean results[].archived
String results[].archivedAt
Object results[].associations
Object paging
Object paging.next
String paging.next.after
String paging.next.link
So to access the id of the contact associated with the ticket, you need to reference it using this notation:
api_response.results[1].associations["contacts"].results[0].id
notes:
results[x] - reference the result in the index
associations["contacts"] -
associations is a dictionary object, you can access the contacts item
by it's name
associations["contacts"].results is a list - reference
by the index []
id - is a string
In my case type was ModelProperty or CollectionResponseProperty couldn't reach dict anyhow.
For the record this got me to go through the results.
for result in list(api_response.results):
ID = result.id
I was coding a webapp based on GPT-2 but it was not good so I decided to switch to official OpenAI GPT-3.
So I make that request:
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine="davinci",
prompt="Hello",
temperature=0.7,
max_tokens=64,
top_p=1,
frequency_penalty=0,
presence_penalty=0
)
And when I print the response I get this:
{
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "length",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"text": ", everyone, and welcome to the first installment of the new opening"
}
],
"created": 1624033807,
"id": "cmpl-3CBfb8yZAFEUIVXfZO90m77dgd9V4",
"model": "davinci:2020-05-03",
"object": "text_completion"
}
But I only want to print the text, so how can I do to print the "text" value in the response list.
Thank you in advance and have a good day.
Using the dict indexing by key, and the list indexing by index
x = {"choices": [{"finish_reason": "length",
"text": ", everyone, and welcome to the first installment of the new opening"}], }
text = x['choices'][0]['text']
print(text) # , everyone, and welcome to the first installment of the new opening
You can try print(response["choices"][0]["text"])
Hope this helps.
I think GPT-3 response structure has been changed, for reference, the response object looks this:
const response = await openai.createCompletion({
model: "text-davinci-002",
prompt: "Say this is a test",
temperature: 0,
max_tokens: 6,
});
// the response looks like the following
{
status: 200,
statusText: 'OK',
headers: {
},
config: {
},
request: <ref *1> ClientRequest {
},
data: {
id: 'cmpl-5zzyzqvh4Hmi5yyNL2LMI9ADkLBU0',
object: 'text_completion',
created: 1665457953,
model: 'text-davinci-002',
choices: [ [Object] ],
usage: { prompt_tokens: 5, completion_tokens: 6, total_tokens: 11 }
}
}
// choices can be accessed like this
var { choices } = { ...response.data }
I'm trying to make and query in Django,But I can't get the output I want. I want to use group by and filter in Django Query, I tried using annotate by looking at some answers on stackoverflow and some other sites but couldn't make it work . Here's my response on after using filter.
[
{
"id": 11667,
"rate_id": "FIT-PIT2",
"name": "FIT-PIT111",
"pms_room": null,
"description": null,
"checkin": "",
"checkout": "",
"connected_room": null
},
{
"id": 11698,
"rate_id": "343",
"name": "dfggffd",
"pms_room": "5BZ",
"description": null,
"checkin": null,
"checkout": null,
"connected_room": null
},
{
"id": 11699,
"rate_id": "343",
"name": "dfggffd",
"pms_room": "6BZ",
"description": null,
"checkin": null,
"checkout": null,
"connected_room": null
}]
What I want to do is group all those pms_rooms which have same rate_id, roughly something like this
{'343':['5BZ','6BZ'],'FIT-PIT2':[null]}
I can do it using dictionary or list .
But I want to do it directly from query like table.objects.filter(condition).group_by('rate_id') , something SQL equivalent of SELECT *,GROUP_CONCAT('name') FROM TABLE NAME WHERE PMS = hotel.pms GROUP BY rate_id . Can somebody please help me out . Thanks.
table.objects.filter(condition).values('rate_id'), check out the doc https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/models/querysets/
Since your example have mentioned GROUP_CONCAT, I'll assume that you are using MySQL. Django did not support GROUP_CONCAT natively, yet you can try django-MySQL, which is supporting an equivalent database function GroupConcat. Then you can make a query like this:
table.objects.values('rate_id').annotate(grouped_rooms=GroupConcat('pms_room'))
The result may be like this:
[
{
'rate_id': '343',
'grouped_rooms': '5BZ,6BZ',
},
{
'rate_id': 'FIT-PIT2',
'grouped_rooms': '',
},
...
]
Not actually meet the format you mentioned in OP, yet you may do some post process to this result in native python for making it meet what you expected.